McMaster solidifies power at NSC — and supports Iran deal, sees Israel as occupier

32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“He allows anti-Israel, pro-Muslim Brotherhood, pro-Iran Obama people like Robert Malley to walk around the NSC and tell people what to do and think.”Glick.

Can,t have anyone who does not show complete fealty to Israel ,(even at the expense of the welfare of the US )roaming the halls of US power and leaking secrets about the real Israel.

Why can,t people understand that The US exists to protect Israel.

For jacko—it says so in the Torah.

Great reporting. I had no idea of McMaster’s stance on the Israel Palestine issues. And I’m amazed that someone holding those opinions managed to sneak through to hold the position of National Security Advisor.

Clearly the Zionists have quite a task at hand in trying to remove him. As the article noted, Trump would look like a fool, correction, even more of a fool if he brought the axe down on yet another General in that post.

This wouldn’t matter to the Zionists. They care for no one but themselves let alone Trump. If there is one thing I have come to learn, never discount the shamelessness and tenacity of the Zionist nutters – nothing phases them and their zeal for supremacy over all of Palestine will not be thwarted by McMaster.

It’s up to all of us to support McMaster’s opinions and see to it he has a long and prosperous career as National Security Advisor.

“Reportedly the adults, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster….” (Paul Pillar)

Has it come to this? When hope for any indication of sanity lies in the hands of a former oil company CEO and two retired Generals, our future is precarious indeed. And notice how “realists” are labeled as “Israel haters.” And if someone “hates” the Jewish state, well I guess we know what that implies.

Greenwald seems to disagree with you on McMasters. I don’t know who is right.

https://theintercept.com/2017/08/05/whats-worse-trumps-campaign-agenda-or-empowering-generals-and-cia-operatives-to-subvert-it/

On his larger point I agree with Glenn. Much of the opposition to Trump comes from people who don’t trust him to invade or intervene as much as they want him to. They are afraid that the noninterventionist version of Trump will prevail or that he will too incompetent or inconsistent to blow things up the way they want them blown up.

I must admit that the developments are vertiginous and I’m not sure what to make of them. Trump’s agenda was deeply islamophobic, and the goal was to provoke terror attacks to use as a pretext to install a police state, and purge the ‘incompetents’ and the leakers. This is why the ‘deep state’ revolted, and rightly so. (And I thank them!) So I think this bodes well for stability and mideast peace, but at the same time I wonder what’s up their sleeves. Because military guys are always strategerizing about something. Why did he go along with Trump on Syria, ceding it to Putin? This seems out of character for neocons. Anyway I like the giddy tone of this article. That Glick is quite a nasty piece of work and it’s preposterous to suggest that Trump ever supported Israel or wanted to go to the wall with Bibi.