There is, unhelpfully, no reply buttons for many comments.
I don’t know why anyone would compare, even in the negative, The NYT to American Herald Tribune. I only know what I know about the NYT from coverage of its awfulness by progressives throughout assorted alternative media, which is the only way that I want to know what’s in the Times. I don’t have the anaylitical chops, or courage, to delve into the American State’s record of agenda. But I don’t fee that I need to. I don’t need to join ISIS either, in order to know something – enough – about that pile of human trash.
I quite like AHT, although, out of the blue, they disappeared a comment I had made, in response to another commenter who asked for some info. We couldn’t figure out why. I was even able to comment about that on AHT, telling Robert (other commenter) to visit my blog in order to get my response to his query.
Progressives are not always what they seem. And gatekeepers are everywhere. In fact, Progressives are dropping like flies – selling their souls. The light is fading fast. There’s a few pin pricks of it on a universe-sized canvas of darkness.
Also, for Boomer and any who are interested; There’s Off Guardian. The website is a mess (and they are always going to fix it but don’t), but it’s pretty good, most of the time. They exist precisely because The Guardian, which they once read and engaged with, has become utterly awful. They go into pro Camelot mode (saint JFK) from time to time, which I find offputting. And one editor there, Vaska, attacked me for pointing out that the Saker (another ‘progressive’ blogger) has an about and an updated moderation policy that, in so many word, tells pro human rights (in the area of sexual identity) commenters to get lost. But other than that, They are okay.
“The Ignorance Of Progressives Is Astonishing” :
“Off Guardian’s Vaska attacks me for pointing out that Saker’s rules for posting include a ban on pro-homosexual ‘ranting’!” :