Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 10 (since 2010-02-10 23:29:53)

Paul Woodward

Showing comments 10 - 1
Page:

  • But Americans favor Palestinian statehood bid, 45-36%
  • In any rational order, Lieberman would be a doorman
    • "In any rational order, Lieberman would be a doorman." Is that to suggest that Lieberman's rise to power is above all an offense to Israel's European class system? That a "rational order" is one in which Israel's leaders have the requisite manners and sophistication of most other Western political elites?

      Personally, I find Lieberman's crudeness one of his more endearing qualities. The fact that he has not devoted any attention to the refined skill of shoveling shit brings some clarity to a political culture in which artful dissemblers usually run the show.

  • Don't jump to conclusions about who staged yesterday's attack
    • Osama Hamdan's point is one that could have been made by most observers, so -- everyone infers -- if the Al Qassam Brigades claimed responsibility it can only mean one thing: they conducted the attack.

      Not so fast. First, leaders of militant organizations have a strong desire to present themselves at the center of the action. Four Israelis get killed and, twisted as it may sound, a competition ensues among those who want to take the credit.

      Secondly, if it turns out that the gunmen really were affiliated with AQ but did this on their own initiative, the group's leaders may be reluctant to reveal that they are not in control of their own operatives.

      As I indicated in this piece, just because an event gets labelled "terrorism" does not circumvent the need to establish the facts: the identities of those responsible, the means through which they planned and carried out the attack, and their motives for doing so. At this point, none of these facts are known by those who nevertheless do not hesitate to make pronouncements about the attack's significance.

  • The thrilla in the Mediterranean won't be coopted
  • They're backing down
    • Petraeus says he "never made that a formal recommendation" but as the original FP article said, the proposition was "dead on arrival" -- it's hardly surprising it would not have made it into a formal recommendation.

    • No, I don't think that's the issue. This would really be a way of telegraphing to the other Arab states that the US recognizes that the Palestinian territories are not part of Israel -- an important point to emphasize.

    • Another thing. Unless the vice president has been moved to an undisclosed location, I'm not sure why it takes Rahm Emanuel to verify what he did or did not say. Biden, as far as I'm aware, is still capable of speaking for himself. If he remains silent, that silence speaks volumes.

    • Read carefully. A lot of people have been confused about this for obvious reasons. Petraeus never asked for Israel to be brought under CENTCOM - just the Palestinian territories.

      The United States does not have adversaries under the same command area because each command handles military aid programs. For that reason, Pakistan comes under CENTCOM, but India under PACOM. Likewise, Lebanon (which is still officially at war with Israel) is under CENTCOM and Israel itself under EUCOM.

      Hence Petraeus says "I never made a formal recommendation to add Israel to CENTCOM" - he has not apparently denied recommending that the Palestinian territories come under CENTCOM.

  • At what point will the West dump Israel?
    • Unless the West finds some place else to feed its insatiable appetite for oil, I don't think the Arab world is in jeopardy of isolation.

Showing comments 10 - 1
Page:

Comments are closed.