thanks phil.. good overview on the situation…

would be better to call it “1% first” as opposed to ‘america first’, lol…

this jake sullivan ought to get a prize for exceptional blather appealing to the same 1%..

no wonder the democratic party is in the gutter where it will remain..

your 918am post – thanks keith!

keith, is there a reason you have linked to a video that requires one sign into fb? fb is already insidious enough as it is.. i refuse to go there, but i would enjoy seeing the video.. thanks..

i agree with you.. thanks for stating all this..

it is more likely the usa will continue to demonstrate it’s slavish commitment to israel… we all know how that translates here.

..”How do such incompetent, useless people get the jobs they do?”

hey, she works for the nyt, lol..what do you expect!

yonah,
where do you stand on the settlements? i am curious to know if you think you would have a chance to hold open minded and fair views if you ever got to be the prime minister! i don’t think you would, but i am curious to know your thoughts.. my impression of israeli society is one of intolerance for any palestinian state whatsoever. it sure looks to me that israel is doing to the palestinians what germany did to the jews 70 years ago.. what are you doing to change any of it?

one can only imagine if she were to say ‘israelis’ have aspiration to martyrdom.

on the other hand, maybe she is saying that if hamas were to refer to the new york times for example as part of israel( or the usa government/military agenda, it would be okay for them to bomb the new york times where she works.. bottom line – nothing she says makes any sense especially when you flip it around..

maybe regev can also explain where the country palestine is if he is able to say a ‘palestinian’ is a legitimate target..