Trending Topics:

Growing chill between Obama and Muslims could prove a headache in November

on 10 Comments
Iftar President Obama speaking at an Iftar dinner during Ramadan at the White House (Photo: Associated Press)

In April, as it does every year, the Arab American Institute (AAI) hosted the “Kahlil Gibran Spirit of Humanity” awards in Washington, D.C. The institute, an organization that promotes Arab-American participation in political life, honored several groups, including the Southern Poverty Law Center “for its tireless efforts to foster a society that respects all its members.”

Notably, one special guest was missing this year: a representative from the Obama administration to deliver the keynote address. While Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, a Lebanese-American, was on hand to speak, it was not for the keynote address, a slot that has gone to administration officials in the past.

The absence of an Obama administration official giving the keynote address was no accident–one sign that Arab-American and Muslim-American support for the Obama administration is waning. Instead, AAI declined to host Attorney General Eric Holder as a silent protest after the Obama administration had said Holder would not address the controversy over the New York Police Department’s spying on Muslims or the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s anti-Muslim trainings.

The news about Holder first leaked onto the Internet as the awards dinner approached, and further details were confirmed by a source close to the Arab American Institute. AAI thought “it would be kind of foolish to just sit there and have them check off the box that they’ve talked to our community,” the source said.

AAI, which works with the administration on a number of levels, has been publicly quiet about the incident.

But the episode is one look at the mounting frustration in Muslim-American and Arab-American communities over the Obama administration’s policies. The Obama administration’s response to the NYPD spying and FBI training controversies has only crystallized the sense that the administration is out of touch with these communities.

Though the Obama campaign was squeamish about Islam due to right-wing smears–campaign volunteers once removed Muslim women from sitting behind the candidate’s podium–the overwhelming majority of American Muslims voted for Obama in 2008.

“American Muslims were very encouraged at the beginning of the Obama administration. There was a lot of nice rhetoric,” said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesperson for the Council on American Islamic Relations, in an interview.

Recent polls show that Muslim support for Obama remains high, and Mitt Romney’s courting of the Islamophobic wing of the GOP means Muslim affiliation with the Democratic Party will likely remain through the 2012 election. It remains to be seen, though, whether that support will be turned into actual votes.

That question could be crucial to the prospects for Obama’s re-election. A new study on American Muslim political participation notes that in Florida, the Muslim “electorate is large enough to swing the vote to whichever party receives most of its votes.” Michigan, with its large Muslim population, was another state the study identified that could be won over with Muslim votes.

But the Obama administration has paid little attention to American Muslims. In fact, President Obama has not set foot in a mosque in the US since he was elected. This is in sharp contrast to the extensive outreach to the Jewish community.

Adding to Muslim-American and Arab-American anger at the Obama administration has been the continuation and escalation of wars in the Middle East, as well as passage of the National Defense Authorization Act. But perhaps the issue that has most hit home is the administration’s response to anti-Muslim trainings and programs in law enforcement.

“All of these revelations–whether it’s the NYPD spying, the FBI Islamophobic training, the Pentagon Islamophobic training, the stepped up presence in Afghanistan, more drone strikes than the Bush administration–add up to a substantial level of frustration in the American Muslim community,” said Hooper.

The administration’s recent bungled response to the NYPD spying controversy is a case in point. An Associated Press investigation has revealed the police department’s potentially illegal program of surveillance on Muslims in the Northeast, and many Muslim activists and community leaders have been organizing since then to put a stop to the program.

When John Brennan, Obama’s chief counterterror adviser and a former Bush administration official, met with NYPD chief Ray Kelly in New York two weeks ago, he said, “My conversations with Commissioner Kelly indicate he’s done everything according to the law.” Brennan repeatedly said he had “full confidence” in the NYPD.

As an Associated Press report put it, the comments represented “a White House stamp of approval of the NYPD’s tactics.” The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) expressed “deep concern” over Brennan’s comments.

“Brennan’s statements could undermine the preliminary review the Department of Justice is considering to determine if there were any unlawful practices that led to spying on Muslim Americans,” an MPAC statement read. MPAC also had a message for the Obama administration: “In a letter to the White House, MPAC made it clear that unless there are steps taken to further clarify the statements this could harm our shared agenda of community-partnership approaches.”

The administration quickly responded with a statement denying that Brennan approved of the NYPD program, and set up a meeting with Brennan and a handful of Muslim community leaders. But even the meeting was panned by critics, who said it only included four people, was organized hastily and did not address the Muslim community’s questions about the administration’s position on the NYPD program.

“It’s clear that this episode will weigh heavily on the community’s mind heading into the November elections,” Omar Tewfik, a spokesman for AAI, recently wrote, referring to Brennan’s comments. “Caught between bigoted policies and confusing or disingenuous outreach, the situation of Arab Americans and American Muslims in the lead-up to this election looks quite grim.”

Alex Kane

Alex Kane is a freelance journalist who focuses on Israel/Palestine and civil liberties. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

10 Responses

  1. HarryLaw on May 3, 2012, 10:38 am

    I would encourage as many muslims as possible to try and get as close as possible and to be photographed on the campaign trail with hypocrites like Obama, preferably with long beards wearing Keffiyeh’s and hijab’s,watch them squirm, I think Medea would do it.

    • Fredblogs on May 3, 2012, 4:59 pm

      Yes, because getting Romney elected is the best thing that could happen to Muslims in the U.S. and worldwide. Let the people paranoid about Obama, who think he is a closet Muslim have reasons to vote. What could be the harm.

  2. on May 3, 2012, 10:53 am

    They can vote for Romney!

  3. dahoit on May 3, 2012, 11:36 am

    Yeah,watching hypocrites squirm is one of my favorite pastimes,but the MSM has failed to be society’s watchdog,so it’s only rare instances that I can enjoy.
    I mean,they are all total hypocrites,but they are called experts,belied by their serial cluster f*cks,lies and dead bodies who can no longer point out that these experts are wearing no clothes.

  4. maggielorraine on May 3, 2012, 12:22 pm

    This article raises a lot of crucial points. However, I do not believe Muslims will leave Obama en masse, unless they are willing to abandon the two-party trap or forfeit their participation in the voting process altogether. There is no Republican alternative. Romney is cowing to the right, not the left, and will not be interested in appealing to the Muslim community. If Obama wasn’t good enough, and he isn’t, no republican will be. So mainstream Muslim voters are left with two choices: 1) vote 3rd party -and that takes a certain kind of person, the kind of person I’ve realized I personally will be this election; or 2) not vote at all. I don’t really think either of these scenarios is likely to occur in the majority.

  5. ToivoS on May 3, 2012, 3:36 pm

    I am seeing growing influence by Arab Americans politics. I am active in the Democratic Party at the county and state level. After 911 and the anti-Islam backlash set in, I have been attending a CAIR annual dinner. National level politicians avoid these dinners like the plague. What I have witnessed is at the local level, many office holders do show up and more every year. These dinners are in Sacramento and at the last one I recognized 3 State Assemblymen, 4 mayors and about 6 County Supervisors. The crowd was obviously well heeled and these officials were obviously showing their support in hopes of campaign contributions. Two of those in attendance could very well be in the US House within a decade.

    I think this is a very positive development and hopefully will be seen at the national level in coming years.

  6. Fredblogs on May 3, 2012, 4:49 pm

    Interesting asymmetry in this:

    “President Obama has not set foot in a mosque in the US since he was elected. This is in sharp contrast to the extensive outreach to the Jewish community.”

    He has been in mosques in other countries.

    Has he set foot in a synagogue in America? Anywhere in the world? Since he was elected I mean.

  7. Denis on May 3, 2012, 7:56 pm

    Very well researched and written, Alex. Thanks.

    Wow, I had no idea Muslims could swing Fla. I am shocked. I would not even have guessed they have the numbers to substantially influence Mich. even though it’s their stronghold. How frustrating it must be to have votes but no candidate. I agree w/ maggie, they are stuck w/ baby-face Obama, who is no longer running on change and hope.

    Obama knows the Muslims have no other choice. He also knows the Jews don’t have the votes to influence the outcome of national elections, but they have the dollars, and that’s the huge multiplier that no other demographic has. Per capita, the Jews’ political influence is huge.

    If you’re one of those Bedouin’s in Alice Walker’s excellent video, that’s bad news. Because unless American politicians flip-off AIPAC, take up the West Bank cause, and lean on the Zionists very hard and very soon, those Bedouin’s are doomed. They are Israel’s Comanches.

    My only (slim) hope w/ Obama is that after this election cycle, he won’t need the AIPAC money anymore and he can do in his last term what he could not possibly do in the first. I also hope this thought keeps Bibi up at night.

  8. Opti on May 3, 2012, 10:39 pm

    The option is clear:

    Vote Green Party or don’t vote.

    Voting for Obama or Romney is the same. Maybe Romney is slightly different, but results will be the same — i.e. Israel/Palestine, National Security, Iran, Syria, etc..

    Green Party:

  9. Denis on May 4, 2012, 11:38 am

    Yeah, nice try, Opti. More vote-for-me spam.

    Voting Green Party is the same as not voting, at least as far as the I/P issue goes.

    Not a single word about Palestine on the GP platform page you link to. So what’s the point within the context of this discussion?

Leave a Reply