-
-
- Resume builders: Be a broken record on Iran, cheer authoritarians … 1
- UN Committee: Israeli system ‘tantamount to apartheid’ 0
- Slater on Beinart 0
- And we live on… 0
- US official — we went to Israel first 3
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status … 23
- Israel takes 30 dunams of land near Salfit ‘for security … 4
- Aaron David Miller: After a short ‘peace process,’ look … 38
-
- BDS victory: South Africa strips Ahava’s ‘made in Israel’ label 713
- Video: Israeli mob demands all African refugees be deported from … 475
- Day after pogroms, Likud MK calls for internment camp for … 427
- Neverending Nakba: Israel breaks lull, attacks Gazan farmers 413
- ‘This is not fair play’: Mahmoud Sarsak’s family demands his … 389
- March of the Flags 345
- Neocons in Washington Post: Military strike on Iran would ‘calm … 323
- Nabi Saleh’s Bassem Tamimi convicted by Israeli courts based on … 293
-
- The Messiah’s Donkey: Settlers fire on Palestinian villagers as the … 235
- Aharon Appelfeld’s rage at the German language (and Arendt’s need … 156
- US to differentiate between ‘personally displaced’ Palestinian refugees and their … 129
- March of the Flags 127
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism 110
- Feeling the hate in Long Island 97
- Israeli judge to issue verdict in Rachel Corrie case 94
- WaPo’s Walter Pincus says US is ‘going above and beyond … 87
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- Resume builders: Be a broken record on Iran, cheer authoritarians in Gulf (1)
- Annie Robbins: Having recognized its weakness, the US knows that it will be the UN that takes the lead in Syria and...
- Did Israeli Eurovision contestant watch too much Juliano Mer Khamis? (54)
- Annie Robbins: GL, urban dictionary has PEP, just no explanation of progressive except for palestine....
- German Lefty: Annie, it looks like you got infected with the Eurovision virus. Great. The more fans, the better. The...
- US official — we went to Israel first (3)
- traintosiberia: OMG! Why I don”t have that Stockholm Syndrome yet! How long do I have to feign that I have it.
- Annie Robbins: a U.S. official…asked to remain anonymous owing to the sensitive nature of the issue. sensitive?...
- Carllarc: proof of ‘Israel firsters’, for sure
- Israel lobby’s favorite senator tries to erase Palestinian refugee status for millions (23)
- piotr: How many Jews who made aliya were actual refugees from Roman persecution? Thus the “Jew who taunted...
- Affirming a Judaism and Jewish identity without Zionism (113)
- yourstruly: what was that sound? the special relationship breaking down and the loud and sustained chorus that...
- MHughes976: I’m still a bit uncertain about what R.Brian means by ‘Zionism’: what proposition did...
- yourstruly: given, that the israel’s brutal occupation of palestine is why much of the arab/islamic world hates...
- Resume builders: Be a broken record on Iran, cheer authoritarians in Gulf (1)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss

- Adam Horowitz

- Today in Palestine

- Annie Robbins

- Alex Kane

- Kate

- Alice Rothchild

- Ahmed Moor

Blogroll

Bravo to Sahar Vardi and the pink-shirted kid who got away!
I don't get your and Mooser's beef. How do you know George Smith was brought up in any religion? What do you know about how his sons were brought up or how they were indoctrinated, nor if it was only because his spouse desired it? How do you know the religious tenets in Mr. Smith's house do not match (as implied by Mooser above) his own? I gather from the post that Mr. Smith has spoken out any number of times against the injustice against Palestinians and against Zionist B-S. One could equally assume (and be on firmer ground) that the value of speaking out against injustice is a view he shares with his spouse, and "indoctrinated" his sons with. Maybe his view is that raising one's sons Jewish is not at odds with that value. So what's your beef?
"Israel did not want this flytilla to have the same repercussions as the Gaza flotilla had and its authorities have been steadfast in ensuring that a deadly charade would not recur."
The same repercussions? A deadly charade? No, the deaths were real, and Israel caused them. Israel is causing all the "repercussions" - not the least, by not allowing travelers to the West Bank, showing how claiming to be a "democracy" is truly a charade.
Thanks, Dickerson. From whatever discipline, you always find the right gem.
I object to “Jewish McCarthy” -It creates a comfort zone similar to “American committed genocide against Indians so it’s not so bad what we are doing.”
The analogy is meant to speak to those who find American McCarthyism objectionable. Those who would justify the crimes of Zionism by saying it is not as bad as American treatment of Native Americans, or as you propose, American McCarthyism, have no moral compass. So either way, it is a good analogy.
The U.S. long ago (i.e., prior to Zionism) established itself as the biggest world-wide bully (think Philipines, for one), so Zionism using the U.S. as it's yardstick is a losing moral proposition.
"Up to this sentence I had thought that the systematic, industrial way the Nazis/SS went about killing the Jews was unique. Now I realized that it was ‘unique’ because the victims consider themselves to be ‘unique’. So, by this definition no other genocide could ever compare to the Jewish Shoa."
I assumed he was being sarcastic, as the concept (of defining the genocide as unique based on who the victims were) is so absurd.
In any case, all insistence by the Elie Weisel types that the Nazi Holocaust was not-only-unique-but-that-nothing-else-comes-even-close notwithstanding, I have never heard this absurd claim that the uniqueness was derived from the idea that an attack on Jews = attack on God, and I do not believe it in any way contributes to "Judaism’s weltanschauung".
Has anyone found a reference for this quote by Foxman?
“YOUNG, JEWISH AND PROUD”- Sounds fine to me.
“TRIBEFEST”- Sounds creepy.
As long as MW has a moderator, why don't you remove Dahoit's hateful comment?
"freier, which is somewhere between a fool and a sucker. "
Sadly and unfortunately, Jewish kids in the U.S. who sign up for the israeli army and young Americans who joined the U.S. Army after 9/11 are equally "fieiers" - each group feeling the respective group they identify with is under attack, each convinced that they are doing the honorable thing by joining the army, to fight in what are in fact completely dishonorable, unjust wars/attacks. Isn't that what generals count on?
Hummm….so that is the racism issue in Atzmon? Admit I haven’t read much of him to know.
Then why are you bothering to comment.?
Obviously a total spoof, and a clever ynet editor must know it.
"That said, I'm open-minded; I sense that Rudoren is not a Zionist, that she's tough and smart, and that we're about to see a sea-change in Times coverage."
I think you have the tail wagging the dog. I also think it is not the point that all the NYT reporters sent to cover I/P are Jewish. The NYT sends people who will carry out their editorial policy. The NYT decided it couldn't get away with the IDF-fawning Bronner anymore, and if there's any sea-change, (maybe it will be a pond-change) its because in the face of increasing public understanding of Israel's repression of Palestinians, they need a leeetle more balance. So they changed tack, and think Rudoren can strike a different pose.
"And our community would embrace a policy of resistance..."
As a child of European Jewish immigrants (some of whose siblings came out of Europe later as refugees), I also was struck by the quote you chose, for its irony. Jews WERE chased out of their homes in Europe (if not killed, of course) but it seems that the communal policy of resistance for a whole generation was that of refusing to acknowledge the crimes that would have to be committed against others for zionism to be successful.
"Dr. Finkelstein’s attempt to withdraw this video from You Tube shows the deep conflict going on within liberal Zionism. This conflict has existed since the establishment of Israel."
What video are you talking about (no link?) and what was the evidence that Finkelstein attempted to withdraw it?
As to the letter from Einstein et al, (and liberal Zionism) there was/is resistance to understanding that in Jewish nationalism, as for all other nationalisms, are the seeds for fascism. Nationalism as a way out of your problems is just no good.
...even Adallah admits implicitly that Israel is (or at least was) a democracy – read its statement “a law the likes of which do not exist in any democratic state in the world”.
No, I think to make your (pathetic) point, it would have had to have read:
“a law the likes of which do not exist in any other democratic state in the world”. As though Israel was just one of the bunch.
yes it is highly ironic, but surely not the worst thing (of the image).
Say what? Is it really relevant that they were Jewish? Sorry, but this sounds like an antisemitic comment too me.
"It is them being delegitimized because of what they do; it is not anti-Semitism because of who they are."
Hard to say whether the above is antisemitism or not - you are conflating a lot of "theys".
"It is Jews being delegitimized because of what Jews do; it is not anti-Semitism because of who they are."
Or "It is Jews being delegitimized because of what Zionists do; it is not anti-Semitism because of who Jews are."
"Jews do" and "Jews are" are kind of touchy.
Having said that, as the point has been made, considering the appropriation of the Jewish star by Zionism and its expansionist, oppressive policies, the use of the star in anti-Zionist graffiti can hardly be questioned.
I have often felt there is a bit of "reaction formation" going on by Zionists - and the Jewish star symbolizes it well. "We were once pathetic victims (labeled with the Jewish star on the way to our deaths) - now we'll show you - we can be the biggest bully, and label our army with the same star.
“The reason I work on this issue is I wanted to be in Israel….”
Not that it matters in the overall critique of Ben-Ami or J-street, but I think I hear him say: “The reason I work on this issue is I want there to BE an Israel...."
He also (perhaps inadvertently, unintentionally?) acknowledges that the US does not play and "evenhanded" role (his word) as mediator between Israel and Palestinians.
Apologies to Phil if this is incorrect, but I would say that perhaps his reaction to the portrayal of Zuckerberg has something to do with some kind of "outsider paranoia" [an impulse I recognize well] - thus the perhaps undue concern with the portrayal of a Jew in a negative light... except that it was his wife (non-Jewish, as I understand it) who first expressed the concern. Perhaps in the context of world history, criticisms of Jews, or Jewish political endeavors (like Zionism) , will always prompt, to one degree or another, either paranoid or legitimate concerns of anti-semitism. What I am trying to figure is whether this column has anything to do with the I/P conflict (other than Phil's blog-ownership perogative) - is it that one just cannot always discern the motivations of a movie maker, just like one cannot always discern the motivations of critics of Zionism? One just has to decide, is the portrayal (or criticism) legit, regardless of motivation.
Why yes, didn't you know, it's a double mitzvah on shabbos.