Media Analysis

Another ‘NY Times’ biased report — this one about Israel’s destruction of Palestinian homes in Jerusalem

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

The New York Times had to report Israel’s shocking demolition yesterday of Palestinian apartment blocks in Jerusalem; the story was too big to ignore. But the paper’s Isabel Kershner cleverly tried to present Israel’s brutal action in the best possible way, while muffling the voices of the victims.

Contrasting the Times’s coverage with other reports, including an excellent article by Mondoweiss’s Yumna Patel, reveals just how biased Kershner’s effort is.

Isabel Kershner (Photo: New York Times)
Isabel Kershner (Photo: New York Times)

Kershner’s slant starts right in the second paragraph, with a long quote from an Israeli minister ominously warning that the “mostly uninhabited buildings” were “a severe security threat and can provide cover to suicide bombers and other terrorists. . .” Kershner’s insinuation is clear; Israel reluctantly had to tear down the apartments to protect itself. She nowhere explains that suicide bombings stopped more than a decade ago, and many reports have shown that the so-called separation wall does not stop Palestinians from crossing into pre-1967 Israel if they want to.

But Kershner’s most impressive effort at whitewash comes immediately, in the 4th paragraph. Here is her tortured sentence:

The decision to proceed with the demolition underscored the legal complexities and human difficulties caused by the absence of internationally recognized boundaries and competing authorities.

This sentence is a masterpiece of deceit. Here is what Kershner should have said: “Israel illegally occupies West Bank Palestine and refuses to negotiate borders. Even though the Palestinian Authority is supposed to be in charge of the area where Israel demolished the apartment buildings, and even granted building permits there, Israel simply overrode the P.A. and tore them down.”

Kershner’s euphemism about “human difficulties” is also repulsive. Her article continues, “By late afternoon, the police were still barring entry to the neighborhood to all nonresidents, including reporters.”

So Kershner just gave up trying to talk to eyewitnesses, confining herself to quoting a couple of Palestinians who were outside the police perimeter. Contrast that with our own Yumna Patel, whose lengthy report includes comment from the Palestinian activist Hamada Hamada: “‘The soldiers were really aggressive, pushing and shoving people, firing tear gas at us, and even beating some people with the butts of their rifles.’”

Two outstanding reporters from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Amira Hass and Jack Khoury, also managed to speak to the actual Palestinian victims:

“I built this house stone by stone. It was my dream to live in this house. Now I am losing everything,” said Fadi al-Wahash, 37, his voice breaking as a bulldozer destroyed his unfinished three-floor house.

Hass and Khoury reported that Israel sent 700 police and 200 soldiers to destroy the homes — figures nowhere reported in the Times. The photo accompanying Kershner’s article also left out this massive assault, portraying only a bulldozer in the distance and a couple of blurry army vehicles in the foreground. 

There are other documented reports that Israeli soldiers celebrated and cheered as they blew up the Palestinian homes — a fact also unmentioned in the Times.

The Haaretz article hinted at the real reason for the demolitions. There was no mention of stopping “suicide bombers.” Instead, Hass and Khoury quoted a left-wing Israeli activist who charged that the demolitions were part of Israel’s “demographic war” against East Jerusalem, the ongoing effort to squeeze Palestinians out of the city entirely. 

Even the Washington Post did a better job covering the story. Ruth Eglash’s lead sentence was “Israel drew sharp international rebuke Monday after its forces began demolishing residential buildings in a neighborhood of East Jerusalem. . .”

By contrast, Kershner’s whitewash nearly ignored the international protest, implying that the main objections came only from Palestinians. 

16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Apparently, no matter what, Israelis are always victims trying just to defend themselves. Palestinians are always, no matter what, terrorists trying to harm them.

At this point, it looks like the New York Times is full of pro Israeli agents. I suppose the label “zionist media” can apply to the NYT, and it seems highly appropriate. You have to wonder how they sleep at night. Children are thrown in jail, killed brutally, homes demolished, and the victims of the zionist occupation, have suffered for decades, yet their loyal servants who pose as journalists, keep reporting these crimes favoring the… Read more »

They sleep well. They like their jobs, and love the life style they have, very comfy.

The NYT continues to prove its incompetence. The article claims that “United Nations officials had appealed to Israel to call off the demolition, which Palestinian officials condemned as a “war crime” and “ethnic cleansing.” allthough the UN has issued a statement that “the move was “not compatible” with Israel’s “obligations under international humanitarian law” … “it results in forced evictions, and contributes to the risk of forcible transfer facing many Palestinians in the West Bank,… Read more »

@Misterioso. Nikki Haley is a daughter of Punjabi parents who emigrated to the US in 1969. No dooubt she found Sahib Deranged Donald`s recent racist tweets truly inspiriational as she has spent the last few years moisturising his posterior. I agree that she has the credentials to become President – not least beacuse of her blind support for Zioland and the Benjamins which would flood her way if she entered the race from the Zio… Read more »