Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 8 (since 2012-01-12 19:24:39)

goodman

Showing comments 8 - 1
Page:

  • Publisher of the 'Atlanta Jewish Times' suggests Mossad should assassinate Obama
    • goodman January 20, 2012 at 7:18 pm

      Why not? They have gotten and continue to get away with ethnic cleansing, theft, and murder all along, and most of the "civilized" world still treats them as respectable members of the world community, thereby reinforcing and rewarding their behavior, instead of treating them as the racist gangsters and thieves they are.

    • goodman January 20, 2012 at 6:32 pm

      Oh, he will resign alright and move to a settlement in the occupied West Bank where he can murder and steal with impunity, protected and funded by an Apartheid regime that is enabled (militarily, diplomatically, financially) by a subservient US government. Coddling and funding zio-supremacists for so long and ignoring their crimes only reinforces their supremicist thinking. With time, the Adlers of this world develop an acute case of self-entitlement and a sense that they can say and do anything anywhere with impunity.

  • Cyber-attacks strike Israeli stock exchange, airline, banks
  • Reports of Mossad role in assasination shine light on Israeli hypocrisy
    • goodman January 16, 2012 at 3:58 pm with 1 replies

      This should should not come as a surprise. Israel as a settler-colonialist exclusivist enterprise could only be built through terror, and terror is required to maintain the zionist project.

      Maxime Rodinson in her book "Israel: A Colonial-Settler State?'' observes:

      ``Given the initial aims of the [zionist] movement, it could not
      have been otherwise. Once the premises were laid down, the
      inexorable logic of history determined the consequences.
      Wanting to create a purely Jewish, or predominantly Jewish,
      state in an Arab Palestine in the twentieth century could not
      but lead to a colonial type situation and to the development
      (completely normal, sociologically speaking) of a racist state
      of mind, and in the final analysis to a military confrontation
      between the two ethnic groups.'' (p. 77)

      Honest Zionists do not mince words.

      "Zionist colonization must either be terminated or carried out
      against the wishes of the native population. This colonization can,
      therefore, be continued and make progress only under the protection of
      a power independent of the native population - an iron wall, which
      will be in a position to resist the pressure to the native population.
      This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs..."

      -Vladimir Jabotinsky, The Iron Wall, 1923.

  • Today in Pittsburgh, Jesse Lieberfeld, 17, will deliver a hammer blow to American Jewish support for Israel
    • goodman January 16, 2012 at 3:00 pm with 2 replies

      Let's try this for size, eee: "Jesse has done the honest thing. If he prefers the ideals of liberal democracy to the compromises of an exclusivist (i.e., racist) state, Apartheid, and Nazism are not for him. As for the rest of us, we believe that an Aryan state is well worth the compromises." You and your ilk, notwithstanding your attempt to conflate Judaism and Zionism, illustrate what Jesse -- and indeed any decent human being -- finds objectionable, namely, your brand of racial supremacy and settler-colonialism.

    • goodman January 16, 2012 at 1:35 pm

      Indeed. As Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

    • goodman January 16, 2012 at 12:38 pm with 3 replies

      In reading Jesse’s wonderful essay, I'm reminded here with an observation made by I. F. Stone in an article in August 1967 in _The New York Review of Books_.
      He wrote:
      ".... Israel is creating a kind of moral schizophrenia in world
      Jewry. In the outside world the welfare of Jewry depends on the
      maintenance of secular, non-racial, pluralistic societies.
      In Israel, Jewry finds itself defending a society in which mixed
      marriages cannot be legalized, in which the ideal is racial and
      exclusivist. Jews might fight elsewhere for their very security
      and existence -- against principles and practices they find
      themselves defending in Israel."

  • Carter: US backed Egyptian dictatorship for 30 years to preserve Israel treaty
    • goodman January 13, 2012 at 5:59 pm

      eee writes: "The US would have accepted Sadat as an ally even if he would not have signed the peace agreement, just like Hussein in Jordan was a US ally and also the Gulf Arabs."

      Your assertion rests on a faulty premise: it presumes that it would be even remotely possible that Egypt/Sadat would be inclined or could be persuaded to be an “ally” of a country (the US) that enables (politically, militarily, and diplomatically) a state that occupies part of its territories, or that it would be remotely possible for a congress “bought and paid for by Israel’s Lobby” (© Tom Friedman) could appropriate any aid to a country that represents even a remote threat to the Zionist settler-colonialist enterprise. I suggest that absent Israel, all states in the region would have – by default - been automatic US allies against the Soviets. . Israel was and is still a major liability to the US, in my view.

Showing comments 8 - 1
Page:

Comments are closed.