Opinion

Israeli reporter for ‘New York Times’ praises AIPAC at closed event: ‘You’ve got our backs’

Ronen Bergman, a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, gave a talk to the Israel lobby group AIPAC in White Plains Monday night and lavished praise on AIPAC for its support of Israel.

“You know, I’ve been all over the U.S. with AIPAC and it’s always a great pleasure, as an Israeli. I always tell AIPAC, you do so much in the U.S., and I know that Israel is not the spirit of where you work, but you need to do a little more to explain to Israelis how much they owe AIPAC. Israelis are not aware. I am aware… I know that you’ve got our backs. It’s such a great feeling.”

AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is famous for its work to prevent any “daylight” between the U.S. government and the Israeli government on policy and maintain support for Israel in the U.S. Congress. It has been the subject of numerous investigations– generally not in the US mainstream press, and certainly not the New York Times.

Two congresspeople also spoke at the event at the synagogue Temple Israel, and over 400 people attended it. But the talk was closed to the press, according to two AIPAC screens over the synagogue sanctuary: “This event is off the record and closed to the press.” Circulars for the event did not include the off-the-record condition.

AIPAC event featuring Congresspeople Nita Lowey and Eliot Engel, was closed to the press and off the record. Oct. 8, 2018, Temple Israel, White Plains, NY. Event also featured Ronen Bergman, New York Times Magazine journalist.
Poster for Temple Israel event by Ronen Bergman, sponsored by AIPAC.

Bergman’s praise for AIPAC is in the tradition of New York Times support for Israel and its lobby. Former editorial page editor Max Frankel said he wrote all the paper’s editorials on Israel. “I was much more deeply devoted to Israel than I dared to assert,” he wrote in his memoir. Times columnists Roger Cohen, Bret Stephens and David Brooks are proudly Zionist. Stephens is scheduled to speak to AIPAC gatherings in Florida next month. Opinion editor Bari Weiss comes out of a career as an Israel advocate, and her father is a stalwart at AIPAC. Four New York Times writers have had sons serve in the Israeli military.

Per my internet searches, Bergman spoke in Cleveland at the behest of AIPAC in 2014; and reportedly appeared at this event in Columbus, Ohio, with AIPAC also in 2014.

The investigative reporter works for Israel’s largest newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth and has many sources in the Israeli government. While we have given props to Rise and Kill First, Bergman’s recent book on Israeli assassinations, as revelatory and gripping, he tends to support Israeli government positions. In his talk, Bergman said that Israel’s policy of assassinations may be illegal but it has worked.

“I know maybe that it’s not a popular view by some people in this country and in Israel as well, but after eight years of research, I can with definite assurance say that, in some cases in history… when it’s done without letting the enemy rest for one minute, when it’s done against the people that should have been killed not against the people that can be killed, yes targeted killings are effective and can change history.”

He said that many Americans’ understanding of Israeli assassinations is based on the 2005 Steven Spielberg movie Munich, but it’s inaccurate, Spielberg was hoodwinked.

“This movie is 100 percent fake news. It is not really true. Now of course there were enemies who were killed and afterwards there were sometimes people dropping dead in Europe, but all the rest, the methods, the… command and control, the hierarchy, who did that, is just 100 percent fake news.  Steven Spielberg fell victim to a crook by the name of Yuval Aviv, an Israeli claiming to be Avner, the commander of the Mossad assassination unit, but in fact behind it all he was the commander of a shift of baggage selectors at Ben Gurion Airport.”

The talk was titled, “Redactions Revealed.” Bergman referred to all the jokes about killing Palestinians and Arabs that Israeli agents make in his book. Saying that “Israelis have sometimes black humor,” he quoted a Mossad source who called Bergman on the day in February 2008 that Imad Mughniyah of Hezbollah was assassinated in Damascus by detonation of a bomb hidden in the spare tire cover of his Mitsubishi Pajero. When the source told Bergman the news, Bergman said, “You sound sad. Why are you speaking with a heavy voice?” The source said, “Ronen, I’m very sad…. It was a grand Pajero.” The hall resounded with laughter. The quote is not used in Bergman’s book, apparently because it was redacted by the Israeli government.

 

25 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, Mondoweiss has always shown us just how pro Israel/zionist the New York Times is, and they are right. The New York Times has many staunch Israeli supporters in their staff, and article after article has shown such an ugly bias which shows that the NYT has no credibility at all when it come to the I/P conflict. Without publications like the NYT and so many of the zionist media in the US, Israel would not have that unwavering support, and the Palestinians would not be seen as the aggressors, who with no weapons, no military, nor the means, to be the constant threat that Israel seems totally afraid of, or so the story goes.

Anyone knows of any situation where the side with billions of dollars in aid, weapons, brutal military, who keeps stealing lands, killing unarmed civilians, and sending precision bombs into homes, being the victim of unarmed and helpless civilians who live in open prisons?

AIPAC has been a curse in this country, corrupting politicians, and our political system. This sorry excuse of a writer obviously is brown nosing the zionists, like many in the media do.

@Kay24
“Well, Mondoweiss has always shown us just how pro Israel/zionist the New York Times is, and they are right. The New York Times has many staunch Israeli supporters in their staff, and article after article has shown such an ugly bias which shows that the NYT has no credibility at all when it come to the I/P conflict”

Agreed but occasionally it is obvious that NYT writers on the I/P conflict have to jump through multiple hoops and avoid looking in multiple mirrors. They don`t give a toss about Palestinians be they peace activists or fellow journalists deliberately murdered by the most moral but when it comes to the increasing numbers of American citizens being detained,harassed,interrogated,deported by the Zio goons they have to have a stab along the lines of steady on old Zio chaps. . not good for the old Zio image what!!

A classic case of this appears in the current NYT in relation to the young American student being barred from doing her course at an Israeli University because of her alleged links to BDS.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/10/opinion/israel-lara-alqasem-bds.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

As usual it is flavoured with the de rigeur pathetic deflectionary (they hope) whatabouteries viz:
” And the same activists who obsessively seek to punish and isolate Israel for its occupation of the West Bank rarely if ever display the same passion for protesting against China for its occupation of Tibet, or Russia for its occupation of Crimea and eastern Ukraine”

The article of course is total and utter garbage but on the positive side it does illustrate the fact that Israel and the Israeli Firsters in America are getting seriously worried about the loss of support amongst young Americans and specifically young American Jews.

I watched Rachel Maddow yesterday and noticed that when she covered the story about the Trump campaign seeking information from an Israeli firm to help with social media manipulation and to gather intelligence to help defeat Republican primary race opponents and Hillary Clinton, she dared not mention the word “ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE FIRM” but said “Foreign Intelligence firm”. What is it with Maddow, she never covers the I/P conflict, and never utters a single world of criticism of Israel. She however is quite free to call out Russia, whenever.

How afraid can these journalists be? I guess this is what they mean by zionist media. It stinks.

Interesting. Thanks for the info about Maddow. I used to watch her from time to time, but stopped during the 2016 campaign. She has done an equally horrible job covering Yemen–that is, by not covering it or giving incredibly misleading accounts about the war. It’s not surprising she didn’t mention Israel by name. She is the most overrated pseudo-journalist on the so-called American left.

“then prime minister Yitzhak Rabin resigned from office due to his wife’s scandal” – Kay24

How noble ..