Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 4100 (since 2010-05-31 18:07:51)

piotr

American university faculty member born in Poland.

Showing comments 4100 - 4001
Page:

  • Cruz says Iran could set off Electro Magnetic Pulse over east coast, killing 10s of millions
    • Upon careful reading, Cruz should be decried as anti-Semite, or one of those gentiles who try to spread Hasbara but have terrible time understanding the message that they try to spread.

      Here you have the Senator belittling the (potential) suffering of Israel that is about to be brusquely loaded by Obama into the Iranian oven, [so far so good, I mean, he delivers correct lines], and then adding that American suffering would be even greater (a suffering larger than Jewish suffering?!?? I dare you to show me what is it exactly, you almost anti-Semitic moron!!!) because ... because ... because they could have a power blackout!

      Excuse me, Senator. As a Canadian import you may be excused to be ignorant, but your constituents survived quite a bit of worse in Alamo. As a denizen of the Eastern Seaboard I have experienced a blackout that covered a major part of NY state. My family was on vacation trip, and luck had it that we had full camping gear, so we could make tea, cook dinner and wait until gas stations would become operational. But do you think that less prepared citizenry was dying in droves? Nothing of the kind.

      Finally, consider the worst case scenario, some people actually dying on the Eastern Seaboard because of long blackout, ineptitude, lack of guns (hungry? why not shooting some squirrels?), in general, being effete liberals, recent studies revealed that those are not REAL AMERICANS (some are even Jews), unlike honest folk in the South, Midwest and so on. Again, something not known to a Canadian carpetbagger.

    • Very painful to watch. Checking new today I have seen this heart-rendering video of a neurologically impaired bulldog trying to find a comfortable position by climbing a chair and climbing down, with much tribulations and derisive chortling of the person holding the camera.

    • I think that one can trace that information. For example, a renown expert on terrorism and demography, Steven Emerson, told that it is difficult for non-Muslim minority of Burningham (England, not Alabama) to survive. The origin of that misinformation were earlier alarmist stories that this city in English Midlands will have Muslim majority at some point in the future, so Emerson made an honest mistake that this already happened. And given the degree of danger he expects in cities with Muslim majority he did not dare to check in person (even a websearch "Birningham" could prove perilous).

      In this particular case, there were science fiction novels with that theme, electromagnetic pulse knocking out almost everything in the eastern part of USA, but owing to the desire of some scientific plausibility, the size of the explosion was 500 megatons, and the explosion happened because an alien space ship was destroyed. When Tsar Bomba, with 50 megaton power, was detonated in Arctic, radio communication over a very large area was out for nearly an hour, and some scientist made projections what would be effects of such an explosion, and even more powerful explosions. However, loading something like Tsar Bomba onto a missile is conceivable, but USA will not be capable of launching such a load for at least 10 years, and of course this is totally out of the league of non-superpowers.

      The infrastructure in USA was mostly build in Cold War years when the effects of thermonuclear bombs were considered, so it is hard to see than transformers etc. are vulnerable at large distances. Additionally, equipment is supposed to tolerate lightning strikes. Additionally, Iran could conceivably load a bomb on a ship, but launching a ship into the air does not occur in SF novels, but in Fantasy -- the same section in bookstores, so that could confuse our Senator.

  • Congressional support for Iran deal solidifies-- and Cory Booker pushes back against friendship ultimatums
    • I actually think that Iran has a positive role to play in Iraq and Syria. In Iraq, ISIL was pushed back in Tikrit by a force that consisted mostly by militias armed and advised by Iran, afterwards USA made a big effort to marginalize those militias, with some degree of sucess, but alas -- ISIL advanced in Ramadi and the whole pushback stopped. And it is our allies that were helping ISIL. In other words, when Iran is to weak, our allies pursue their follies with terrible consequences. In other words, we are do not have choices between government of Denmark and Iran, but between terrorists supported by Gulfies, Jordan, Israel and Turkey and militias supported by Iran.

      In simple terms, the rational policy is to tell our allies: when you fuck up, we will work with Iran instead. And our allies are either bloodthirsty tyrannies (monarchies, fascist of Egypt) and deeply imperfect democracies, Israel and Turkey. There is no particular reason not to make choices from situation to situation, and right now, it would help to cooperated with Iran, actually, hinder Iran less.

      By the way, Iran has a complicated political system that should not be glibly summarized as tyranny. They have elections with theocratically screened candidates, Israel wishes to do that too with anti-Zionist candidates but Supreme Court so far prevents it, Turkey now wants to eliminate incorrect parties after the elections. It is not comparing white and black.

    • Someone forgot to inform GoI that "progressive except Palestine" does not include "progressive except Iran". Surely those are different quite different, and "progressive except Palestine and Iran" is basically neo-con.

      More precisely, the lines were already drawn and people fond of GoI hate progressives and "progressives", and folks like Wieseltier are either tolerated as useful idiots or openly detested. The battle which is most important for supporters of GoI is the battle for power in Israel, and the hostility to Israel was build up as one of the shiboleths: you dare to pronounce it wrong, and off with your head. Herzog, Livni and Lapid got the sounds correct, but lacked the required enthusiasm and consistency, so they failed to gain votes.

      I mean, when a true PEP looks at Iran issue, he/she sees mere struggle for power that leads right wing to victory, and they detest that right wing as it includes religious cranks that despise non-Orthodox, outright fascists, economic rightwingers, the full Zoo. Those can be minor details, but on top of it, the foreign policy tries to cobble Israeli-Sunni axis, and this project seems dangerously insane fro PEP perspective. Make no mistake, I have no beef with Sunnis, or even Saudi Sunnis, but what is the composition of that "axis"? The most bloody government of Egypt in memory, monarchies that thrive on slave labor, a monarchy that suddenly decided to make a record of public beheadings, and a few terrified bystanders (I mean Jordan that has no slave labor that I know of, and no ambitious beheading practices).

      To the degree that PEP perspective is "realist", this is folly. To the degree that PEP perspective is racist ("we must recognize that not all cultures are equal"), this is totally deluded.

      In other words, PEPs are still PEPs even if not PEP&I. But they started to resemble Communists purged from their party (I know exactly how that looks like). Inevitably, it leads to a wider perspective, but it may take time.

  • Rand Paul turned into a hawk on Iran and libertarians are burning his stuff
    • The news that "Wieseltier compromized liberal ideas" borders on a bad jokes. At occasion he bloviates kind of "progressively". He is a third rated intellect passing as a "luminary", which is of course clear to see in an outright evil piece linked by traintosiberia. Like Banderistas have a "noble cause" because they killed more Poles than Jews. More precisely, most of them were on Nazi payroll, and thus were killing Jews to make a living, but then most of them rebelled against the Nazis, deserted and made a huge massacre of Poles, and now their ideological descendants argue that the people who inspire them were anti-fascists (contrary to Russian slander).

      Slide the screen south, where "Sunni governments make a common cause with Israel" against the tyrannical regime in Tehran (or is it Qom?). And these regimes are NOT tyrannical because ....

      Egypt does not kill scores of opponents when they demonstrate, but adds a zero or two to the total. The number of death penalties, and casual manner they are imposed, beggars imagination. Add enforced adulation of the Leader and the Egypt is not fascist because ... because ... because ... it has a common cause with Israel, that's why!

      Saudi Arabia is not a fascist regime because it is an absolute monarchy. Something that "we, Anglo-Saxons" enjoyed in the good old days before Magna Carta. And it is not a tyranny because ... because ... because ...

  • You be the judge
    • In some parts they prefer hose to socks, and on faces rather than on boots. Once properly dressed, you can go to a convenience store.

    • Actually, during the last year I put socks on my feet AND sandals. You leave home on a warm day, but when you return late it is chilly, solution: pack a pair of socks. I find no easy justification to put a scarf under my shirt so it sticks out at the bottom. That is ueber slobby look. Although a combo of undershirt visible under the uniform visible under bullet-proof vest AND radically bizarre headgear is perhaps ueber alles.

      By the way, isn't the sartorially challenged kid being kidnapped by an alien?

  • Iran deal is overwhelmingly supported by American voters -- 54 to 38 percent
    • Sure she knows Americans. However, it was reported that fewer Republicans intermarry with Democrats than Jews with Christians. Socially, those two subsets socialize and discuss less and less. So among the numerous Americans that she knows there are very few who would have opposing view (and dared to say it to such a ferocious lady).

  • Focus on Jewish Democrats as key to Iran deal raises 'loyalty' issue
    • Obama is rather spineless, so I would bet on his recognition of the politics within Democratic Party, and how Democratic Party can attract the independent voters. He is not a person who would do something just because "it is right".

      Concerning the election in Israel, they were actually helpful, because the opposition to the deal is lead by Adelson, Netanyahu and Glick, rather than Hertzog, Brookings etc.

    • It is not like Schumer will suddenly start demanding the closure of illegal settlements etc. In objective terms, the deal with Iran does nothing against Israel, it is not even detrimental to the short term nationalistic policy currently popular in Israel. Refusing any deal with Iran except "capitulation without conditions" and contemplating the "military option" was never realistic, and postponing the recognition of that reality ceased to be possible. So there is much wailing and teeth gnashing.

      It also becomes a useful wedge issue, giving politician a possibility for staking their positions and exploiting their marketing niches. Thus Sanders became the first Presidential candidate and one of the first senators to support, then there is a niche for supporting "after much thought and considering alternatives", and "resolute opposition" so admirably articulated by Emerson, Glick etc. I posted how I envision the role of Glick in the coming battle with Iran (swinging her sword on the left of link to upload.wikimedia.org )

      To me, the position of the "resolute opposition" is "Wotan First". There should be as many bloody battles as possible so the souls of brave warriors can be brought to Valhalla. But politically, since there is no danger of actual battle, it allows for perfect posturing, what we would do if the despicable liberals did not stab us in the back.

    • chill, talknic, Caroline merely imitated cadences of a famous speech with memorable phrases like "I throw a gauntlet upon the feet of tyranny". link to youtube.com
      I try to popularize a name "Hojotoho" for the feminine version but this is perhaps sexist. link to youtube.com

  • 'NYT' must think it has no Amish readers
    • This column is outright weird, apparently the writer described her inability of rationally raising children. Why send a child to a camp if she is unhappy? The "Amish" motif was just an example of utter inanity. The daughter was unhappy by being excluded from the conversation, and the motherly advise was wrong in every possible way. Only an idiot (or a New Yorker) can imagine Amish farm girl being sent to a summer camp, and also without a bonnet and a dress reaching below mid-calf. link to metrouk2.files.wordpress.com
      Hm, some groups do not use bonnets, but really, it is not simple to pass for an Amish girl even if your bra has no hooks.

      link to m2.i.pbase.com

      Then, why would it help with the problem of being excluded from the conversation?

      Finally, why spend money just to make a child unhappy?

  • US Jews want Congress to approve Iran deal, by whopping 53 to 35, far more than Americans overall
    • I guess another example of negativism that is rampant in Exile. Rather than applaud that GoI prevents military conflicts every other year, and when it engages in such a conflicts it avoids millions of casualties, "if they wanted they would make a parking lot", you focus on the occasional wars etc. Total lack of appreciation for creating "the only safe place for Jews" in "the most dangerous neighborhood".

  • Christian Zionists expose their anti-Semitism at conservative summit in Iowa
    • Link to illustrate the importance of Mama Bear to Koreans:

    • Not only they are Chosun, but they are also the chosen people of Mama Bear. Suppose that you have a choice: Mama Bear or some very cranky character offering dubious real estate that you can get if you only promise not to touch shrimp for eternity and slaughter the inhabitants. Unfortunately, as some American politician observed, "all theology is local" so no Mama Bear for you, mooser.

      PS. About the real estate deal: perhaps not so bed, but once you canceled the lease, packed all belonging and started to move, the same character appears again with an addendum that add more that 600 conditions to the agreement. I want Mama Bear!

    • It is not easy to define low intelligence. Is half of the humanity below the average? If so, is it alarming?

  • 'If we don't take out Iran,' it will reenact the Holocaust in US and Israel -- Steven Emerson to Times Square rally
  • Scenes from a Sanders presidency
    • Wow! So perhaps good Senator will compile several sentences to describe his foreign policy goals?

      Yes, supporting Obama on this issue is a plus, but scooping Hillary by a day or two exhibits a "timid degree of boldness".

      The most encouraging thing about Sanders is that he got the least amount of money from AIPAC and related entities, and his voting record is better than most. But if he were a serious candidate, his evasion on military and foreign policy would be disturbing. And he could actually be a serious candidate.

    • I kind of understand that "taking Zionism head on" could be counterproductive, Sanders' campaign centerpiece is inequality, "big money" versus good jobs and good wages. In the fullness of time big money will dispatch his campaign anyway, but in the meantime he can focus attention of the public. But totally ignoring the military-industrial complex and shedding our morality for the sake of our "key allies" strikes me like a giant counterproductive evasion. OK, if you do not want to cite Israel as a negative example you still have KSA that is currently busy creating a humanitarian crisis of size Gaza x 10. And to the benefit of al-Qaeda.

    • Sanders seems to have the lowest amount of AIPAC donations in his senatorial campaign funds, additionally he refrained from signing some napkins circulated by AIPAC. So he is not THE WORST candidate, perhaps the best official candidate "of a major party". Overall, his foreign policy stands are underwhelming.

      He did champion some humanitarian causes, opposition to the oppression in Tibet, Myammar, Darfur, and he called for early withdrawal from Afghanistan. So far, he avoided ANY positions on foreign and military policy on his presidential campaign website:

      CREATING DECENT PAYING JOBS
      INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY
      GETTING BIG MONEY OUT OF POLITICS
      CLIMATE CHANGE & ENVIRONMENT
      A LIVING WAGE

      So this is crickets' foreign policy (you can hear their chirping). I would actually ask him a "neutral" foreign policy question:

      Saudi Arabia and allied countries of Arabian peninsula for the last several months wage bombing campaign in Yemen, leading to acute humanitarian crisis. At the onset of the campaign, those countries placed 48 billions in new weapon orders, mostly to USA, and since them our countries supports this bombing campaign with intelligence and diplomatically, blocking any negative votes in Security Council. Does it fit your campaign goals to secure decent paying jobs for American workers?

  • If Americans support Iran deal, 56-37, what gives Israel the power to 'croak' it?
    • “it will not have a positive impact on Jews living in America. – ” qualtrough I am not worried at all. - See more at: link to mondoweiss.net

      If I recall, catalan claimed to be from Bulgaria, so what type of news is it that he is not worried? He should worry more about IMRO than about Zionists.

  • The Iran deal: a triumph of irrationality
    • "Maybe the United States is trying to save Israel from itself. "

      Perhaps. I suspect that Israel grossly exaggerates its guesses of the number of missiles in the possession of Hezbollah. If the estimates were correct, I think that Hezbollah would use at least several hundreds or several thousands in the fights with al-Nusra etc. My personal guess is that Hezbollah lacks huge number of missiles, but it created a big number of hideouts for them, so they cannot be neutralized with bunker trusters, and it takes only a few modern missiles hitting targets like chemical factories, oil storage facilities etc. to wreck huge havoc. In other words, it is doubtful that Hezbollah could substantially demolish Israel, but enough to have credible deterrent against gratuitous attack. Which is vexing Israel quite a bit.

      Instead, there existed a larger strategic balance that involved Iran, Iraq, Syria and folks I would call "peripatetic jihadists". The large countries realized that perpetual war in ME backfires directly on them, given the peripatetic habits of the jihadists, and that if Iran is weak and poor the supporters of the jihadists feel strong and are quite surly (and they include Israel and the Saudis). Additionally, there are economic issues. These issues have relatively minor importance for USA but if USA were outright obstructionist there was a potential of a humiliating defeat.

      So Israel can "save itself", i.e. survive a war -- Lebanon did survive in 2006, after all, but USA diplomatic standing can be seriously dented. Which explains wide support of the agreement in American establishment that at other times is very indulgent to various Israeli "needs".

      And thus our foreign policy made a great step from insane to inane. A substantial progress for which we should be gratefeful.

  • Video: Israelis in West Jerusalem call for attack on Iran
    • Someone mentioned attacks on scientists, which is a vile practice. I have a sweet spot on scientists, particularly, paleontologists who uncover various amazing creatures, and also biologists who sometimes find so-called "living fossils", similar to their long extinct cousins. On that front, I was amazed by a today's title:

      Moynihan’s message on BDS and Iran appeasement: We’ve got to stop this

  • Let's help the 'NYT' get an interview with Netanyahu
  • Nine reasons Obama is going to win on Iran. The first: Netanyahu
    • Actually, CNN was a bit mischievous, because the "girlfriends" were his donor's; Menendez helped him in more mundane endeavours, like bilking Medicare or obstructing foreign policy on Iran, and more refined, like collecting models from diverse countries, so he served as a one-stop shop for all needs of his chief sponsor (I guess he would offer fellatio, but clearly Dr. Melgen preferred young ladies).

      On edit: Melgen paid hotel bill of Menendez so he could entertain HIS girlfriend in Paris, so the title should really mention FOUR GIRLFRIEND.

    • More on Menendez. It is actually pretty simple for an ordinary citizen who is not destitute to secure a visa, you have to issue an invitation and vouch for living and health expenses. However, the donor in question is married, and perhaps his spouse was not supportive.

    • It is quite possible that the new strategy of AIPAC is to dispel the anti-Semitic stereotype that Jews rule in USA by offering a string of examples to the contrary. In this way, supporters of Israel on college campuses will become idealistic, supporting politicians will become courageous rather than bootlickers and so on. That could explain copious donations to the defense fund in the case that was summarized by CNN with the following headline:

      Menendez indictment: 3 girlfriends, 7 lavish trips, more than $750,000

      By the way, this is indeed a great, amusing and extremely topical story where the description how Menendez secured visas for three models who were "girlfriends" of his devoted political donor is followed by "Menendez was also the most vocal opponent of White House foreign policy .... Iran ...".

    • "Supporting country X" is always a vague statement, but clearly, those who support the current government and the views of the majority of the opposition, Zionist Union and Yesh Atid, support "war option". The majority "Galut" position is that Israel as a country, and as a population which has some objective indicators of well-being, regardless of the currently predominant opinions, gets their support. A kind of view that drives people like Oren to conniptions. A kind of support that disregards common wisdom of Israeli elite and Grand Poobahs of "organized Jewish community, not counting minor Jewish organizations".

      So, those who support Israel, as the word is usually understood, on the subject of Iran do support a war, more specifically, a war with Iran. Of course, most of the people who oppose a war with Iran were (im)perfectly happy with a war in Gaza etc., an obvious difference being the military and political prospects. But Israeli establishment is like Exxon Valdez on the issue. On a wrong course, with a wrong crew, and damn hard to turn or to stop.

  • Angela Merkel makes a 14-year old Palestinian girl cry by telling her she is not welcome in Germany
    • It is documented that females sometimes have irresistible urge to cuddle the young ones. The story linked below has very lyrical narrative, but more sober summary is this: two lionesses attacked a tribe of baboons, and one lioness snapped the neck of one of them, a female with a baby on her back. Then lioness spend some time playing with that baby which was eventually rescued by a male baboon from the tribe. And the photos of lioness playing with the tiny monkey are indeed adorable. The narrative does not say who ate the mother.

      link to voices.nationalgeographic.com

    • Yea, while not necessarily true, it would fit the general situation if it happened as follows: "After checking that the crying girl is not Greek, Madam Bundeskanzlerin decided to hug her, which made the terrified girl sob uncontrollably".

      By most accounts, the resolution of Greek problem was greatly hindered by unnecessarily peevish attitude of German government. For years, European banks were obliged to keep mere 0.9% in reserves against the volume of loans to Greece, because such were idiotic rules of the central bank of the Euro zones, and German government clearly had influence to prevent that idiocy. Now it is easier to squeeze blood out of stone than money out of Greece, and German government basically vents, to the applause of the public.

      In the meantime, Ukraine economy has a similar downward trajectory and loans are extended for political reasons. It is not the question if the government will default, but when, clearly it is easier to get loans before the default than crumbs of aid afterwards so the government and the foreign backers try to delay it. At least, Ukrainians will have the option of going back to the bosom of mother Russia.

  • 'NYT' discovers elephant in living room: 'Pro-Israel billionaires'
    • Is it possible that donations are not related to positions of Menendez that pertain to Israel, instead, the donors simply love when a Senator is corrupted?

  • The people love the Iran deal -- to judge from 'NYT' letters
    • "Here is a country that represents everything that a society should aspire to – a civilized treatment of prisoners, modern criminal code, ..." I lost track what catalan is about, but surely he is not writing about USA. Highest incarceration rate among the countries that deign to have public statistics, death penalty, massive use of solitary confinement, brutality in prisons (check revelations about NYC prisons, and that is supposed to be one of the more advanced nooks of the country), police brutality with people being killed for such offenses like sleeping on a sidewalk, riding bike without a light or selling a cigarette, or just looking at a policeman.

  • Crisis for the lobby: Clinton bucks Saban, AIPAC doesn't know what to say
    • Nihil nove sub sole department:

      In ancient Greece, medism (Greek: μηδισμός, medismos) was the imitation of, sympathizing with, collaboration with, or siding with Persians. The ethnonym "Mede" was often used by the Greeks of the Persians although, strictly speaking, the Medes were a different Iranian people.
      Medism was considered a faux pas, even a crime, in many ancient Greek city-states. Themistocles the Athenian was ostracized for medism. Pausanias, the Lacedaemonian hegemon of the Hellenic League in the Battle of Plataea, was accused of medism by other member states ...

      So who will be Themistocles now?

  • 'We should seize it' -- Obama announces Iran deal as 'new direction' for the Middle East
    • A strange aspect is that the deal looks pretty bad to Iran, with onerous inspections looming at military installation (and Iran needs its military secrets, as does USA for that matter) and arms embargo that was vigorously protested until the last minute.

      At the end of the day, it is simply peaceful economic opportunities that Iran gains and that are bringing the opponents to conniptions. "Iran will have hundreds of billions of dollars to finance terrorism", Israeli and Gulfies complain, although it is not like have less to finance THEIR terrorism. I guess that arms embargo hinders Iran's opportunities to import flashy weapons like SS-400, and the rest is not traded officially in any case. Like Russia, it will use import substitution as the engine of growth, but with unhindered import of higher tech goods, and easier export with the access to SWIFT it can unleash pent-up demand.

      It is hard to predict what will happen militarily, but USA experimented with countering ISIL using a combination of attacks from air and ground troops of official Iraqi army, while sidelining mostly Shia militias. It did not work well. Getting "moderate Syrian insurgents" to train was an almost total flop, one or two diminitive militias joined YPG. The game can change only with mass mobilization of militias in Iraq, supported by Iranian specialists and officers, and substantial force supporting Assad, perhaps 100,000. That will upset Israelis, Saudis and a number of GOP senators, and it will be a huge relief to everybody else. And dreading prosperity in Iran is really an absolute nadir of political priorities.

      AIPAC and Israel will rue the day when they decided to oppose deal with Iran, whatever its content. You really cannot win against the ENTIRE UNSC plus a huge number of corporate interests, But once they loose credibility, bigger scrutiny will be given to their hobby of oppressing Palestinians and expanding settlement.

      Observe the "sensible triage" of Hillary (and Sanders), supporting deal with Iran, where large corporate interests are also supportive and opposing BDS which on the big scene has "who cares" status. Contrary to Chomsky, support of Israel is not essential to any major economic and corporate interests, instead it is basically a hobby on the part of otherwise influential and rich folks who do not give any offense to big players, military-industrial complex, a larger medical-corporate complex, banking, energy etc. AIPAC served a useful role in training legislators in obedience to lobbyists. But the game starts to change when AIPAC goes against the others. For example, distaste of corporate media for "radicals" like Mondoweiss remarkably declined.

    • Clearly, the main outcome of the deal will be a plethora of business opportunities. I read about a tunneling equipment company in Germany that wishes to work again with the builders of Tehran subway. Many opportunities will also open in Israel and USA. For example, one can sell more of those:

      link to teethnightguard.com

      Protect your teeth from the effect of teeth gnashing and grinding! No Israeli patriot and no ardent supporter of The Only Democracy In The Middle East and The Only Jewish State should be without one in those trying times. We recommend one guard for daily use (90 dollars, 270 shekels) and one for the night (160 dollars, 500 shekels).

  • 'Suck Iranian ****' --- Netanyahu's Farsi twitter account earns negative reviews
  • US public supports Iran deal, but lobby groups seek to quash it
    • "Key US allies, Israel and Saudi Arabia, oppose the deal. "

      This is an expression that circulates in the media, but is it accurate? Key allies, as opposed to France, Germany and United Kingdom? Especially Israel, economically smaller than Belgium, with exports at par with Slovakia. Neither Belgium nor Slovakia raised any opposition to the deal, and NO newspaper made a note of that.

  • Et tu, Michael Oren?
    • It is not clear that Jewish Ethiopians were Semitic, because historically they were speaking a Cushitic Agaw language.

    • "There’s no question but that Oren has betrayed erstwhile allies in order to better advance Israeli propaganda. "

      I have opposite impression, namely that Oren attacked his allies TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE ISRAELI PROPAGANDA, and while is he probably intelligent enough to see the damage, his adherence to principles (however weird they may be) won the day.

      One of the schticks of crafty practitioners of hasbara is to assert that while they would never equate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism or self hatred, "why! I myself criticized Israel many times!", what the night crawlers like Mondoweiss, BDS or Finkelstein are doing is waaaay beyond the pale, veritable distillation of hatred and so on. To me it looks like a clever schtick, but it insults the conviction that Jews form the supreme subspecies of mortals, and they have something similar to spiritual hierarchy from neo-Platonic or Kabbalistic diagrams. In that diagram Aliya is higher than Galut, and Lords of the Aliya are immeasurably higher. I surmise that Oren's ego is substantially enlarged since he was admitted to the ranks of those Lords.

      Thus even to feign criticism with the explicit goal of having more "credibility" when spouting hasbara points is an act of despicable contumely.

  • The case for US government sanctions on Israel
    • Some argue that in the light of how much the world depends on technologies developed in Israel, any boycott would be hypocritical and futile. But some argue that such technologies, if any, were developed mostly by immigrants educated elsewhere, while the education level in Israel is declining, and the current crop of scientists and engineers not really being the envy of the world. Consider today's story:

      Israeli Drone Crashes in Lebanon for 2nd Time in 3 Weeks

      An Israeli drone crashed in the northern Lebanese port city of Tripoli on Saturday, the Lebanese army said, in the second such incident in three weeks.

      "At around 8:30 am (0530 GMT), a drone belonging to the Israeli enemy went down in the port of Tripoli, and the army has taken the necessary measures," the military said in a statement, without elaborating.

  • Michael Oren misrepresents 1971 synagogue bombing that changed his life
    • I had slight experience with bullying myself as a kid, and it really seems that Oren had scars because he had to beat up some kids who refused to give him lunch money, since they were anti-Semitic and did not want to give money to a Jew. It is hard to get scars on the knuckles when one larger guy grabs you from behind and the other makes a wedgie, or in other typical bullying scenarios.

    • A comment on Disney movie on Hercules, linked by JLewisDickerson. All versions of myths compiled for children leave out the best bits, so I wonder if Disney presented that bit:

      "Another episode of his female affairs that stands out was his stay at the palace of Thespius king of Thespiae, who wished him to kill the Lion of Cithaeron. As a reward, the king offered him the chance to make love to his daughters, all fifty of them, in one night. Heracles complied and they all became pregnant and all bore sons. This is sometimes referred to as his Thirteenth Labour. Many of the kings of ancient Greece traced their lines to one or another of these, notably the kings of Sparta and Macedon."

  • US only country to oppose UN holding Israel accountable for war crimes, yet again
    • So France and United Kingdom were "gutless", "played into the hands of the Palestinian cause". What does it mean? "Lacking courage and determination". This is rather preposterous. Lacking courage makes no sense if you cannot identify what these governments were afraid of, other than opinion of the voters, which is not a vice in a democracy.

      Obviously, a number of nations, including the French, British and Americans figured, in the aftermath of WWII, that turning large city into wasteland is not a practice that should be perpetuated. What Mayhem calls a "principled stand" is glorification of bloodthirsty militarism. Believe it or not, "proportionality" is the letter of the international law.

    • "Sadly, with members like China, Russia, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Venezuela and Qatar,"

      can be rephrased "with members like France, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Netherlands and United Kingdom."

      But not all is gloom and doom! India joined the ranks of wanna-be theocracies. Protection of (sacred) cows is much improved, with the border troops instructed to vigilantly enforce the ban of tradition informal border trade with Bangladesh were many aged cows were herded to provide material for slaughterhouses and tanneries. Such effort is not always appreciated, apparently two soldiers were killed by the smugglers while dozens were injured by the animals. As we know from our own politics, sacred cows are habitual ingrates.

  • A racist country with too much influence over US -- Israel's new image among Democrats
    • Mooser, this guy is too incoherent even to be a troll. Most people who comment on such issues would not that the size of the "leftist area" does not matter much, it is still one citizen, one vote, not one deer one vote, or 20 woodchuck one vote.

    • Only 53% could locate Missisipi, and 52% could locate India. Mind you, Israel is even smaller than Missisipi, and waaaaay smaller than India.

      By the way, sad news. One of the most steadfast friends of Israel, Micronesia, lost soccer game to Fiji, which is bad enough, but they manage to get largest loss in the history of international soccer games, 38 to 0. And this is because previously they lost 30 to 0 to Tahiti, and Fiji was afraid that the number of goals may decide which team will advance. I think IDF should dispatch planes providing disaster relief.

    • I think that prospects of "Israelis wising up" are dim in the next few years. As Netanyahu correctly observed, Israel is the only place where Jews can be proud. Settlement freezes, and even negotiations were from time to time you have to meet Fakestinians and Hofjuden are all blows to pride and dignity. So here comes a handsome pair of "wiser leaders", Hertzog and Livni, and they solemnly promise to do exactly same thing, but more politely and more effectively (we will charm Americans soooo much that they will cheerfully cooperate in whacking Iran really well), this whole thing made no sense. So instead of Foreign Ministry you get Ministry in Charge of Insulting the Furriners or Explaining the Infidels the Error of Their Ways.

    • As ulterior motives of Frank Luntz are concerned, I guess GOP would like to have a lock on Jewish votes and Jewish political donations. However, they guy seems a professional, and I do not think that the results are manipulated.

      The swing from bipartisan support to GOP support is not a good news for Israeli elite. GOP is a reactionary party in the most literal sense: they organize their message in the form of wedge issues which constitute reaction to change. Almost every one of those issues waned in popularity, but this is not stopping GOP, they simply go for another one. Several election cycle ago, opposition to gay marriage was the centerpiece of GOP campaigns, and so was the readiness to apply any torture necessary to the "worst of the worst". To be more precise, the latter issue had nice contours, as it is often the case with wedge issues. As Democrats tended to say things against water boarding, GOP did not defend the practices like hanging the suspect on his hands for days and kicking until the poor chap expires, NOBODY talked about that, but they stoutly objected to abandoning "almost benign" water boarding. Fast forward, and nobody really urges to renew and expand torture programs, and opposition to gay marriage is moved to sotto voce.

      Support of Israel, be it nice or naughty reaches the popularity of fan-fen therapy for excessive weight. (OMG! it was fen-phen therapy, so popular and now hard to remember). I recall when GOP nominee, certain Mitt Romney, promised to base his Middle East policies on the advise obtained in phone calls to Israeli Prime Minister, thus nearly avoiding the pressure to elucidate details. But he was most clear on his wish to bomb Iran. Needless to say, the results where underwhelming. Apparently, too many independent voters preferred a president who has his own opinions too, and who is not chomping at the bit to spend another trillion dollars on another war.

      To have a better idea about the results of the next Presidential vote, I would commission a poll with that question: do you prefer bumbling foreign policy, or a scary one?

      ===

      I just recalled a not-so-succesful GOP wedge issue. A candidate for governor of California offered this choice: do you prefer progress and investments that provide jobs and increase the value of your real estate, or would you cut it down to the benefit of some weird creatures? As the example of the latter, he chose kangaroo rats. He lost. And I do not see campaigns against kangaroo rats anymore.

  • Oren's demands make Israel's liberal apologists squirm
    • I am not sure about this one, Phil: Writing in the Jewish Press, this rightwing Israeli also loves Oren. The title explains it well: "Michael Oren is Tired of American Jews-and So Am I". But check this: About the Author: Vic Rosenthal created FresnoZionism.org to provide a forum for publishing and discussing issues about Israel and the Mideast conflict, especially where there is a local connection. Rosenthal believes that America’s interests are best served by supporting the democratic state of Israel, the front line in the struggle between Western civilization and radical Islam.

      By his own admission, Vic Rosenthal is self-hating Jewish-American. Ouroboros comes to mind. link to en.wikipedia.org

  • Bulldozers poised outside Susiya, right in time for July 4th congressional break
    • I guess that with Congress in session, AIPAC would feel obliged to orchestrate a resolution of both houses supporting Israel as it is unjustly maligned, but right now it is a bother.

  • Oren's memoir reveals Israel's elite is hyper-sensitive to U.S. criticism
    • Hostage,

      as your citations show, if you apply cladistic approach to ideologies, contemporary Zionism is not much inspired by Nazism, instead, both were inspired by 19th-century colonialists and racist ideologies. And so does GOP. And yeah, colonialism is a more benign label than Nazi, but not THAT benign. In the struggle between civilized Germans and savage Herero, should we stand with the Germans?

    • I do not think so. Nazi analogies evoke Goodwin law, and indeed, the history is much richer than that. After terrible XVII century, Europeans started to think about better ways than mass slaughter, largely justified by religion, and that lead to Enlightenment. But colonialism, accompanied with mass slaughter, slave trade etc. became very profitable and created demand for intellectual justifications, and that included racism. The first genocide of XX century (to my limited knowledge) affected Hereros who stood in the path of progress in German South West Africa (today, Namibia). But exploits of Congo Free State (perhaps top oxymoron in history) some decade prior were much worse. Clearly, the concept of Lebensraum was basically the envy of successful colonialist states.

      Colonialism allowed for democratic rule among the members of "top nation" with brutal ways of controlling other people. Balfour Declaration was made five years after South African Act that allowed to formalize the Apartheid and the invention of concentration camps.

      If you want to find sociologically useful analogies, I recommend the evolution of Southern states in years preceding Civil War. Democracy, oligarchy, intolerance (sometimes murderous), and, of course, the subjugation. Yet it started on high intellectual note, as you can see from the record of the Founding Fathers from Virginia etc.

      I guess there are intellectual connections between Revisionist Zionism and fascism from "the good days of Mussolini, before the Pact of Steel". But it was more general Zeitgeist. E.g. every self-respecting radical organization in those times had its terror wing, or perhaps even better, a more radical and more pragmatic wings, each with its own terrorist organization.

    • I have checked the link to Josh Marshal. I stopped reading after this sentence: "The latter[influential Jews] are too conflicted and defensive about their identity as Jews not to give thanks that they were born in the same era as Benjamin Netanyahu, the embodiment of the Jewish people who brings together both Maimonides and Herzl into one unified, deluxe Jewish person. (I hate it when that happens!)"

      I hate it when that happens? Begrudging! Red card! See my explanation of the crime of begrudging.

    • Clearly, it is not anti-Semitic to claim that Jews have power, but to claim that they have too much power. On the list of tough crimes this is "begrudging". Perhaps this is the most widespread and thus insidious crime.

      For example, it is OK to note that Israel has many settlements in occupied territories, but claiming that there are to many gives you a red card in Oren's book. Even if you are a hasbara champion of the caliber of Wieseltier, who also implied that IDF killed too many children.

      In all such instances, the correct mental attitude is to acknowledge that there is a lot of X, so the credit should be given and, crucially, support to have more. Incorrect mental attitude always has a reason, evil and/or feeblemindedness.

  • 'Patronizing Israeli crap' -- more American Jewish responses to Oren
    • I guess he is a liberal according to Chomsky's view: not standing much for anything except tactically passionate advocacy of the most conventional causes acceptable to the establishment, and that included Zionism. Unfortunately, that also entails taking stands that Geller derided as "pretty", like displaying moments of distraction upon learning of the killing of hundreds of children etc. This is roughly what raised Oren's ire, while Wieseltier was clearly very pleased with himself for penning the offending articles. So we got a clash of mindsets: "How could he stab HIS country in the back", versus "How could he fail to appreciate my subtle feelings".

    • Perhaps we see a bunch of camels with a back problem.

    • I am verklempt. First, Israeli cows produce less milk than Saudi cows. Now Israel was not the first to arrive in Haiti, not the second but something like number 10? What next? Do not tell me that it was possible to have cell phones and computers without Israeli help.

  • Palestinian family says alleged attacker being held on false evidence
    • It reminds me a Polish proverb "Na bezrybiu i rak ryba" that wikisource translates "beggars can't be choosers" but literally means "When the fish do not take, crayfish is a fish too". It is amazing how hard it is to translate it into English, bezrybie = [without][fish] = place or time with the absence of fish; Russians have an identical proverb with an additional alternation: "at [without][bird], arse is a nightingale".

  • Oren's criticism of US Jews earns his book five thumbs down: 'slinky,' 'self-aggrandizing,' 'twists reality'
    • I distinctly remember the phrase "Odessa, the star of our exile" from Odessa Tales, written by Isaac Babel in 1920-ties. And in the narrative, the phrase was spoken as a typical thing than an old Jew would say at the very beginning of XX century.

      The problem is that it was Zionist invention that Galut is juxtaposed with Aliyah, and the former are "down there", while the latter "up here". In that mode of thinking, Galut makes sense only to the degree that it plans Aliyah and in the meantime gives full support and deference to Israel. Amazingly, this point of view was largely (but never universally) accepted by "Galut", and this happened quite gradually.

      However, among the "elevated Jews" of Israel a competition ensued who is a better Jew, or more Jewish, or more elevated etc. This competition also exists in USA, but unlike in Israel, it encounters a certain friction and limitations. Oren cannot comprehend that a Jew could refrain from the chance of ever greater commitment to Israel and ever more slavish deference to "democratic choices in Israel" unless having some abnormal, ulterior reasons.

      This inability suggests that he was never a serious historian. But who needs a serious historian? It does not increase book sales, academic prospects etc. Most rewards go to folks who follow the "dominant narrative", even if it is tribalist, triumphalist, self-pitying and, above all, hostile to attempts at an objective perspective.

  • 'Jewish cow' is udderly superior to all other cows in the world, Netanyahu says
    • After checking, it seems that no-grazing is predominant in USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and if anything, there is no particular benefit to it except in places where good grazing pastures are scarce. Digesting grass is healthier for cows, but it is somewhat slower, so you get somewhat smaller amount of milk per cow. Israel and Saudi Arabia probably have no grazing pastures whatsoever, both would save a big bundle by importing milk.

    • I made another check using Google, and this is what I got:

      link to i0.wp.com

      Israeli cows are NUMBER TWO!!! And the number one is ... tadah! ... the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    • Perhaps there are indeed deeper, darker reasons, but perhaps you are a cheapskate. A gallon of milk costs 6 dollars in Israeli stores, under 4 dollars in USA and in yet less advanced Poland, about 2.40.

  • 'We are doing you people a favor by allowing you to be seated here,' Netanyahu deputy tells Palestinians in Knesset
    • “No one has the right to make false accusations that IDF soldiers committed war crimes.”

      I do not know the Basic Laws, but I guess one of them prohibits self-reflection. False accusation of terrorism are practically a civic duty!

  • 'Obama coffee' is black and weak -- racist tweet from wife of Israel's vice premier
    • Some here tried to claim that Judy Nir-Mozes is "just one lady", one cannot generalize etc.

      One fact is that she is a fat checkbook carrying member of financial elite, an opinion maker (in the radio) and not a mere "wife" (the money in the marriage is mostly from her). More importantly, every day I can cull even more drastic story from Israeli media, except for the more stereotypical nature of the targets of the racism. The other day I cited the story about a "cinematographer" who lost it when a flight attendant in Muslim scarf told him that his hand luggage has to be checked for the weight limit. It seems that he was hired for something like filming of a wedding, so not much of an opinion maker. But this is fresh stuff from today: the inter-faith comity in the halls of Knesset (Ynetnews):

      Deputy Interior Minister Yaron Mazuz (Likud) caused an uproar in the Knesset on Wednesday when told Arab MK Hanin Zoabi that the State of Israel was "doing you a favor in giving you ID cards" during a discussion on the Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law.

      ….

      You can check details at the source. A major brouhaha started, with Prime Minister more or less siding with Mazuz. I see a natural progression from "hateful, but sophisticated" to "hateful, and proud of it".

    • I stand corrected. A supposition that many Zionist have a sense of humor is definitely rash. I found many more example of anger than of humor. But I admit that I have a strong observation bias. For example, I did not found anything funny in Arutz Sheva or ynetnews, while regularly there are funny items at +972 (and less frequently, here). But in the former sites I am only making an occasional spot-check of new and comments.

    • This dispels one meme: Zionists lack sense of humor. Some people have a personality that makes it easy to find something funny, some not. The majority of Jewish Israelis claim that they are happy and probably lough easily, many at the joke of Judy Moses.

      One thing is clear: Right wing Zionists, a large majority of Jews in Israel and probably a minority in USA, hate Obama a lot, and this is definitely a wedge issue. And the chief reason is that their worldview divides the world into "the hated ones", "the friends", and few "neutrals". And it takes very little to make right wing Zionists barking and foaming (or inventing distasteful jokes if they have more sunny disposition). My favorite example is that one Israeli soccer player considered accepting Polish citizenship to qualify for Polish national team (his mother was born in Poland and he played for a premier league Polish team). His former Israeli coach condemned him in a public letter as national traitor, newspapers made it a big story, the young man got a ton of hateful communications, he dropped the idea and there was a jubilation.

      And it is not like Poles were lately blowing up some cafes or buses. For some reasons they are the European nation that Israeli hate most, which does not mean that you cannot find articles in, say, Jerusalem Post, devoted to the cultivation of hatred against, say, Norwegians or the Dutch (always beware of the Dutch!).

      =====

      Part of it is the provincialism that was bemoaned by David Rothkopf. A lot of folks are racists, xenophobic and so on, but upper classes and urbane people are supposed to express it sparingly and with a modicum of taste. But in a small community, after ostracizing all differently thinking people, there are much to few people who may spread this modicum of taste, and perchance, a modicum of common sense. But part of it is the right wing concept of championing the common man, the real people, those without taste, common sense and so on (most political movements with wide following champion common people, but needless to say, in different ways).

  • Israeli diplomats 'are not allowed to speak' on US campuses, but North Korean diplomats are, Israeli official says
    • I am not as optimistic as you are, echinococcus. It seems to me that Americans by and large accept that as "average Joe's" they are clueless, so they have to follow their betters, the most able and productive citizens, with net worth in at least 10 figures, and thus it is only natural, and by no means regrettable, that any election is preceded with so-called money primary. The politician who find support among at least some of the ablest and most productive can participate in the subsequent primaries. They are attested as "serious mainstream candidates".

      If echonoccus was right, disclosure that for years Mario Rubio would be bankrupt the instance after Norman Braman would withdraw his largest would make him laughingstock. Mrs. Clinton is definitely more financially responsible, but her family owes a lot to the largesse of the rich. And her donor base is quite decent as well, hence, she belongs to the ranks of serious politicians.

      Of course, such rational attitude is insufficiently prevalent among the youngsters, hence some some campus troubles. Really, Israeli diplomats should count their blessing that they are not in trouble among, say, farmers. Then they would need to attend country fairs and speak just before and just after the something like that:

      "Can you call your husband better than anybody else? What about your hog? Fairgoers who think they can do either of these amazing feats will have an opportunity to display their unique skills when the husband and hog calling contests return to the Clay County Agricultural Fair.

      HOG CALLING CONTEST is sure to get a few laughs out of those in attendance. Three judges will choose the best hog call from among the contestants. … come by the J.P. Hall Livesrock Arena Monday April 6, 2015 @ 6:00 PM" (I guess that each competing wife must have a husband and a hog).

  • 'You have to go'
    • “Those responsible for this despicable crime will face the full force of the law." Reminds me the following:

      I was in no mood to trifle,
      I took down my trusty rifle
      And went out to stalk my prey.
      What a haul I made that day.
      I tied them to my fender, and I drove them home somehow,
      Two game wardens, seven hunters, and a cow.

      The law was very firm, it
      Took away my permit,
      The worst punishment I ever endured.
      It turned out there was a reason,
      Cows were out of season,
      And one of the hunters wasn't insured.

      Read more: Tom Lehrer - The Hunting Song Lyrics | MetroLyrics

  • Does Israel have a toxic personality? Ask Michael Oren
    • That explains why so many Israelis declare themselves to be happy. Allegedly, a while ago a former mayor of Chicago said that he does not know what is fun about baseball (or was it golf), because it that sport "you cannot punch anyone". And Israel provides her favored citizens with tons of fun.

    • Perhaps a minor contribution to the discussion on "Israel spiritual outlook". A member of intellectual elite (cinematographer) was removed from the flight from Vienna to Tel Aviv for unruly behavior and paid a fine of 100 Euros. Excerpts from link to timesofisrael.com

      “We happened upon a Muslim stewardess who decided to abuse us. I told her: ‘Why do you not weigh anyone’s carry-on luggage but you weigh mine? To what degree can you abuse a person?’ and she said: ‘I learnt it from you people.’ At this point, I lost it,” Davidov told Channel 2 in a clip shown on Saturday evening.

      Davidov’s attorney, Reuven Laviav, said: “My client went to film an event in the Bucharian community in Vienna. On the night of the 12th he called me and said he was arrested along with three other cinematographers. I don’t justify him, but when he went on the plane there was a Muslim stewardess with a headscarf and it seems that because she saw him with a Star of David chain she decided to treat him badly. He was traveling with cameras costing tens of thousands of dollars and he always takes them to the cabin. On this plane, they wouldn’t let him and so he got upset.”

      Davidov was dragged out by airport security, refusing to obey order shouting "I do not understand English", and then "You killed six million Jews and now you want to kill another one?".

      ------

      As a matter of personal experience, you can obtain a lenient treatment from an airline by being polite. Before my flight from Brussels to Chennai security check discovered a bottle of liquid in my backpack that exceeded allowed capacity, and I pleaded that this is mosquito spray, necessary to avoid malaria, and a supervisor ask me to spray it on myself, and as it indeed stinked like a mosquito spray (and it was a bottle labeled as such) they made an exception.

    • "The BDS movement is a declaration of nonviolent war against Israel." This is oxymoron. Carl von Clausewitz, in his "On War" brilliantly explained that war is politics by other (violent) means. Hence politics without violence is just that: politics.

  • Israeli leader turns on US Jewish journalists Friedman, Wieseltier, Remnick and Silvers for disloyalty and anti-semitism!
    • It is a bit debatable if the peace process was busted or it was a zombie deprived of the simulacrum of life. Perhaps "busted" is technically good term, as opposed to "killed". The problem with the zombie process was that however harmless to the Zionist cause, it was resented by many as a humiliating aggravation. I guess that in the case of Oren, we can see the results of mental strain induced in a major part by this process.

      The special place of Netanyahu in Israeli right is that he has some modicum of realism, plus mental fortitude to spout some nonsense about two states or stuff like that. Many view this as necessary, perhaps more than admit that. In the last elections his success was to take the votes of "fortified Lidud" parties led by Bennet and Lieberman, and before that, to secure Likud leadership even though rank and file cannot stand even a whiff of the "process" and other forms of liberalism (like letting NGOs exist without being molested). At the end of the day, they appreciate that Israel needs at the helm a face that at least at some occasions is not contorted in righteous anger.

      Mind you, Likud universe has very few such people, as can be seen from their choices to run Foreign Affairs. It became a laughing stock run be zealous idiots, with actual foreign policy run from Prime Minister office.

      By putting together various statements of Oren, one can see that he is surely literate, most probably learned and probably intelligent. However, emotions can take better of him, and venting emotions is a favorite pastime of Israeli right (not that peculiar if you compare to GOP, or Turkish AKP). So on one hand, he finds it foolish to annoy American with untimely requests etc., like Netanyahu's trip to Congress, but on the other hand, he is infuriated that such caution is necessary, while all those rascals like Jews in the media and other prominent positions could do so much more.

      To some degree, I understand Oren. Wieseltier, for all his good works for the Zionist cause, reeks indolence, narcissism and lack of enthusiasm. I wanted to paste his faint critique of the Israeli conduct in the last war in Gaza, but I decided to spare some bytes and nerves of the readers here. Among a usual dollop of propagandistic falsification and a huge amount of empty verbiage, he rather skillfully leads the reader to the conclusions that he, Wieseltier, is the nicest and wisest man, sadly unappreciated by pro-Israeli zealots (swamping him with e-mails).

    • I guess the interesting aspect of Oren's rant was that included Wieseltier among the self-hating adversaries of TODITME (the only democracy in the Middle East) was particularly delusional, but otherwise it is a standard fare, for example the office of Netanyahu once put NYT on the enemy list. Dual loyalty of Jews who have other ideas and attachment besides the veneration of their "only Jewish state" is increasingly perceived as an aggraviation among the political elites of Israel and their approved friends who are free from those "non-Jewish entanglements".

      Assume for a moment that Wieseltier was included because of a simple mistake, like when Honorable Scalia referred to his Honorable colleague Goldberg, who in actuality has name Ginsburg. We still have a group mindset that rejects the possibility that people who disagree can do it for some relatively innocent reasons, like different personal experience, different personal values (which, after all, are personal), or feeblemindedness (most people lack the sagacity and acumen of Michael Oren or our friend hophmi). Instead, those people are either duped by the Dark Forces or themselves are card carrying members of Dark Forces. In recent years, Dark Forces manifest themselves as Worldwide Leftist-Islamist Conspiracy.

    • I have no idea how Wieseltier strayed from the straight and narrow, but Oren should be careful when he casts stones. After all, he himself erred and criticized Netanyahu, and that is not the only sin he committed:

      link to jpost.com

      Perhaps Oren believes what he wrote, namely that criticizing Netanyahu is a carrier enhancement, and he knows a thing or two about maintaining a carrier. For all I know, it may be true, and that fact should be drummed into all American journalists and politicians.

  • Obscure Netanyahu minister emerges as unsung international hero in latest 'NYT' report
    • I actually find that story surprising and refreshing. Until now, I would never guess that neo-cons or Likudnik (there are differences!!) could see the episode of back pedaling from promises to rain death on Syria as something positive.

      And of course, "Al Qaeda types" are the cherished Hashem's gift to Israel, Netanyahu visits them at the bedside, supports with artillery, airstrikes and probably with supplies and so on. And they did a nice piece of work, disabling Syrian air defenses and degrading the capabilities of Syrian military in general. However, the endgame may turn to be a nightmare for Israel, namely that their favorites are so terrifying to most of the world that massive influx of Iranian troops to Syria will not find any significant opposition. This is how the civil war in Lebanon ended (massive presence of Syrian troops) and this is probably the way the war in Syria will end.

  • Netanyahu likens BDS to Nazi Germany
    • Perusing the link to Hitchhiker wikis I found an actual motivation for destroying Earth that suggests that the plan of hyperspace bypass was not accidental:

      " The very worst poetry of all perished along with its creator, Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings of Sussex, in the destruction of the planet Earth. Vogon poetry is mild by comparison."

    • By JODI RUDORENJAN. 15, 2014
      Photo

      Dov Lipman, a rabbi and a sponsor of the bill, has had the word Nazi flung at him. Credit Rina Castelnuovo for The New York Times

      JERUSALEM — Israel is on the brink of banning the N-word. N as in Nazi, that is.

      Parliament gave preliminary approval on Wednesday to a bill that would make it a crime to call someone a Nazi — or any other slur associated with the Third Reich — or to use Holocaust-related symbols in a noneducational way. The penalty would be a fine of as much as $29,000 and up to six months in jail.

      Wiser heads prevailed, so Israel can conduct its foreign policy as before.

  • How will Sheldon save Israel?
    • Very close-minded answer, dear talknic. I try, within my modest abilities, to learn something before I criticize. Today I learned something new: Sheldon Adelson = "Jews in Denmark, Belgium and France".

  • Why haredi Jews should resist military service
    • I would give the "Rabbinate" (there are several in Israel) a benefit of the doubt that they know how to interpret Rabbinical law. For example, perhaps Maimonides explained why "The universal obligation of military service in times of emergency" is justified. By admission of the leaders of Israel, there is no emergency, to the contrary, the chief danger is BDS, and hard to see how additional IDF recruits can help. IDF needs manpower to harass villagers more effectively, but quite possibly the current level is sufficient.

      Majority of Haredi rabbis are convinced that prayers and Torah studies are more effective in maintaining the occupation than purely military means. Even that can be correct. After all, however secular Israel is, the justifications for occupation and oppression are in religious zealotry. They may also be correct thinking that IDF service can be detrimental to the preservation of medieval values in their communities.

      In short, extracting moral values that are useful in XXI century from ancient religious texts is a hard effort that can well be futile.

  • Netanyahu government ramps up effort to combat BDS
    • 100 million shekels is a paltry sum when existence of the state is at stake. I think the problem is in finding productive ways to spend it.

      Prime minister hinted at two issues. Jews on campuses have to stand tall and proud, plus they have to be armed with facts. Concerning the first issue, some are vertically challenged. I myself use a plastic stool to reach on top of the kitchen cabinets (from Home Depot, 8 dollars = 25 shekels) but while lightweight, it is not particularly portable for a convenient use at a university campus. Concerning the second issue, apparently, more facts are needed. Both issues can be addressed by much admired Israeli arm industry that could produce better stools and better facts. Thus we need to spend 100 million shekels on R&D, and then sell improved stools and facts to proud Jews at campuses.

      However, from engineering stand point, making convincing brand new facts and lightweight, inexpensive and portable stools are both rather complicated, as they have to perform in adverse environment. My stool somewhat resembles up-side down milk crate and it folds to a rather bulky shape, but any attempt to make it fold more would make it weaker, so you would need to use a more expensive plastic and more intricate construction. Making up convincing facts is even harder, as they can be subjected to scrutiny. An argument like "even Rav Shmuley says so" does not always work (I got a number of e-mails from Values Network).

  • Obama says peace talks are pointless because Netanyahu won't see the 'best' in others
    • You are too cynical. Take the most recent war waged on Yemen. Obama chose a principled position: the first priority is to fill book orders of American arm companies. Badly needed manufacturing jobs for American workers, yea! And some profits too. Sometimes I wish that he was more pragmatic, perhaps noticing that this is pointless s..t that can backfire on us.

    • My take is that poor Kerry broke his leg and now just cannot find enough masochism in his body to suffer extra pain of going through pointless meeting and getting all the hate from Israeli ingrates who did not appreciate American efforts to provide them with a smokescreen. In the same vein, Obama should designate a special officer, preferably autistic, who would take care of all calls from Netanyahu or whoever else wants to call from Israel.

  • Goldberg predicts 'civil war' between American and Israeli Jews as Israel is 'defined as an apartheid state'
    • Glass half empty (of theocracy): hophmi calls Israel "largely secular". The right to marry, divorce, refuse divorce, immigrate is in the hands of state paid clergy that use their own criteria, not regulated by the secular Knesset. Some aspect of lives are controlled by clergy, some are not, like in Iran, and granted, the proportions are different. But why the Ministry of Transportation attempted to ban self-service bicycle rentals in Tel Aviv on days of some religious holidays? Simply put, the Ministry was controlled by religious fanatics. In the new government, fanatics of various ilk control most of the government, although haredi fanatics do not particularly like Modern Orthodox fanatics, the former view compulsory military service as abomination, the latter, as sacred duty to take part in the Holy War.

      Concerning "largely British legal system", Israel inherited the most retrograde parts of the British system, lack of the constitution and colonial artifacts like administrative detention (not used in the home country). USA is using something a bit similar in the case of undocumented aliens, but Israel uses it for domestic oppression, which is worse. In any case, USA ceased to be a normative democratic state.

    • "It is remarkable, the degree to which he holds Israel to standards he doesn’t apply to other American allies."

      This is one of the central tenets of Hasbara, a belief shared by Zionist from most obtuse to most liberal. It is also a very intelligent ploy: deconstruction of that belief gives so much fun to a non-believer that it is really, really disruptive. Even so, I give it a try. First, to what degree "Israel is hold to something"? For example, holding Piotr to some standard basically means that if he does not fit to those standards he is fired. But Israel is a sovereign state, so the rules are different. One rule is for non-allies that cannot do much, then we proclaim that they are no good and impose severe sanctions. With luck, that leads to hyperinflation and total immiseration, like in Zimbabwe, or to somewhat stagnant economy like in Iran. Second rule is for non-allies that can do something. We impose sanctions which cause some degree of inconvenience, but we also foment insurgencies and support terrorist movements that they may find inconvenient. Third rule is for non-allies that we cannot do anything about, lest they stop buying our Treasury bonds, or leave us bereft of such life necessities like shoes, shirts, smart phones etc, surely we do nothing, BUT!! BUT!! we mention their misdeeds in yearly reports compiled by a dedicated federal agency.

      And what rules operate with allies? In good old days if an ally was committing a major atrocity, CIA would provide it with a check list, so they would also murder people on that list. Or provide training how to conduct torture and run death squads. However, occasionally those allies would be mentioned in yearly reports.

      So how does Israel fare in the comparison? Especially within "the region" our allies tend to be a wild and crazy bunch, where check and balances have the form of the nephews and uncles of the current absolute monarch, while Israel was, and remains, the most liberal theocracy in "the region". For example, Israel routinely uses a despotic procedure called "administrative detention". For some reason, the highest per-capita use of that occurs in Jordan (a truly despotic regime does not have to use British colonial laws that Brits would be ashamed to use, would they still have colonies, and no record of administrative detention in Falklands, Gibraltar of Bermudas). Advantage, Israel! However, since the sanctions on allied abusers of human rights range gamut from laughable to inconsequential, it is hard to tell if Israel is "hold" to more or less than the others.

  • ‘They said we drink the blood of children’—Netanyahu goes off the deep end after FIFA campaign
    • , the latest culinary advances.

      I got that from the web, but the quoted cookbook is from 1922. Related historical references exists from ancient Greece. link to en.wikipedia.org

    • Dear Mooser, drinking blood of geezers was never subject of a libel, it just raises the question about the taste. Just imagine this picture with roles reversed:
      link to horroraddicts.files.wordpress.com

      I must also admit that I have heard about the "blood libel", but it was about the use of Christian blood (not necessarily babies) in baking matzos. The origin of that folk legend could stem from the fact that it is very difficult to understand why regular matzos are not good for Passover -- I must admit I do not understand it myself.

      Additionally, nobody in the region would drink something that was neither boiled nor fermented, while blood was used in a number of dishes:

      [After you have killed the pig] cook the lungs, skin, various parings and veins with onions, greens and salt until you get a fine broth. Remove cooked solids and cut finely, and use the strained broth to cook buckwheat groats or barley. Groat may be soft, but not mushy.

      Add to the chopped meat and pour the liquid so much blood that the entire mass was not dry, but somewhat thick. Mix all perfectly, add salt to taste, pepper, English herb and marjoram. Stuff loosely in a clean intestines, bind in small section, or fasten with little sticks and simmer slowly for an hour" (F. Gensówna," Little Housewife - kitchen, pantry, medications and friendly advise)

  • StandWithUs invests nearly half a million dollars in ongoing anti-BDS lawsuit against Olympia Food Co-Op
    • Some plaintiffs complained that BDS has nothing to do with the mission of the Coop. However, the coop has this as a part of its mission:
      link to olympiafood.coop
      One can argue that food produced on land obtained through dispossession of the natives entails oppression, and I guess some arguments of that kind were made. Most importantly, it is only natural that most of 24 thousand active members would be against oppression, and against pro-oppression slogan "stand with the civilized man" (or join us at the Grim Rippers Squad and mow the grass).

    • A question to law literate folks: I understand that the issue is what standard applies to non-jury decisions imposing penalties. Opponents of the boycott are counter-sued as raising a case without merit with explicit intention to create a nuisance. Suppose that Mondoweiss would write in an article about "Piotr who delusionally thinks that he is the Lord of the Universe" and I would file a libel suit, claiming the damage to my reputation and material well-being, since it can decrease the level of devotion and gifts to Piotr with the false claim that he is not the Lord (while he is)". The court can dismiss the case, fine Piotr for making fun of the court or even award damages to Mondoweiss. However, the court has to evaluate the arguments raised by Piotr, and do it in a way that does not impinge on the right of Piotr to have a jury trial.

      So the Washington State stature allowed to dismissed the case under more permissive (and thus apparently unconstitutional) standard, kind of "most people would not believe it" rather than "only few people would believe it". And the judge does not need to present any statistics on how many people in fact believe that Piotr is the Lord of the Universe. But there can be other ways to reason about Piotr's case: if he is indeed the LofU then as a public figure he has no right to damages without submitting the proof that Mondoweiss did not believe in its claim, or his is not LofU and there was no libel.

      I would not be too afraid for Olympia Coop yet.

  • US and Israeli pressure on Nigeria to sell out Palestine at U.N. amounted to 'national security threat'
    • “Israel has been a crucial and loyal ally in our fight against Boko Haram,” Mike Omeri, the chief coordinating spokesman of Nigeria’s National Information Center, told the Jerusalem Post. “It is a sad reality that Israel has a great deal of experience confronting terrorism.

      For all that help, the fight against Boko Haram was going very badly, and it seems to be going better now. Former president was either simply inept, or unpopular in the military. New president is a former general, and apparently the war is more successful. Objectively, both Israel and USA have pretty bad record with counter-insurgency. Of course, if you have almost unlimited superiority in arms and almost total control over the population then even inept leadership and tactics will give a modicum of "positive results", but this does not work in Lebanon or Nigeria.

  • Turning Lebanon into Gaza -- Israel's hole card against Iran deal?
  • 'This land is ours. All of it is ours': Meet the Netanyahu cabinet members focused on fighting BDS & annexing the West Bank
    • Bryan: Finally, outside of the Bible itself their is not a jot of evidence that God has ever engaged in conversation with humans, or snakes, or asses, that God makes promises, or even exists.

      Nothing could be further from the truth. Amaterasu is a very fine goddess and an ancestress of Japanese imperial family, so somewhere along the line there had to be a direct intercourse between a god and a human. Somewhat atypically, Japan was created by gods and then given to the Japanese who did not had to conquer anything. (At least they got central Japan without any problems). I think a god promised Mexico to Aztecs who had to trek from their ancestral Aztlan to get the prize, which they had to conquer. Heracles got the land of Peloponesus from Zeus and promised it to his ancestors, but they were sadly expelled. No worry! Heraclids returned and ruled Laconia, Argos etc. Incidentally, their periods of exile and return are dated very similarly as those of Hebrews. (Spartans were most note-worthy Heraclids and allegedly their story was inspiring to Jews in the last centuries B.C.) Wotan not only speaks to humans, but he also sings very nicely in deep baritone. Indian gods were tramping all around Bharata as avatars. I could fill a library with literary sources, photographs of the respective locations and so on.

      For example, why do we play with a rubber ball? It all started with a ball games between humans and gods of the underworld.

    • I do not think that Hotovely is "ultra-Orthodox". She seems to be Modern Orthodox, which to me is a fascist movement with "religious motivation". Who knows, perhaps her household has two dishwashers, but she struts around with uncovered hair and elbows, poses to photographs etc. She is ultra-nationalist, and clearly an excellent pick for the Ministry of Defiance (formerly known as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

      “Rashi says the Torah opens with the story of the creation of the world so that if the nations of the world come and tell you that you are occupiers, you must respond that all of the land belonged to the creator of world and when he wanted to, he took from them and gave to us.” Is it really an exemplar of Jewish religious scholarship? First, Rashi is surely a revered scholar, but one could expect to consult him on something less obvious than the opening of the Torah. Second, isn't it a bit non sequitur? Creation of the world does not seem very related to deciding who lives where and when. Or perhaps the point is that if the Creator could cheerfully disregard all those fossils and archaeological finds and create the World 5800 years ago, He could also give the Holy Land to Hebrews cheerfully disregarding other folks who live there. My guess is that Tsipi reveres the Torah but couldn't be bother reading more than the first few pages.

  • Netanyahu's new Foreign Ministry aide gets $226,000 from Sheldon Adelson shop in U.S.
    • By the way, Mondoweiss was puzzled why Dore Gold was paid as a consultant by AEI, and that is indeed a puzzle. One of the chief roles of AEI is to support otherwise unemployable right wing folks and give them a label of an "expert" or some such, something that looks good in a business card. However, when Gold got the money he was a full-time President of Jerusalem Center of Public Affairs.

      Similarly puzzling is the fact that was is the President of Center for Jewish Community Studies in Baltimore in the same time.

    • Wikipedia: Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs

      President: Dore Gold

      Recent initiatives:

      International Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Anti-Semitism

      In May 2015 the center sponsored an event promoting an initiative to make anti-Semitism an international crime through a convention to be signed by participating states. No foreign diplomats attended the event. Of 160 representatives invited, not one chose to attend. The organizers seemed surprised. The Times of Israel reported: "So far, not a single state has indicated that it is considering signing the convention, including Israel.

      ========

      The Intitute is located in Jerusalem, but its spiritual home is firmly in Chełm (check Wise People of Chełm).

  • Sam Harris and the dangers of false atheism
    • I guess I am not an atheists because I worship nitpicking. Thus I would pick the following nit: not much evidence was shown for Sam Harris being a "false atheists". That said, I will pick some nits on his luxuriantly hirsute head.

      Sam Harris advances the concept that Noam Chomsky has "dangerous delusions about global jihadism". But what are "sober views on the global jihadism, stripped of any delusions"? That it is a part of a wider international conspiracy aiming to destroy motherhood, apple pie, Second Amendment and all the rest that is good, with Chomsky being one of the main culprits? Or that it is an inevitable consequence of the cult lamentably started by a self-styled prophet in Arabian peninsula, and motherhood, apple pie etc. are in dire danger as long as that cult is not expunged? When you add adjective "global", do you mean that there exists good local jihadism that USA and other Western government can wisely support, like insurgents against Qaddafi, Assad, Russia (in North Caucasus) or Afghan mujahadeens? Or was (or is) the support of any of the above a stupid blunder? It is a fact that fighters in "good local jihadism movements", goodness evidenced by Western support (we would not support bad folks, would we?) were subsequently found as "bad global jihadists". Perhaps jihadism should be considered more comprehensively than the narrow focus on the "global" jihadism, with all arbitrary inclusions and exclusions. Any social study that focuses on "bad folks" as currently defined by the State Department lacks intellectual merit -- why we need Sam Harris if we can read posts on the website of the State Department? Just because we are junkies who need more?

      In other words, the concept of "global jihadism" is not so much delusional as mercenary. tailored to get funding. And throwing invectives like "delusional" is a time-proven mercenary tactic as well. That hints that Harris may indeed be worshipping something. Nevertheless, while the concept is sloppy, what are prescriptions?

      If I understand, the prescription is to focus on the root cause, which is the existence of Islam. This is heavily delusional. Given the numbers of adherents, the dynamics of those numbers and their global distribution, I see no realistic policy based on that assumption. If this is the only way, we should just morosely await the end of our good atheist days, or concentrate on getting some fleeting carnal pleasures while we still can. Or create an international system of death camps to eliminate Muslim minorities in countries where Muslim are not in power (sadly impossible because of carping of lily livered liberals like Chomsky). I do not want to go into details, but outside radical Zionist circles most folks agree that to the degree that "jihadism" is a problem, most Muslim reject that idea, moreover, since "Jihadism" entails mostly Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities, 9/11 being very much an outlier rather than the rule, there is a necessity and opportunity to work with Muslim to reduce it.

      That said, the details are bewildering and crucial (e.g. the support of the fascist rulers of Egypt or absolute monarchies like KSA is not the best way to put it mildly). Rants in Harris style are much more dangerous than any mistakes in Chomskian analysis because they provide surprisingly effective support for very misguided policies. For example, USA supports (with cash and arms) a very bloody and completely fascistic regime in Egypt, and any time there is another news item about, say, hundred death penalties ordered in short proceedings with highly dubious reasons, most commenters approve because the victims are claimed to be "Islamists", And it is not like that fascist regime is "secular", in fact, it is somewhat theocratic, except that this is a form of religion deformed by the puppets nominated by the State.

    • About Turks in ISIS: there was a story about an "ISIS commander" who got wounded and left for his native Turkey for hospital treatment, and nobody bothered him. Unlike policemen who stopped trucks with weapons and explosives that were driving on orders of military intelligence and according to the shipping papers, contained "humanitarian aid"; the poor guys were fired.

      Statistics of ISIS fighters from various countries come from law enforcement in those countries, and zero stat from Turkey does not mean much.

      Concerning reasons for "radicalization and violence", various societies experience crisis situations and "radicalization and violence" is one of the outcomes. And it is a genie that is not easy to put back in the bottle. For example, Colombia experienced something called "Violencia", and it has effects on the society even today. Not much in our media on that. In any case, dependent on the distribution of religions and ideologies during the crisis, you can get "radical and violent" Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Shinto, Anarchists, Marxists, liberal democrats and so on.

  • 'Jerusalem Day' and the sacralization of propaganda
    • Women of the Wall are heretics, as established by the religious authorities in a theocratic state, so they should be grateful that Israel is a liberal theocracy with rather lenient penalties for disobeying the edicts of three chief rabbinates (Ashkenazi, Military and Sephardi).

      "My daughter in her American history class used Israel as a example of a society with freedom of religion but not separation of church and state." Excellent example! Like the lack of provision for any marriages NOT sanctioned by one of the officially approved religions, and that short list does not include Jewish denomination that most numerous in United States. Or reservation of certain type of jobs, including jobs in power stations, to the members of the official state religion. The latter causes problems because the most pius among the Jews do not want to use state-supplied electricity on Saturdays as it is made with Jewish labor on Sabath.

      Could be worse, of course. Imagine being a non-member of the ruling religion in a state where all, the faithful and non-faithful, have to spend one day of the week hopping on one leg.

      I hope that the summary of your daughter was that the separation of Church and State in USA was not one of the mistakes of the Founding Fathers.

Showing comments 4100 - 4001
Page: