Those who advocate one state, if it is more than just an idea, you should be pleased by Bibi’s annexation. You should call it a move in the right direction. You should assert that he hasn’t gone far enough. He must annex the entire west bank and give all residents the right to vote. Democratic candidates clinging to the two state solution should be mere distraction. If indeed you favor one state, Israeli annexation is the path that leads to your stated destination.
The next step chronologically should be the Trump big deal. It will take Bibi a month about to form the government and Trump should be pressured to release his plan already, what is he waiting for.
I realize that by backing Zionism, a family in Gaza deems me their imprisoner.
It is not enough to convince me of the future equanimity of one state, you have to convince me enough to argue the cause as if it’s my own and for that I must truly believe it. I have no faith in the future kumbaya state that is proffered here, and certainly insufficient faith to argue it to others and unlike most of you denizens of the internet who never talk in person to anyone who gives 2 farts about this issue, let alone someone who disagrees with you face to face, your entire palestine world takes place between your ears and in your fingertips, but never 99.9% of the time face to face even with those that agree with you and zero point zero zero zero with people who disagree with you, your need to be able to communicate in face to face is never even tested. never. whereas my need to communicate face to face is tested all the time, regularly. So you have to convince me, it ain’t enough to taunt me. and for that the first step would be some sort of a conversation. which is about as likely as throwing 4 sixes in a row on one die. (1/1296)