Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 1909 (since 2010-06-24 23:41:16)

Showing comments 1909 - 1901
Page:

  • Philosophy prof who likened Palestinians to 'rabid pit bull' ignites protest on CT campus
    • advocating the commiting of crimes is an illegal act one someone can be fired for. i'm sorry but anyone who calls for genocide like he did needs to be fired post haste

  • Emails show Missouri museum canceled 'Ferguson to Palestine' event under pressure from Jewish group
    • lol since when has anything a zionist group ever been principled. supporting war crimes terrorism and the supression of these facts from getting out is not principled

  • Sheldon Adelson is not the problem
    • there is what people will accept and than there is what the laws actually says. the 67 lines are Israel's legal borders. talknic believes Israel's conquering inside the partian lines is legal i don't. but for anyone with even a passing understanding of international law will tell you nothing out side those borders is legally Israel's under international law.

  • Selective voting in the land of Greater Israel
    • while i agree a jewish sense of entitlement in zionism is a major roadblock i think it can happen. not soon it would take decades of work and the Israelis would more than likely choose to kill everybody than cede dominion i believe there is a small but real chance that it could be achieved.

    • its my firm belief that the only way long term peace will happen is one palestinian state on all of historic palestine for everyone who wants to be an equal citizen of the territory.

  • We may not have Netanyahu to kick around anymore
    • they had to be pressured into all of those moves. none of them were done because of a sincere desire for peace. Israel won't make real concessions because the Israeli electorate is to divorced from reality to demand them. again hop saying your going to steal less is not a concession. something like offering economic aid would be a real concession and show the palestinians that finally after 70 years they have a partner in peace and that their willing to give up there conquering ways

  • 'NYT' reports 'surge of hostile sentiment against Jews' nationwide -- on what basis?
    • maybe people wouldn't ask for evidence if it weren't for the mulitude of times jews have been caught fabricating or misrepresenting things as anti semitism. and at the same time those groups don't have a history of labeling anything critical toward them as automatically bigoted.

    • because despite what you and yours claim its not all that pervasive. blind hate is very rare. anti semitism is only pervasive if you include legit criticism of Israel in it which i'm willing to bet most recorded incidients are. zionist college groups have trained colligiante jews to be hypersensitive to criticism of Israel and treat as a personal attack on them and hence they label it anti semitic when its not.

  • Why Iran is not and has never been Israel’s #1 enemy
    • look if a muslim country was going to give nukes to terrorists pakistan would have done already. a nuclear Iran isn't a threat to Israel it just ceases to be a country Israel can threaten which in their eyes is the same thing.

    • Page: 19
  • Rightwing rabbi seeks to pit Power against Rice on Iran ahead of AIPAC speeches
    • @dabakr hate to break it to you but as voters a shift of jews to the republican party would be meaningless in the demographic changes. the republican party is dead as a national party and dying in most parts of the US. the republicans ability to gerrymander themselves into office is going to end and than you'l start seeing republicans losing in the house in droves. remember based on total vote counts the democratic representatives and senators got millions more votes

  • Netanyahu's speech and the American Jewish condition
    • no its a personal attack because your to small minded to allow any jew to think for themselves. you demand absolute alligience to a militeristic and violent ideology. phill doesn't hate him self or jews that obvious to any honest human being but unlike you he doesn't think that promoting hate and violence is the way forward.

  • Hillel's segregated lunch counter
    • your comparing to very different things and pretending their the same. Zionists are actively opposed to peace. it would be like inviting david duke to speak at the NAACP. jews who are for BDS aren't opposed to jewishness or even zionism they just don't think Israel should be commiting war crimes. and SJP is not ignorant on Israel that they don't agree with your dishonest and distorted view doesn't mean their ignorant it means they're informed. so once again you demand SJP to invite people inimical to there interests as the same same as your pressure terrorist supporting hillel for once not banning any and all dissent. your a hack

  • Right-wing bomb thrower David Horowitz behind anti-SJP posters
    • seriously he wanted dishonestly labeled a hate group yes he does want it it shut down. and i seriously doubt that number. I'm willing to bet most of those so called antisemitic incidents are just anti Israeli incidents based on Israel's warcrimes. they've been trained by professional haters like your self to view anything critic of Israel as antisemitic. every serious study I've seen shows the number given by pro zionists groups on anti semitism is inflated

  • Israel gives out 'security Oscars' at the UN to Iran, Hezbollah, Saudi Arabia and PA
    • So this is more substantional than actualy trying to fix issues? self absorbed finger pointing is substansive in your mind? how but this fix your own shit first.

    • i find it Israeli delusions humerous saying the palestinians are rewriting history when the entire Israeli mythology and idea is based on historical revision. Israel rewrites history to suit its needs constantly

  • Netanyahu speech is 'destructive' of 'bipartisan, immutable relationship' between US and Israel, Rice says
    • well it seems your understanding of geopolitics is on par with your understanding of history, poor and substandard. normalizing relations with Iran will undercut the radicals because they won't have the legiatmate rallying case of our aggression against them. it would give the majority of moderate Iranians the lift they need. of course that will still be hard with Israel's calls for Iran's demise. its hard for good people to succeed in peaceful goals when their being threatened by sociopaths.

      also it should be noted that most Iranians have a relatively positive view of the US. in fact i'm sure if you you looked at even though we blindly support Israel's war crimes and attack Iran the Iranian people probably view americans more favorabaly than Israelis do.

  • Congress flooded with letters urging members to #SkipTheSpeech of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu
    • polls say what they don't say why? and the why is they have been fed inaccurate biased information to engender a positive viewpoint. with out the pro israel propaganda those numbers would crash

  • Racism is in the air: Video showing racist exchange between Israelis and a flight attendant goes viral
    • you'd have a point if this was an isolated incident but its just one more in a larger pattern. that such displays are so easy to find and pop up so often shows that yes this does represent most (jewish)Israelis

  • Netanyahu flips off Harry Truman
  • Jewish groups that blindly support Israel make US and European Jews potential victims of violence -- Avnery
    • @ kathleen not really most of them are in the states and so far protected from the consequences of their actions. but you misunderstand me if you think i'm excusing violence. My ethics are influenced by the wiccan rede " an it harm none, do as ye will" but I'm also a firm believer if you want to stop something from happening you have to understand why its happening something i feel zionists don't want to because it will reflect on their actions.

    • and people like you are the reason bigotry will never die. No one is saying that people should die for what others do. but the simple fact remains if your going out of your way to cause harm to a group expect backlash against your group. acknowledging the consequences of zionist actions doesn't mean the victims deserved to die. you might support collective punishment hop we don't.

  • Hate in the aftermath of Chapel Hill
    • @yonah. it is a war crime. that is an irrefutatable fact. to pretend other wise is insanity. their is no honest way to look at the facts and come to any other conclusion. that you like the terrorist enterprise of Israel doesn't changes the facts which is it was created on terrorism and war crimes and the terrorism and war crimes continue today with a vast majority supporting them.

      and no where not putting a bullseye on your back your doing that by supporting terrorism and war crimes.

    • its always nice the rare times people show what being a person of faith truly is about instead of the self serving bs most people do.

  • Boteach and Israeli ambassador say everything from BDS to Abbas places Jews under threat
  • Closed-door debate on divestment by U of Toledo student gov't to include officials from Jewish Federation
    • @doublestandard

      false the palestinians claimed political sovreignty over it. in fact the palestinian mandate specificly recognized their sovriegnty over the territory. by founding their state zionist illegally declared a war of conquest. zionist didn't represent an organized polity representing the people of palestinian they represented terrorists who wanted to conquror

  • Stanford petition misrepresents resolution to divest from occupation
    • you seem confused to what is in the fourth geneva conventions
      link to en.wikisource.org this should help. a protected persons are just that protected no matter who is fighting on there land. so no despite your claim the palestinians aren't protected they are. what is it with you zionists and your defense of war crimes?

    • @jeffB no its not arguable its a fact. the gazan didn't initiate the Israeli gazan war Israel once againinitiated a war against the palestinians. your analogy is crap. a accurate analogy would be canda attacking alaska so the Us retaliates from washington state. the only people who view gaza and the west bank as seperate political entities is Israel and those that support its war criminal ways. gaza and the west bank or all palestinian an attack on one is an attack on the other. their 2 parts of the same political entity. and its funny how you blaim Israel's victims in the 6 day war as starting it but here you label what in your mind is a simliar act as starting here because you don't like it. your just a hypocrite jeff.

      @ hophmi. no its not a good one. the only reason you feel that way is beecause it fits with your own biases and bigotry. but that doesn't mean its a good one.

  • Israel: Schabas resignation cannot ‘whitewash’ bias in UN war crimes inquiry
    • @jeffb
      I'm sorry but after your fiasco of trying to claim jews weren't allowed in palestine for 2000 years when the facts disagree with you I'm not going to make the attempt so save it trying to accuse me of lying. facts don't matter to you propganda. you may not find rude people convincing but I don't find people who lie very convincing.

    • do you ever get tired about lying about history? your attempts to show how history exonerates the zionists for their crimes only showscases your own bigotry and biases.

    • not one's expecting an exact percentage match but when the side with precision weaponery is killing civilians at a percentage at best 3 or 4 times and at worst 10 times that of the side with imprecise weaponery the accusation is based in fact and is perfectly moral. you just don't like it that your terrorists and and war criminals are being called out on it. if the numbers were reversed i doubt you'd blink an eye about the "amoral" disporportionality. their is noting just about Israel's wars of conquest and retribution.

    • really a zionist bitch about someone else's ego. I've never met a zionist without an ego and a sense of entitlement

  • Chair of Democratic National Committee opposes Jewish intermarriage and MSNBC showing Gaza carnage
    • the ideas are implicent in each other hophmi. you can pretend its an innocent mind set but its not. again whether or not your thinking in such terms its the idea that non jews are beneath jews and not fit to be among them. its essentially stating that you feel your better than everyone else because of your jewishness.

    • so your ok with with supporting a viewpoint that is inherently rooted in a bigoted mindset? by saying you want intermarriage rates of jews to go down your saying it is wrong for jews not to marry jews. whether or not your thinking of it in those terms is irrelevant the message is clear.

    • yes because the number shouldn't matter at all.the only that matters if your a decent person in my opinion is whether or not people are marry the ones they love.

  • Netanyahu speech could allow Obama to 'take on the Jewish lobby' as he took on Cuba lobby -- Indyk
    • exactly Iran would never use nukes offensively and i doubt they would ever use them defensively. there are only 2 countries in my opinion that bring sufficient crazy to the table to use nukes offensively. north korea and Israel.

    • thats a load of crap. there is a reason the state department practically revolted when truman recognized Israel. the Us interest would be have a palestinian state. Israel hurts US interests. Israel is actively inimical to US interests. You will never understand it because your incaopable of putting the US interests ahead of Israel's. you think its a good thing because it benefits your terrorist state. your a typical zionist. crying about people saying bad things about your war criminals. whats good about Israel ? I can't thing of one damn thing. because everything they do is su[pported by the bad things. a good thing done through evil is evil hop. why can't you get threw your thick skull.

  • Is inter-faith work between Jews and Muslims possible?
    • Israel isn't their sovreign. their favoring the settlers because their trying to ethnically cleanse it. are you just not paying attention?

    • what calling out your flat out lies? muslims haven't ethnically cleansed jews from large parts of the planet. jews i'm sure would be welcome so long they push for things hostile to the interests of those countries. jews how ever when given the chance tried to ethnically cleanse the territory they had of muslims. they failed but lets not pretend they didn't try.

    • please explain how is Israel a vassal to the US? you've said this delusion more than once but how do you get to it? because Israel thanks to its lobbyists in the US control US foriegn policy to a degree in the middle east. last time i checked vassals do what their told and Israel continues to act like a sociopath. your continuing to lie and make things up to push your victim narrative.

  • 'NYT' perpetuates myth Israel was 'fighting for its very survival' during 1967 war
    • FYI your mixing singular and plural in your latin i'm fairly certain it either be casus bella in the singular and cassi belli for the plural. funny how you should mention casus bella for reasons because you like whining about the palestinians histility but by your own admition live in a settlement that provides a legit casus bella to the palestinians.

  • Salaita sues donors for 'injecting' themselves into U of Illinois decision, threatening to withhold gifts unless he was fired
    • so because you like the fact that he was prejudicially denied employment you think its ok to well basic slander him and his field. i bet if a jewish person was treated this was you'd beg to differ. your name is apt once again supporting the double standard in zionism's and zionists favor

  • Phila Inquirer publishes a lie: 'Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the same'
    • well except for the fact your flat out lying about if jews could immigrate. i noticed you like to skip over large parts of history, like the sassianid empire. secondly the concept of citizenship really didn't exist at all so trying to use that as an argument is just try to play games of anchronism. you. and the arabs only starting attacking jews in the late 1800's because of zionists like your self saying they intended to take over and dominate everyone else. you can't declare hositility against others and expect them to treat as if your peaceful. the only reason you got 5 years is your a dishonest hack you manipulated history. jews were free to move to palestine for most of 2000 years and chose not to. no matter how much you lie nothing can change that fact

    • maybe thats because the zionists like your self refuse to allow dissent? Israel is not a complicated society. militeristic cultures never are. is simplistic. what ever "good" they may do is irrelevant. when it requires evil to be done.

  • 'NYT' and Matthews warn that Netanyahu speech to Congress could lead US to war
  • 80+ Cartoonists And Comics Workers Tell Comics Industry: 'No Business As Usual With Israel'
  • US calls ICC decision to investigate Gaza 'tragic irony'
  • Obama cites donor pressure re Iran, but 'NYT' won't tell you what he means
    • other lobbing groups don't demand the US sacrifice its own interests for a foreign power responsible for the most unprovoked deaths of americans in the region.

    • well to a democrat actually yes. i can't think of a group that would promote a hardline stance. unless you seriously believe hardline christian conservatives don't tons of money to the democrats

  • Netanyahu crashes Paris unity march, French gov't fumes
    • first of neither Israel nor the US is a fuedal state so niether can be leige or vassal. and how is Israel a vassal of the US. it get to force the US to act against its own interests for Israel's benefit. that doesn't sound like a vassal to me. destroying Israel is the best thing that could happen for everyone. i fail to see how continuing to show just how violant jewish people have shown they can be is in their interest. maybe if you zionist every tried peace you'd have a point but they don't and you don't

    • god your bigoted a******** so because he didn't want to risk politics intervening which it did because netanyahoo decided to exploit the tragedy for politcal means like a sick bastard its means the french are mean. i didn't see anything about france wanting no israeli presence. they just didn't want your ahole of a prime minister there.

  • A tale of two tests
    • no hop the only person failing a morality test is you and and all the other thugs like you who feel because you want you have the right to use violence. Israel is not a liberal democracy defending it citizens. its a fascist state invading and conquering. the only terrorists i see are you and yours.

  • Jo Roberts on Jewish trauma, the Nakba, and the olive tree
    • @ jeffb
      I'm confusing nothing. i don't really expect you to know anything of the history involved given your zionist education and their attempts to rewrite history. but it was the us pro Israel stance in recognizing Israel and helping arm the nascent state to continue its conquest. how ever much you like to repeat the tired lie of innate arab anti-semitism it remains a lie. while the us was nowhere near as subserviant to Israel than as it is now it was decided pro-Israel from the first. mainly so truman could prop up his presidency.

    • your assuming everything else would remain the same. it wouldn't. the fundmentalist turn in islam states might be traced to the cold war. lets not forget the arab world was more secular in the 40's and 50's. and rather pro us for the obvious reasons with the support of self determination. its in all likely hood that there would be increased trade and without the us abbadoning them during the cold war a very different turn of event could have happened. of course their probably a varity of factors i'm missing that's the problem with these kind of alternate history guesses. their just to many variables but i think your overstating the likelyhood of anti jewish sentiments.

  • Anti-Semitism at Fordham?
    • if your asserations were so proven you would have provided credible proff which you want because you have none.

      rome's rule lasted several hundred years though 63 was the start of the hasmodean dynasty in a jewish puppet state. but jews were only expelled after the bar khova(sp?) revolt in the mid 200's so the roman period of time frame your referring was around a hundred years.

      yes it is a fact. that your only believe zionist lies doesn't change historical fact jeff. that your ignorant doesn't mean i am making things up. there was no banning of jews from returning for 2000 years. that is a lie plain and simple.

      Israel's asseration is a load of crap. it is not exactly like the other laws. all other laws require an actual physical connecton. Israel doesn't it requires a purely religious one. yes but unlike the jew we know someone of Irish decent has a physical connection to Ireland because it was immpossible to be Irish without gaining that link. it is entirely possible for someone with zero physical connection to palestine to aquire Israel citizenship merely by converting to judaism. a creek or innuit could convert and be invited in. are you seriously going to say would have that physical connection. all other return laws are about ingathering the Israeli law of return is entirely about increasing their demographic presence.

    • @ jeff

      Yes there doing fine. well of course their leaving most places your government pays them to move into palestinian homes if they immigrate. but in general the Diaspora is doing fine. the Diaspora has been doing just fine. its population is stable. if the Diaspora wasn't doing fine it would comprise of of a little less than 2/3 thirds of the worlds jewish population. which is a higher percentage than after WW2

    • really cause jews out side of Israel seem to being doing just fibe. Israel isn't a last hope just the first in desire to steal from other for a want

    • @jeffb. that's just false. the byzantium never barred jews from returning. and of course the roman's didn't, no state will allow rebellion foster. and mentioning rome when it was a period of less than 100 years is really just trying to to pad your dishonest argument. so again jews weren't barred from returning. they could have returned at any point. they chose not to. no matter how many times you lie, this fact remains.

      actually its over 30 countries that have some sort of returning laws. and only Israel's allows people whose families never lived into the territory their under the law. so once again the Israel law of coming to a place your family never was is unique.

    • the Israeli law of return is unique. every other such law requires to show proff that you trace you ancestry to said state. i could convert to judiasm today and be able to to move to israel under the law of the return. so yes there is no other law like the law of return in israel. i'm sorry but the refugees are tied to palestine. i know you feel you should be able to run out the clock on their rights but you can't. since your terrorist country illegally refused them back the right remains invested.

    • @ jeffb

      how is supporting crimes and attacking the innocent while demanding they be stripped of their rights this" I choose actual justice and equality over imaginary non-implementable justice and equality. I understand that justice and equality require more than just stupid bumper sticker slogans. One of the core ideas of justice is that a moral principle that applies to some should apply to all. " no jeff you don't two wicks about justice and equality. its amazing your idea of justice and equality means you and yours get to get away with 60= years of crimes. thats not justice or equality. that's being a bigoted entitled thug.

      so if the palestinians get the power to kick your illegal immigrant but out they can because that's the "moral" principle your defending

  • 'NYT' reporter says Palestinians must make 'concessions... they have long avoided'
    • first off their previous sovriegnty is irrelevant as for 1 unlike you there not basing their claim onto that. 2. once the accepted means of creating a new country was self determination not conquest being the native population was enough. and their was no arab conquest of palestine. there was a muslim one but it was of conquerring the already present arab population.

      what gives is the palestinians are basing their claims on self determination of being the legal resident population in the territory. no myths required. there are only facts. you how ever are demanding a jewish state with borders as stated in the bible which have zero basis in any sort of fact. if the palestinians made the same sort of bs claims your making i'd knock them just as hard.

      as fior allowing you to claim the kingdom of judah. I was saying if you'd want to make a legit historical based argument i'd let you combine the kingdom of judah with the kingdom of Israel and argue those borders as a basis rather than the mythical ones your using.

      ???why are you asking if i think any part of palestine should belong to your terrorist country. jerusalem is legally the palestinians. while me and talknic has differences in opinion over the legality of Israel declaring its self the fact remains while those lands fall into a very dark grey part of the law everything out side of that is most asurdedly illeaglly occupied land belonging to the sovriegn state of palestine.

    • @robert what makes your myths so special that they get to be tresated as historical fact? bibilical israel was a myth it never existed so what your really saying is you made up a bunch of borders based on a country that never existed and demand a country based on that? does that mean i can make up borders for a mythical state and claim those borders. I'd be willing to treat you as honest if you willing to deal with the actual borders of the kingdom on Israel and hell since i'm a nice guy i'll let you include the borders of the kingdom of judah but to insist on bibl;ical bordefrs is literally demanding reasonable people to admit to a fairy tale.

    • funny how the native voice you found was a christian zionist. can you find a non christian zionist one? again that you found one voice doesn't negate the truth of mine statement that native american as a group show very high levels of support for the palestinians. both are oppressed indigenious peoples who were dispossessed by colonial forces.

    • @ robert that 200 was a typo. and what muslims arab occupiers. how can the native population occupy their own land. when islam conquered palestine it conquered the native arab inhabitants. the arabs aren't occupiers. and jews never tried to come back. they never tried to live their they left and never attempted to come back until the 1900's. and the muslim world protected its jewish citizens for the most part until the zionist invasion and conquest in 1948.

      and no jews weren't alway recognized as a nation because nations only came into being as and idea around 200 years ago. jews have always been viewed as preciesely what they are a religion.

      so please don't tell me your explaining and to read.r funny the guy who is quoting only zionist sources telling someone to read sources. i have read zionist sources they just fail to be convincing. probably due to the fact they are lies. so your not explaining anything your just repeating lies about why you and your should be allowed to get away with war crimes. i suggest your read not that it would do you any good. if its not in line with you bs you'll refuse to even consider it. your arrogant ignorant and little more than a thug in mentality.

    • @yonah actually i said only nations have homelands i can of the top of my head think of several national homelands that aren't based on ethnicity. the USA being the obvious one. the former piecemeal state of italy and germany being others.

      but case in point jews don't have everything that other nations have. they don't have any sort of cultural connection to each other outside of the jewish faith which is kind of important in trying to claim their more than a religion. hell even the language can't really be used as its a modern version of what was a dead language.
      so there is no culture no language nothing i can see for connections that aren't purely there because of the religion. its not so much a decree as recognizing despite attempt of zionists to lie jews don't meet the definition of a nation. i'm sorry just because their terror campaign to get a state worked doesn't mean their actually a nation.

    • How can you say the borders are not made up when their is zero evidence that the country your subscribing those borders to ever existed?

      again palestine cannot be the homeland of the jewish nation because their is no jewish relation or do catholics buddahisms and shintoists have homelands and are nations as well? and how could palestine be the homeland of a made up jewish nation for 3300 years when there is only evidence of a jewish state only goes back 3000?

      and the name palestine is not derived from hebrew in fact the hebrew term probably comes from the same source as palestine the original egyptian Peleset which again predates archeological evidence of a jewish state.

    • wrong it is you who is incapable of dialogue. repeating insane sociopathic demands is not dialogue recognizing peoples wants and needs is and actually talking is dialogue. you want to have a real dialogue its simple quit issuing criminal demands and start acting like a decent human beings. I'm sorry you feel people not kowtowing to your and your your countries demands but dialogue requires a give and take. all you want is to take.

    • @ robert
      your only proving my point. and i did read actual archeologically based evidence. so i tell you read something other than your big book of jewish fairy tales and maybe you'll quit demanding Israel be given borders to represent a fictious state. the united monarchy never existed. there was a kingdom of Israel and a kingdom of judah which were eventually absorbed into more powerful states. the fact remains the palestinians are the true indigenous people and modern jews for the most part interlopers.

      @talknic. I'm not saying it wasn't but at the end of the day GA 181 is a clear violation of the UN charter requirment that states only be created via self determination. the moment the majority of legal resident of palestine said they didn't want their country divided anything else was illegal. launching a war of conquest via armies created by european jews to conqueror territory. I'm sorry but inside "Israel" or out its was still gained via conquest. we should be willing to concede it but don't lie and say it was given to jews they stole it with blood and iron just like everything else. now I'm not saying at this point we should take a completely hardline stance if only because actualy trying to comply with the law now would require to much bloodshed. but if we want a just resolution we need to call the spade a spade and that was all of the territory Israel has was gained via conquest.

      so even if Israel never annexed anything out side of its borders it would still be illegal. because it would be declaring territory belong to another state as belonging to it. the moment the mandate ended sovriegnty and control immiedently was vested into the provisionally stated country of palestine. the Israelly decleration of independence was nothing less than a decleration of war and intent to conqueror.

    • @ robert. your seriously going to bring up the native americans? you do realize the native tribes are pro palestinian. they know who the indeginous people are. and its not you in your stolen house. so I ask why is it ok for some native population in your mind to get there land back but not the native population you currently support the occupation and disspossesion of. because as a jew of assumingly european orgin you are not native and have zero claim to palestine.

      its irrelevant before the law. i fully understand you and the rest of warcriminal terrorist country men's motives. I'm a student of history you'd be wise to be one too. tyrant conquerors usually meet bloody ends and they always end up badly.

    • whats just in giving to a state borders that were never theirs. your arrogance shows. their can't be a palestinian state on the jewish homeland because there isn't a jewish homeland. there is a palestinian one in palestine. your litlerally demanding us to cave into borders that were made up

    • @robert I didn't base of of history I based it off of the definition of the word nation. which I fail to see how jews meet when all the connection are solely based in religion. and other ancient nations that are countries now actually meet the definition. there was once an ancient hebrew people but modern jews have nothing in common with them outside of religion. that i reject the fairy tale of jewish nationalism and am "intolerant" to it is not due to a culutaral bias but more due to the fact I'm literate.

      and the armenians have a national idienty outside of religion. jews don't. and i catagoricaly reject states for religions.

    • @ robert there is no double standard. jews were premitited to come and live in palestine for close to 200 years they lost the right to claim it because the chose to abbadon it. the palestine right continues because unlike they jews conquerors they want to go back and are forcibly prevent from returning to their homeland and excercizing their legal sovreignty over the territory.

    • @ robert
      the term palestinian never meant jew. that's be rather difficult considering the etymology of the word predates archeological evidence of a jewish state. the term means the samething its always meant a person who resides in palestine. you could argue it means legal resident. but no your point is nothing but a self serving lie palestinian never meant or refered to solely jews.

    • talknic. jews weren't given a state. they illegally seized one

    • Robert. that the fact that you and other zionist thieves don't see yourselves as thieves is rather irrelevant. its an irrefutable fact you are.

      and that you see those 5 conditions as reasonable shows you for the thug you are

    • so you expect intelligent people to recognize are fairy tale. biblical Israel never existed. if you want Israel's actual historical borders your looking at a state a third the size of palestine and giving up giving up any claim to jerusalem. jerusalem was never in Israel until its illegal conquest in 48

    • still with the tired lie of a jewish nation. jews are a religion not a nation. and its not their homeland as only ethnic groups have those. the alleged jewish homeland wasn't occupied jews abaddoned it. and arab and proto arab people have always been in palestine. your just another entitled zionist jew who thinks you deserve others people things simply because you want them.

    • your answer is bs. the true question isn't Israels security from palestine. it neither deserves nor should expect security from it. it should be what needs to be done to protect palestinian security from Israel. the criminals "rights" are less than that of his victim

    • just how many more concessions should the palestinians make. why doesn't Israel ever have to make a concession? these people are sick

  • State Dep't threatens aid to Palestinians over ICC, but holds out no consequences for Israel's settlements
    • we punish the people for only trying to protect themselves and their rights. we reward the people commiting war crimes. this is wrong and anyone who can defend it is messed up

  • Israeli settlers attack US consulate convoy in the West Bank (Updated)
  • Fireworks in Ramallah, as Abbas signs treaty to join International Criminal Court
  • Campus movement against Israel is largest since anti-Vietnam war movement, Cary Nelson says
    • zionist support a double standard in favor of jews and israel. in the end though i find their demanding this standard ends up being extremely anti semitic because at its core it robs jews of the ability to ever be resposnsible for their actions at least their negative ones.

    • thats a straight up lie and you know it hophmi. the BDS movement condems terrorism. you on the other hand condone war crimes. so once again your own bigotry leads to lie. i've seen the BDS movement condemn terrorism. i've yet to see you condemn any Israeli violence let alone one of your thugcracies long list of war crimes.

    • do you ever get tired of repeating the same lies. and not all violence is terrorism. i'm really tired of the REAL reactionaries people like labeling everything terrorism.

      you want people tocondemn palestinian terrorism( though i don't get we do" fine right after you condemn the settlements as the war crimes they are and Israel's illegal annexation of palestinians territory including jerusalem. than we can talk. until than your just another shill for thugs.

  • Leading rabbi tells Arab ambassador not to 'shlep' Kerry's view of Palestine into discussion of religion and terrorism
    • @ hophmi

      the only reason jews don't have the same list as christians and muslims is lack of opertunity. there behavior in palestine shows had they the opertunities their list might very well be the longest. your argument is just another very bad attempt to whitewash judiasmism condoning of violence.

      also side note why doesn't every post have a reply button under it. some post I don't have an option to reply to.

  • Caroline Glick says there were no Palestinian refugees
  • Roger Cohen recites Livni talking points in 'NYT' column to blame Palestinians for peace process failure
    • well of course its the palestinians fault. Israelis responsible for anything, especially their own actions? never

  • 'We want Christmas without occupation': Israel attacks Bethlehem protesters dressed as Santa with tear gas
    • today's jews have no claim to land. Israel was founded on naked conquest plain and simple. criminal behavior never gives legal right to property. the terriotry of palestine is still legally entirely owned by the state of palestine. the only reason Israel exist today is cause truman felt jewish votes and money were more important than arab ones.

  • Hillary Clinton's decision to support Iraq war was driven by Israel concern, Chris Matthews says
    • what common goals? its in the US interests to see a free palestine state and have closer relations to the muslim world. Israel just wants to kill arabs. we have no common goals no common interests. Israel is an enemy of america. it kills our citizens without remorse, provocation, or consequence. it sell our secerets to our enemies. its our third largest counterinteligence threat. the Us only interest is to see Israel broken and a free secular palestine with equal rights for its citizens emerge in palestine rather than the militant neo colonial theocracy state of Israel.

  • Shmuley Boteach taunts Palestinian solidarity demonstrators in NY
    • @ at shingo. i fail to see to see why your addressing that question to me. I don't understand anything of how war-criminals and their supporters think. i wouldn't care to speculate on his motives only that i doubt their pure of heart given his support of war crimes.

    • @at shingo
      no it wasn't. while there was a terrorist element( and any one who thinks taring and feather incidents don't constitute terrorism don't really get what terrorism is) most of the work was done out side of terrorist element so saying it was founded by terrorists in my opinion is false. Israel terrorist and there supports were a major percentage of their population and than went ahead and elected those terrorists to office. Israel is the only state founded by terrorist.

    • Israel the only country founded by terrorists

    • you can't be pro human rights and pro israel. you cannot support a group that fundementally abuses human rights and claim to be a human rights supporter

  • NY Times says a Palestinian majority would 'endanger Israel's democratic ideals'
    • exactly. when a group of people are systemically denied meaningful representation that is not a democratic ideal.

  • Why Israel's Jewish nationality bill is a big deal
    • british palestine was never intended to become a jewish state. it was intended to become the state of palestine. the balfour decleration was never part of international law. and jews didn't have the right to self determination. religious groups have never had that group least of all in a teritory they didn't reside and comprised a small minority in. as usual for a zionist jew your either lying or grossly ignorant of the topic your talking on.

  • From Hillel to Sabeel: The path to unlearning Zionism
    • anti zionists are all for dialogue. what you mean by dialogue is repeating zionist lies so you don't have to be held accountable for your actions.

  • AIPAC seeks to blow up negotiations between Iran and US
    • um the expansion of a blue water navy combined with threatening there neighbors is decidedly less than peaceful.

  • ICC believes Israel may have committed war crimes in flotilla attack, but not of 'sufficient gravity' to justify formal investigation
    • first as I've stated before. most of the rocket attacks against Israeli civilians are against those who are not protected under international law so technically not a war crime, though still morally reprehinsible. you can wonder all you want and think what ever your hateful bigotry leads to believe but as i said a warcrime is a warcrime and all should be prosecuted.

      you may try and hide your support of your terrosrist little country but they deserve to be prosecuted. no one should live in fear of war crimes. or violence in general

      as for the comparison of the gazan rockets and fireworks i felt was unfair fireworks kill more people.

    • a war crimis is a war crime and should be prosecuted always

  • The hidden documents that reveal the true borders of Israel and Palestine (Updated)
    • yes it is unreasonable for the m to view it as an invasion. invasion require actually entering said territory.

  • Does SJP have the right to free speech?
    • and how much you want to bet that the vast majority of that so called anti semitism is actually people being critical of Israel's illegal and decidely terroristic behavior. there is real anti semitism in this world and zionist help it along by obscuring it with their crybabiness on Israel

  • Loyola SJP investigation reflects double standard towards Palestinian voices on campus
    • I'm sorry but when you support crimes you don't get a right to be comfortable. you get to admonished for it. don't like being called out for supporting criminal behavior don't support criminal behavior. no lies no race baiting. you just don't like it when zionists are called out for their support of crimes.

  • Israeli army kills 14-year old Palestinian with U.S. citizenship
    • she had plenty it was plastered all over yahoo. and not everytime a palestinian kills an Israeli is terrorism. terrorism is not about killing that is an Israel and and american lie. it about fear. a palestinian losing over the crimes you and yours commit against them on a daily basis and killing some is sad, morally bankrupt, and wrong but terrorism it is not. terrorism rerquires the use of fear to coerce. you know like Israel's war crimes. but than again you jews in your stolen houses on stolen propertry are as pure as angels right? before you show your own biased bigfptry you and yours need to start taking someresposibility for your own actions. they have consequences. eventual you all will have to grow up.

  • Israeli president's diagnosis -- 'Israel is a sick society' -- doesn't go viral in the U.S.
    • an ad hominem attack is one that trys to use personal facts about you to refute an argument. to wit very few people have done that.

    • what percentage of Israel supports the terrorist settlers in the west bank? 70 80%?

  • Under cover of night, nine Jewish families take over two buildings in Silwan
  • Ethnic Cleansing by All Means: The real Israeli ‘peace’ policy
    • back any living creature into a corner and threaten it and they will lash out. a rabbit will attack a wolf if cornered. want the attacks to stop quit attacking them and remove your thieves from their territory.

    • really your going to blame wars that Israel started on the palestinians?

  • Wiesel lauds settlers for 'strengthening the Jewish presence in Jerusalem' -- and expelling Palestinians
    • well if i remember my history correctly jews were in jerusalem during Saladin's reign. and he allowed christian pilgrims access to their holy sites. so no mister the holocaust gives jews the right to genecide no is not the first time all people of abrahim faiths could worship in jerusalem

Showing comments 1909 - 1901
Page: