I realize Jackdaw is well-known on this site as a racist anti-Palestinian troll, a commenter who has no interest in thinking about pretty much anything the writer has to say, and therefore not worth responding to. After all, does anyone sane think that "militias of Haifa's Arabs" just out of the blue decided to start waging war on "militias of Haifa's Jews"? No, only a racist who wants to sneer at and slur Arabs would think that.
"When you start a war, you risk being defeated, same as any gamble." Right, because even if Jackdaw's racist vision of warlike Arabs or Palestinians were true, it would totally be decent and moral for the victors to then spend many decades pursuing racist laws to victimize the defeated, and that's totally not a war crime or beyond the pale of civilized behavior.
Since Jackdaw chose the name Jackdaw for some reason to do with his racist psychology, including his racist triumphalism, I wondered about whether there were some history of Jackdaws stealing other birds' nests to make their homes, and there is, since this kind of behavior is common in many bird species, including the crow family, which includes jackdaws.
Which Jackdaw would argue is totally OK--it's just what happens. The winners get the spoils. Then they make racist laws to enhance their agenda as racist war criminals. Like the Nazis working to take the property and assets of Jews in 1930s Nazi Germany. Or Zionists working to steal Palestinian property over many decades.
It's all just perfectly fine, says racist Jackdaw.
Thankfully, the call of real jackdaws is not as ugly as that of this one.
In the end, this is the kind of thing that you need to sue Twitter about. I don't know if people can bring enough attention to this so that Twitter just acts decently without a lawsuit, but it's just insane to say that you can't compare one group of victimized people with vicious tormentors to another group of victimized people with vicious tormentors. In the end, what Twitter is saying is that they, Twitter, believe that Zionists are racially superior. How would that hold up in court? Not very well, I should think.
With a lawsuit you'd be looking at a punishing expense--at least $10,000.00, and probably more like $20,000.00-$30,000.00, or more, depending on how brutal and vicious Twitter wants to be in proclaiming their belief in the racial superiority of Zionists.
Any of this crap obviously has a massive chilling affect on free speech, which is of course the intention of the Russian-troll-style Zionist pressure groups.
Dear Rabbi Zemel,
I have read about your concerns regarding young Jews and their "birthright" to Israel. Unfortunately, your logic is no better or more decent than that of the crusaders who believed that they, too, had a "birthright" to the "Holy Land."
You are a man of European descent and like most--probably all--European Jews you have zero genetic, ancestral connection to Israel. You are not a descendant of the ancient Jews. The Arabs, Jewish and Muslim, are.
There was no flight from Egypt. There were no "Seven Tribes Of Israel." This is all cultist hooey. What you have is the descendants of European converts going to Israel to kill and rule as a Master Race over people who are the Jews of the Bible. They never left. They are still there. And you treat them as your inferiors.
Even if we were to believe the twaddle that your ancestors were from Israel, your logic is highly doubtful. My German ancestors lived for hundreds of years in what Hitler called "the Sudetenland" and believed he should take it over as part of his "birthright," the "birthright" of the "German people." Your logic is Hitler's logic.
I have no God-given right to live in "the Sudetenland," and you have no God-given right to live in "Israel."
I guess I could try to tell you how God, Jesus, Mohammed, Confucius, Buddha, etc., are all blatant, obvious myths.
But I'd be happy if you would just choose not to follow a racist, racial-supremacist Master-Race ideology.