Jeb Bush bashes Iran talks as ‘foolish’ and hails Israeli settlements as ‘new apartment buildings in Jerusalem’

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
The famous Adelson primary is afoot! The race among Republican presidential hopefuls to get money from the leading backer of Republican candidates, Sheldon Adelson, who says there is no such thing as a Palestinian and wants to nuke Iran.

Yesterday we noted that Texas Senator Ted Cruz embraced Israel in announcing his presidential run– and immediately raised a lot of money from neoconservative Wall Street guys in New York. Well, likely Republican candidate Jeb Bush is also embracing Israel. He writes a piece in the National Journal condemning Obama’s talks with Iran as “risky” and saying White House comments on Israeli leaders are “no way to treat an ally.”

Here are some excerpts; they are all neoconservative talking points straight out of his brother George W.’s braintrust; and they don’t give Hillary Clinton a lot of wiggle room. Unless she decides to line up with the president?

The administration believes Iran will become a responsible partner for peace once it signs up to a deal that largely leaves in place its nuclear infrastructure. In a region that is in a near-constant state of conflict — with Iran as a primary instigator — this approach is foolish.

It is clear that nothing — not public opinion, not opposition from his own party in Congress, and not even the facts — will deter President Obama from a potentially risky agreement that may well allow Iran to intimidate the entire Middle East, menace Israel, and, most of all, threaten America.

Israel’s elections should be something to celebrate. If only the rest of the region were able to hold peaceful and vibrant multi-party elections . . .

Yet instead of recognizing Prime Minister Netanyahu’s reelection and the achievement of Israel’s multi-party, multi-ethnic democracy, the White House issued half-hearted congratulations.

Then Obama threatened to downgrade the U.S.-Israel relationship and permit a series of anti-Israel resolutions to pass the United Nations Security Council without firm American opposition.

But this is consistent with a pattern of diplomatic scolding of Israel. The Obama administration has insisted that Israel make concessions just to get the Palestinian leaders to the negotiating table.

The Obama administration treats announcements of new apartment buildings in Jerusalem like acts of aggression. The Obama administration anonymously insults Israeli leaders personally and then pretends that such insults were never authorized. This is no way to treat an ally.

Conducting the foreign policy of a great nation requires maturity and a strategic sense of America’s long-term interests. This is no time for schoolyard antics. With Israel, those interests lie in a firm alliance. Israel and America must work together to build a more prosperous and hopeful future for the region.

A state for the Palestinian people, side by side with Israel, will be possible only if the Palestinian people are represented by leaders committed to delivering on the promises made at the negotiating table. Ultimately, the most fruitful efforts for peace come in moments when America’s word is trusted and America’s commitment is certain.

Anyone who claims to pursue peace in the region — especially between Israel and her neighbors — must know that Israel will make no sacrifices for peace when she feels threatened.

41
Leave a Comment

Please Login to comment
newest oldest most voted
a blah chick
a blah chick

Oh my dear Lord, why are they subjecting us to all this now? A two-year presidential campaign will take at least a decade off my life, that’s assuming I live through it. Something Shrub jr said leaped out at me: “A state for the Palestinian people, side by side with… Read more »

johneill
johneill

That “the foreign policy of a great nation requires maturity and a strategic sense of America’s long-term interests,” is true enough. If only conservative-minded Americans knew that supporting Israel, as it stands, is a losing proposition in the near-future. But this “region that is in a near-constant state of conflict… Read more »

Kay24
Kay24

For shame. They are so power hungry they will ignore the plight of the downtrodden and suffering, to kiss up to zio assets, so that they will be bestowed with casino money to run their campaigns. This is going to be disguising. Get your barf bags ready….these so called American… Read more »

eljay
eljay

Conducting the foreign policy of a great nation requires maturity and a strategic sense of America’s long-term interests. That’s right, Jeb. And it’s clear that you don’t have the requisite maturity and strategic sense. This is no time for schoolyard antics. That’s right, Jeb. This is no time for people… Read more »

Blownaway
Blownaway

I thought the elections in Israel were over? What country is Jeb trying to become leader of? I cant tell