Activism

Why did Sec’y of State Clinton stick her nose into $465 donation to Scottish film festival in ’09? (BDS)

A month ago we spotlighted Hillary Clinton’s disturbing letter to megadonor Haim Saban, in which she promised to work with Republicans to oppose the BDS movement– Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel.

Well it turns out this isn’t a first for Hillary Clinton. She’s been battling BDS for many years. Even as Secretary of State. So her emails show!

Here’s an amazing story in the Scotsman, about then-Secretary of State Clinton’s decision to step into a foreign country’s film festival in 2009, in order to protect Israel.

Six years ago the Edinburgh International Film Festival took a 300-Pound donation ($465) from the Israeli government to allow an Israeli artist to attend the shindig. This was right after the massacre of Cast Lead in Gaza. Director Ken Loach objected to the donation, and the Film Festival returned the money. That’s when the lobby pressured Clinton, using family connections, to do something about the Scottish Film Festival.

Today the Scotsman can reveal that the row went right to the upper echelons of the American political system with Mrs Clinton suggesting pressure could be exerted on the Scottish Government and the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown to get the festival to reverse its decision.

The controversy was brought to the attention of Mrs Clinton by newspaper publisher Brian Greenspun, a college roommate of Bill Clinton, who forwarded a newspaper article on the boycott to the then US Secretary of State.

According to emails from her personal account released by the US Department of State, the article had originally been emailed to Mr Greenspun by Bruce Ramer, an entertainment lawyer and former president of the American Jewish Committee, an advocacy group.

The emails were released amid controversy about Mrs Clinton’s use of private email accounts while she was Secretary of State.

In his email, Mr Ramer wrote to Mr Greenspun: “I hope you can enlist Hilary’s support (and please give her my personal best). We need, for many reasons, to have the US protest and condemn this outrageous boycott and to oppose the anti-Semitism inherent in it. The organisers of the festival must be convinced to reverse themselves.”

After Mr Ramer’s email was forwarded to Mrs Clinton’s private email account, on May 25 2009 the then Secretary of State responded: “Thanks for the headsup on this. We are working to decide the most effective way forward, and I’ll keep you informed. We have some good ideas as to what our govt can do, but we also want to see pressure from local people brought on the British and Scottish govts.

“Can you and Bruce reach out to the community in London and Edinburgh to urge them to raise this w PM Brown and other govt officials? We’d like to see top down and bottom up pressure. Let me know what you think.”

Mrs Clinton, who is now a front-runner for the Democrat nomination in the US presidential elections, Cc’d the email to her deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan, Andrew J Shapiro, a senior adviser to Clinton who would soon become assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, and her spokesperson Philippe Reines.

In an email sent to the three the previous night, Mr Clinton wrote: “Pls read Brian’s message and all the email traffic below. What can we do about this? Let me know if you have ideas. Thx.”

Mr Sullivan responded: “We will confer in the morning and come up with a plan.”

The Scotsman has no evidence that Clinton actually did anything. But it’s a good bet to judge from the email. The Scottish government says it didn’t interfere in the film festival, wouldn’t do that kind of thing. But Hillary Clinton would! And:

Asked if they had received any pressure from the US government or Hillary Clinton over the boycott, the Edinburgh International Film Festival declined to comment.

Greenspun was a frequent visitor to the White House who lobbied the Clintons on other Israel-related issues. Israel’s close to his heart.

Bruce Ramer is an attorney for Hollywood celebrities who is big in the Jewish community and is also a friend of Barack Obama’s. He has a federal appointment. No wonder President Obama has equated anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, lobbying support for his Iran Deal.

This is important now because it demonstrates the intensity of the Israel lobby when dealing with our highest officials. It uses political pressure to make them come to heel. This isn’t even settlement policy in the West Bank. No, nothing is too small; and the usual rules don’t apply. A foreign film festival makes a decision you don’t like? Bigfoot ’em with the US secretary of state. And how many emails a day did Clinton’s office get asking her to do something? Scores or hundreds. The Democratic Republic of the Congo was then in crisis, millions had been killed there over the previous ten years. You’d think that issue might be front and center on the secretary’s agenda. Not quite.

Also: You think BDS isn’t effective? It’s certainly gotten a lot of folks’ serious attention. And just imagine if our support for Israel were politicized. Shenanigans like this would suddenly become scandalous. Bernie Sanders would be questioning Clinton’s professionalism.

Thanks to Max Blumenthal, author of The 51-Day War: Ruin and Resistance in Gaza. And to James North, expert on int’l justice campaigns.

20 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Doesn’t it show the effectiveness of the interconnected nature of the disparate elements who live times and spaces apart come together to do the bidding of the Zionist?
Paul Singer teams up with AIPAC,FDD,and UANI to sharpen knives against Argentina .
Lauder urges Merkel to toe the AIPAC lines on Iran.
Lantos goes after Chirac and Schrieder . Chirac folds and Merkel emerges .
HBL asserts that as a Jew he would like to see Sarkozy break up Libya and Syria to make sure that the rebels get the chance to recognize Israel.

Perhaps the US gov should appoint a “Secretary for Israeli affairs” reporting directly to the President and the Israeli PM with special powers including veto rights on any decisions by his / her American boss, not to Israel,s liking.He or she would be required to sign off on any legislation affecting the “Jewish State”.

Why not move American Foreign Policy to Tel Aviv and avoid all the back and forth.The US would save a fortune on airfares.

RE: “This is important new because it demonstrates the intensity of the Israel lobby when dealing with our highest officials. It uses political pressure to make them come to heel.” ~ Weiss

SEE: ■ A Problem of Self Image (Mysh) from Richard Silverstein’s Tikun Olam site

RE: “Bruce Ramer is an attorney for Hollywood celebrities who is big in the Jewish community and is also a friend of Barack Obama’s.” ~ Weiss

MY QUESTION: Does Haim Saban have Ramer on retainer?

P.S. If Hillary Clinton gets back into the White House (i.e., is elected U.S. President), Haim and Cheryl Saban will effectively have a sublet on the Lincoln bedroom! *

* SEE: “The Clinton Years Revisited”, By Philip Giraldi, Antiwar.com, 2008-02-26

[EXCERPTS] As bad as the past eight years have been, it may be fruitful to remember what U.S. national security policy was like under Bill Clinton . . .
. . . In an astonishing testament to the resiliency of the Clinton era neocon-lites, several of the better-known examples have recently surfaced in Doha. Qatar hosts an annual conference called the U.S.-Islamic World Forum, which was just concluded, running from Feb. 16-18. This year, for the first time, there was a co-sponsor, the Saban Center of Washington’s Brookings Institute. The Saban Center, far from an objective observer of the Middle East, is funded by Israeli-American billionaire Haim Saban, who said in a 2004 interview, “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.” Saban is extremely close to the Clintons and is also reported to be the largest contributor to the Democratic National Committee. When Bill was in office, Saban and his wife slept in the Lincoln bedroom on a number of occasions. Like its founder, the Saban Center is Israel-centric in its policy analysis, sponsoring bilateral meetings in Jerusalem to discuss issues of common concern. . .

ENTIRE COMMENTARY – http://www.antiwar.com/orig/giraldi.php?articleid=12418

Do I smell desperation? Why, yes I do.

“Israeli Business Sets Up Anti-boycott Hotline

Established by the Presidium of Israel Business Organizations, the new channel will provide ‘individual and discrete’ assistance to companies facing boycotts.

Israeli business has opened a hotline to deal with issues arising from the activities of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, Israeli financial newspaper Globes reported on Sunday.

The hotline, which was established by the Presidium of Israel Business Organizations, will handle queries and complaints from business owners regarding cases of boycott or concern about boycott.

“The new line will enable us to provide individual and discreet solutions for Israeli businesses exposed to boycotts and attempted boycotts,” said Dan Catarivas, Director of the Division of Foreign Trade and International Relations at the Manufacturers’ Association of Israel.

“BDS is not a uniform phenomenon; it is expressed differently in each country. When complaints or reports of such cases are received, we will address the situation specifically, using the tools we have, in order to provide them with a relevant and correct response.”

Businesses, including the hotel, agricultural, cinema, and industrial sectors, as well as other economic concerns, were informed of the new channel in a letter from presidium chairman Shraga Brosh.

“For a long time, we have been exposed through the media, and some of us personally, to growing harassment by BDS activists promoting an economic, academic, and cultural boycott of Israel,” Shraga
wrote.

“Unfortunately, these attempts at a boycott have worsened and expanded recently and are not expected to go away in the near future.”

The hotline will offer legal and economic assistance to businessmen coping with cases of boycott. Those include cases of “silent boycott,” in which businesses and organizations refrain from doing business with Israeli companies out of concern that they will suffer public relations or economic damage. …”

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/business/1.670374