Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 740 (since 2010-06-24 23:41:16)


Showing comments 740 - 701

  • Why I'm keeping my child home from school in Israel on Holocaust Day
    • than you don't know how to see fear. anyone who looks and knows what to look for can see that fear is the primary motivating emotion for israelis as a whole.

  • Huffpo writer expresses bigotry against Palestinians by equating battle for equal rights and anti-Semitism
    • I took issue with the the fact Sabin thinks its appropriate for a 20 something jewish college kid to use the holocaust as a claim they have been oppressed as troubling. people who didn't live through it shouldn't be allowed to act as if they did. it mocks the experiences of the people who actually did.

  • Front-page play for Israel battle shows that Israel has lost the Democratic Party base
  • Resolution 242 does not mean what you may think it means
    • @ talknic

      funny on the 1948 illegal borders your no different than the most murderous zionist terrorist. the 48 borders have no legal validity despite your sense of entitlement to them. Israel was not a secession from palestine as you oh so dubiously want it to be. it was a violent foreign conquest. just because the US and countless other states violated international law to recognize Israel doesn't magically make Israel's terrorist war of conquest in 48 legal. in fact the United States recognizition is unconsititional. the montevideo convention preculdes the regonition of gains through force and coercion. all of Israel was gained that way. Despite your pretense to belief in the law you have the same sense of zionist entitlement belief in conquest makes right. either go all the way in defending the law or just quit pretending you care about it at all. this half way stuff just makes you look like an intellectual coward.

  • Anti-Semitism is considered a serious moral failing. But no one calls out anti-Palestinian bigotry
    • The biggest problem with the anti semitism claims is if you are accused of it you are automatically deemed guilty no defense is allowed thats it doesn't matter how baseless it is your forever tainted. your anti palestinian no body really cares.

  • Saying Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state is not anti-Semitic
    • are you trying to claim jews can only exist as war criminals? how antisemitic of you

    • well yeah most people tend to try and fight off invading armies. funny how that one works out.

  • Advice to British leftwingers on kicking racism out of their anti-Israel rhetoric
    • of course you like it. in the end he is another zionist jew trying to suppress criticism of Israel. only 3 is a valid concern. for the second colionalist endevors and self determination are mutual exclusive. as for the first whine about all you want there are rather strong signifigant parrals between certain nazi actions and Israeli policies. while there is no comparison between treatment of jews by nazis and Israeli's treatments of the palestinians. how ever some rather strong comparisons between nazi policies in poland in regards to the polish and Israeli treatment of palestinians do exist. and saying they shouldn't be mention is trying to suppress criticism. should these claims be handled with the upmost care yes but to wholesale they shouldn't be made is wrong

  • Sy Hersh's 'forbidden statement': Sanders's liberation from NY Jewish money could change US foreign policy
    • many because people like you force feed them lies. if one side is always portrayed as innocent and one as always evil who do think people are going to side with? you keep repeating that like there has been some sort of nuetral info stream and they just choose to support israel. there has been a distorted information given to ensure that. you ignore that because your dishonest.

  • Woman and child killed in Iraq as US adopts Israeli 'knocker' bombs and leaflet drops
    • Call me stupid or nuts but i'd rather have my house not get blowed up. i know crazy thought

    • Thats a load of crap. you want to minimize civilian casualaties its real easy. DON"T SHOOT AT THEM

    • its illegal when israel does it. its illegal when the us does it. no matter how you want to slice it you can't fire ordinace at civilians legally

  • BDS has arrived
    • Am i the only person who caught the fact that the guy is fundementaly claiming that being jewish and being for human rights are mutual exclusive?

  • The Jewish-Israeli navel-gazers
    • perhaps if you want to be taken seriously you shouldn't use made up names for places. its the west bank. judea and samaria are names given to it by terrorists

  • Academics both 'pleased and concerned' with Salaita settlement with University of Illinois
    • says the person belonging to a coddled minority that cries like babies if anyone says anything they don't like. says the person who demands special privileges based on his faith. your a real piece of work. thankfully in the next you will get that which you have earned.

  • Why do Palestinians burn Jewish holy sites?: The fraught history of Joseph’s Tomb
    • there is no such thing as a jewish nationality. it was a fraudlent creation in the late 1800's as a means to aquire land. to be jewish is to be a part of the religion. even israel which pushes the lie of a jewish nation relies on religion to determine who is a jew.

  • Israel gets to use violence. Palestinians don't. That's the rule
  • Israeli society is crumbling under the weight of occupation
  • East Jerusalem is closed for Palestinians, but settlers march unimpeded
  • Which nation spends more on its military: Iran or Israel?
    • @daBakr
      seriously? i mean i'm used to right wingers being delusional. you flat out claimed Iranian and hizbullah support was to blame in the refugees. perhaps instead of accusing me of not reading you could not lie about what you said. i won't hold my breath. so you accuse me of not reading and than dishonestly try and claim my point for your self. no you don't get to pretend you didn't claim Iran and hizbullah were supporting the side responsbile for the refugees ISIS and Assad.

    • Obama want to act. it was your fellow aholes the republicans in congress that refused to give him the authroization to act. please don't lie

    • @dabakr

      the palestinians have come to the table with reasonable compromises. its your precious war criminals that are incapable of compromise reasonable or other wise. so long Israel demands humilation and the giving up basic human rights the conflict will continue

    • um Iran and Hezzbollah are fighting against ISIS. nice job there way to get your facts straight

  • How Israel legitimizes vigilante terror
    • bendict the moment the picked up weapons and opened fire they lost their protections and became combatants. and not all of that 78 were docters or nurses.

      benedict its standard practice to leave docs unarmed.

    • so were supposed to believe you a pathological liar and terror supporter rather than people whose honesty has never been called into question?

  • Long Island synagogue marks High Holidays with thanks to Israeli soldiers in Gaza war
  • Dreamspace in Jerusalem
    • god how paternalistic. so she is immature because she rejects militerism and hate in favor of well more mature ideas. i'd say you and yours are the ones with immature ideas.

  • Israeli gov't used my image for propaganda purposes without my consent
  • 'NYT' misrepresents Iran's prediction about 'Zionist regime' to mean 'Israel'
    • that tired old lie? no jordan is not the palestinian state. only serverely uneducated people make that claim. well those and supporters of western imperialism. jordan is the state for jordinians. palestine is the state for palestinians which zionists jews stole through warfare and terrorism.

  • Scenes from a Sanders presidency
    • thank you for proving my point. you and the other people pushing him as pure evil on this are no different the zionists. you think this is the only thing that matters. guess what i'm an american i think israel shouldn't exist at all and i'm going to vote for bernie sanders. i loath his stance on Israel but i'm sorry but to through away the only candidate who actual looks like he wants to address the real problems america has domestically i'll bite the bullet. because i'm not willing to starve to death for the low chance someone else might have of stopping genocidal aholes.

    • i find this problematic. this is just the reverse of the coin of zionists jews rants against the europe of the 30's and 40's. this single issueism. yes there are reasons to be displeased with bernie sanders on foriegn policy but the notion that american should reject him for the crimes he wishes to commit against the palestinians while ignoring the good he could do for the american people. this strikes me as similiar to the zionist jews who feel european peoples should have commited national suicide to save the jews.

  • The Iran deal: a triumph of irrationality
    • we need more men like him he was legend. he was also a decent person. i'm glad to say i met him.

  • How long will I have to convince liberals that Palestinians matter?
    • the left has never really been anti cop. I'm sorry but expecting the cops to do there jobs properly and not abuse people is not anti cop. its anti a-hole abuser. if you'll not back during the 60's the cops abused a crap ton of people than too

  • Why the Charleston massacre isn't terrorism, and Palestinian resistance always will be
    • some times violence is the answer. it should be avoided whenever possible and always be the last resort. but when an oppressor doesn't listen and kills those who peacefully speak out i would say it is time for the sword to leave its sheath. being peaceful is a laudable thing but pacifism for the sake of pacifism is just stupid.

  • BDS will keep Israeli tanks from moving and F15 from flying, Oren says
    • no being responsible or acountable for anything is against zionism. its always somebody elses fault jews are perfect superman who should rule over everyone.

    • its easy to win with a rigged deck. israel would lose any fair fight mainly because it doesn't know how to win with out in overall advantage. mainly because its always had that advantage. shoddly trained and heavily reliant on superier tech. look at the flight logs of Israel pilots. next to nothing compared to actual top notch countries. its all about patting them selves on the back for killing people with no effective means of fighting back.

  • Munayyer and Beinart's historic debate on the solution to the conflict
    • i really wish you wouldn't use the term self determination to refer to israel. its creation and existence have nothing to do with the concept of a right to self determination which is the right of the people of a territory to decide there own political status. Israel was created through naked conquest by people from outside the territory.. there is not a single solitary inch that was gained through naked conquest. to claim or imply other wise is misrepresenting what happened and only rewards criminals for there crimes.

      again Israel creation is literally the exact opposite of self determination.

  • Dutch government issues travel warning about 'violent Jewish colonists'
  • 'This land is ours. All of it is ours': Meet the Netanyahu cabinet members focused on fighting BDS & annexing the West Bank
    • neggy i don't need to zionist attacks on arabs (and the british i might add) were common before the war of zionist conquest started. that benny morris said arabs started is meaningless. the guy was a zionist. he was going to make the jewish terrorists look as good as possible. and haganah started attacking arab communities in 46. and i say the zionists started because had they be willing to live in peace instead of demanding territory they had no right to and planning on waging a war to do it the conflict would never happen. your a typical zionist deviod of any sense of responsibility or accountability for your sides actions.

    • @neggy no it was the zionists who started the war.

      your just defending thugs who use war to steal.

      the palestinians should get all of their country back and Israel should go bye bye like the terrorist state it is.

  • Israel will imprison soldier, 19, for publicly criticizing the occupation
  • International calls rise for FIFA to suspend Israel
  • An open letter to Pamela Geller
    • no thats what she is claiming to defend her bigotry. she however makes it a point to attack muslims for being muslims. she was behind much of the lies and hate behind the attacks against park 51. she is a borderline sociopath who feeds on hate.

  • Two videos to challenge my liberal Zionist friends
    • @dabakr

      there is no bias its a simple fact i understand why it scares you. of course it not your "truth" but at the end of the day what you support is criminal that you lack the decency to stand up to it is not my problem. and truth isn't a funny concept. the truth is simply the facts something zionist have yet to come to terms with.

      I never said the difference was large but there is a difference and it does make a difference in how we approach them. you need the palestinians to mindless creatures of hate so you can defend your beliefs but the reality is there the innocent victims of your hate.

    • there is a difference though which you fail to understand. the palestinians hate is a product of what others did to him. the Israelis is a product of what he is done to others. he learned to hate so he could harm innocents.

    • a single ember can burn an entire forest. and whitewashing somethat happened as oppossed to a more factual telling is suppressing it.

  • Night of horror at Ben Gurion airport for two French music students
    • its naive to expect to be treated with basic human decency? maybe in in israel but in the civilized world it is not.

  • 'Celebration of ethnic cleansing is intolerable': Baltimore JVP crashes 'Israeli Independence Day' party
    • well yeah thats usualy what happens when invade a country they defend themselves. I'm sorry but Israel's victims are not responsible for Israel's crimes Israel and its supporters are.

  • Accusations of anti-Semitism roil Stanford campus as student coalition denies discrimination charges
    • but as you so conviently ignore it is appropriate to ask questions based on peoples membership in groups that oppose what the group is seeking. if jewish orgs wouldn't try and supress ideas they didn't like these questions would be needed. the fact remains given jews student groups behavior the ability to unbiased on anything regarding israel is suspect

  • Terrorism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: An argument
    • palestine 48 tibet 51. also you could argue the palestinians were under occupation under british rule considering how the UK suppressed the palestinians and favored zionist interests against the palestinians.

  • Understanding the Jewish National Home
    • @hophmi 2 things your inflating your numbers again and even if we accept them which i don't given your track record that still a far cry short of the hundreds of thousands you claimed. so considering your rampant dishonesty don't tell others top stop it. you got caught lying is it really that important to you to keep digging a deeper hole.

    • still sticking to your misrepresentation of history i see. anything to protect zionist crimes and strip palestinians of their humanity. again you claimed it happened in association with the holocaust it didn't plain and simple hop you lied about history yet again

    • oh quit being cranky that you called out on your disorting of history. and again so the palestinians should have been willing to accept jewish dominion over them simply because of bad things happening to jews your obtuse and showing the naked bigotry of zionism. the palestinians aren't required to accept people into their country who are hostile to them. holocaust or no.

    • um your chronology is off the knowledge of the nazi deathcamps didn't happen until late in 41 and the genoicide your refering to as the holocaust didn't start until than either. so your complaining about them not being able to see the future.

    • really if they wanted to live in peace why did they start so many wars? its the zionists who were never willing to live in peace. and jews to allied with the nazis. both for the exact same reason they were at war with the british. this is common through out history. the french scots guard for example.

    • evidence of a jewish state in palestine only goes back to around 1000bc where do you get your extra millenium from?

    • @ hophmi

      no hophmi they don't. words do not take precedent over actions. their actions show them to be racists. the only bias here is yours trying to whitewash zionism's criminal history.

    • @ hophmi
      Or simply, the Carlsbad resolution suggests that Zionists have always vied for peace, and it is their Arab neighbors who have been unwilling to make peace with them. - See more at:

      of course your going to argue pretty words actually mean they wanted to live in peace. sorry hop but wanting to go to a foriegn land with the intent to seek dominion over it is not a desire for peace. the zionist than and now only care about peace so long as it serves their wants.

  • Just like the Nazis, Iran 'plans to exterminate six million Jews' -- Netanyahu
    • @debakr

      what ships to strike in the mediterranean. once you remove the litoral subs from irans inventory they only have 1 more sub than Israel and while they do have more frigates which in theory could be used to project a blue water presence to use them in the med would be suicide. NATO could easily intercept with 1-3 carriers plus destroyers from the countries in the area. yeah the 9 frigates Iran could send would do squat. Iran has a brown water navy just like Israel differences they aren't trying to add to there blue water abilities like Israel is.

    • so basiclly true real self determination rather than the fake zionist one

  • Video: Max Blumenthal on the ways Zionism exploits anti-Semitism
    • @hophmi
      "Oh no? How many times has Ward Connerly or John McWhorter spoken to a mainstream African-American organization, or a campus Black Students Union, in the past decade? -"
      um last time i checked charles barkley hasn't been expelled from the black community and he disagree with with several mainstream black views. and it should be noted that both people you mentioned are asscioted with libertarian think tanks. so you know being linked to groups actively defend the right to discriminate might be the issue not their anti affirmitive action stances.

      "Another vote for an extreme antisemite. Seems we have a lot of Atzmon fans here at Mondoweiss"
      your only proving my point. he is against zionism so therefore he must hate jews. your showing my entire argument that as a zionist jew you will not even entertain the notion that a jew can be anti-zionist. for some one who whines about how nobody wants to have a real dialouge you sure refusing to have a dialougue

    • that is disingenious. black people aren't expelled from the black community for being anti affrimitive action. jews however are expelled from the community at large if they aren't zionist. most jews are zionists do to the implicent threat if they have a differing opinion. your own hatred of gilad atzmon is case in point.

  • Philosophy prof who likened Palestinians to 'rabid pit bull' ignites protest on CT campus
    • @ yonah

      i'm not denying it yonah. but unlike you i'm willing to take the time to understand. as i stated one there was zero overt call for harm and was clearly coming from a place of anger. ie the guy in anger and grief making a statement beyond what he would state normally is the one your attack the guy who literally called for the commiting of a war crime dispassionately coming from a place normality is the guy your defending. honesty is the best policy. you should try it. instead of lying about Saliata debacle to defend a criminal.

    • bullshit. your boy Passin committed a crime by inciting for the commition of a war crime genocide. Salaita did know such thing. and at no point actually called for harming Israelis and jews. the two aren't comparable. one( saliata) was someone who was expressing his anger at his people being illegally harmed and never adovocating harm to anyone. which you condemned. the other (passin) called for the genocide of another people with zero provocation and was merely expressing his own blind hate and bigotry.

    • @jeffb
      thats a load of crap. there is not one single instances of salaita calling for genocide like pessin did. you lying jeff plan and simple. salaita was inciting or trafficking toward genocide. typical of you though to attack someone who is against warcrimes and defending someone who is

    • so in your mind Salaita calling Israel warcrimes and terrorism and the people like you who defend them is the same thing as this jewish professor calling for genocide against the palestinians? my bad you think speaking out against Israel's crimes is bad but calling for genocide of your victims is ok in your book

      Salaita wasn't trafficking in hate. most of the jewish orgs you support however do. what Salaitawas trafficking is accountability some you yourself as a zionist wouldn't understand.

    • what a suprise your condoning calling for genocide. maybe this why every decent hates zionists their just a bunch a criminals.

    • advocating the commiting of crimes is an illegal act one someone can be fired for. i'm sorry but anyone who calls for genocide like he did needs to be fired post haste

  • Emails show Missouri museum canceled 'Ferguson to Palestine' event under pressure from Jewish group
    • lol since when has anything a zionist group ever been principled. supporting war crimes terrorism and the supression of these facts from getting out is not principled

  • Sheldon Adelson is not the problem
    • there is what people will accept and than there is what the laws actually says. the 67 lines are Israel's legal borders. talknic believes Israel's conquering inside the partian lines is legal i don't. but for anyone with even a passing understanding of international law will tell you nothing out side those borders is legally Israel's under international law.

  • Selective voting in the land of Greater Israel
    • while i agree a jewish sense of entitlement in zionism is a major roadblock i think it can happen. not soon it would take decades of work and the Israelis would more than likely choose to kill everybody than cede dominion i believe there is a small but real chance that it could be achieved.

    • its my firm belief that the only way long term peace will happen is one palestinian state on all of historic palestine for everyone who wants to be an equal citizen of the territory.

  • We may not have Netanyahu to kick around anymore
    • they had to be pressured into all of those moves. none of them were done because of a sincere desire for peace. Israel won't make real concessions because the Israeli electorate is to divorced from reality to demand them. again hop saying your going to steal less is not a concession. something like offering economic aid would be a real concession and show the palestinians that finally after 70 years they have a partner in peace and that their willing to give up there conquering ways

  • 'NYT' reports 'surge of hostile sentiment against Jews' nationwide -- on what basis?
    • maybe people wouldn't ask for evidence if it weren't for the mulitude of times jews have been caught fabricating or misrepresenting things as anti semitism. and at the same time those groups don't have a history of labeling anything critical toward them as automatically bigoted.

    • because despite what you and yours claim its not all that pervasive. blind hate is very rare. anti semitism is only pervasive if you include legit criticism of Israel in it which i'm willing to bet most recorded incidients are. zionist college groups have trained colligiante jews to be hypersensitive to criticism of Israel and treat as a personal attack on them and hence they label it anti semitic when its not.

  • Why Iran is not and has never been Israel’s #1 enemy
    • look if a muslim country was going to give nukes to terrorists pakistan would have done already. a nuclear Iran isn't a threat to Israel it just ceases to be a country Israel can threaten which in their eyes is the same thing.

  • Rightwing rabbi seeks to pit Power against Rice on Iran ahead of AIPAC speeches
    • @dabakr hate to break it to you but as voters a shift of jews to the republican party would be meaningless in the demographic changes. the republican party is dead as a national party and dying in most parts of the US. the republicans ability to gerrymander themselves into office is going to end and than you'l start seeing republicans losing in the house in droves. remember based on total vote counts the democratic representatives and senators got millions more votes

  • Netanyahu's speech and the American Jewish condition
    • no its a personal attack because your to small minded to allow any jew to think for themselves. you demand absolute alligience to a militeristic and violent ideology. phill doesn't hate him self or jews that obvious to any honest human being but unlike you he doesn't think that promoting hate and violence is the way forward.

  • Hillel's segregated lunch counter
    • your comparing to very different things and pretending their the same. Zionists are actively opposed to peace. it would be like inviting david duke to speak at the NAACP. jews who are for BDS aren't opposed to jewishness or even zionism they just don't think Israel should be commiting war crimes. and SJP is not ignorant on Israel that they don't agree with your dishonest and distorted view doesn't mean their ignorant it means they're informed. so once again you demand SJP to invite people inimical to there interests as the same same as your pressure terrorist supporting hillel for once not banning any and all dissent. your a hack

  • Right-wing bomb thrower David Horowitz behind anti-SJP posters
    • seriously he wanted dishonestly labeled a hate group yes he does want it it shut down. and i seriously doubt that number. I'm willing to bet most of those so called antisemitic incidents are just anti Israeli incidents based on Israel's warcrimes. they've been trained by professional haters like your self to view anything critic of Israel as antisemitic. every serious study I've seen shows the number given by pro zionists groups on anti semitism is inflated

  • Israel gives out 'security Oscars' at the UN to Iran, Hezbollah, Saudi Arabia and PA
    • So this is more substantional than actualy trying to fix issues? self absorbed finger pointing is substansive in your mind? how but this fix your own shit first.

    • i find it Israeli delusions humerous saying the palestinians are rewriting history when the entire Israeli mythology and idea is based on historical revision. Israel rewrites history to suit its needs constantly

  • Netanyahu speech is 'destructive' of 'bipartisan, immutable relationship' between US and Israel, Rice says
    • well it seems your understanding of geopolitics is on par with your understanding of history, poor and substandard. normalizing relations with Iran will undercut the radicals because they won't have the legiatmate rallying case of our aggression against them. it would give the majority of moderate Iranians the lift they need. of course that will still be hard with Israel's calls for Iran's demise. its hard for good people to succeed in peaceful goals when their being threatened by sociopaths.

      also it should be noted that most Iranians have a relatively positive view of the US. in fact i'm sure if you you looked at even though we blindly support Israel's war crimes and attack Iran the Iranian people probably view americans more favorabaly than Israelis do.

  • Congress flooded with letters urging members to #SkipTheSpeech of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu
    • polls say what they don't say why? and the why is they have been fed inaccurate biased information to engender a positive viewpoint. with out the pro israel propaganda those numbers would crash

  • Racism is in the air: Video showing racist exchange between Israelis and a flight attendant goes viral
    • you'd have a point if this was an isolated incident but its just one more in a larger pattern. that such displays are so easy to find and pop up so often shows that yes this does represent most (jewish)Israelis

  • Netanyahu flips off Harry Truman
  • Jewish groups that blindly support Israel make US and European Jews potential victims of violence -- Avnery
    • @ kathleen not really most of them are in the states and so far protected from the consequences of their actions. but you misunderstand me if you think i'm excusing violence. My ethics are influenced by the wiccan rede " an it harm none, do as ye will" but I'm also a firm believer if you want to stop something from happening you have to understand why its happening something i feel zionists don't want to because it will reflect on their actions.

    • and people like you are the reason bigotry will never die. No one is saying that people should die for what others do. but the simple fact remains if your going out of your way to cause harm to a group expect backlash against your group. acknowledging the consequences of zionist actions doesn't mean the victims deserved to die. you might support collective punishment hop we don't.

  • Hate in the aftermath of Chapel Hill
    • @yonah. it is a war crime. that is an irrefutatable fact. to pretend other wise is insanity. their is no honest way to look at the facts and come to any other conclusion. that you like the terrorist enterprise of Israel doesn't changes the facts which is it was created on terrorism and war crimes and the terrorism and war crimes continue today with a vast majority supporting them.

      and no where not putting a bullseye on your back your doing that by supporting terrorism and war crimes.

    • its always nice the rare times people show what being a person of faith truly is about instead of the self serving bs most people do.

  • Boteach and Israeli ambassador say everything from BDS to Abbas places Jews under threat
  • Closed-door debate on divestment by U of Toledo student gov't to include officials from Jewish Federation
    • @doublestandard

      false the palestinians claimed political sovreignty over it. in fact the palestinian mandate specificly recognized their sovriegnty over the territory. by founding their state zionist illegally declared a war of conquest. zionist didn't represent an organized polity representing the people of palestinian they represented terrorists who wanted to conquror

  • Stanford petition misrepresents resolution to divest from occupation
    • you seem confused to what is in the fourth geneva conventions this should help. a protected persons are just that protected no matter who is fighting on there land. so no despite your claim the palestinians aren't protected they are. what is it with you zionists and your defense of war crimes?

    • @jeffB no its not arguable its a fact. the gazan didn't initiate the Israeli gazan war Israel once againinitiated a war against the palestinians. your analogy is crap. a accurate analogy would be canda attacking alaska so the Us retaliates from washington state. the only people who view gaza and the west bank as seperate political entities is Israel and those that support its war criminal ways. gaza and the west bank or all palestinian an attack on one is an attack on the other. their 2 parts of the same political entity. and its funny how you blaim Israel's victims in the 6 day war as starting it but here you label what in your mind is a simliar act as starting here because you don't like it. your just a hypocrite jeff.

      @ hophmi. no its not a good one. the only reason you feel that way is beecause it fits with your own biases and bigotry. but that doesn't mean its a good one.

  • Israel: Schabas resignation cannot ‘whitewash’ bias in UN war crimes inquiry
    • @jeffb
      I'm sorry but after your fiasco of trying to claim jews weren't allowed in palestine for 2000 years when the facts disagree with you I'm not going to make the attempt so save it trying to accuse me of lying. facts don't matter to you propganda. you may not find rude people convincing but I don't find people who lie very convincing.

    • do you ever get tired about lying about history? your attempts to show how history exonerates the zionists for their crimes only showscases your own bigotry and biases.

    • not one's expecting an exact percentage match but when the side with precision weaponery is killing civilians at a percentage at best 3 or 4 times and at worst 10 times that of the side with imprecise weaponery the accusation is based in fact and is perfectly moral. you just don't like it that your terrorists and and war criminals are being called out on it. if the numbers were reversed i doubt you'd blink an eye about the "amoral" disporportionality. their is noting just about Israel's wars of conquest and retribution.

    • really a zionist bitch about someone else's ego. I've never met a zionist without an ego and a sense of entitlement

  • Chair of Democratic National Committee opposes Jewish intermarriage and MSNBC showing Gaza carnage
    • the ideas are implicent in each other hophmi. you can pretend its an innocent mind set but its not. again whether or not your thinking in such terms its the idea that non jews are beneath jews and not fit to be among them. its essentially stating that you feel your better than everyone else because of your jewishness.

    • so your ok with with supporting a viewpoint that is inherently rooted in a bigoted mindset? by saying you want intermarriage rates of jews to go down your saying it is wrong for jews not to marry jews. whether or not your thinking of it in those terms is irrelevant the message is clear.

    • yes because the number shouldn't matter at all.the only that matters if your a decent person in my opinion is whether or not people are marry the ones they love.

  • Netanyahu speech could allow Obama to 'take on the Jewish lobby' as he took on Cuba lobby -- Indyk
    • exactly Iran would never use nukes offensively and i doubt they would ever use them defensively. there are only 2 countries in my opinion that bring sufficient crazy to the table to use nukes offensively. north korea and Israel.

    • thats a load of crap. there is a reason the state department practically revolted when truman recognized Israel. the Us interest would be have a palestinian state. Israel hurts US interests. Israel is actively inimical to US interests. You will never understand it because your incaopable of putting the US interests ahead of Israel's. you think its a good thing because it benefits your terrorist state. your a typical zionist. crying about people saying bad things about your war criminals. whats good about Israel ? I can't thing of one damn thing. because everything they do is su[pported by the bad things. a good thing done through evil is evil hop. why can't you get threw your thick skull.

  • Is inter-faith work between Jews and Muslims possible?
    • Israel isn't their sovreign. their favoring the settlers because their trying to ethnically cleanse it. are you just not paying attention?

    • what calling out your flat out lies? muslims haven't ethnically cleansed jews from large parts of the planet. jews i'm sure would be welcome so long they push for things hostile to the interests of those countries. jews how ever when given the chance tried to ethnically cleanse the territory they had of muslims. they failed but lets not pretend they didn't try.

    • please explain how is Israel a vassal to the US? you've said this delusion more than once but how do you get to it? because Israel thanks to its lobbyists in the US control US foriegn policy to a degree in the middle east. last time i checked vassals do what their told and Israel continues to act like a sociopath. your continuing to lie and make things up to push your victim narrative.

  • 'NYT' perpetuates myth Israel was 'fighting for its very survival' during 1967 war
    • FYI your mixing singular and plural in your latin i'm fairly certain it either be casus bella in the singular and cassi belli for the plural. funny how you should mention casus bella for reasons because you like whining about the palestinians histility but by your own admition live in a settlement that provides a legit casus bella to the palestinians.

  • Salaita sues donors for 'injecting' themselves into U of Illinois decision, threatening to withhold gifts unless he was fired
    • so because you like the fact that he was prejudicially denied employment you think its ok to well basic slander him and his field. i bet if a jewish person was treated this was you'd beg to differ. your name is apt once again supporting the double standard in zionism's and zionists favor

  • Phila Inquirer publishes a lie: 'Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the same'
    • well except for the fact your flat out lying about if jews could immigrate. i noticed you like to skip over large parts of history, like the sassianid empire. secondly the concept of citizenship really didn't exist at all so trying to use that as an argument is just try to play games of anchronism. you. and the arabs only starting attacking jews in the late 1800's because of zionists like your self saying they intended to take over and dominate everyone else. you can't declare hositility against others and expect them to treat as if your peaceful. the only reason you got 5 years is your a dishonest hack you manipulated history. jews were free to move to palestine for most of 2000 years and chose not to. no matter how much you lie nothing can change that fact

    • maybe thats because the zionists like your self refuse to allow dissent? Israel is not a complicated society. militeristic cultures never are. is simplistic. what ever "good" they may do is irrelevant. when it requires evil to be done.

  • 'NYT' and Matthews warn that Netanyahu speech to Congress could lead US to war
  • 80+ Cartoonists And Comics Workers Tell Comics Industry: 'No Business As Usual With Israel'
  • US calls ICC decision to investigate Gaza 'tragic irony'
  • Obama cites donor pressure re Iran, but 'NYT' won't tell you what he means
    • other lobbing groups don't demand the US sacrifice its own interests for a foreign power responsible for the most unprovoked deaths of americans in the region.

    • well to a democrat actually yes. i can't think of a group that would promote a hardline stance. unless you seriously believe hardline christian conservatives don't tons of money to the democrats

  • Netanyahu crashes Paris unity march, French gov't fumes
    • first of neither Israel nor the US is a fuedal state so niether can be leige or vassal. and how is Israel a vassal of the US. it get to force the US to act against its own interests for Israel's benefit. that doesn't sound like a vassal to me. destroying Israel is the best thing that could happen for everyone. i fail to see how continuing to show just how violant jewish people have shown they can be is in their interest. maybe if you zionist every tried peace you'd have a point but they don't and you don't

    • god your bigoted a******** so because he didn't want to risk politics intervening which it did because netanyahoo decided to exploit the tragedy for politcal means like a sick bastard its means the french are mean. i didn't see anything about france wanting no israeli presence. they just didn't want your ahole of a prime minister there.

  • A tale of two tests
    • no hop the only person failing a morality test is you and and all the other thugs like you who feel because you want you have the right to use violence. Israel is not a liberal democracy defending it citizens. its a fascist state invading and conquering. the only terrorists i see are you and yours.

  • Jo Roberts on Jewish trauma, the Nakba, and the olive tree
    • @ jeffb
      I'm confusing nothing. i don't really expect you to know anything of the history involved given your zionist education and their attempts to rewrite history. but it was the us pro Israel stance in recognizing Israel and helping arm the nascent state to continue its conquest. how ever much you like to repeat the tired lie of innate arab anti-semitism it remains a lie. while the us was nowhere near as subserviant to Israel than as it is now it was decided pro-Israel from the first. mainly so truman could prop up his presidency.

    • your assuming everything else would remain the same. it wouldn't. the fundmentalist turn in islam states might be traced to the cold war. lets not forget the arab world was more secular in the 40's and 50's. and rather pro us for the obvious reasons with the support of self determination. its in all likely hood that there would be increased trade and without the us abbadoning them during the cold war a very different turn of event could have happened. of course their probably a varity of factors i'm missing that's the problem with these kind of alternate history guesses. their just to many variables but i think your overstating the likelyhood of anti jewish sentiments.

  • Anti-Semitism at Fordham?
    • if your asserations were so proven you would have provided credible proff which you want because you have none.

      rome's rule lasted several hundred years though 63 was the start of the hasmodean dynasty in a jewish puppet state. but jews were only expelled after the bar khova(sp?) revolt in the mid 200's so the roman period of time frame your referring was around a hundred years.

      yes it is a fact. that your only believe zionist lies doesn't change historical fact jeff. that your ignorant doesn't mean i am making things up. there was no banning of jews from returning for 2000 years. that is a lie plain and simple.

      Israel's asseration is a load of crap. it is not exactly like the other laws. all other laws require an actual physical connecton. Israel doesn't it requires a purely religious one. yes but unlike the jew we know someone of Irish decent has a physical connection to Ireland because it was immpossible to be Irish without gaining that link. it is entirely possible for someone with zero physical connection to palestine to aquire Israel citizenship merely by converting to judaism. a creek or innuit could convert and be invited in. are you seriously going to say would have that physical connection. all other return laws are about ingathering the Israeli law of return is entirely about increasing their demographic presence.

    • @ jeff

      Yes there doing fine. well of course their leaving most places your government pays them to move into palestinian homes if they immigrate. but in general the Diaspora is doing fine. the Diaspora has been doing just fine. its population is stable. if the Diaspora wasn't doing fine it would comprise of of a little less than 2/3 thirds of the worlds jewish population. which is a higher percentage than after WW2

    • really cause jews out side of Israel seem to being doing just fibe. Israel isn't a last hope just the first in desire to steal from other for a want

    • @jeffb. that's just false. the byzantium never barred jews from returning. and of course the roman's didn't, no state will allow rebellion foster. and mentioning rome when it was a period of less than 100 years is really just trying to to pad your dishonest argument. so again jews weren't barred from returning. they could have returned at any point. they chose not to. no matter how many times you lie, this fact remains.

      actually its over 30 countries that have some sort of returning laws. and only Israel's allows people whose families never lived into the territory their under the law. so once again the Israel law of coming to a place your family never was is unique.

    • the Israeli law of return is unique. every other such law requires to show proff that you trace you ancestry to said state. i could convert to judiasm today and be able to to move to israel under the law of the return. so yes there is no other law like the law of return in israel. i'm sorry but the refugees are tied to palestine. i know you feel you should be able to run out the clock on their rights but you can't. since your terrorist country illegally refused them back the right remains invested.

    • @ jeffb

      how is supporting crimes and attacking the innocent while demanding they be stripped of their rights this" I choose actual justice and equality over imaginary non-implementable justice and equality. I understand that justice and equality require more than just stupid bumper sticker slogans. One of the core ideas of justice is that a moral principle that applies to some should apply to all. " no jeff you don't two wicks about justice and equality. its amazing your idea of justice and equality means you and yours get to get away with 60= years of crimes. thats not justice or equality. that's being a bigoted entitled thug.

      so if the palestinians get the power to kick your illegal immigrant but out they can because that's the "moral" principle your defending

  • 'NYT' reporter says Palestinians must make 'concessions... they have long avoided'
    • first off their previous sovriegnty is irrelevant as for 1 unlike you there not basing their claim onto that. 2. once the accepted means of creating a new country was self determination not conquest being the native population was enough. and their was no arab conquest of palestine. there was a muslim one but it was of conquerring the already present arab population.

      what gives is the palestinians are basing their claims on self determination of being the legal resident population in the territory. no myths required. there are only facts. you how ever are demanding a jewish state with borders as stated in the bible which have zero basis in any sort of fact. if the palestinians made the same sort of bs claims your making i'd knock them just as hard.

      as fior allowing you to claim the kingdom of judah. I was saying if you'd want to make a legit historical based argument i'd let you combine the kingdom of judah with the kingdom of Israel and argue those borders as a basis rather than the mythical ones your using.

      ???why are you asking if i think any part of palestine should belong to your terrorist country. jerusalem is legally the palestinians. while me and talknic has differences in opinion over the legality of Israel declaring its self the fact remains while those lands fall into a very dark grey part of the law everything out side of that is most asurdedly illeaglly occupied land belonging to the sovriegn state of palestine.

    • @robert what makes your myths so special that they get to be tresated as historical fact? bibilical israel was a myth it never existed so what your really saying is you made up a bunch of borders based on a country that never existed and demand a country based on that? does that mean i can make up borders for a mythical state and claim those borders. I'd be willing to treat you as honest if you willing to deal with the actual borders of the kingdom on Israel and hell since i'm a nice guy i'll let you include the borders of the kingdom of judah but to insist on bibl;ical bordefrs is literally demanding reasonable people to admit to a fairy tale.

    • funny how the native voice you found was a christian zionist. can you find a non christian zionist one? again that you found one voice doesn't negate the truth of mine statement that native american as a group show very high levels of support for the palestinians. both are oppressed indigenious peoples who were dispossessed by colonial forces.

    • @ robert that 200 was a typo. and what muslims arab occupiers. how can the native population occupy their own land. when islam conquered palestine it conquered the native arab inhabitants. the arabs aren't occupiers. and jews never tried to come back. they never tried to live their they left and never attempted to come back until the 1900's. and the muslim world protected its jewish citizens for the most part until the zionist invasion and conquest in 1948.

      and no jews weren't alway recognized as a nation because nations only came into being as and idea around 200 years ago. jews have always been viewed as preciesely what they are a religion.

      so please don't tell me your explaining and to read.r funny the guy who is quoting only zionist sources telling someone to read sources. i have read zionist sources they just fail to be convincing. probably due to the fact they are lies. so your not explaining anything your just repeating lies about why you and your should be allowed to get away with war crimes. i suggest your read not that it would do you any good. if its not in line with you bs you'll refuse to even consider it. your arrogant ignorant and little more than a thug in mentality.

    • @yonah actually i said only nations have homelands i can of the top of my head think of several national homelands that aren't based on ethnicity. the USA being the obvious one. the former piecemeal state of italy and germany being others.

      but case in point jews don't have everything that other nations have. they don't have any sort of cultural connection to each other outside of the jewish faith which is kind of important in trying to claim their more than a religion. hell even the language can't really be used as its a modern version of what was a dead language.
      so there is no culture no language nothing i can see for connections that aren't purely there because of the religion. its not so much a decree as recognizing despite attempt of zionists to lie jews don't meet the definition of a nation. i'm sorry just because their terror campaign to get a state worked doesn't mean their actually a nation.

    • How can you say the borders are not made up when their is zero evidence that the country your subscribing those borders to ever existed?

      again palestine cannot be the homeland of the jewish nation because their is no jewish relation or do catholics buddahisms and shintoists have homelands and are nations as well? and how could palestine be the homeland of a made up jewish nation for 3300 years when there is only evidence of a jewish state only goes back 3000?

      and the name palestine is not derived from hebrew in fact the hebrew term probably comes from the same source as palestine the original egyptian Peleset which again predates archeological evidence of a jewish state.

    • wrong it is you who is incapable of dialogue. repeating insane sociopathic demands is not dialogue recognizing peoples wants and needs is and actually talking is dialogue. you want to have a real dialogue its simple quit issuing criminal demands and start acting like a decent human beings. I'm sorry you feel people not kowtowing to your and your your countries demands but dialogue requires a give and take. all you want is to take.

    • @ robert
      your only proving my point. and i did read actual archeologically based evidence. so i tell you read something other than your big book of jewish fairy tales and maybe you'll quit demanding Israel be given borders to represent a fictious state. the united monarchy never existed. there was a kingdom of Israel and a kingdom of judah which were eventually absorbed into more powerful states. the fact remains the palestinians are the true indigenous people and modern jews for the most part interlopers.

      @talknic. I'm not saying it wasn't but at the end of the day GA 181 is a clear violation of the UN charter requirment that states only be created via self determination. the moment the majority of legal resident of palestine said they didn't want their country divided anything else was illegal. launching a war of conquest via armies created by european jews to conqueror territory. I'm sorry but inside "Israel" or out its was still gained via conquest. we should be willing to concede it but don't lie and say it was given to jews they stole it with blood and iron just like everything else. now I'm not saying at this point we should take a completely hardline stance if only because actualy trying to comply with the law now would require to much bloodshed. but if we want a just resolution we need to call the spade a spade and that was all of the territory Israel has was gained via conquest.

      so even if Israel never annexed anything out side of its borders it would still be illegal. because it would be declaring territory belong to another state as belonging to it. the moment the mandate ended sovriegnty and control immiedently was vested into the provisionally stated country of palestine. the Israelly decleration of independence was nothing less than a decleration of war and intent to conqueror.

    • @ robert. your seriously going to bring up the native americans? you do realize the native tribes are pro palestinian. they know who the indeginous people are. and its not you in your stolen house. so I ask why is it ok for some native population in your mind to get there land back but not the native population you currently support the occupation and disspossesion of. because as a jew of assumingly european orgin you are not native and have zero claim to palestine.

      its irrelevant before the law. i fully understand you and the rest of warcriminal terrorist country men's motives. I'm a student of history you'd be wise to be one too. tyrant conquerors usually meet bloody ends and they always end up badly.

    • whats just in giving to a state borders that were never theirs. your arrogance shows. their can't be a palestinian state on the jewish homeland because there isn't a jewish homeland. there is a palestinian one in palestine. your litlerally demanding us to cave into borders that were made up

    • @robert I didn't base of of history I based it off of the definition of the word nation. which I fail to see how jews meet when all the connection are solely based in religion. and other ancient nations that are countries now actually meet the definition. there was once an ancient hebrew people but modern jews have nothing in common with them outside of religion. that i reject the fairy tale of jewish nationalism and am "intolerant" to it is not due to a culutaral bias but more due to the fact I'm literate.

      and the armenians have a national idienty outside of religion. jews don't. and i catagoricaly reject states for religions.

    • @ robert there is no double standard. jews were premitited to come and live in palestine for close to 200 years they lost the right to claim it because the chose to abbadon it. the palestine right continues because unlike they jews conquerors they want to go back and are forcibly prevent from returning to their homeland and excercizing their legal sovreignty over the territory.

Showing comments 740 - 701