Trending Topics:

Smear campaign is defused as Tom Suarez speaks at UMass

on 21 Comments

When in late August, in response to a casual question on someone else’s Facebook page, I mentioned that I would be in the United States in September for a few talks, a screen-grab of the innocuous exchange swiftly appeared on Zionist blogs and Twitter. Trolling must be a dreary, boring plight.

Yisrael Medad, an American settler in the West Bank and former director of Israel’s Media Watch, was quickest on the case with a hurried critique of the book upon which he assumed my talks would be based. As he put it, having learned that I would be giving “a talk at the University of Massachusetts Amherst … I’m rushing this.”

Mr. Medad’s ‘rushed’ verdict? Mine is

a dangerous book … an evil book.

The British journalist Melanie Phillips seized upon the ‘news’ with a headline that was equally inspirational:

“Has truth lost all meaning”? For Israel-haters, yes.

She warned:

Thomas Suarez is an Israel-hater. He is about to embark on a tour of America. He recently concluded a tour of Scotland. He has spoken at universities in the United Kingdom. A book he wrote, published last year, which vilifies and defames the state of Israel and which references and has been endorsed by other Israel-haters, was honoured with a launch inside a meeting room in the House of Lords.

Her fiction of this “launch”[1] came from two pro-Israel activists in the UK, David Collier and Jonathan Hoffman, who had just produced their own critique of the book, an academic-looking 59 page PDF. Mr. Hoffman, announcing their work on Twitter, added innuendos of Holocaust denial to the brew through an extraordinary non-sequitur to Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor (about whom I have never written or spoken) who conducted deadly experiments on prisoners in Auschwitz.[2]

Except for such libel, any book should of course be critiqued by anyone who can demonstrate flaws. Nor was there anything wrong with the Collier-Hoffman manifesto coming to the attention of three professors at Amherst, where I was scheduled to speak. But if this was intellectually honest, the letter writing campaign that, according to the Amherst Wire, ensued protesting the event and describing it as “supporting ‘identity-based hate’ against Jewish people,” was not.[3]

Amherst Wire article maligning Suarez

Whatever the internal exchanges, my talk proceeded without incident, as did the Q&A, which became more of a discussion among all of us present. A question from an ‘adversarial’ audience member was engaged constructively and amicably. Members of Jewish Voice for Peace who were present contributed to a discussion of a question raised about Israeli-US ‘security’ cooperation.

The evening was introduced by Professor of Communication Sut Jhally, and Interlink Books publisher Michel Moushabeck. Professor Jhally is also executive director of the Media Education Foundation, whose roster of films includes, most recently, “The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel’s Public Relations War in the United States,” narrated by Roger Waters.

Several days later, part of the professors’ letter appeared in the Washington Free Beacon, where I was introduced as “peddling conspiracy theories about Israeli responsibility for terror activities.”

UMass history faculty members Jay Berkovitz, Daniel Gordon, and Jonathan Skolnick released a statement writing off Suarez as an “amateur author” who produced “deeply flawed work … full of factual errors, and distortions of the archival record …It is disappointing to see a student group and outside groups use universities to promote ideological polemics like Suarez’s which only look to demonize an ‘enemy’ … This is unscholarly incitement, not responsible history.”

The Beacon went on to say that

a diligent fact-check [found Suárez’ book] to be “dripping with racial hatred against Jews.”

Thus it was not surprising that Professor Jhally, given his expertise in communication, advertising, and propaganda, wished to learn the nature of the evidence with which his three colleagues had tried to discredit my talk. Through perseverance, he obtained a copy of the full letter, which cited a single source: the same Collier-Hoffman PDF. And what was the source for the Beacon’s “dripping with racial hatred” quote? An advertisement for the same PDF. These two political activists — neither an academic — have a pastime of getting themselves evicted from events and then alleging that they were targeted because they are Jewish. They have not only disrupted and blocked talks by non-academics like me, but have disrupted and blocked talks by the most highly respected and experienced professors, experts on the subject at hand, such as Richard Falk.

Looking up: In Hebron, when the upper storey has been commandeered by settlers, the families remaining in the lower storey install horizontal fencing to protect themselves from the garbage thrown down by the settlers. [Photo: T Suárez]

It was indeed these non-academic (“amateur,” if the word is to be applied consistently) activists in whom the Amherst professors had put their trust, who wreaked havoc when Professor Falk visited Britain in March, successfully intimidating two universities into cancelling his scheduled talks. And they did not forget to invent a way to include the obligatory Holocaust smear — in Professor Falk’s  case, a non-sequitur to David Irving.

At Amherst, the smears were for nought. I spoke. In contrast, Britain’s University of East London, and Middlesex University, in deference to a foreign pariah state, both deprived their students of the experienced, intellectual voice of Professor Falk.

In follow-up to my talk in the 125-year-old Massachusetts Daily Collegian, the same source continues to reappear in difference guises, as though they were corroborating each other. Collegian columnist Joe Frank had not attended the talk; yet he jumped right to “anti-Semitism” in his title and byline:

The anti-Semitism of the Suarez talk is not the way to discuss the Israeli-/Palestinian conflict / Suarez’s rhetoric is a detriment to the Jewish student body on campus.

Most strange of all, the article was tagged with ‘American Symphony Orchestra’, apparently taken from some online bio of mine; but if this was a CanaryMission-esque inspiration, it was wasted effort, as it has been some years since I sat in the ASO violin section.

To demonstrate that UMass is not the first school where I received “backlash from local Jews,” Mr. Frank cited a talk I gave at London’s SOAS in November last year. Perhaps unknown to him, that “backlash” was — yes — from the same two activists upon whom the UMass professors relied, and on whom the Beacon relied.

It was these same two who fed the notorious Daily Mail the tabloid story Mr. Frank repeats: “[Suárez] claimed that the Zionist movement is racist and fascist, and he compared Zionism to Nazism, as reported by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.” What is left unsaid is that those words were in response to a question where I was paraphrasing words I had earlier quoted verbatim — of British and US war-time intelligence, and the journalist Robert Weltsch, a German Jew who fled the Nazis and found a terrifying similarity in the mentality of the Zionist elite in Palestine.

Nor would many readers in the United States be aware that the euphemistically-named CAA is a political pressure group notorious for trivializing true bigotry against Jews in order to smear good people on behalf of the Israeli state. The tactic continued when a Daily Mail headline flaunted a new lie about me in order to smear by association UK Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, whom I have neither met nor ever had any contact with. Its headline:

Corbyn is urged to cut links with Palestine charity after it hosts anti-Semitic speaker who accuses Jews of exploiting the Holocaust

When he was MP for Islington North, Jeremy Corbyn had a history of Palestinian solidarity. Though that is much diminished since becoming UK Labour leader, he remains a primary target of pro-Israeli activists. Thus the Holocaust fabrication about me is used to smear Corbyn as well.

And it was this same Jonathan Hoffman who so manipulated, and then repeatedly lied about, an incident involving me and the Quakers in Cambridge (UK), that the Quakers issued a formal statement setting the record straight and calling on him to stop. [4] Meanwhile, HotAir, declaring me to be a “particularly odious speaker,” wondered in its headline:

Is it time for conservatives to “shut down” anti-Israel campus speakers?

One of Mr. Frank’s allegations is correct: I violated the US State Department guidelines for anti-Semitism. Indeed, I would be anti-Semitic if I did not violate it. This definition, and the similar IHRA [5] definition that is commonly cited in Europe, seek to impose a nineteenth century ethnic-nationalist settler project as the common destiny of Jews, simply because they are Jews. That is anti-Semitic, not the vast majority of people, a large proportion of them Jews, whose lives Zionist activists have sought to derail.

I am guilty, the article continues, of “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination,” also drawing the same sources and from Zionists’ anti-Semitic definitions of anti-Semitism. Had Mr. Frank attended my talk, he would have heard me address this very issue.

The following is from a word-for-word transcript:

Zionism freed nationalism from the constraints of geographic borders, making ethnicity itself the frontier. Nationalism, and what Zionists needed to consider to be a Jewish race, were made one and the same in the service of the Settler state. Thus, Israel, taken at its word, makes Jews, simply by virtue of being Jews, partner to whatever it does. And the profound anti-Semitism of this is, to me, self-evident. A principal justification being decided by the defenders of Israel’s actions is that Zionism is Jewish self-determination. We hear this all the time now. No — it is exactly the opposite. It is the theft of Jewish individual self-identity and self-determination.

After two follow-up letters in the Massachusetts Daily Collegian stating that Mr. Frank had misrepresented what I had said, a new article, now in the Amherst Wire, was something beyond mere ‘misrepresentation’: it was outright fabrication.

… “There was a moment when he essentially blamed Zionists, his quote, ‘for selling out European Jews to Hitler.’ He basically said Zionists allowed or enabled or directly dealt in creating the Holocaust so they could profit off the Middle Eastern Israeli venture,” said UMass sophomore Anna-Nicole Bosco, a Hillel member and Student Government Association senator for the Class of 2020 … “This speaker comes in and says if we wipe Israel off the map, then the entire region will be at peace, where as [sic] Saudi Arabia and Iran have been fighting for over a millennium,” said Bosco.

Fortunately, I had a video [6]. As a result of the SOAS talk referred to by Mr. Frank, where I was unable to prove what I had actually said and the context in which I had said it, I have recorded every talk since. Professor Jhally had the complete unabridged video transcribed. The Amherst Wire removed the fraudulent article. [7]

A final commentary by a Collegian columnist brought the circular reasoning and self-corroboration to its logical, absurd conclusion: Messrs. Collier and Hoffman have suddenly become academics, Mr. Collier is now a professor, and they, along with the UMass professors who relied upon them, now constitute “a variety of academics” who have “debunked” the book upon which my talk was based.

Following UMass, I spoke at Columbia University in New York, and at the Jerusalem Fund in Washington, DC. (Here is video of these appearances.)

My episode at Amherst is unimportant in and of itself. But it is systematic of the assault on universities and public discourse on behalf of the Israeli state, and an example of how just a couple of political activists with a provable history of sabotage, deliberate distortion, slander, and lies, can exert profound influence on — can ‘occupy’ — the academic and public spheres on behalf of a foreign state.

This is more than an assault on open, democratic society on behalf of a foreign state’s lawlessness; claiming to do so in the name of Jews is an additional affront against us all.

Facing east along Gaza’s eastern “border”*, an armed, remotely controlled Israeli tower enforces a buffer zone entirely on the Gazan side, that keeps Gazan farmers from their most fertile land (*though the land on the other side was to be Palestinian according to UNGA Resolution 181). [Photo: T Suárez]


1. Jonathan Hoffman filed a false complaint with the House of Lords alleging that a talk I gave at that institution in December 2016 (at which he was not present) was a ‘book launch’, which would have been illegal. The HoL Committee for Privileges and Conduct investigated and dismissed the complaint, finding that in fact there was not even a copy of the book present (HL Paper 142, 15 March 2017). Mr. Hoffman continues to repeat the invention, now citing as proof a screen-grab of some announcement of which neither I nor the publisher were aware, in which an editor or publicist had inserted the term.

2. Mr. Hoffman’s Holocaust innuendo is based on an endnote in my book, State of Terror. This is the endnote in full.

3. “Hillel students say hate does have a home at UMass,” AmherstWire, October 4, 2017 (article deleted; screen-grab archived)

4. Statement from the Quakers rebuking Jonathan Hoffman (with permission):

Elders of Jesus Lane Friends Meeting (Quakers) are concerned at the continuing misrepresentation by Jonathan Hoffman and others regarding the decision made by Cambridge Jesus Lane Quaker Meeting to cancel a talk by Tom Suarez in May 2017. To be clear, we want it to be known that this decision was arrived at under pressure of time and with incomplete information, in response to a request to reconsider the booking. Jesus Lane Meeting has a long historical relationship supporting Palestinian refugees dating back to the early 1970s and we continue to engage on the issues in the Middle East. Since the cancelled booking some of us have attended the talk by Tom Suarez, which was relocated, or watched a recording of it. Some have purchased the book and read it. Friends (Quakers) who have read the book or seen the video recording of Tom’s talk have no reservations about Tom Suarez or his work.

5. The so-called International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition associates anti-Semitism with criticism of the Israeli state or Zionism, and thus is engineered to shield Israel’s ethnic/racial crimes from scrutiny. It was reviewed and judged unsound by QC Hugh Tomlinson.

6. Complete, unedited video of the entire UMass event, for the record.

7. The author has a screen-grab of the Amherst Wire article.


Links :
Sept 18, 20, 25:  Video of US talks
Sept 19, Daily CollegianAuthor Thomas Suarez leads talk on Israel-Palestine conflict
Sept 26, Daily CollegianThe anti-Semitism of the Suarez talk is not the way to discuss the Israeli-/Palestinian conflict
Sept 27, Washington Free BeaconAnti-Israel Speakers Making Rounds at U.S. College Campuses, Libraries
Sept 28, Daily CollegianLetter: Understanding Suarez
Sept 28, HotAir.comIs it time for conservatives to “shut down” anti-Israel campus speakers?
Oct 3, Daily CollegianLetter: Students for Justice in Palestine defend Suárez talk
Oct 4, Daily CollegianUnderstanding commentary, Suarez and others

Sep-Oct, The Link, Suárez, The Cult of the Zionists – An Historical Enigma


Tom Suarez

Tom Suarez is the author, most recently, of "Writings on the Wall", an annotated collection of Palestinian Oral Histories collected by the Arab Educational Institute in Bethlehem (2019)

Other posts by .

Posted In:

21 Responses

  1. eljay on October 31, 2017, 11:05 am

    Zionism is an evil ideology built on self-righteous entitlement, supremacism, hatred and violence. It’s no wonder Zionists seem impervious to moral values such as truth, justice and equality. Kudos to you, Mr. Suarez, for your steadfastness.

  2. pabelmont on October 31, 2017, 12:20 pm

    Be a gas to write up the fabrications of the Amherst professors — their reliance on non-academics to trash a book and a speaker — as if their trashing were on solid academic foundation.

    This all follows the playbook of the Zionists who lauded “From Time Immemorial” and trashed Finkelstein without every having looked up a single one of Joan Peters’s own fabricated (or badly misinterpreted) “academic” citations.

    Somehow we (the anti-Zionist collaborative ) should find a way to hold to the fire the feet of academics who are swayed by Zionist ideals (or by Zionist pressure) to abandon their own (presumed) academic standards, But, of course, it is hard work, The Dersh ™ has prospered despite a clear showing of his own lack of standards. It’s almost as if universities say, in effect, “we won’t stand for bad academic behavior — unless in the service of Israel in which case, it’s regarded as lighthearted frolic, as teenage indiscretion, perhaps as statements made when ‘in one’s cups’, and therefore of no professional importance.”

  3. on October 31, 2017, 1:48 pm

    Tom, I just finished reading your book: it is well-written, almost entirely fact-based with little interpretation. The facts related are based on the UK archives in Kew, and that fact in itself is conveniently ignored by your detractors.

    I commend you for the book, and I can only say: keep up the good work, and stay strong in front of vile, utterly despicable behaviour of what can only be described as Ziofascists, Nazi-onists.

    Please take care of your safety too, because people like that stop at nothing.

    • JosephA on October 31, 2017, 7:30 pm

      Ditto, I also enjoyed the facts in your book. Unfortunately, I did have to put it down several times due to the utter horror and inhumaneness that has been dealt to the Palestinians for the past 70+ years.

  4. John O on October 31, 2017, 2:19 pm

    You’ve upset Melanie Phillips. Well done, sir.

  5. Bumblebye on October 31, 2017, 3:31 pm

    Aside from endlessly maligning anybody who speaks out about israel’s excesses, Hoffman can often be found (and has been photographed) palling around with highly placed leaders of British far right groups, such as EDL and Britain First. He was also openly supportive of the Irish Times columnist (and holocaust denier) recently sacked for claiming the highly paid female bbc stars achieved their high remuneration because they were Jewish.

  6. JosephA on October 31, 2017, 7:31 pm

    Also, thank you very much for documenting the ridiculous efforts against your scholarship!

  7. ymedad on November 1, 2017, 8:23 am

    Did I miss any refutation of anything I published?
    And I “rushed” it into print rather than waiting for another platform to take it.
    I read the book over 4 months, at least and there are many dozens of errors, misrepresentations, falsification, inability of Suarez to read, etc.

    • Keith on November 1, 2017, 11:57 am

      YMEDAD- “Did I miss any refutation of anything I published?”

      Since in the second paragraph of the article Tom Suarez refers to you and links to his critique of your “hurried critique” of his book, you are clearly lying about any refutation of the BS you published. Typical Zionist pilpul. One thing which bothers me about you Zionists is your ongoing lack of intellectual integrity. For you, truth is what works. For you, an effective lie is better than an inconvenient truth. Of course, I am taking Tom Suarez’s word over yours. In view of my experience, it is a pretty safe bet. For those who may have missed it I provide the link. So cut the “Did I miss any refutation” crap.

  8. Ronald Johnson on November 1, 2017, 10:05 am

    Before posting a comment with Mondoweiss, or doing an Amazon book review, be aware that the same folks who monitor Tom Suarez’s Facebook can look you up for smearing – and in that event, your friends and neighbors will probably watch in fear and remain silent.

    • Keith on November 1, 2017, 11:07 am

      RONALD JOHNSON- “Before posting a comment with Mondoweiss….”

      Jeez, Ronald, why do you think so many of us use screen names or first names only?

  9. Marnie on November 1, 2017, 10:37 am

    It’s astounding how the truth gets these zionists so aggravated they look like they need an exorcism. The more truth that comes out, the louder they squeal.

  10. MHughes976 on November 1, 2017, 12:01 pm

    I can’t go along with pinning the ‘anti-Semite’ label on Zs. They claim to be, when it comes to Jewish rights, the proudest and most authentic Jewish voice, dissenters therefore having a false consciousness. The essence, the ‘what it is to be authentically Jewish’, they regard with pride if they are themselves Jewish, admiration if they are not. This, of the rights they claim are falsely claimed, is not naturally described as resulting from prejudice against Jews (anti-S) but from prejudice in their favour. We still haven’t found the rhetorically convincing shield against the poisoned arrows labelled ‘anti-Z is anti-S’.

  11. Ronald Johnson on November 1, 2017, 12:51 pm

    Yeah, It is a dilemma. Anonymous testimony has to be taken with a grain of salt, and is never admissible in court. Take responsibility for what we say. But we have a right to remain silent in a reign of terror. We are waiting for the absurdities to accumulate to a tipping point – not far off.

    But notice that our nation is chasing down the Russian “Hacking” of US polity. How hard would it be for a well-funded operative to correlate pseudonyms with email addresses in the systems of Amazon and Mondoweiss?

    Remember Equifax.

  12. [email protected] on November 1, 2017, 2:23 pm

    Juan Suarez spoke in Portland, Oregon as a keynote speaker at a BDS regional conference. I and others objected as he is an opponent of BDS and as a leader in US academic circles, there are letters written by him to British professors urging them to not to consider measures to approve BDS. In Portland direct questions to Mr. Suarez were asked regarding BDS which he ducked. For many of us, supporting anyone whos approval of human rights only exists in theory , while at the same time working against concrete measures to hold Israel accountable (like BDS) makes him a dubious ally. Happy to hear concrete examples as well as a defense of Mr. Suarez here from his supporters.

    • RoHa on November 1, 2017, 8:14 pm

      Is Juan Suarez any relation to Tom Suarez?

      • Tom Suarez on November 2, 2017, 5:57 am

        No, Juan Suarez is no relation to me.

    • Ladidah on November 1, 2017, 9:38 pm

      Tom Suarez, the author here, wrote this defense of and argument for BDS:

      Are you thinking of someone else? Juan Suarez is the president of the International Federation of the Red Cross/Red Crescent, which deals with Palestine issues but often in a very non-firm manner (excepting the Palestine Red Crescent Society.)

  13. Elizabeth Block on November 1, 2017, 5:50 pm

    I read his book, took extensive notes, would recommend it to anyone who has the stomach.
    I think it was Daniel Patrick Moynihan, replying to criticisms of a book of his (about Henry Kissinger?), who said that lots of people had attacked the tone of his writing, but no one had impeached his facts. And on another occasion, he said that everyone has the right to their own opinion, but no one has the right to their own facts. Tom Suarez got his facts from the archives of the British and Israeli governments.

    I wore my “Free Palestine” t-shirt at an event where, I was informed later, some people were offended. I said great! it means that their consciences haven’t completely evaporated.

  14. tony greenstein on November 1, 2017, 7:07 pm

    People may be unaware of Jonathan Hoffman, who is a former co-Vice Chair of the British Zionist Federation, but he is an expert in anti-Semitism. having studied it at close quarters.

    In this blog there is a famous picture of the Ahava demonstration in London (an Israeli shop were closed down in Covent Garden) where Hoffman is pictured dancing down t he street with Roberta Moore of the Jewish Defence League. In the background in fatigues are members of the fascist English Defence League who, like most anti–Semites these days don’t like Jews but do love Israel and Zionism.

    Hoffman incidentally responded to this photo by saying it was ‘photoshopped’. After the photographer, David Hoffman (no relation) threatened to sue for libel Jonathan was forced, not for the first time in his life, to issue a grovelling apology.

    In July this year the biggest Palestinian politico/cultural festival was held in Europe at the South Bank Centre in London. The far-Right section of the Zionists – the Campaign Against Antisemitism/Jewish Human Rights Watch and Hoffman and friends bitterly objected to this Jew hatred festival. So opposed was Hoffman to this orgy of ”antisemitism’ that Hoffie held a small demonstration outside. Who was on this demo? None other than the ‘Intelligence’ Officer (I use the word advisedly) of Britain First, the fascist group held responsible for the assassination of Joe Cox MP. It of course combines hatred of Jews, holocaust denial and love of Zionism into quite a heady brew. Also present was an open Hitler admire the defrocked priest Neil Horan.

    EXCLUSIVE – Lifting the lid on Collaboration between the Far Right and Zionist Activists
    Zionist Demonstration Outside Palestine Expo 2017 included neo Nazi group Britain First’s Intelligence Chief Paul Besser and Jonathan Hoffman

    so yes, we should take Jonathan Hoffman very seriously when he says something is anti-Semitic!

    • Keith on November 2, 2017, 12:44 am

      TONY GREENSTEIN- “People may be unaware of Jonathan Hoffman, who is a former co-Vice Chair of the British Zionist Federation, but he is an expert in anti-Semitism. having studied it at close quarters.”

      Indeed, there is an ongoing close association of Zionists with fascists. Recently to include Zionist Victoria Nuland and her support for Ukrainian neo-Nazis. Any correlation with the reported rise in European anti-Semitism?

Leave a Reply