News

Netanyahu’s a loser. Can Lapid become a winner?

As of yesterday (Wednesday), Benjamin Netanyahu is officially a loser. He lost four elections in a row, and failed to form a government – the one time he managed it, a year ago, he did so on Benny Gantz’s mandate.

That, however, does not mean Yair Lapid, who received the mandate to try to form a government yesterday from Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, will do any better.

Let there be no mistake: If anyone tells you they know how things will turn out, they’re either lying to themselves or to you; likely, both. The Anything-but-Netanyahu bloc – which is the one Lapid leads – is deeply fractured. Lapid himself considers himself to be a centrist, but would be considered a right-winger, sometimes (as in his unhinged behavior during the “single’s intifada”) an extreme-right in most countries. As for the Palestinians (as can be seen in his recent interview with Jeffrey Goldberg)  he basically advocates endless apartheid, wrapped up in hasbara platitudes. Lapid sounds like Netanyahu, because you barely discern between the two when it comes to policy.

And Lapid will have to govern with two hard-right parties: Naftali Bennett’s Yamina (which literally means “rightwards”) and Gideon Sa’ar’s New Hope (there are strong suspicions the name is a pun on the first Star Wars movie; Sa’ar’s name means “storm”). Both parties contain hard racists. One of the members of Sa’ar’s party is Yoaz Hendel, who as a former member of Gantz’s party torpedoed a Gantz government because he would not agree to accept a Palestinian party as a partner.

But the main problem, as far as Lapid is concerned, is Naftali Bennett’s Yamina. Bennet, of inflated ego unfitting his slim winnings – he had only seven seats in the March 23 election– demands to be first minister. Even yesterday, when the parties submitted their responses to President Rivlin, Bennett recommended himself for the prime ministership; nobody else did.

Bennett demands a rotation in the office of prime minister, with himself going first, for at least a year. And, astonishingly, he may actually get it. Even Meretz agreed to it. The Joint List supported Lapid, but announced it will not support Bennett. And it is not at all clear Lapid can form a government without the Joint List. And Bennett has his own problems: One of his seven members of Knesset, an unusually racist nobody by the name of Amihai Shikli, already announced he will not vote for a government with Meretz and the Joint List. Another Yamina MK, Ayelet Shaked, is also strongly rumored to pull a similar stunt.  

So, it’s a fool’s game trying to guess whether Lapid will actually form a government. He has 28 days to do so, but if he doesn’t, then we’re going to a fifth round of elections.

If he does, he will have the most unwieldly coalition of all times, composed of parties that detest each other and are tarnished by the very agreement to sit with other parties. The first main obstacle would be the budget; the government has to get one approved by the Knesset within three months. It’s hard to see the Joint List and Yamina agreeing on a settlements budget, for instance. Every party within the coalition would be vulnerable to criticism over the concessions it would have to make in order to allow the coalition to survive.

Which is why Bennett demands to be Prime Minister for the first year; such a coalition would be unlikely to see a second. But its main goal is to sunset Netanyahu, the grand illusionist of Israeli politics – to show that an Israeli government can be formed without Netanyahu, and allow his criminal trial to grind him down.  For over a decade, Netanyahu has cast a huge shade on Israel: Everything – this was his main gift – was about him. Your politics were either pro-Netanyahu or anti-Netanyahu, with the anti-Netanyahu’s becoming as shrill as the Bibiists. Likud is a personality cult now, much as the Republican party is: For the past five election cycles, it did not even bother to write a platform. Any platform would have shackled Netanyahu.

With Netanyahu gone, Israel may return to a semi-normalcy: Issues will become relevant to political life again. And then, perhaps, countless leftist voters, who abandoned their parties in the futile belief that a centrist party will bring down Netanyahu, may come home.

Perhaps. But as long as this inner conflict continues, Palestinians will have to rely on the small numbers of Israeli activists who already march in solidarity with them. The apartheid regime will grind on – unless the International Criminal Court and the international community delivers a short, sharp shock.

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It is such a relief one war monger is gone, but we cannot rejoice because he will soon be replaced by another. Unfortunately, there is NO moderate candidate in that country, and all we have seen are a bunch of war mongers trying to outdo each other trying to kill Palestinians, and refusing to do the right thing and end the occupation. Until the Zionists get rid of the Arabs in all the territories, and stop taking their land shamelessly, we will have to accept the status quo. We should not put it past Crooked Bibi to try and sabotage Lapid’s efforts at forming his government. He is known to sabotage, and put spokes in wheels, even in the US.

1 of 2
Breaking news!:
Campaign of Israel’s Netanyahu against Biden Iran Deal crashes and burns along with his Career (juancole.com)

“Campaign of Israel’s Netanyahu against Biden Iran Deal crashes and burns along with his Career” Informed Comment, May 6/21By Oraib Alrantawl

EXCERPT:
“The Israeli security and military delegations flocking to Washington in the past few weeks have returned disappointed following their failed efforts to dissuade the Biden administration from returning to the Vienna Agreement with Iran and lifting the imposed sanctions. Israeli security and military believe that Washington is determined to close this file, even if it means lifting more than 1,600 Trump-imposed sanctions.

“History is repeating itself, but it is doing so within a short period of time. In 2015, the Netanyahu government spared no effort to thwart the Obama administration’s endeavour to reach the agreement. Netanyahu himself did not hesitate to appear in person before the two chambers of Congress to address them and incite the US senators and congress people against their president. This was an unusual precedent in diplomatic norms. However, today, it is difficult for Netanyahu to face the Knesset, let alone Congress.

“Iran has gone through four difficult years under the most severe sanctions, armed with ‘strategic patience’. It has not budged from any of its conditions and demands to revive the agreement, and it ultimately got what it wanted. The agreement, which is on the verge of seeing the light of day, is close to including almost all of Tehran’s demands and conditions. There is no limit to the stubbornness and patience of an Iranian negotiator. If only our people would learn from them.

Washington is lifting the sanctions imposed on most Iranian entities and individuals. It is lifting sanctions from three of the most important strategic economic sectors: oil and energy, industry, and banking. In addition, nearly $100 billion will be released after being frozen for years, provided that Tehran implements its nuclear obligations without nuclear expansion, like Washington, Tel Aviv, and European and Arab capitals have been demanding.” (cont’d)

.

2 of 2
“The delegate of the greatest power was not allowed access to the hotel where the Iranian delegation resided and met with delegations from China, France, Russia, the UK, and Germany. Before starting the deliberations, the Iranian delegation insisted that the US flag be removed from the flags of countries involved in direct negotiations and that Washington would not partake. Despite the attempts to arrange direct meetings to speed up the negotiations, the Iranian delegation seemed the least rushed in this regard. If only our people showed patience and resilience.

“Iranians should not be denied the right to victory in the face of Trump’s arrogance, as well as the plotting of Netanyahu and some of his allies in the region, the weakness of Europe and its subordination, and the hesitation of China and Russia. Seemingly, Iran will soon emerge from isolation and siege, and Arab and European capitals will flock to it to get on its good side. We have already started to see new winds blowing in our Arab capitals.

“Netanyahu is watching the scene, vowing to continue his war on Iran, and is offering his services as a leader of a country that can ‘fill the void’ of Washington. However, Netanyahu’s problem is that he cannot find anyone to buy this ‘commodity’ since even the Arab parties most enthusiastic about normalization with Israel have begun to realize that this card is losing its value with diminishing momentum. They have also discovered that dialogue with Iran, not the alliance with Israel, maybe the shortest way to preserve its security and stability while safeguarding its interests.”

“Netanyahu’s a loser. Can Lapid become a winner?”
Who gives a flying thought, Gurvitz?
You liberal Zionists are more dangerous than both of them, anyway.