Total number of comments: 8 (since 2010-06-27 08:17:06)
sydwalker
Australian environmentalist, peace activist and anti-Zionist
Website: http://sydwalker.info/blog/
Total number of comments: 8 (since 2010-06-27 08:17:06)
Australian environmentalist, peace activist and anti-Zionist
Website: http://sydwalker.info/blog/
Comments are closed.

I think the Greek people are quite energized at present - and very well informed about the unpleasant realities of the political landscape.
Zionists may think they have Greece in the pocket but I don't think so.
I have been utterly mystified by Jeff Blankfurt's support for the NATO 'operation' in Libya (4,900+ 'strike sorties' and counting) - and reading this exchange has been fascinating, though I remain no less mystified.
If Matan Cohen is one of the group who disrupted NuttyYahoo's speech some time back, then hats off. That was a very courageous and effective action. Bravo!
All commentary here seems to assume the bona fides of Wikileaks. There's a growing view that it is, in reality, just another Zionist black op, which would help explain its longevity (in seemingly dangerous work) and the massive publicity it's attracting.
To round out the discussion, here's another take from Jonathan Azaziah:
link to empirestrikesblack.com
It's notewothy also, perhaps, that none of Wikileaks' leaks ever seem to cause embarrassment to Israel . 'Cablegate' has been more or less welcomed:
link to csmonitor.com
This could be explained by superior Zionist PR which the movement is well-placed to exercise - essentially Phil's point in the article above. But that's the not only possible explanation...
This may seem OT, but it is beyond me why otherwise decent people such as the author and visitors to this website allow their use of the English language to be so corrupted as to use the term 'ethnic cleansing" - a very recent invention less than two decades old which is an oxymoron of the worst kind.
There's nothing 'cleansing' about destroying peoples' lives and forcing them off the land they inhabit. It's utter filth.
We should stop using this sordid term IMO. It subconsciously helps justify the unjustifiable.
This may seem OT, but it is beyond me why otherwise decent people such as the author and visitors to this website allow their use of the English language to be so corrupted as to use the term 'ethnic cleansing" - a very recent invention less than two decades oldm which is an oxymoron of the worst kind.
There's nothing 'cleansing' about destroying peoples' lives and forcing them off the land they inhabit. It's utter filth.
We should stop using this sordid term IMO. It subconsciously helps justify the unjustifiable.
Jonathan Swift, in all his satirical brilliance, would have been pressed to invent this stuff.
This may sound naive, but are there no civil liberties in the USA?
Why can't a dismissal such as this be challenged in the courts?
It's surely a matter of human rights.