Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 555 (since 2010-05-07 21:27:34)

Showing comments 555 - 501
Page:

  • Salaita sues donors for 'injecting' themselves into U of Illinois decision, threatening to withhold gifts unless he was fired
    • @DoubleStandard

      You don't agree with:
      1. That Chancellor Wise destroyed papers?
      2. That the law forbids potential litigants from destroying papers which might be evidence?
      3. That the donors threatened to withhold money?
      4. That he was offered a job?
      5. That it was torn up?
      6. That they should get a good judge?
      7. That we should follow this closely?
      8. The typo?
      9. Or ....."Terrific complaint"?
      10. Or none of the above?

  • Netanyahu speech scandal blows up, and 'soiled' Dermer looks like the fall guy
    • There are at least 6 different US foreign policies:

      1. President
      2. Congress
      3. State Dept
      4. Pentagon
      5. CIA
      6. John McCain

      and now maybe

      7. John Boehner

  • Phila Inquirer publishes a lie: 'Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the same'
    • I am intrigued, JeffB. Who were these Zionists who predated Judaism? And what happened to them? What did they believe? Where did they live? What exactly were the borders of Zion and how long did it exist for? When was the "fall of Zion"? I appear to be "unbelievably ignorant" on this matter.

      What are the main tenets of this philosophy "which is a total philosophy of being individually (psychologically), morally and collectively (sociologically) for Jews"? Is it only for Jews? I have never heard of a philosophy being restricted to one particular tribe. Please elucidate.

    • I am not sure I can agree with that statement, Annie. If a Jewish "community institution" chooses to support the kind of carnage we saw in Gaza last year, then I reserve the right to have a "certain perception" of it, and to manifest that perception rhetorically - but not physically.

  • Tell your congressperson: Don't attend Netanyahu's speech
    • @Yonah JeffB's generalization of Christian views is no less inappropriate than giles (or even JeffB's) generalization of Jewish ones. Neither are valid.

      Nor apparently is your "shame on Jewish manhood" statement:

      link to desip.igc.org

      Unfortunately the Alfred Lilienthal link has been taken down.

    • @Yonah

      No I live in an even more ZIonist country than the US - Australia.

      giles can turn up here with whatever name (s)he wants as far as I am concerned.

      JeffB just posted this on another thread:

      Christians are unable to respect Jews because they are a defeated people. So there can’t be a parity.

      I'd be interested in your opinion.

    • @Yonah

      I am not sure if your comment "won't even reveal his own ethnic group" refers to me or giles but just in case you mean the former I'll discuss mine. Firstly "his" is a bit of an assumption - though as it turns out, valid. Secondly I don't even know what "ethnic group" means, really. I have some Irish, Viking, Anglo-Saxon ancestors for sure - but then the overlap between these labels is pretty large - that's one of the problems with "ethnicity". Possibly I might have some Roman ancestors too. My grandfather claimed to have had a Jewish birth mother, but as he was adopted that is hard to prove - or disprove. Even then I am not sure what that says about "ethnicity". So what would you say my "ethnicity" is? I believe I belong to a species called homo sapiens sapiens and the rest is up for grabs. I think I am pretty unique and don't need a tribal label, but then so are you. In the words of Brian "You're all individuals".

      As to your reports of giles comments they do seem to generalize more than I would regard as acceptable and to that extent I personally have some problems with them, but I think also that "jew hating" is also presumptuous on your part, based on the evidence.

    • @Yonah That is a pretty strong statement about giles. Can you cite evidence?

      Not only have you made a response which is a "no response", you have made a retraction which is "no retraction".

    • @Yonah Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders have been saying that an Iranian bomb is 1 year, 2 years, less than 5 years away, for around 25 years - maybe more. And it has not happened. Meanwhile a number of more trustworthy sources - for instance ones that voiced serious doubts about the claimed active Iraqi WMD program - have been saying that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program.

      A rational human being would start to doubt the "Iran is about to get a bomb" sources.

      Why a "no response" response (when is a response a "no response") to giles statement that Netanyahu is a thief, and if he does have dual US-Israeli citizenship which some have claimed, a traitor. You accept that Netanyahu is a thief, but not that he is a liar?

      If Israel wants a war with Iran, so be it - it is their call - Israel is an independent country with an independent foreign policy (unlike mine). But it is not a war that the US or any other Western country should fight - at least not on the side of the aggressor - Israel.

  • Like the Wind, We Will Be Free: How being detained at Ben Gurion airport during a family trip to Palestine reaffirmed my identity
  • 'NYT' and Matthews warn that Netanyahu speech to Congress could lead US to war
    • @ApolloSpeaks "Building the bomb"

      We've heard it all before and before and before ....

      link to salon.com

      This is nothing to do with "building the bomb" and is all about Israel's regional hegemony.

    • Polygamy is a federal crime in the US - courtesy of Brigham Young.

      link to huffingtonpost.com

      link to en.wikipedia.org

      From the latter:

      "Mormons were determined to create a Zionist, polygamous kingdom in the newly acquired territories."

      "Yet with the start of the Civil War, Republican majorities were able to pass legislation meant to curb the Mormon practice of polygamy such as the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862."

      Re Roha's cartoons, New Zealand has 7 sheep per person (or, putting it more starkly, about 14 per male New Zealander) - not a little over 4 as the cartoon suggests. However in the good old days - 1982 - it had about 22 sheep per person (44 or so per male). It appears that a crisis is approaching! Come to think of it, my last statement would probably be banned under this proposal.

  • #JeSuisUnJuifBritannique
    • Of course Yorkshiremen are better than Lancastrians! I can speak with some authority!

      Incidentally Nick Park, creator of Wallace and Gromit, was born in Lancashire but studied in Sheffield, Yorkshire. And Wallace's favourite cheese is Wensleydale which is definitely from Yorkshire!

      link to wallaceandgromit.net

      In fact, the "War of the Roses" is, these days, more a matter of fun than anything serious, except for the twice yearly cricket match between the two counties - then it becomes serious. These days the two counties are united by a common enemy - bloody southerners!

    • I have often wondered what would happen if the Palestinians said "We surrender". What would Israel do? International opprobrium would hopefully prevent wholesale deportation and to where? The last thing Israel wants is that the Palestinians surrender - whatever that means. It cannot then go on doing what it does to them with impunity.

  • Why do Muslims object to depictions of their prophet?
    • @Taxi - I was reading a few days ago about the Ugaritic sources too which seem to be a separate strand that predates the Torah from the Assyrian/Zoroastrian one.

      link to theology.edu

      I'm sure someone here knows more about this than I do. Zofia?

  • Sadness and anger as 4 Jewish victims of Paris attack are buried in Jerusalem
    • I've just checked the BBC website - nothing there about this issue. I will not pay NYT so I cannot check there but willing to have a small bet with you about what you will find. I checked the Guardian - nothing there. The Daily Telegraph - nothing there. Sydney Morning Herald - nothing there - and then that would mean The Age too, which is almost identical. I will not check the Australian for the same reason as NYT but there I would bet a large amount! All of these outlets have something about the funerals in Jerusalem but none that I can check mention this.

      So DeBakr all of these "liberal" outlets (well except for DT which is conservative) are indeed giving me, at least, the wrong impression. Thank G-d for MW for telling us what Israelis are allowed to read in their own media.

  • Netanyahu crashes Paris unity march, French gov't fumes
    • @Philemon: "I have no recollection of any other song in connection specifically with Australia. "

      Before 1984 the Australian National Anthem was "God Save the Queen". In 1977 there was a national referendum for a "National Song" in which "Advance Australia Fair" was chosen. It became the National Anthem in 1984. It ranks amongst the most boring of national anthems so there is no reason why you should remember it. Musically it has similarities to the tune of "God Bless the Prince of Wales" . Why would anyone want any country to be associated with that sentiment?

    • It was JeffB not Mayhem, Mooser. I can understand how you confuse them - they read from the same script. Or maybe you know something I don't. Why do I always feel like a schlemazel when I'm writing to Mooser?

    • I take you at your word Jeff. It wasn't obvious to me - or apparently jimby.

    • I voted for Waltzing Matilda in the referendum on the "National Song" for Australia many years ago - much more in keeping with Australia's self-perceived larrikin character but the wowsers won. I have no idea what the words of the current National Anthem are - something about "Advance Australian Fare" which might be about the rising price of public transport, or kangaroos on our dinner plates.

      My favourite is PRCs - March of the Volunteers.

    • I am always impressed by the logic of hasbarists. Would you please explain your reasoning Yonah? It seems to me that, on the contrary, the interviewee's view is that all Palestinians are targets and Wilcox was suggesting that that might not be the case. How you reason that into your statement defies logic.

    • Here's a wikipedia page on French massacres.

      link to en.wikipedia.org

  • Why I am not Charlie
    • Damned cunning those Chinese:

      link to gizmodo.com

      They built a tall building that did not collapse at the first hint of fire! Maybe they learned to do it by looking at all of the steel that was shipped there from the WTC buildings immediately after 911.

  • The moral hysteria of Je suis charlie
    • Your simplistic rant shows that you clearly fail to see Klug's point. Freedom of speech is a relative concept - not an absolute one. One person's freedom of speech is another's blasphemy.

      He is pointing out that there are always points at which any society abhors freedom of speech and that is different for different societies. Therein lies the hypocrisy of this reaction.

      Consider how you might feel about holocaust deniers or "racial" stereotyping of your ethnicity? Do you want freedom of speech for them?

      Your problem with this particular wave of human emotion is that it does coincide with your selfish agenda. I don't think Klug talks about any agenda - selfish or otherwise.

  • Don't let's go to the war of civilizations again
    • @Danaa

      The modus operandi of the posters you name ("ivri", "hophmi", etc) is to insert themselves into a conversation with some falsehood. After a few (often no more than one) interaction their falsehoods are exposed. They disappear from the conversation and move on to another. See the example of Yonah above about the 2006 war with Lebanon. Never do they apologize for attempting to mislead us - or even accept that they were wrong. In fact, they will go to another conversation and state the same lies. When others posters say something that's proved wrong they typically express some regret. Being a hasbarist means never having to say you're sorry. This MO is what distinguishes them most clearly from the others here for me.

      This is nothing to do with the content of their arguments or the language, it's about basic human respect for others and self-respect. When you're discovered with your hand in the cookie jar, you don't just walk off and find another cookie jar. If that's what Israeli society is like (and you say it is worse) then it explains everything about I/P.

      These people are not here to debate - or as Yonah said on another thread "have a dialogue". Their role is purely that of propaganda.

  • Anti-Semitism at Fordham?
  • 'NYT' reporter says Palestinians must make 'concessions... they have long avoided'
  • Dershowitz story is also an Israel story
  • 'It is time to make it costly for Palestinians,' Ross warns in NYT; and readers reject his argument
    • To paraphrase Mandy Rice-Davies, "You would, wouldn't you." But instead of repeating your comfortable myths, why don't you respond to talknic's question on the "Media obsesses ..." thread. Too hard to supply real evidence to support your myths?

      Incidentally Hamas is no longer regarded as a terror organisation by the EU General Court. Zionist propaganda is beginning to wear thin.

      link to bbc.com

      What's your stance on terrorist organisations like Irgun and the Stern Gang?

    • You're too kind, amigo.

  • Palestinian resolution fails at the Security Council, U.S. votes against 'staged confrontation' at the UN
    • I too am ashamed of my country. The only country apart from the US to oppose the resolution. And of course our media are silent on it. I am reminded of what Gareth Evans said in 2012 when Australia was intending to vote "No" to observer status for Palestine:

      to vote 'no' on this resolution would be not to help the cause of peace, not to help Israel and to be putting Australia absolutely on the wrong side of history in terms of our region and in terms of our capacity to be a credible and effective performer on the Security Council over the next two years

      The wrong side of history indeed. With regard to Australia's two years on UNSC, we started badly and finished worse. It may be a very long time before we get another chance.

  • 'NYT' writer takes Salaita's side, saying U of Illinois violated 'intellectual and academic freedom'
    • @Yonah: "but guess what? no one has heard of hartman or cares about hartman and this salaita dude is now a famous representative of the Palestinian viewpoint,"

      Exactly - I think Hartman and his statements deserve much more coverage. What about it NYT?

      @Yonah: "I am sorry that my role here as adversary does not give me sufficient opportunity to comment on the suffering of the Palestinians."

      Yeah - right! But that would be less lucrative.

  • As Kerry and UN press on occupation, Netanyahu sees a 'diplomatic assault'
    • Yes, Marnie, shame on Australia - as an Australian I agree. But be aware that there is no debate of this issue in Australia. The media do not report it or if they do they slant the discussion to suggest that Israel is being victimized. This is not a decision by ordinary Australians but by our rulers. Unfortunately, the leadership of both major political parties, as in the US, are now more than ever totally committed to the Zionist cause. I cannot see Australia voting any time soon for even a symbolic recognition of Palestine.

  • Israel's proposed Jewish nationality law is a flop on Broadway
    • @ckg: "I really would like to know what Iran did to get to number 1"

      Be the enemy of choice for the neocons and Zionist-owned media.

  • UN commemorates Palestine's long journey
    • I have been searching to find the other three countries that voted against the resolution without success. I suspect mine - Australia - is one of them. Unlike Canada, Australia's history has barely fluctuated - Zionist through and through, except perhaps briefly under Rudd. The current crowd in power falls into the "tawdry sycophant" category.

  • Israel lost the British elite after Gaza onslaught, UK ambassador says
    • @MDM: "not ONE major UK politician condemned Israel by name during this summer’s slaughter"

      Gerald Kaufman:
      "...unless the Israelis are willing to make peace, the day will come when the Palestinians will explode in anger and despair,"

      Nicholas Soames:
      "Would my right honorable friend agree that this is not just a war about rockets from both sides but it is actually a war about illegal settlements and stolen lands?"

      Fiona O'Donnell, Jeremy Corbyn, Lyn Brown, Edward Leigh, Andrew Slaughter, Fiona Mactaggart, Karen Buck, Cathie Jameson, Nia Griffith, .....

      You can see them all and more here:

      See link to youtube.com

      We even saw a meally-mouthed criticism of Israel from Jack Straw - he whom Condoleezza Rice thought too much susceptible to pressures from his Muslim constituents.

      The tide has turned in the UK - next hopefully Australia.

  • First they came for the Palestinians . . .
    • Michael Leunig is a national treasure. I am proud to live in the same city and occasionally frequent the same cafes. As recent threads here have indicated the Zionists have so much power over the media in Australia, and yet this wonderfully talented human being can still touch the masses.

      His Wikipedia page is worth a read:

      link to en.wikipedia.org

  • Caltech prof says Israeli scientist passed NASA rocket secrets to his government
    • I agree with your last sentence - she should have reported it to the federal agency, but I cannot see how this potential crime by Dr Gat can be ignored or result in a "discreet settlement". If the article is correct, a federal offence has been committed and the FBI has a duty to investigate it and bring it before the courts. The question is not whether this is a national security risk, it is whether ITAR regulations have been breached and on the evidence presented that does seem to be the case. Discussion of the research, as Dr Gat has apparently done, with a non-US national (or perhaps dual national) with no involvement in the program is contrary to the regulations - period!

      There is no generic ITAR waiver even for countries like Australia and the UK and this has been the subject of much diplomatic activity over such programs as the Joint Strike Fighter.

      The Wikipedia page is pretty good in explaining this:

      link to en.wikipedia.org

    • And if she told the university administration, they should have told her to talk to the State Dept. Violators of ITAR regulations can personally receive very significant fines and prison sentences. By not discussing with the appropriate federal agency, to my non-legal mind Dr Troian and the Caltech administrators are both accessories to a possible crime.

      According to this:

      link to mondaq.com

      lack of detailed knowledge of the legality or otherwise of the conduct is not a defense.

    • I believe that Dr Troian is personally responsible in this situation. If she believes there was a breach of ITAR regulations "on her watch", nothing her institution would or would not do will protect her. She should have, at once, notified the State Dept in addition to her university administration. I agree, Walid, that she should have signed the affidavit if it represented her understanding of the situation.

    • @Qualtrough: This is not "top secret" as far as I can see or even "secret". It is ITAR restricted. A US national does not need a clearance to work on such a project, but as I said above, non-US nationals/permanent residents need to have a waiver. And those on the project are precluded from allowing such information to fall into the hands of non-US nationals.

    • @ritzl: Violation of ITAR regulations even by US nationals can result in very hefty fines and/or long prison sentences. And it is a personal responsibility - not an institutional one as far as I am aware - there is no defence of "I was just doing what I was required to do by the institution." Who knows what would happen to a non-US national engaging in such activities.

      Re your point about "Jewish candidate with an Israeli bent" That is an interesting question - if you might end up as the meat in the sandwich (or is it the ham in the matzah) between federal authorities and your university administration, it might be better not to collaborate with such a colleague.

    • Unfortunately, David, the support by Australian representatives for Israeli lawlessness is stronger than ever. It was an ex-representative (former Foreign Minister, Bob Carr) who voiced support for Palestine, and he has been slapped down by the current representatives and the Australian media - including the use of the "a-s" word.

    • @ivri: As is indicated in this NASA manual, NASA works at various levels of security clearance.

      link to hspd12jpl.org

      As to sharing of confidential information, that is true but only up to a point.

      link to haaretz.com
      To quote:
      "Despite inarguable ties between the U.S. and its closest ally in the Middle East and despite statements from U.S. politicians trumpeting the friendship, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be, at times, a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat."

      Finally this appears to be an ITAR issue - not a military security issue. The ITAR program:

      link to en.wikipedia.org

      is run out of the State Dept, not the Defense Dept. ITAR applies to exports of certain kinds of materiel and expertise to any foreign entities - whether they be Israeli, British, Australian, Canadian or ...

      There are many programs in US Universities that are ITAR restricted. Non-US nationals/permanent residents working on them have to have an ITAR waiver, under which they agree not to pass information to other non-nationals. Dr Gat would have signed such an agreement before being allowed to work on an ITAR restricted program.

  • 'We will make soap out of you!': Violent right-wing protest against Jerusalem art exhibit reflects rising anti-democratic tide in Israel
    • The atrocities of the Jewish Holocaust were bad enough, their exaggeration is unnecessary:

      link to freewarehof.org

      "But Diane Saltzman, director of the collections division of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., is highly skeptical that the shade is human skin. Despite the reports, not one has been found."

      “None of the lampshades that have surfaced over the past 50 years have ever turned out to be real,” Saltzman said. “There is no proof that this practice has ever occurred.”

  • Sea change down under: Ex-Australian Foreign Minister announces himself a 'Friend of Palestine'
    • Since this thread seems to still be alive, I will link to an earlier MW discussion about the power of the lobby in Australia:

      link to mondoweiss.net

      There is a very interesting comment from Arie Brand.

    • Reply to ivri:

      So "Center-left' does not mean center-left, and "New World" does not mean New World. Please send us your dictionary, ivri.

    • Good piece lysias! I still contend that if Rudd had not made some enemies in other directions he *might* have been able to resist the Zionist onslaught.

Showing comments 555 - 501
Page: