Total number of comments: 26 (since 2009-07-31 03:30:38)
andrewfelluss
i swear i don't hate myself
Website: http://www.artistsagainstapartheid.org
Total number of comments: 26 (since 2009-07-31 03:30:38)
i swear i don't hate myself
Website: http://www.artistsagainstapartheid.org
Comments are closed.

For DS, the Nakba was worth it for his precious fantasy about "jewish self-determination". Take the pigeon shit out of your eyes.
I was there at the EIR Keffiyeh day, and we were all complaining that the "Yehudi" dude should shut up.. He was told to do so in english and farsi before some zionist made a whole scene accusing EIR of supporting his statements.
Mobius, this is a very presumptuous comment, and I think you miss the point. Palestinians are asking for people to recognize ALL of their rights, not just witness their oppression so that NIF board members can sleep at night.
The PACBI guidelines clearly state: "All such events and projects that bring Palestinians and/or Arabs and Israelis together, unless the Israeli side is explicitly supportive of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and unless the project/event is framed within the explicit context of joint opposition to occupation and other forms of Israeli oppression of the Palestinians, are strong candidates for boycott. "
Couple that with the JCC's continuous shilling for Brand Israel and the various Israeli sponsors, then this is an obvious case for boycott.
Also, to presume that there isn't a wide chasm between those in the "Pro-Peace" movement and those who are 100% committed to BDS (and universal human rights) is to fear leaping across.
pondering the occupation's navel.
Israel is inherently antisemitic.
Dershowitz arrogantly thinks he can sway public opinion to win the case for Zionism. However, in his arrogance he fails to notice that while juries are dismissed, justice can wait for a long time.
thanks for clearing that up Kadi :) Apartheid is a clearly defined crime against humanity which Israel violates daily, not only in the Occupied Territories, but with it's denial of refugee rights and 2nd class citizenship for "non-jews". South Africa was the precedent, but not the exclusive domain. If Israel doesn't like the term, then STOP PRACTICING IT!!
On topic: here's to chain reaction: link to artistsagainstapartheid.org
great points Ahmed..
euphemisms confuse the general public, and give too much credibility to Zionism..
Witty says 'The diminishment of “legitimacy” that Ali Abunimeh and Philip describes is not accurate.'
I'm not sure of Witty's age, but I sense that those who may remember 1967, might think of the occupation as a state of abnormality, which must be unclenched to restore to an Israel that is more accepted, with maybe a few more settlements than they started with. I was born in 1973, and have no recollection of a more "tame" Israel that didn't occupy and dispossess Palestinians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or Gaza. Therefore, I have no sentimentality for its legitimacy... and feel that any it may have had has been forfeited by decades of zionist oppression, and failure to meet obligations to the UN, its expended friend.
something I heard from my filipino friend: there were Muslims in the south BEFORE the spanish colonial era. so in a sense, they are still resisting occupation.
tree, i like the micro-zionism analogy.. Guess Who's coming to dinner: Benjamin Yahoo!
sorry for the typo 'guarantee'..
it's amazing how people will cherrypick the parts of Israel they like (or would like to see), without looking at the big picture: Continuous Transfer.
carnas, this idea of yours called Zionism (to create a Jewish State in Palestine) is a failed idea, and with good reason. You can't just push people off their land and then try to negotiate a "final status" of injustice... The cost of pursuing this awful idea is more Palestinians lives and land, less Jewish safety... you can't guaranteed freedom from persecution by persecuting other people. It just doesn't add up buddy, sorry you've been brainwashed.
the difference is that State-backed terror is sold by the media as defending our freedoms... while rogue terror is used as an excuse to take them away. thanks alot OBL Bush, Cheney and Olmert.
people seem really scared of getting associated with BDS. (remember semantics about boycott language re: Toronto Declaration) good for BDS! bad for Zionism. Ni!
i agree, seems like the settlers are delusional warm bodies being used as pawns to pioneer the landgrab under the watchful eyed of the IDF. another function they serve is to assist in the persecution of the Palestinians, maintaining the "transfer" pressure.
...and yes to BDS! Witty would drain all of our energy with rhetoric that we could be using on BDS campaigns.
Phil, i would consider being called out like that as a badge of honor. J Street might just be a fabrication to provide context for white-house policy, which seems to be: aggressively seal deal with uncle-tom to sell out Palestinians, retain a zionist state, and create bantustan-west bank . There's little concern from the white house that Abbas has no credibility, let alone the ongoing flagrant oppression of Palestinians in all quarters.
The real left acknowledges "jewish democracy" as an oxymoron.
seems like Google is taking down the Declaration..
"Possible Blogger Terms of Service Violations"
link to torontodeclaration.blogspot.com
puke-o-rama...
that's a pretty twisted campaign to prop israel up as a progressive fountain of falafel. more like cauldron of hate.
I have to agree with #12, you guys are on the pulse of things, and a beacon to journalism. With the amount of traffic, there are several ways to monetize, even just renting banner ads.
I don't think Benny Yahoo is exactly bashful.
Obama promised a Jewish state, "easing up the throttle" is pragmatically what those realist zionists in the USA see as the strategy to pull it off. still they can't hold back the pitbulls...
maybe obama, mitchell, clinton, et al.. will realize that it's hard to negotiate with war criminals
These families are now twice refugees. OK, the Israeli supreme court is "enforcing" this likely-bogus property claim on occupied lands from the Ottoman era!!
link to americanchronicle.com
but what about property claims of Palestinian refugees from post 1948, where the Israeli supreme court actually has legal jurisdiction?
We don't have to dig too deep to find the inherent bias in Zionist courts.
new article in NYT misses E Jerusalem evictions.. (or omits as 'unhelpful')
link to nytimes.com
shame, shame, shame... the whole world is watching.
that is so Harvard