The news that several donors to the Clinton Foundation gained VIP access to Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State has raised the question of what these donors got for their money beyond facetime. And one way in which Clinton has evidently been responsive is the Israel issue. Several Foundation donors are strong supporters of Israel and opponents of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign (BDS). As a presidential candidate, Clinton has been a one-woman campaigner against BDS. She has issued several denunciations of that human rights campaign over the last year, and she injected anti-BDS language into the Democratic Party platform.
Of course, Clinton has long supported Israel, before and after her State Department stint, and she has long had pro-Israel donors. But the anti-BDS list of Foundation donors suggests the new lineaments of the Israel lobby in the age of Clinton, as a right-center-liberal lobby. The State Department under John Kerry has actually made a specific point of not opposing boycott of Israeli settlements.
News articles list several donors who care about Israel who got access to Clinton as secretary. They include Haim and Cheryl Saban, Randi Weingarten of the American Federation of Teachers, Slimfast founder S. Daniel Abraham, and Hollywood executive Casey Wasserman.Hollywood producer Jeff Skoll,
The Sabans donated between $10 and 25 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the Associated Press. Saban has said his one issue is Israel. He has also funded a campaign against BDS, as Julia Carmel and Max Blumenthal reported:
Seated beside [Sheldon] Adelson on stage at the casino baron’s Las Vegas anti-BDS conference, Saban openly panicked about BDS, warning of “an anti-Semitic tsunami coming at us.”
Saban called for an initiative to punish corporations that refused to work inside Israel or the territories it occupies through military force: “Any company that chooses to boycott business in Israel is going to look at this case, and once we’re done they’re going to think twice whether they want to take on Israel or not,” Saban declared. “Trust me, this is just the beginning.”
Saban has since directed his giving to the Democratic Party, and Hillary Clinton wrote to him a year ago to assure him that she would work with Republicans to fight BDS:
“I know you agree that we need to make countering BDS a priority.”
was granted almost immediate access to then-Secretary of State Clinton, with [Huma] Abedin serving as the facilitator. According to the Clinton Foundation website, Abraham, like the Wasserman Foundation, has given between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.
BDS may hope that pressuring Israel will lead to peace, the truth is that outside forces will not resolve the I P conflict, particularly when anti-semitism is rising throughtout the world, Democrats must condemn efforts to isolate and delegitimze Israel. Delegitimization must stop immediately.
Casey Wasserman, whose foundation gave between $5 and $10 million, is also a strong supporter of Israel. He surely opposes BDS; he co-signed a letter to Hollywood bigs last year with Haim Saban, urging them to support Clinton because she’s behind Israel. Variety:
“She will be an excellent leader for the United States and for our International standing,” they write. “She is and always has been a strong leader and true friend when it comes to the U.S. and Israeli relationship. Trust me we know!”
Under Weingarten, the AFT donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and pledged partnership commitments with other interests in four separate Clinton Global Initiative programs. Weingarten had two private meetings with Clinton in 2009 and 2012 and also joined her at a photo shoot in 2010.
Her attack on BDS – the Palestinian-led campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions – and her attempt to associate it with “violence” and “terrorism,” echoes her earlier condemnation of the American Studies Association for endorsing the Palestinian call to boycott Israeli institutions complicit in occupation and human rights violations.
Weingarten is not just an ardent Zionist, but a militant one:
For our ancestors, if we had said: There will be a Jewish state—for the 6 million who died in the Shoah, there is now a homeland where more than 6 million Jews live—they would have said, “Dayenu.” [That is enough] A state with a powerful military. Dayenu. A vigorous economy. Dayenu. A proud democracy. Dayenu.
And yet none of those things alone—the economy, the military, the democracy—is enough to secure that future. Unless we act.
Benjamin Ringel is a developer and Foundation supporter who the New York Post says sought access from then-Secretary Clinton for a far-rightwing Israeli leader:
On June 16, 2009, Ben Ringel wrote to Abedin, “I’m on shuttle w Avigdor Liberman. I called u back yesterday. I want to stop by to see hrc tonite for 10 mins.” Ringel donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
It is not clear from the emails whether Ringel got immediate access. The shopping-center developer is surely opposed to BDS. He has had financial difficulties in recent years and in one court case his creditors alleged that he “would potentially flee the country for Israel, where lenders claim he has been spending more time recently.”
Finally, here are two liberal Zionists who gave to the Clinton Foundation and would likely oppose BDS, though there’s no direct evidence on that score. Jeff Skoll, is a pro-peace Jew who has taken part in initiatives to bridge gaps between Israel and Palestine with economic development, women’s empowerment, bridge-building, etc. Jewish Journal:
Skoll has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to organizations such as Common Ground that are working toward better understanding and peace in the Middle East.
Jill and Ken Iscol gave 500,000 to 1 million to the Clinton Foundation, and their friend the entrepreneur Jacqueline Novogratz got an appointment from Clinton, according to the new emails. The Iscols are donors to the liberal Zionist New Israel Fund, which opposes BDS. Jill Iscol wrote that her late father on Long Island, who was pro-Israel, was a model for her as a philanthropist:
My father gave back mainly in an active commitment to Jewish causes, especially those which strengthened and secured Israel. But his generous spirit reached beyond the temple doors.
Phil,
It’s not fair that you consistently fail to mention that while there many Zionist donors of the Clinton Foundation, there are also pro-BDS heavyweights that also donate to it.
Why won’t you acknowledge such an important fact? I don’t get it.
Qatar is a pro-BDS government that is currently the richest country in the world, possibly richer than all Zionist Clinton supporters combined. They have been reported as donating to the foundation and also have organized meetings with Hillary on undisclosed issues.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/27/clinton-foundation-donors-included-fifa-qatar-host-committee/
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/01/hillary-clinton-emails-cherie-blair-lobbied-qatari-royal-family
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-foundation-hamas-share-major-donor/
@silamcuz “there are also pro-BDS heavyweights that also donate to it.”
such as??
It seems to me that Clinton is a lobbyist politician; she will take money from oil prince war BDS organizers too anti-BDS supporters… it is called triangulation politics. She is completely inaccessible to the common man; she will be the Arab leaders political best friend, ever in the history of the conflict.
That is why I cannot vote for her or Trump. With her in office Iran will then build the Nuclear bomb, I predict; possibly within months. According to DEBKA… Iran can build the nuclear bomb in a few months.
If your Pro-BDS, which I am not, you should vote for Clinton. Once in office, and Iran gets the Nuclear bomb she or her staff won’t even take calls from AIPAC.
Bill Clinton probably thinks Israel is a corporate welfare state.
Iran has been a few months away from building a nuclear bomb for the last twenty years or so. Somehow, they haven’t got around to it yet. I don’t know whether this is because they are inefficient, or because they are signatories to the Non-proliferation treaty.
Here is a nice bit on Iran.
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/iran-as-a-twentieth-century-victim-1900-through-the-aftermath-of-world-war-ii/
I’m surprised Phil and Mondoweiss even bother to ask the question of whether there is a quid pro quo from the Clintons and most other U.S. politicians in return for pretty much monolithic Zionist, Israel Lobby-type support. It’s been well documented for years, including during the Clinton presidency, the Bush II presidency, the Obama presidency, Hillary Clinton’s reign as Secretary of State and the Hillary Clinton-dictated Democratic Party Platform, pushing for even more support for Israel and hinting at conflict, even war, with Iran and Russia.
The factual evidence here includes Mearsheimer and Walt’s “Israel Lobby” book, Alison Weir’s “Against our Better Judgment” book, and the work of the Washington Report on Middle East Affair’s for many years, including its March 2016 conference “Israel’s Influence: Good or Bad for America” at which Phil was a speaker and many Mondoweiss posts.
Hope that Obama will somehow take belated steps to blunt the growing tide of American and Israel Lobby support for Israel, right or wrong? Don’t make me laugh. Obama is and always has been a hand-picked puppet, groomed and supported by the Pritzgers and other Zionists, starting with his stint as an Illinois State Senator, in return for pro-Israel support as a politician. Neocon Zionists were big in Bush’s years and some carried over to Obama. Zionists were big during the Clinton years and have carried over to Obama. They now salivate at the prospect of a Hillary Clinton regime feeding their insatiable hunger. Obama jeopardize his golden parachute. I don’t think so.
We need a new language to replace outdated terms like so-called liberal Zionism and right-wing Zionism as distinct “isms”. BDS support or non-support may separate them, but it’s a fairly minor issue on the spectrum of Israel, Palestine, Middle East issues.
Phil correctly hints at a blurring of the lines between liberal Zionism and right-wing Zionism, but at their core, they are both part of the pretty much seamless and faceless oligarchic corporate elite who run this country for their own special interests, foisting neoliberalism and globalism on the increasing impoverished masses of Americans. They argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, but it’s mostly show to deceive the populace, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
See Chris Hedges book, “Wages of Rebellion, The Moral Imperative of Revolt” (2015).