-
-
- UN Committee: Israeli system ‘tantamount to apartheid’ 0
- Slater on Beinart 0
- And we live on… 0
- US official — we went to Israel first 2
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status … 22
- Israel takes 30 dunams of land near Salfit ‘for security … 4
- Aaron David Miller: After a short ‘peace process,’ look … 38
- Rafah march for deteriorating hunger strikers as family appeals for … 0
-
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 713
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 475
- Day after pogroms, Likud MK calls for internment camp for … 427
- Neverending Nakba: Israel breaks lull, attacks Gazan farmers 413
- ‘This is not fair play’: Mahmoud Sarsak’s family demands his … 389
- March of the Flags 345
- Neocons in Washington Post: Military strike on Iran would ‘calm … 323
- Nabi Saleh’s Bassem Tamimi convicted by Israeli courts based on … 293
-
- The Messiah’s Donkey: Settlers fire on Palestinian villagers as the … 235
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 156
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their … 129
- March of the Flags 127
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism 110
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 97
- Israeli judge to issue verdict in Rachel Corrie case 94
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond … 87
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- US official — we went to Israel first (2)
- Annie Robbins: a U.S. official…asked to remain anonymous owing to the sensitive nature of the issue. sensitive?...
- Carllarc: proof of ‘Israel firsters’, for sure
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status for millions (22)
- traintosiberia: Spain has been allowing ( under pressure) any descendants of the victims of inquisition to settle in...
- Blake: Boy, history won’t be kind on you reprobates. I doubt anybody can be as despicable to you though as you...
- Talkback: Fredblogs: “Frankly if an odd sentence in a cherry picked report, and some obfuscating change of...
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism (110)
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their descendants (129)
- talknic: Fredblogs May 25, 2012 at 7:24 pm “For thousands of years, and even since then for anyone who isn’t...
- Aaron David Miller: After a short ‘peace process,’ look for war with Iran in 2013 (38)
- NickJOCW: Yes, it’s almost as if this is a delaying tactic, bounce the ball around while waiting for something else...
- Rafah’s nicest tunnel: Siege meets surf in Gaza (7)
- Blake: Good comment Avi but I should have entered his whole quote in my comment to put it into perspective:...
- US official — we went to Israel first (2)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss
- Annie Robbins
- Allison Deger
- Alex Kane
- Today in Palestine
- Kate
- Paul Mutter
- Adam Horowitz
Blogroll
The War of Ideas in the Middle East
and for the last time no one here is talking about oil companies, we are talking about strategic interests. i.e transforming the middle east by getting rid of non compliant government such as iraq, and iran.
sorry for the late reply you ask how would costly wars increase US strategic dominance in the middle east. First to the planners of the war this war wasn't supposed to be costly it was supposed to play for itself. Second a friendly government in IRaq allied with the US and letting the US have numerous megabases as it was originally dictated in the SoFA would definitely increase US dominance of the region. Keeping bases in Saudi Arabia was already proving too costly. Third removing a government that was unfriendly to the US, and replacing it with one that was supposed to be closely aligned with the US would definitely increase US dominance.
i dont think V is arguing that the war was fought for oil companies, its almost an indefensible poistion. A far better theory is that it was fought to increase the United States' strategic dominance of the middle east. This has been a staple of middle east policy since the cold war. Its not just the chomskyite faction that says this.
there was actually a good article about this in the journal Middle east critique. It was titled "The US invasion of Iraq explanations and implications" volume 16 issue 3, pgs 209-228 sept 2007.It gets really good from page 12 onwards. Id also like to add that the middle east is considered the most important strategic location in the world for a reason, and a lot of has to do with denying other powers control of the resources in the gulf as Iraq tried to do in the early nineties.