Media Analysis

‘The Nation’ lifts up Jewish fears over Palestinian realities in a Zionist tract

The Nation runs a righwing religious endorsement of Zionism that opposes BDS and leaves out the forced expulsion of Palestinians from their land.

Important and dismaying: The Nation has run a full-throated defense of Zionism as a thousands-years-old Jewish connection to their land, and a project necessitated to this day by the threat to Jews from antisemitism. Jews suffer “oppression” and “discrimination” in the west, writes Alexis Grenell, a political consultant and columnist.

The article, “How the Left Alienates Jews,” is remarkable for several reasons. At a time when The Nation is giving a platform to Mohammed El-Kurd, the poet and Sheikh Jarrah activist, it is offering a sop to the diehard Jewish Zionist community which obviously is a big part of its New York liberal constituency, and likely its donor base too. Rightwing Zionists love this article.

The argument is also remarkable for its denial of the Palestinian experience in favor of Jewish fears. Grenell laments “the oppression of the Palestinian people,” but says progressives must not boycott Israel because boycott strikes “profoundly emotional chords” in Jews due to the Nazi boycotts. Those same emotional chords go back to mythological history and our “forced exile”, Grenell says: “in the Jewish liturgy ‘Am Yisrael’ refers to the ‘nation of Israel,’ often used interchangeably to mean the Jewish people, and our collective identity is inextricably bound up with centuries of forced exile from a historic homeland.”

So the recent Palestinian exile counts for nothing in this article against biblical “history” and fears, and anyone who doesn’t acknowledge that is “goysplaining” to Jews, she says.

This is the Jewish historical id talking: The left doesn’t understand how much Jews have to fear as an oppressed minority, Grenell says, so the left discounts the need for a Jewish state. No one should discount those fears. They are meaningful, and flight is a genuine response to persecution. But Israel is much less safe for Jews than the U.S., and the reason is because of ethnocentric attitudes like Grenell’s that erase the Palestinian experience.

She calls Palestinians an ethnic minority in the land, while saying that Jews are connected to the land from time immemorial, and the two state solution is a “compromise” for Jews–

a compromise position that reflects a historical reality dating back thousands of years, one that most self-described anti-Zionists seem uninterested in learning anything about.

There is no discussion of the Palestinian connection to that land, no understanding that the “two-state solution” for Palestinians has been an endless charade as the business of apartheid and ethnic cleansing go forward.

The article also erases anti-Zionist Jews. A recent survey says that 40 percent of young Jews see Israel as an apartheid state and 20 percent say it has no right to exist as a Jewish state. But Grenell works as hard as other Israel lobbyists do to equate Judaism and Zionism. Jewish voices should be “leading” the progressive discussion of Israel, and not BDS-supporters, because Jews don’t support BDS, she says.

“Surveys consistently show overwhelming opposition to BDS among American Jewry, including young people and those who identify as secular or ‘cultural’ Jews.”

I’m told the comments at The Nation are critical. Twitter is publishing derision.

“Is this a way to appease Zionists after giving mohammad elkurd a column in your paper? Bc it’s just ugly and gross,” 48Refugee writes. “A place can have religious significance without justifying war crimes, ethnic cleansing, occupation, and apartheid to support hostile take over and to maintain control over natives.” “I’m just confused as to how this person thinks they are qualified to talk in broad strokes about two things with widely divergent ideas and experiences: ‘Jews’ and ‘the left’ cannot be reduced to one parochial viewpoint.”– Vilde Chayeh. “Drivel,” and not worthy of the Nation, says Alex Kane of Jewish Currents. “A despicable hit piece on DSA that the Nation should be ashamed of having published” — Nathan J. Robinson. “Zionism is white supremacy. What does that make you?” — Yoav Litvin.

My own criticism is that the article denies Jewish power in the U.S. In describing antisemitic violence, Grenell accuses the left of mysticism about Jewish media and political power. She puts the “Zionist lobby” in quotes as if this is a conspiracy theory and not the lived reality of foreign policy that even the New York Times acknowledges; and says that the Democratic coalition relies on Jewish voters when plainly the Jewish presence in the Democratic Party is far more than voters: we make up much of the professional class of the party, and are the biggest donors too, and among the leading media figures. And meantime the Republicans out-Israel one another to get Miriam Adelson’s millions.

Thanks to Dave Reed, Adam Horowitz, James North, Donald Johnson and Bob Herbst.

37 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1 of 2
“The Nation has run a full-throated defense of Zionism as a thousands-of-years old connection of Jews to their land,…”
Reality:
The Jebusite/Canaanites were ancestors of today’s Palestinians & it was they who founded Jerusalem circa 3000 BCE. Originally known as Jebus, the first recorded reference to it as ‘Rushalimum’ or ‘Urussalim,’ site of the sacred Foundation Rock, appears in Egyptian Execration Texts of the nineteenth century BCE, nearly 800 years before it is alleged King David was born. Its name ‘seems to have incorporated the name of the Syrian god Shalem [Canaanite God of Dusk], who was identified with the setting sun or the evening star…and] can be translated as ‘Shalem has founded’.” (Karen Armstrong, Jerusalem, One City, Three Faiths; Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1996, pp. 6-7)
It is estimated that the Hebrews did not invade until circa 1184 BCE & their resulting United Kingdom of Israel, which never controlled the coast from Jaffa to Gaza, lasted only about 75–80 years, i.e., less than a blip in the history of Canaan & Palestine. Even the Hasmonean Dynasty under the Maccabees lasted only about 70 years (circa 140 – 70 BCE) & it was under Roman control.
No credible archaeological evidence, or writings of contemporaneous civilizations, have been found that prove Solomon or David actually existed. Nor has any evidence been discovered to confirm that the Jewish exodus from Egypt ever occurred.
The late renowned Jewish Israeli writer/columnist, Uri Avnery: “[David & Solomon’s] existence is disproved, inter alia, by their total absence from the voluminous correspondence of Egyptian rulers & spies in the Land of Canaan.” (”A Curious National Home,” by Uri Avnery, May 13/17 – http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1494589093/)
Aclaimed historian/anthropologist & “Holy Land” specialist, Professor Ilene Beatty: ‘When we speak of ‘Palestinians’ or of the ‘Arab population [of Palestine]‘, we must bear in mind their Canaanite origin. This is important because their legal right to the country stems from the fact that the Canaanites were first, which gives them priority; their descendants have continued to live there, which gives them continuity & they are still living there, which gives them present possession.’ (“Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan,” 1957)

2.of 2
“The Racist Gene” Haaretz, June 21, 2017: EXCERPT: “In 2013, the results were published of a study by the prominent British geneticist Martin Richards, who specializes in researching the maternal genome, which passes from the mother to all of her descendants. Richards researched the maternal genetic ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews. Lo and behold, he discovered that 80 percent or more (!) of the maternal genetic makeup of Ashkenazi Jews derives from European women – goys, heaven forbid. Gevalt! Devoid of any gene originating in the Land of Israel.”
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2017.00087/full
Front. Genet., 21 June 2017  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00087
“The Origins of Ashkenaz, Ashkenazic Jews, & Yiddish”
“Recent genetic samples from bones found in Palestine dating to the Epipaleolithic (20000-10500 BCE) showed remarkable resemblance to modern day Palestinians.”
“The non-Levantine origin of AJs [Ashkenazi Jews] is further supported by an ancient DNA analysis of six Natufians & a Levantine Neolithic (Lazaridis et al., 2016), some of the most likely Judaean progenitors (Finkelstein & Silberman, 2002; Frendo, 2004). In a principle component analysis (PCA), the ancient Levantines clustered predominantly with modern-day Palestinians & Bedouins & marginally overlapped with Arabian Jews, whereas AJs clustered away from Levantine individuals & adjacent to Neolithic Anatolians & Late Neolithic & Bronze Age Europeans.”
“Overall, the combined results are in a strong agreement with the predictions of the Irano-Turko-Slavic hypothesis (Table 1) & rule out an ancient Levantine origin for AJs, which is predominant among modern-day Levantine populations (e.g., Bedouins & Palestinians). This is not surprising since Jews differed in cultural practices & norms (Sand, 2011) & tended to adopt local customs (Falk, 2006). Very little Palestinian Jewish culture survived outside of Palestine (Sand, 2009). For example, the folklore & folkways of the Jews in northern Europe is distinctly pre-Christian German (Patai, 1983) & Slavic in origin, which disappeared among the latter (Wexler, 1993, 2012).”

Are Jews entitled to live, work, trade and study in Palestine and live as equal citizens like other people there, or are we ipso facto entitled to own and dominate it, and treat the Muslims and Christians as if they are there at our sufferance, expected to accept second-class status and to leave if some Zionist settlers decide they need the land? That’s the most important question, and one the article seems to skirt. If Palestine became a single secular, democratic, binational or multinational state, with appropriate compensation for those who were uprooted in the past, how much of a dent would that put into antisemitism in the Diaspora? One difference I have with the thrust of most thinking at MW, though, is that I also believe that the same applies to Jews who were similarly dispossessed in and expelled from Arab countries around 1947-55.

The Nation has gone downhill ever since D.D. Guttenplan became editor in chief. I was alerted to this when he supported the Zionist smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn before he became editor. I used to subscribe but finally cancelled when he continued his criticism of Corbyn after he took the helm. Nor was I impressed with the new contributors he put on the staff. The Nation seems to be following the trail that led the New Republic to the right.

Israeli policies have dictated the one state reality. Israeli practices have given Palestinians at least as great concerns for their future well-being. Israelis will get the respect they extend. Will achieve security as they extend security. Its been said, “All the love you’ve given has been meant for you.”