Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 35 (since 2012-02-16 22:03:16)

Showing comments 35 - 1
Page:

  • Democrat Eliot Engel appears at pro-Israel rally featuring anti-Muslim activist Pamela Geller
    • For me, Geller is a grotesque caricature of the self-absorbed, Jewish conservative, Israel First crown. She'd be a joke to write off if she didn't have a bullhorn and a stage so often. Her own quote she refers to in the short speech above in this article from Alex (civilized, savage, etc...) is of course from the racist and offensive ads she took out two years ago. Back then I made a short video mocking her grotesqueness. Maybe of interest here:

  • Massacre in Gaza: At least 60 killed in Shuja'iyeh, over 60,000 in UN shelters
    • Hey Maximus. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you read my postings which included these excerpts:

      "I will say absolutely that their deaths are completely their own fault and responsibility; and also the fault and responsibility of the Israeli government and, yes, the U.S. government. I would lay approximately 0% of the blame on Hamas for their deaths."

      "[Zionism and Israel] are all bad. One of the most horrifically ironic historical events/facts in the history of history. Truly disgusting."

      "[Maximus], no doubt, shares the same anger we have against Israel’s grotesque policies, colonization, and killing. I understand his inability to care about Israeli casualties."

      Assuming you read that stuff, you were still able to aim this at myself:

      "It’s quite interesting that you seem to have a lot more to say about occupation soldiers killed in battle than about the hundreds of Palestinian civilians who were their victims."

      Implying that I value Israeli/Jewish lives more than Palestinian lives, without knowing the first thing about me aside from these few posts here, is so extremely offensive to me that I certainly won’t be engaging w/ you any longer. Your implication is unfortunate, wildly incorrect, and quite frankly, gross.

    • Thanks Elisabeth. Yes, I totally understand and share your incredible anger. For me, Cast Lead was the breaking point. Maybe "Protective Edge" is yours. I no longer see any good coming from "Zionism" or the creation of Israel and it's make me sick as an American jew. It's all bad. One of the most horrifically ironic historical events/facts in the history of history. Truly disgusting. However, even w/ all my anger, and even w/ all the facts about Israel's total culpability in the events occurring right now and all along this conflict since the early 20th century, I can still muster the intellectual ability to understand that saying you "don't care" about a person being killed - even if this person is a soldier on the wrong side of history - is morally wrong. From your post in response to mine it would seem you feel the same and for that I'm happy. From Maximus's response above to my post, it would seem he does not feel the same. He, no doubt, shares the same anger we have against Israel's grotesque policies, colonization, and killing. I understand his inability to care about Israeli casualties. But I don't share it...

    • Exactly right, Sumud. Over and over again I've made this point to Israeli-firsters/Zionists/Conservatives/whateveryouwanncallem and 100% of the time they will say something like, "Well, I don't wanna talk about numbers." Of course they don't. It's like forcing them to look in the mirror...

    • To Elisabeth and Maximus: It's your right to "not care" about the dead Israeli soldiers. But I do care about them. It's awful that they died in this conflict/conquest. However, at the same time, I will say absolutely that their deaths are completely their own fault and responsibility; and also the fault and responsibility of the Israeli government and, yes, the U.S. government. I would lay approximately 0% of the blame on Hamas for their deaths. But that's just me, and yes I do care about them as human beings.

      On a colder, more practical note, I feel that you two (Elisabeth and Maximus) should take more "care" in what you write. I'm certain you are aware of the giant, relentless and manipulative Hasbara machine. And I'm sure you are aware of its importance in the continuation of the occupation/conquest. Comments like yours out here in the internets are helping them w/ the Israeli PR war/campaign. They can point to your comments and simply say, "Look! They don't care about Jews dying. We have to defend ourselves against the new anti-semitism, look what what we're up against, blah blah blah etc etc etc..." Whether they're being simplistic in their criticisms (of course they are...) of your comments or not isn't the point. You're giving them the opportunity to say it and people eat it up. Is that what you want? Not trying to come off harsh, but I honestly feel that comments like yours are helping the israelis and that's the last thing I personally want. I assume the same for you two...

  • Israel is in a pickle
    • Hey Annie and American. I agree w/ both of you to an extent. I agree w/ Annie that this ground invasion feels a bit different than other Israeli military aggressions; a bit more "blind," desperate, craven and self-aggrandising than others. But, of course, that's not saying much. The Zionist Israel project has always been all of those things. But I also agree w/ American when he/she says that as long as Israel can broadly influence world governments (The U.S. particularly) to support their actions (ie: slaughters...), there will be no major "pickle." Annie: your mentioning Hezbollah, combined w/ the issue of Israel being horrified of any legitimate peace initiatives being proffered by a unified Palestinian coalition government (Fatah/Hamas), reminded me of the PLO and 1982. And this goes to American's point - Our U.S. government bends over backwards to make it look like we would do anything to keep defenseless Israel safe from all the scary Arab World countries into which it decided to insert itself over a century ago. In reality, if the U.S. ever truly withdrew unconditional diplomatic support and military funding, Israel would be more isolated than ever and would lose much of its military edge, forcing it to deal diplomatically with Palestine on the world stage. This is something in which Israel has consistently shown no interest, as evinced by Israeli military analyst Avner Yaniv’s classic description of the PLO’s willingness to engage in diplomacy toward a two-state solution as a “peace offensive” which needed to be neutralized through the brutal invasion of Lebanon in 1982. U.S. protection allows Israel to put off true diplomacy indefinitely. This is exactly what is happening this moment. Israel, the U.S., and Britain are fighting against the "peace offensive" that was (is?) the Palestinian Unity Government. They're scared. Are they in a pickle? I don't know...

  • On the photo of three Gaza brothers whose parents were killed by an Israeli bombing
    • Hey Citizen. I agree w/ you that most Americans can't process the information. Pardon the long post here, but the processing of media information on this conflict is something I wrote a little about a while back. This article, and your comment, reminded me of it. I summed up my thoughts after detailing how I think our media (and government...) manipulates and clouds our population's perceptions of these events. I have no other outlet so I'm hoping this is allowed here. Yes, it does relate to the photo above and the concepts in the excellent article. Maybe of interest to some below:

      This clouding of the nature and reliability of sources, and the general erosion of any faith in the integrity of media and politics, creates an environment where seemingly no information can be trusted. Add to this the increasing polarization of the political “right/left” narrative within the media, publishing worlds, and throughout the culture. This polarization mirrors, and widens, the same gap of attitudes within the Jewish community toward Israel (not to mention the polarization between the rich and the poor). Publishing houses and news organizations put out increasingly conflicting content. So conflicting now that it’s to the point of complete opposites. This is certainly true of content relating to the Israel/Palestine conflict, but maybe the more obvious example of this phenomenon familiar to all Americans would be the case of the Bush II administration. We have thousands of books and reports on their war crimes, impeachable offences, intentional deceptions of the public, improper justice department firings, legalization and acceptance of torture (not unlike Israel), corporate welfare, etc… We also have a huge amount of publications praising this same administration’s moral authority, the legality of their tactics in their “war on terror” and their necessity to the world’s safety, their fair and honest tax policies that allow businesses to grow and hard-working people to reap the fruits of their labor, etc… Leaving aside the validity of either side’s argument, there can be no debate that they are essentially opposites. And like the physical acoustical properties of opposite signal waves, they cancel each other out. When people are confronted with so much wildly conflicting information, the natural impulse can be to shut it all out. Trying too hard to make sense of so much polar opposite information could literally drive some to experience serious, prolonged, and unresolved cognitive dissonance. This could lead to major behavioral problems, so ignoring this information can be a survival mechanism. But when people decide (or are led) to ignore information, they become susceptible to being manipulated solely through their emotions. This opens up the floodgates to mass manipulation. The inability to trust the media and publishing houses, coupled with the reflex of shutting out conflicting reports with polar opposite spins on the same realities of major issues, is the end of information. The “Information Age” has imploded and has left us with its evil twin: The Age of Disinformation. In 21st century technology-speak, it’s as if the whole of our news/media/mass information system is one large corrupted file.

  • Joining Graham, Schumer calls for end of Palestinian unification for sake of Israel's 'survival'
    • From the above article: "Does the survival of that state require slaughter?" The answer to that question is yes. If we're talking about the state that the founding Zionists envisioned and wanted, and leaders like Netanyahu want, then the answer is yes. There are many well known quotes showing that men like Dayan, Jabotinsky, etc... knew slaughter would be necessary. And they moved forward with it. They are still moving forward with it. It's happening as we speak. That's why Israel is such a grotesque reality to be existing today; let alone when this sort of colonialist slaughter and repression was more the norm.

  • Missing Israeli teens found dead near Hebron; Netanyahu: 'Hamas is responsible and Hamas will pay'
    • Robert G. Sugarman... and Malcolm Hoenlein: "[These murders] cannot be met by indifference or pro-forma expressions of sympathy. For too long the threats against Israel, including missiles and terrorism, have elicited limited responses, with the roles of victims and perpetrators inverted. It must stop.”

      This may be the most disgustingly ironic statement I've ever read. I've not been this terrified for the Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank since Cast Lead. No words to express my frustration and anger right now. This is a very dark day.

  • 'J Street has to change or die': Divestment battle exposes tactical rift among liberal Zionists
    • Thanks seafoid. I wish it was shorter, but it is what it is and I hope you get through it (I'd suggest headphones for helping you find 'quiet'). It's basically clips of the J Street sponsored speaker at a showing of The Gatekeepers and my responses cut into them. There a few other supportive clips added as well (Chomsky, Amira Hass, Beit-Hallahmi...). What does the "J" stand for in J Street, anyway? So many options...

    • Ah, J Street. I'm something of a broken record on this subject. I don't buy the term "liberal Zionist." And I don't buy J Street. The article I wanted to have published here a couple years back made my thoughts clear on it, but that didn't work out. I've made two videos (over a year ago) on this topic: one short, one long. The long one is the better one and it's also about Dror Moreh's film The Gatekeepers. Movies such as The Gatekeepers and organizations like J Street are of a piece.

      I'm under no illusions that folks here will be too interested in these, but if anyone actually watches the entire longer piece, I'd be interested in any thoughts. J Street is not an organization that is attractive to anyone who believes in universal equal rights:

  • Israel announces identity of suspected kidnappers, still no evidence of abduction made public
    • If Abbas did dissolve the partnership due to these, as yet unconfirmed, kidnappings, he and Netanyahu would say that it would be "to end the sweeps/home invasions/killings," as you say. But after a brief period of "relative calm," I assume the sweeps/home invasions/and killings would continue just as they have for decades and decades. The dissolution would stop nothing, really. Maybe if we got Scarlett Johansson to interrogate Gary Oldman w/ some enhanced interrogation techniques at Gitmo, we could get some solid intel on these three Jewish Israeli teenagers...

  • The Ramallah bubble just popped: Reflections on a city under siege
  • After ADL says opera is 'biased' toward Palestinians, Met cancels broadcast, citing rising anti-Semitism
    • "some local Zionist friends suggested I change it to give it a neutral point of view..."

      You can't be neutral on a moving train. You are right Philip to not "neutralize" yourself. Your Zionist friends' suggestion of neutrality is the same technique as the "balance" canard in the media. Creating an image of balance out of an obviously unbalanced situation is simply inaccurate. Be neutral? That's like standing with a bucket of water in your hand next to a man on fire and opting to wait for it to rain 'cuz you don't feel you should "interfere."

      Prediction: This cancellation of Adams's work is so outrageous that it will have repercussions many years into the future. Adams is a giant figure in American music, and in music history generally. This is a MAJOR event. The Met fucked up. But big...

  • Don't let Pamela Geller speak for American Jews
    • Not a bad article. I think most informed, reasonable people know that Geller is completely [fill in the blank here w/ favorite relevant pejorative]. Related specifically to Rachel Roberts's subject above, I made a very short vid a couple years back on Geller's [fill in the blank here w/ favorite relevant pejorative]. Enjoy:

  • Don't destroy our dream-castle Israel! (Why the Jewish establishment shut out J Street)
    • "J Street is controlled opposition. They never came into being until acknowledgement of and criticism of the Israel Lobby began to be seen. They are the wolf in sheep’s clothing." Giles is exactly right. Except that the word "opposition" is too strong. Understudy, perhaps?

      I attended a J Street event a few years back. Disappointingly, my impression from this event was that J Street is simply another example of the prescience found in Chris Hedges’s Death Of The Liberal Class. Hedges writes that the true left/liberal class in America - the one that used to fight for universal rights and justice through the beginning of the 20th century (many of whom were Jews incidentally) – has been diluted to the point of being a useless shadow of the moderate/conservative “center.” Over the last century, true liberal values and activism have been neutralized in this country and replaced with pseudo-liberal organizations like J Street. Progressive ideas live on in diluted rhetoric but not in action. Instead of a sincere emphasis on the need to end the illegal occupation of Gaza and the West Bank (to my memory, the word illegal was never used in reference to the occupied territories during the event), with concrete and specific policies toward that end, J Street and Ben-Ami presented the same old UN bashing, military worshipping, “right to self-defense, right to exist, right to self-determination (for Israel), right of return (for Jews only)” Israeli-centric blather. Truly progressive, liberal attitudes place “Jewish rights” as a subset of “Human rights,” not above them.

  • 'NYT' self-censors, axing headline blaming Israeli settlements
    • Good piece here. And, as always, excellent work from Representative Press. If anyone here is unfamiliar w/ the man being interviewed by RT at the end of the vid, I suggest googling four words: "Miko Peled Revolution Books." The first hit will be an excellent, long talk given by Peled. It will give you a good idea of where he's coming from and why he should be amplified when/if at all possible. He doesn't shy away or sugarcoat in any way the fact that, at the root, Israel is to blame. As he says, this is not a balanced issue. So he doesn't give balanced talks. To give a "balanced" talk, as defined by nearly all mainstream media (ie: NYT, CNN, ABC, Fox, NPR, etc...), is to be inaccurate. Balance? Oy veh...

  • Canadian groups press Neil Young not to play Israel
    • i think we can all guess pretty accurately what hophmi's thoughts might be on the video considering his referring to the BDS movement as "anti-jewish," which it, of course, is not. However, as good as the intentions are w/ this video, and while i whole-heartedly support the idea of trying to convince Neil Young to cancel his concert in Israel, i think this video is approaching trash. i think Independent Jewish Voices would be taken much more seriously by Young had they simply stuck to showing him the facts of the situation instead of using Young's own music (presumably without permission) in a lazy video that makes all too broad "connections" between Young's topic in the song Ohio and Israeli oppression and Operation Cast Lead. it trivializes both events (particularly OCL). the stringing together of relatively random violent images w/ phrases against Israeli oppression, then saying "look Neil, it's like Ohio" is not helpful. i'd assume it is likely the opposite. and i understand that some would say these images are not random, i'd say they do come off somewhat random unless the viewer is already very aware of the particulars of OCL and are already a supporter of the Palestinians; which Young apparently, sadly, is not... yet. and if this video's intent was to "inform" Young about Israel's lack of human rights for all citizens, war crimes, lack of constitution, illegal settlements, etc etc etc..., it's a bogus attempt. good intent, very bad execution. if i was Young and was relatively uninformed about Israel's track record of daily oppression of the Palestinians, their war crimes, and the U.S.'s aid in their war crimes and Apartheid, i'd've taken one look at this video and said to myself, "Wow. That video sucked, the IJV abused my music and I don't really know why. Maybe I'll add another tour date in Israel." bummer...

  • Eric Alterman continues to justify lack of Palestinian voices at 'The Nation'
    • thought you should know that when i read this, "I think Eric feels reality is some kind of anti-Israel plot, and he’s getting increasing pissed off about it," i laughed out loud. no, seriously. out loud for about 10 full seconds. i think it bothered my neighbors. thank you :)

    • I wrote off Alterman as a major league jackass after witnessing his idiotically misplaced venom heaped on the great Ralph Nader in the documentary "An Unreasonable Man." If Nader wasn't a Lebanese-American who openly criticizes Israel when they deserve it, I'd bet Alterman wouldn't've blamed Nader for Bush winning the election and subsequently for all the ills caused by the that administration. He is a Jackass and one of the best examples of the so-called PEP.

  • Reactions to Ariel Sharon's death over social media (Updated)
    • all the predictable reactions from all the usual players are of course nauseating.

      however, i wouldn't say i'm happy he's dead. but then, i'm certainly not happy that he was ever alive either.

  • J Street's leader will debate two-state-solution with Munayyer and Lustick on Capitol Hill
    • hey kayq. i'd say phil is partially right: imo J Street isn't "becoming" part of the lobby establishment. they always have been part of it. J Street is a trojan horse. here's a small vid i made on them:

      link to youtube.com

      there's a longer vid on my channel that deals w/ J Street a bit more in relation to the film Gatekeepers...

  • J Street's keynote speaker was ambassador for Gaza slaughter of '08-'09
    • "I ask again: Why is a liberal American organization hosting someone who played such a prominent role in a war targeting civilians?"

      Because J Street is not a "liberal" organization. They spend a lot of energy creating the illusion that they are liberal when they are actually quite conservative/status quo. If my piece on J Street had been published here I'd be able to refer folks to my thoughts on that here at Mondo. Anyone who is interested can see it here:

      link to thepalestineconflict.blogspot.com

      Scroll down for the piece on J Street...

  • Was James Gandolfini sucked into Tony Soprano's fierce dream?
    • Is this short article intimating that James Gandolfini is dead because he played Tony Soprano? Wow. Wildly disrespectful and, imo, intellectually childish. James Gandolfini was a great actor and, from what I've seen, a great person. He obviously had some unfortunate health issues coupled w/ some bad choices. But his death had nothing to do w/ his playing Tony Soprano. WTF? Gimme a break.

      If you haven't yet seen it, I would suggest seeking out and watching "Romance And Cigarettes" for anyone interested in Gandolfini's gift. Great, great actor. RIP.

  • 'NYU' business school and 'Think Progress' endorse businesses that operate in occupied West Bank
    • Oh snap! Didn't know this was up here. I was directed here yesterday after I received info from a tweet by Max B. I think... Thanks Annie :)

    • endtheoccupation.org had a video "contest" recently for ads countering the sodasatream super bowl ad. i found out a bit late and only had half a day to put mine together, but here it is anyway:

      link to youtube.com

      i assume there's no way to embed video here so click on the above link if interested. some of the other vids were worth a viewing as well. maybe some folks saw them and thought twice about buying sodastream afterward. a guy can dream :)

      too bad we didn't have 3 million dollars to waste like sodastream did to buy time actual air time during the super bowl...

  • Day after Israel rejects ceasefire, bus explodes in Tel Aviv outside IDF Spokesperson office
    • agreed American. the second i heard about this bus bombing i thought the same. i guess we'll see.

      and by way of showing this kind of thinking is not what simpletons would label "conspiracy theory," from David Remnick’s “The Vegetarian” in The New Yorker magazine, 9/3/12:

      “[Reporters] Yigal Sarna and Anat Tal-Shir once investigated a story that, before the Israeli’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon… Meir Dagan (former Mossad director) led a secret unit across the border whose mission was to instigate terrorist events that would justify an incursion. Military censors killed the story..."

      and this - from a 1976 interview where Moshe Dayan talks about a relatedly devious Israeli technique (used just pre '67 6-day war) in provoking hostilities while making it seem like the Arabs/Palestinians are responsible for the escalation:

      "We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot. And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was..."

      we don't know yet about the bus bombing. but since there has been no claim of responsibility yet, and considering the above historical facts/anecdotes, thinking it may have been administered by the Israelis themselves is in no way an absurd idea.

  • Segregation in the 'democratic state' of Israel
  • J Street sells its soul, completes evolution to AIPAC lite
    • Hey seafoid. I assume the "Nice try" was for me? That reads to me like some kind of accusation of me trying to justify Israeli actions (ie: Operation Cast Lead) or of my trying to play down the war crime that was OCL. You have no idea how offensive that is to me.

      From my understanding the generally accepted/agreed upon number of Palestinian civilian casualties during OCL is approximately 700-800. This means, B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, etc… While I understand the argument that the number may be higher depending upon differing classifications of “civilian” vs. “combatant” (police, etc...), making a blanket statement like “All 1,400 were civilians…” is not useful. Why is it not useful? Because it gives Israel apologists something to point to and say crap like, “Look! The Israel haters lie w/ their statistics to justify their hatred of Israel. Why do they hate us?!” You’re giving them ammunition. And so is Rosenberg by putting it in "print." Don’t give them the chance to say that shit. Isn’t the conservative estimate of 700 civilians killed, 300 of them children, horrific enough? Of course it is. And since it’s accepted, it can’t be argued against. It was a massacre even by the conservative estimate. I say stick w/ that for now and don't give the apologists a chance to evade the truth of the crime by giving them the chance to focus on some other detail.

    • Decent article by Rosenberg. Except this:

      "...I say tell that to the people of Gaza, including the 1400 civilians (300 kids) who heard all about that context in 2009-2010."

      This seems to be referencing Operation Cast Lead (OCL), right? With the numbers that are used, the dual-year date marker "2009-2010," and the specification of Gaza - Rosenberg must be referencing OCL, right? What else could he possibly be referring to? I agree w/ his point about "contextualizing," but with an event this historic, he's got to get his facts right. And since Mondoweiss put this article up on their site (presumably having read it through), they need to get it right as well. It wasn't 1,400 civilians killed in OCL, it was approximately 700. 1,400 is the number of total palestinians killed (I use the word massacred). And it wasn't 2009-2010. It was 2008-2009.

      Sure, some people could say that parsing numbers and details like these is unimportant. I'm not among them. Get it right.

  • American Jewish relationship with Israel is debated at New School
    • That being said, I would be interested to read your longer take on J Street. Perhaps MW could give you my email address (fine with me) or forward your essay to me.

      I'd be more than happy to forward/send you the little essay on my J Street experience. That's nice of you to be interested. But I don't know how :( I'm totally new to the board here and it seems there is no way to "private message" another member on the board. Maybe I'm missing something simple? At the moment I'd prefer to not put my private email up here. However, I have listed my little youtube channel address in my personal info here at mondo. If you have a youtube account maybe you could message me over there?

    • Hey David (and Mondoweiss…).

      General info: while the New School may have recorded the event, there was a gentleman there from C-Span as well who told me that it would be up on their site shortly.

      I also attended this talk/debate and like you, David, was also very impressed w/ Baltzer.

      There was disagreement over the term Zionism. Norman argued that it should be avoided, because it means different things to different people… Anna responded that we have no business telling or advising Palestinians not to use the word…

      This awesome exchange brought us the most hilarious soundbite of the afternoon from NF: “For most people, Zionism is a hairspray.” Priceless! While I agree w/ NF about the currently confused nature of the term “Zionism/Zionist,” by no means should anyone be told not to use the term. If you’re speaking w/ someone who uses the word, and you’re not sure what they mean by it, simply ask them, “What do you mean Zionist?” NF should not be in the business of trying to restrict someone else’s language but simply holding them accountable for how they use it. Many words are slippery and broad in meaning – shifting in specifics from context to context. People have different views of the term/word “Jew.” Is it a religion, a race, a culture, a nationality, etc… Should we stop using that word as well? Or should we simply demand clarity when it is needed? I, and it seems Baltzer, side w/ clarity and not the unnecessary narrowing of language. This is particularly personal for Baltzer as she is, from what understand, involved w/ IJAN (Internat’l Jewish Anti-Zionist Network). Somehow this reminds me of an old SNL mock TV commercial: “It’s a floor wax – No, it’s a dessert topping. Wait: It’s both!”

      Anna had an excellent line about J Street. While expressing her differences with the organization, she called it a “gateway drug,” explaining that Jews who are attracted to its message as an alternative to AIPAC could be persuaded to move further along and leave J Street behind

      While this may have worked for you David, I’m personally skeptical. I had a very negative experience w/ JStreet and feel they may even be harmful. I wrote up a JStreet event I attended a while ago, but it was unfortunately too long for publication here a Mondoweiss. (I’d be more than happy to send my little article to anyone who is interested. Just lemme know). The “Gateway Drug” analogy for me is suspect. JStreet puts itself across as a “Progressive/Liberal” organization representing the majority view of American Jewry. From where I stand, it is no such thing. But American Jews who hear the words “Liberal, Progressive, Majority” and want to start learning about the conflict may join because they consider themselves to be progressives. My fear is that people starting out learning about the conflict from JStreet will be convinced that JStreet’s stance is actually “progressive” because that’s what they’re being told. This contributes to the general deterioration of the true “Liberal Left,” similar to what is detailed in Hedges’ “Death Of The Liberal Class.” JStreet is a very slick scam imo.

      The last question selected by Shatz for the Q&A happened to be from me. And, imo, Shatz showed some chutzpah for choosing it. It brought up the issue of the ubiquitous Two State Solution vs. the increasingly proposed One State Solution. For me, this is where I have the biggest issue w/ NF. He is completely and immediately dismissive of even discussing the possibility - to the point of close-minded condescension. Don’t get me wrong: I’ve read a good amount of NF, seen him speak twice and have a HUGE amount of respect and admiration for the man. I don’t see that ever changing. But I feel on this issue he has something of a “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks” syndrome happening. He’s been focused like a laser beam on the Two State Solution for, what, 30 years now? After all that time and professional/emotional energy spent, switching from that to a quite different attitude could be, dare I say, near impossible and maybe too much to ask. Though I disagree w/ him on his dismissiveness of the option, I can understand his inability to wrap his head around its possibility. As for his spoken justifications for the Two State Solution being the only solution worthy of consideration, I may try to write something more on that after the video is published. He has a very specific reason for his argument, and I have a very specific reason I disagree w/ his argument.

      Hello Mondoweiss ☺

    • u-s-officers-in-israel-for-military-exercise

      However.
      Time said Washington had reduced the number of military staff going to Israel, as well as the number and strength of missile defence systems that would be used during operation Austere Challenge 12.
      Of the initial 5,000 US troops lined up to take part in the exercises, only up to 1,500 will take part. US Patriot missiles will be sent as originally planned, but not the crews that were to operate the batteries, Time said.

      In addition, only one of two Aegis anti-missile cruisers is bound for Israel, and even this is not certain, according to the magazine.
      Raw Story (link to s.tt

Showing comments 35 - 1
Page:

Comments are closed.