Commenter Profile

Total number of comments: 3269 (since 2010-07-22 04:45:40)

a nominal Israel supporter until the '67 War when anti-Arab racism became so blatant that there was this Eureka moment that went something like "Damn, what a fool I've been". Ever since I've been a staunch pro-Palestinian anti-Zionist.

Showing comments 3269 - 3201

  • 'Third intifada was launched,' Palestinian law student posted before carrying out fatal attack in Jerusalem
  • How can a 'New York Times' reader possibly know what is truly happening in Israel/Palestine?
    • Gaza and the Warsaw Ghetto
      same place
      different time
      while the world stands by

      Zionism and Naziism
      same deadly hatred
      different target
      while the world stands by

  • Israeli embassy's attack on Rosengarten just made her stronger
    • an accurate Israel-Nazi Germany comparison -

      Gaza and the Warsaw Ghetto

      same place
      different time
      while the world stands by

  • Remi Kanazi will be a poet for as long as the western media is on coffee break
    • solidarity

      since none of us will be free

      until that last chain is broken

      doesn't it all boil down to

      each of us having to decide

      on which side


      or slave-owner


      or oppressor


      or occupier

      and that only the slave/oppressed/occupied within each of us

      (the there but for go I)

      can free us all?

  • Department of Projectile Vomiting
    • With AIPAC et al discrediting themselves on account of their Israel-firstness being exposed, there's more space not only for us to further reduce their influence, but to advance the cause of justice for Palestine. Simply stated, as they go down, we go up. Assuming, of course, that we take advantage of this opening.

    • For his contributions to improve government policy, social welfare, or political understanding, the American Enterprise Institute is honoring the still at large war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu? Who will the AEI honor next, the also still at large war criminal George W Bush, for having eliminated Iraq's nonexistent WMD and {not} bringing democracy to that nation? And just think, he accomplished all this at the bargain price of 5000+ American lives, not to mention the half-million Iraqi lives wasted.

  • Everyone's kicking AIPAC now that it's down
    • On account of its blatant Israel-firstness AIPAC et al are suffering a loss of credibility. Deservedly so, considering their role in much of the violence and turmoil that afflict the Middle East., But what this take-down of AIPAC means vis-a-vis the attainment of justice for Palestine depends upon how effectively those of us in this struggle take advantage of the space that the decline of Israel-firsters affords us. Space in the marketplace of information, that is, with which we can reach the public re: the righteousness of the struggle of the Palestinian people for freedom and independence. Simply put, as AIPAC et al go down, we go up.

  • Bernie Sanders is 'radical' on economic policy but a pussycat for Israel
    • Once again, Bernie Sanders must be challenged by anti-Zionist activists on the issue of Israel/Palestine, if for no other reason than to make I/P a campaign issue. Somehow we have to convince the public that peace in the Middle East begins with justice for Palestine, that without said peace we face a continuation of all the multiple permanent wars in the region, wars that are so costly they'll leave little to nothing for President Sander's to fulfill his promises re: economic justice. Our challenging Sanders will enable us not only to raise the I/P issue, but to motivate the public into joining us activists in pressuring Sanders to get with it.

    • Bernie Sanders has to be challenged at his rallies by a delegation of pro-Palestinian/anti-Zionist activists demanding that he reconsider his position on the I-P conflict, as well as his embrace of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia as the foremost U.S. ally in the Middle East. Will this tactic move Sanders, as it did when Black Lives Matter confronted him? Probably not, but until representatives from, say, Jewish Voices for Peace challenge him at his rallies, how will we know for sure?

  • 'NYT' and 'NYRB' publish important pieces on Jewish terrorism
  • Long Island synagogue marks High Holidays with thanks to Israeli soldiers in Gaza war
    • Froggy,

      Yes, of course, praying for a foreign army. Need some help on that one. A relationship between two nations (er, one nation and an entity) that's analogous to the U.S.-Israel axis? Any thoughts? I did consider substituting the Vatican for any German religious body but not sure a Long Island synagogue-Vatican comparison is appropriate.

    • piotr,

      so in your opinion it all boils down to the Zionist side being the good side, the Palestinian side, the bad side? Nice that it's that simple. But you omitted one important person, Grand Mufti Amin al-Husayni of Jerusalem. Don't you remember, he met with Adolf Hitler? Did you leave him out because you thought we might counter with the names of Zionist officials who collaborated with the Nazis? Rudolf Kastner, for one, the representative in Hungary of the Jewish Agency who cut a deal with the Nazis that allowed over a thousand wealthy Zionist Jews (including he and his family, of course) to depart for Palestine; the quid pro quo being Kastner's giving the Nazis a list of names and addresses of Jews to be deported. Consequently nearly 450,000 Jews were deported. With Zionist "friends" such as Kastner, it's not surprising that so few Jews escaped the gas chambers.

    • I don't know if any German religious body ever gave thanks to Hitler's Waffen-SS troops for having quashed the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, but if such an occurrence did take place, it would be the WW II equivalent of the Long Island Synagogue's marking the High Holidays with thanks to the Israeli soldiers in the Gaza war.

  • 'New Yorker' says anti-Zionism is 'firmly rooted' in British left, and it's anti-Semitic
    • Lane envisions Labor MPs as being opposed to Jeremy Corbyn's leftist proposals. Initially maybe, but watch them move to the left as the popular support that gave Corbyn his victory puts pressure on Labor MPs to rally behind their new leader. And despite Lane's belief that proposals for public ownership of railroads and dismantling Britain's Trident missiles belong to a prior era, opinion polls indicate that such proposals still resonate with the public. Having participated a half-century ago in one of Britain's Aldermaston Marches, I can attest to the strength and fervor of the antinuclear movement there, today just as much as yesterday, based on the Scottish National Party's call for ridding itself of the Trident.

  • Iran Deal's liberation: Judaism is not Zionism
    • Today Judaism and Zionism are no longer united in the American Jewish mind. Well enough, but it's just as important that non-Jewish Americans also recognize that this is so. As for the the Iran deal being liberatory for Jews, this may be true in the sense that false beliefs are as shackles on the mind, but for the Jew (all peoples, actually), the attainment of justice for the Palestinian people will be the ultimate moment of truth. So while it's quite natural that we acknowledge to ourselves the importance of this victory over Zionism, not to forget that this much anticipated victory lies just ahead. Onward together!

  • Video: Israel's celebrated Labour Party 'is the mother and father of racism', says member of Knesset
    • Israel is a settler colonial entity

      without exception settler colonial entities are racist

      therefore all of its institutions are racist

      the labor party is an Israeli institution

      no surprise that it is & has always been racist

  • 'NYT' openly counts Jewish politicians, and Obama and Clinton both reach out to Netanyahu
    • As if he's having misgivings about his role in securing the nuclear accord, President Obama has vowed to preserve Israel's qualitative military edge?

      Oh no you don't, Mr. President.

      Why not?

      Because the peace movement that helped you convince forty-two Senators to support the accord won't let you get away with giving Israel the tools & wherewithal to go it alone against Iran.

      How will we accomplish this?


  • Don't trade a war on Palestinians for a war on Iran -- Berman
    • How to prevent Israel from once again attacking Gaza?

      We pressure Congress to end the special relationship.

      Once isolated Israel won't dare attack any nation.

      What about AIPAC and the rest of the Israel-firsters?

      We treat them like the losers that they are.


  • 'NYT' misrepresents Iran's prediction about 'Zionist regime' to mean 'Israel'
    • Timeline for Dissolution of Zionist Regime

      2015 - Iran nuclear accord

      2016 - anti-Zionist movement pressures political candidates on special relationship, thereby influencing November election

      2017 - New President feels pressure from anti-Z'ers

      2018 - BDS seriously impacts Israeli economy

      2019 - exodus of Jewish-Israelis accelerates

      2020 - Israeli government agrees to no pre-conditions peace conference with Palestinians

      2021 - Dissolution of Zionist regime

  • AIPAC is going out with a whimper not a bang
    • Former AIPAC boss Dine:
      "We have to heal the wounds inflicted by the clashes over the Iran deal as soon as possible.The future of the U.S., the Middle East and Israel depend on it."

      Doesn't this tell us that the Israel Lobby is on the ropes. Our task? To keep pummeling away until they go down for the count*. And just because AIPAC was able to recover from the 1982 AWACS debacle doesn't mean they can recover from this one. For one, there was no organized Jewish anti-Zionist movement then, there is now. Secondly, no BDS. Thirdly, we can do this!

      *please forgive the sports metaphor

    • Furthermore, given this victory over Israel-firsters along with their prominence in the neocon cabal, what will the imminent dissolution of Israel (the entity, not its people), portend for the global so-called order?

    • One crucial victory for us peacemakers over the Israel Lobby, but continued progress depends upon our ability to keep Israel-firsters on the defensive.

  • Why do Jewish legislators carry more weight on Iran Deal?
    • They may carry more weight because AIPAC and other Israel-firster organizations/individuals are trying to pin the label "anti-Semite" on members of Congress who support the nuclear accord (for Jewish members the pejorative used is "self-hating Jew" Despite these attacks by Israel-firsters, most Jews in Congress have come out in favor of the accord. And based on opinion polls, the position of Jewish legislators on this issue closely mirrors that of Jewish-Americans. What will the general public make of all this michigas? Will they think "Best we stay out because it's strictly a Jewish affair", or, recognizing that what's at stake here, war or peace, effects every American, will it pay close attention to what's being said and decide for themselves, on which side, that of the Israel-firsters or that of those who put America's interests before that of any other country. As for the accusation that Jews who support this nuclear accord are self-haters, contrariwise, considering the fact that it is Israel's mistreatment of Palestinians that is responsible for most of today's antisemitism (google spikes in antisemitism after Israeli attacks on Gaza), it is Israel (claiming, as it does, that it speaks and acts on behalf of world Jewry) and its supporters who are the real anti-Semites, for it is their violent deeds that incite this backlash. After all, isn't it antisemitic to commit acts of violence that themselves lead to antisemitic responses? That's not to excuse such responses, but to attack another people when it's almost certain that there'll be a price to pay? Let Israel cease and desist in its aggression against the people of Palestine and antisemitism would be reduced to a size that could be flushed down the toilet. The nuclear accord represents a step in this direction, since it will give peace a chance.

  • The Israel lobby is alive and well-- and split
    • @Stephen Shenfield

      Not ward off accusations of antisemitism, but render them resistant to such taunts. Has to do with the spirit and power of solidarity.

    • the struggle is for the minds of all Americans, not Jewish-Americans only. Too many Americans avoid entering the fray because of fear that they'll be labeled antisemitic. And this is where Jewish-Americans can best serve the cause of justice for Palestine - by expressing such a profound and unwavering commitment to justice for Palestine that those Americans, who, up to now, have been holding back for fear of being called antisemitic, will feel free to step forward, each saying something like "label me antisemitic if you choose, but clearly I'm not, being that, in this struggle on behalf of human rights, I'm part of a diverse coalition that has many Jews in its ranks?"

  • Debacle for the Israel lobby: Booker jilts Boteach, and Netanyahu sinks AIPAC
    • Now that the myth about the invincibility of the Israel lobby has been shattered, how long before the special relationship between Israel and the U.S. is no more? A year? Five years? And with the U.S. no longer Israel's guardian angel, will Jewish Israelis begin to doubt Israel's long term viability? How widespread does such doubt have to be before those Israelis who have dual citizenship play it safe and take off for some other land? No problem, though, because there'll be plenty of Palestinians eager and ready to exercise their right of return, thereby taking the place of Israelis who opt to live elsewhere. Gradually, then, the peaceful dissolution of Israel. In its place, Palestine rising, the homeland of people of various religions and ethnicities, living together peacefully based on equality and justice for all.

  • Obama and the Zionists
    • Michel Siegal of the Jewish Federations told President Barack Obama that "Jews get unsettled and anxious whenever there's "daylight" between the American government and Israel? Some Jews, perhaps, but fewer and fewer now, based on recent polls as well as on the rapid growth of anti- Zionist organizations such as Jewish Voices for Peace. Surely President Obama knows this, what with Jewish supporters of the Iran nuclear agreement going all out to bring their position on said accord before Congress and the White House. Perhaps he was too polite to remind his Israel-firster visitors that, despite their claim, they don't speak for all Jews. Too bad there was no one in the oval office to speak for the growing number of us Jews who are grateful for all this "daylight" and eagerly look forward to the day when the special relationship between the the U.S. and Israel will be a thing of the past.

  • Jewish community is Humpty Dumpty-- it won't come back together again, and shouldn't
  • 'NYT' and Chris Matthews are frank about Jewish role in Iran Deal debate
    • No matter their religion, color, ethnicity or sexual orientation, our elected representatives in Congress must concern themselves with the merit of this nuclear agreement vis-a-vis its importance to the U.S. of A.. Those whose primary concern is heeding Prime Minister Netanyhahu's call for the accord to be rejected are Israel-firsters. As such they should be impeached by their fellow congresspersons/senators &/or primaried out of office, whichever comes first.

  • Videos: 'Vanity Fair' story about anti-Semitic pogrom in Paris is falling apart
    • Marie Brenner wonders whether French Jews should leave their country.

      Earlier this year Israeli Prime Minister called not only upon French Jews but all European Jews to immigrate to Israel.

      Not surprising since by its own admission Israel faces a "demographic problem",

      which might be alleviated, temporarily, at least, by the the quick fix that the mass exodus of 600,000 French Jews would provide.

      Dirty tricks, such as those carried out last year in Paris by the French version of the Jewish Defense League, are tactics previously used by Zionists in their efforts to stampede Jews into emigrating to Israel (google Lavon Affair).

      Why is Vanity Fair allowing its pages to be used to propagandize for Jewish immigration to Israel?

  • President Obama wants us to argue about the special relationship
    • way way back during the presidency of Barack Obama

      when only a nuclear deal stood in the way of a war against Iran

      a deal that the Israel-firsters

      were desperately seeking to prevent

      no matter to them the possibility of WW III

      after all

      wouldn't be there children coming home in body bags

      only it turned out

      inspired as they were by peacemakers of all racial, political and religious persuasions

      that at the last moment the public woke up

      with the sanity of the people united quickly prevailing over the madness of Israel-firsters

      soon thereafter the special relationship between the U.S. and Israel ended

      that there be no war no more, nowhere, never again

      with special thanks to mondoweiss

    • petition signed

    • these Israel-firsters are scared

      and well they should be

      knowing as they must that their putting the interests of Israel before those of the U.S. is a risky business

      especially, should they succeed in turning Congress against the Iran deal

      and by so doing

      once again the public is to be confronted with the spectacle of body bags coming home from the Middle East

      each containing what remains of a life


      in another war that could (should) have been averted

    • Zionism is a form of settler colonialism

      all forms of colonialism are racist

      Judaism is not racist

      therefore Zionism is not the same as Judaism

      what is it then?

      a 19th century racist credo that's out to hijack Judaism

    • Zionists fear that "opening up the argument will crack the American support system"

      as when Humpty Dumpty had his big fall, only in this instance it'll be -

      all the Israel lobbyists and all the dual loyalists couldn't put the special relationship together again

  • It's not bigoted to call out the Israel lobby over Iran Deal
    • body bags with the remains of Americans just might wake them up

    • Regardless of their religious or political persuasion, we should go after all these Israel-firsters. For starters they should be primaried out of office next year. As for the WH "crossing a line to sell the deal", turns out that it's these same Israel-firsters, by their raising the issue of antisemitism where there is none, who are doing the line-crossing. Win or lose in their attempt to bring on an Iran war, Israel-firsters are setting themselves up for a significant and well-deserved backlash.

  • Schumer defection raises fears about firewall on Jewish support for Iran Deal
    • Another interesting but yet to be asked polling question: "Members of Congress who put the interests of Israel before those of the U.S. are 1) Israel-firsters; 2) traitors; 3) impeachable; 4) all of the above.

  • Shocker: 'NYT' runs front page press release for AIPAC warning Obama to cool his jets
    • a new low in relations between Aipac and the White House?

      let us hope so

      better yet

      let us see to it!

  • Iran Deal Latest: AIPAC lies and, in a first, Schumer runs from the cameras
    • the Jewish Federation of L. A. opposed the nuclear deal in the name of Jewish safety worldwide.

      except making war on Iran is what will endanger Jews worldwide.

      the purpose of the nuclear deal is to prevent such a war.

      so by its opposition to said deal the Jewish Federation of L. A. puts Jews at risk worldwide.

      putting Jews at risk is an act of antisemitism.

      therefore the Jewish Federation of L.A. is antisemitic.

  • Obama ushers in the crisis of the Israel lobby
    • could it be true?

      the public waking up

      to the fact that the interests of Israel and the U.S. are not one and the same

      never have been

      and that without U.S. backing Israel won't be able get away with its crimes against humanity

      never again

  • Obama tells Americans it is 'abrogation of my constitutional duty' to defer to Israel on Iran Deal
  • Reps Deutch, Lowey, and Israel choose Netanyahu over Obama-- and who will bring down the hammer for the Iran Deal?
  • 'I love Obama' 'You're infatuated' (The argument on the left)
    • Pardoning 46 prisoners was a nice gesture, whereas, pardoning every nonviolent inmate would have been an act of liberation. Obama's 2008 campaign had populist tendencies, his two terms in office , except for an occasional bone that he throws to progressives, have been mostly status quo or worse. Given that time is running out (on account of global warming + perpetual war = doomsday), Weiss may love President Obama, but many of the rest of us are in agreement with Michael Smith - that he bamboozled the public into believing he would bring about meaningful change.

  • Sanders risks losing left over unprogressive views of Palestine -- Washington Post
    • Sanders can win the democratic nomination if he ties justice for Palestine to his economic proposals. Not only justice for Palestine but demilitarization en route to peace on earth and goodwill to all living beings.

  • Leading US Jewish group opposes Iran deal, citing 'baseless hatred' of Jerusalem temple destruction 2000 years ago
    • For purposes of countering the Israel-firsters, how about ads in favor of the nuclear deal? A crowdsourcing campaign, say, that could start right here on Mondoweiss?

    • Does the Israeli Prime Minister oppose the nuclear deal because of security concerns or out of fear that with the nuclear threat (assuming there ever was one) removed, and with Iran no longer isolated, that the latter will dominate the Middle East? Israel, meanwhile, brought down in importance to a size befitting its population of six million.

  • The deep roots of vigilante violence in Israeli society
    • Zionism is a manifestation of settler colonialism

      all such projects are inherently racist

      there being no essential difference between the 19th century settler practice of scalping native Americans and today's Zionist practice of burning to death an 18 month Palestinian toddler

      racism enables the settler to feel righteous about subjugating an indigenous people

      thus the settler can have his cake and eat it too

  • Netanyahu will lobby American Jews on deal, calling on alleged loyalty to Jewish state
    • Israeli P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu is going to call upon Jewish-Americans to "kill the deal"

      to put Israel's interests before the interests of the U.S. of A.

      even though killing the deal could set our (the U.S.) nation on a path to a war upon Iran

      the sight of grieving relatives and friends

      silently awaiting the arrival of the body bags

      within each the residue of a life


      on another war that could have been averted

      Iran never having been a threat to America

      so beware

      you who advocate killing the deal

      no matter your religious persuasion

      don't think that you won't be held accountable!

  • Did the BBC cover up the anti-Semitism of Gaza's children?
    • Since studies have shown that antisemitism in Europe spikes every time Israel takes to the mass slaughtering of Palestinians, what, are we to believe that the victims of Israel's rampages shouldn't have negative feelings towards those who destroy their cities and kill their loved ones? As for the children in Gaza who blame their suffering on the Yahud, since Israeli leaders have proclaimed Israel to be a Jewish state, who, other than Yahud, should they say is mass murdering them? Norwegians, perhaps, or Japanese, or why not Aliens instead of Yahud? Indeed, it's surprising that Prime Minister Netanyahu hasn't already seized upon this contested section from "Children of the Gaza War" as proof that Palestinian have come around to accepting Israel's claim that it represents Jews everywhere? Maybe he eventually will, but not until the Jewish Chronicle exhausts its effort to get as much mileage as it can out of the words "the Yahud are massacring Palestinians" - as an example of the Palestinians turning their children into antisemites. Contrariwise, P.M. Netanyahu, it's Israel's brutal occupation of Palestine that's responsible for any rise in antisemitism. Indeed, were it not for this, antisemitism would quickly drop to an amount that could easily be flushed down a toilet.

  • Huckabee's 'oven' comment echoes many Netanyahu statements equating Iran to Nazis
    • In the popular uprising against making war on Iran, a strong Jewish-American presence will facilitate the participation of the 98% of the public that's non-Jewish, some of whom otherwise might hold back for fear of being tarred with the anti-Semitic "brush" by Israel-Firster Americans. Except in said uprising a significant presence of Jewish-Americans has to strengthen the resolve of all participants - "When there are so many Jews marching alongside me, what's this about any of us being anti-Semitic?"

    • Not a threat, merely a prediction.

    • Should Israel and its U.S. Israel-Firster supporters succeed in bringing on a U.S.-backed war against Iran, once the body bags start coming home, anti-Semites will experience no difficulty in convincing an understandably angry public that's out looking for scapegoats that Jews are to blame for this latest ill-begotten war. Not a difficult sell, either, considering the fact that Israel claims that it speaks for all Jews.

      The potential for a repeat of that horrific past?

      Damn right!


      Jewish-Americans rise up en mass and declare "Never Again" and "Not In Our Name."

    • In a world where the truth is the opposite of what the public is being force-fed, Prime Minister Netanyahu's "I will never allow my people to live in the shadow of annihilation" easily translates into "I'll do anything to prevent Iran from acquiring the bomb, even if that means taking down the entire world."

  • It's time for American Jews to recognize they have been duped
    • Regardless of one's race, ethnicity or religion one is either on the side of the slave or the slave-owner.

      Since Israel occupies Palestine (the Palestinian's homeland), and since occupying another people's land is an act of enslavement), it follows that in the case of Israel/Palestine, it's the Palestinians who are the slaves and the Jewish Israelis and their supporters (no matter where they reside nor whether themselves Jewish) who are the slave-owners.

      and since none of us will be free until the last chain is broken ........

  • Crisis for the lobby: Clinton bucks Saban, AIPAC doesn't know what to say
    • All Americans (especially those of the Jewish persuasion*) best think twice before opposing this Iran deal. That's because if its opponents manage to scuttle it, an Iran War will be almost inevitable. Now such a war will translate into lots and lots of casualties, most of whom will be young, poor men and women from inner city, small town and rural America, with very few (if any) from the ranks of the warmongers. And as these casualties mount, there's going to be this enormous outcry - "Who's responsible for what's happened to my son {daughter, father, mother}?" So if an Iran war breaks out, as the casualties mount, watch-out, warmongers, seems that people get angry when a loved one is lost in a war that should never have been fought.

      *If, that is, Israel and mainstream Jewish organizations here in America are in the forefront of the campaign against the nuclear deal

  • Abe Foxman says goodbye to an America of secret Jew haters
    • Most of the antisemitic attacks upon French Jews correlate with Israeli aggression against Palestinians, and the perpetrators are mostly of North African descent. This is especially evident in France where antisemitic acts spike each time the Zionist settler state launches an attack upon Gaza. Indeed the linkage between Israel's onslaughts and antisemitic acts is so tight and well known that whenever there is a large scale Israeli aggression, French authorities provide police protection to synagogues and other Jewish institutions. In Spain too, where to date antisemitic acts have been nonviolent, synagogues also receive police. protection, more so on Jewish holy days. How to explain this resurgence of antisemitism in Europe? Yes, in part, it's a consequence of Israel's occupation of Palestine and subjugation of its people, the Palestinians. But doesn't it also have something to do with the claim by Israel's leaders that they speak and act, not only for Israeli Jews but for Jews everywhere, a lie that only too often gets reinforced by statements from Jewish leaders in the U.S. & elsewhere? If so, isn't it imperative that Jews who oppose Israel's occupation of Palestine speak out and let the world hear the words "Not In Our Name". The task for Jewish-Americans rises beyond those words, it's to convince our government to end its unconditional support of Israel, without which Israel would have to behave like a law-abiding nation, whereupon, antisemitism would be reduced to a level that could be flushed down a toilet.

  • Time for a Jewish reformation?
    • Just as "Christians attempting to atone for crimes committed against Jews are, by this very fact, blocked from confronting crimes committed by Jews", so too, Jews who accept Zionists' claim that they speak and act on behalf of all Jews are blocked from confronting crimes perpetrated by Zionists upon the Palestinian people. Practically speaking the question isn't whether it's time for a Jewish reformation, it's how to remove said blockage, thereby opening the way for Jews to confront Jewish crimes. In this effort, educating Jews as to the crimes that Israeli Jews and their U.S. supporters (both Jewish and Christian) are carrying out against Palestinians, while vital, by itself may not be enough. Jews also must be made aware of the consequences of their continued support of the Israeli occupation of Palestine; specifically, the flareup (ie. blowback) of antisemitism now afflicting Europe. That's because whether or not antisemitism in Europe deepens and spreads (including to the U.S.) may very well depend upon how effective and intense Jewish opposition to Jewish Israeli crimes. Currently, while Jewish opposition to Israel is growing, it's hasn't seriously dented the widespread acceptance in America that Zionist Israel speaks for all Jews. Unfortunately the danger to Jews posed by Israel's crimes against the Palestinian (& other) people is far greater than what's being acknowledged. The reason the full extent of this threat isn't getting out is that Israel and its supporters know that if the U.S. public (Jews especially) ever learn the truth - that it's Israel's U.S.-backed actions, rather than Arab/Islamic responses to those actions) that drive the region's cycles of violence - then watch-out, U.S. politicians and other so-called leaders.

      Yet to the extent that Jews are front & center in the movement to reshape U.S. policy vis-a-vis Israel/Palestine, a catastrophe can be averted. Otherwise, unfortunately, there's that horrific precedent to think about.

  • New online digital mapping tool shows inside story of Israeli assault on Gaza
    • Had you been in Gaza last summer you wouldn't be saying that. You also might change your tune if you knew the international legal definition of genocide. From the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide it's as follows ....

      Article II describes the two elements of the crime of genocide.
      1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic,
      racial or religious group, as such", and
      2) the physical element which includes 5 acts described in sections a,b,c,d & e. A crime must include both elements to be called genocide

      Article III describes 5 punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide, conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity

      Article II: In the present Convention genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:
      a) killing members of the group;
      b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to the group;
      c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
      d) imposing methods intended to prevent births within the group;
      e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

      Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the groups physical survival, such as clean water, food, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion int deserts.

      So if what Israel's doing to Gaza fits the definition, let the punishment fit the crime, the punishment fit the crime, the punishment fit the crime!!!!!

    • Gaza and the Warsaw Ghetto

      same place
      different time
      while the world stands by

  • In Gaza, the ultimate humiliation
    • Gaza and the Warsaw Ghetto

      same place
      different times
      while the world stands by

  • Oren's criticism of US Jews earns his book five thumbs down: 'slinky,' 'self-aggrandizing,' 'twists reality'
    • One is either on the side of the slave (oppressed) or the slaveowner (oppressor). This holds no matter one's nationality, ethnicity, religion, race or gender.

      In Palestine/Israel the Palestinians are the slaves, since it is their homeland that is being occupied (occupying another people's land is a form of enslavement), which means Jewish Israelis (being that they are the occupiers) are ipso facto the slaveowners.

  • 'Six Jews sitting in the White House discussing the Palestinian state'
    • U.S. and other non-Israeli Jews should be grateful to Israel for what? For taking over Palestine and subjugating its people, while, at the same time, claiming that it's acting on behalf of Jews everywhere, and never mind that said claims give rise to outbursts of violent antisemitism such as what recently took place in France. Israel then exploits the antisemitism engendered by its maltreatment of Palestinians by citing such incidents as justification for the existence of a Jewish homeland and by imploring members of the so-called Jewish diaspora to "come home." But with a homeland like Israel fewer and fewer Jewish-Americans (this one included) express any interest in migrating there, let alone being grateful for its existence.

  • Oren pushed Random House to hurry his book so American Jews will 'intercede' to stop Iran deal and save millions of Jews
    • Michael Oren claims to be on a mission to save millions of Jews from a nuclear armed Iran, and never mind that Iran's leadership has denied any intention of building nuclear weapons. Israel, on the other hand, actually has nuclear weapons, and has threatened to deploy them. So who's going to same millions of Iranians from being wiped out should the colonial state use its nukes? Or don't Iranian lives matter?

  • Rightwing American Zionists fight over whether Palestinians should get a state
    • I remember well those post-1967 war days, the racist jokes about arab inferiority and jewish supremacy, an attitude which continues to this day. indeed, it was this surge of racism that led me to recognize the inherently racist nature of the zionist entity israel and open my eyes to the plight of the palestinian people.

  • Egypt's continuing revolution makes a mockery of Huntington's 'clash of civilizations'
    • from Wael Eskander's "There's Still Hope for the Egyptian Revolution", Counterpunch, July l, 2013

      .........."Direct action is becoming widely accepted and adopted as a means of change. The constant rhetoric that problems should be addressed by political parties and legal means is being challenged. This may mean than until a system can be set up which change can be effected through elections and organizations, people will give legitimacy to street politics and actions. The people may be cheering for the army today, but it doesn't necessarily mean that they will be cheated out of their rights. The hope is that some of those who took to the streets adopt positions that are value-driven rather than loyalty driven. Their is hope that they will continue their path and see things for what they are and be fooled less by politicians and propaganda. There is hope that the revolution that was founded on human dignity started calling for bread, freedom and social justice will continue until those promises are delivered. There is hope that even if we go through another tunnel, there will be light. There is hope." -

      and beyond hope there is the demonstrated creative potential of a revolutionary people. But how to sustain the revolution, because after those magical eighteen days in Tahrir square two years ago, the fire, while it didn't go out, seemed to sputter. How to keep it simmering, at least, so as to prevent the "counters" from regrouping and taking over? Obviously there can't be permanent mass street mobilizations, not if there's to be a viable economy. Here, perhaps, the internet will be useful? Meanwhile, power to the people - today, tomorrow, always.

    • "Washington would rather see a failed, starving Egypt rife with sectarian strife, than a successful Egypt outside of empire".

      as per Tunisia and Libya today with Afghanistan and Iraq headed the same way, not to mention what happened only a few decades ago when liberation movements in Central America temporarily achieved a measure of independence from their neighboring goliath.

Showing comments 3269 - 3201