Media Analysis

Israel distorts timeline of events to play victim in the dangerous escalation with Iran and Syria

Distorting the timeline of events is a longtime Israeli strategy to make its enemies look like the aggressors and pass itself off as the victim. Israel’s massive aerial attacks earlier today on Iranians and Syrians — its most extensive cross-border strikes in decades — are carrying out this propaganda strategy to perfection, and even normally skeptical news outlets are being fooled.

Here’s the actual order of events:

* Just one hour after Donald Trump violated the Iran nuclear deal on May 8, Israel launched missiles against targets south of Damascus, Syria, reportedly killing 15 people, at least 8 of them Iranians.

* In response, Iran early this morning apparently struck back with 20 rockets aimed at the Golan Heights, (which is occupied by Israel since 1967 but is still legally part of Syria).

* Hours later, Israeli warplanes attacked dozens of allegedly Iranian targets in Syria.

The mainstream Western media is falling into Israel’s propaganda trap. Most reports are treating the Iranian rockets as the original provocation, and framing Israel’s massive air strikes as the (understandable) response. Unusually, the New York Times coverage was actually moderately less biased than other outlets, such as the Washington Post and the BBC. The Times at least noted — down in paragraph 12 — that Israel had first attacked Syria right after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Iran deal.

Nor, so far, are the major media connecting Benjamin Netanyahu’s belligerence to his desperate need to distract from the multiple domestic corruption investigations against him and his wife — an angle some of the Israeli press is not too squeamish to bring up. In the excellent online publication, +972, Dahlia Scheindlin notes today that Netanyahu’s strategy is working; he “appears to have inoculated himself against looming corruption charges due to the dramatic developments on the security front.” She adds that the latest Israeli opinion polls show Netanyahu’s Likud party with its highest level of support in a decade.

Larry Derfner, the American-turned-Israeli who is one of that country’s most experienced reporters, is hammering away at the truth on his Facebook page:

I’ve been arguing all day against Israel’s policy of continually bombing Syria, Lebanon and Iran, pointing out that they’re not bombing us, we’re bombing them, which means we’re not acting in self defense, we’re the aggressors. . . For [people with the opposing opinion] it doesn’t matter how many times Israel bombs the enemy and the enemy doesn’t bomb back — Israel is still bombing in self-defense and the other side is still the aggressor. Why? Because Israel is Israel and Iran/Syria/Lebanon is Iran/Syria/Lebanon. Israel is right because it is good and they are wrong because they are bad. . .

35 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Syrian Arab Army put out its version of events:

“A short summary of the chain of events that led to the current situation in the occupied-Golan Heights

• Enemy air force fired a stand-off missile toward Damascus that was intercepted by Syrian Air Defenses

• Enemy artillery targeted a Syrian military point in al-Quneitra which led to a return of fire from the Syrian Military across borde

• Enemy brought a Merkava Tank which fired 6 random shots into al-Baa’th city in al-Quneitra

• Syrian Tank Hunters fired back at the enemy’s Merkava with no reports on its status yet

• Syrian Military responded by firing a barrage of missiles at Zionist military points inside the occupied-Golan”

“Unusually, the New York Times coverage was actually moderately less biased than other outlets, such as the Washington Post and the BBC. The Times at least noted — down in paragraph 12 — that Israel had first attacked Syria right after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Iran deal”

Times actually states:
“Though Israel has hit Iranian forces in Syria with a number of deadly airstrikes, Tehran has been restrained in hitting back, until now. The rocket attack against Israel appeared to be in response to Israeli strikes on southern Syria on Wednesday.

Hours later, Israel responded. By Thursday morning, the country’s air force had destroyed “nearly all” of Iran’s military infrastructure in Syria, according to Israel’s defense minister, Avigdor Lieberman”.

Things are hotting up.

Best advice for the US IMHO would be to withdraw any USS Intelligence Gathering vessels stationed anywhere in the Mediterranean. The Ziocolonial forces might mistake them for hostile cattle transport ships and tragically and accidentally attempt to sink them with all hands on board.

Of course north can’t accept the obvious. Even if his timeline is true it just makes the irg that much more stupid.

“The mainstream Western media is falling into Israel’s propaganda trap”

CAMERA has a ‘special relationship’ as they call it with the western media.

The western media is not falling into Israel’s propaganda trap as you assert the western media jumped into the trap with both feet because it is who they are and how they operate.

http://www.camera.org

Mr North, what are these “normally skeptical news outlets”?