Obama vs Gelb=democracy vs covert war

by Philip Weiss on June 23, 2009 · 6 comments

In a piece in the forthcoming New York Review of Books, David Bromwich creatively opposes the post-colonial credo of Obama in his Cairo speech to a book by Leslie Gelb of the Council of Foreign Relations, which mingles the best-and-the-brightest and Machiavelli. Excerpts:

Obama spoke at the end about the general good of democracy: his predecessor's favorite and almost his only theme. Advocates of democracy ought to maintain their support for freedom even when they gain power. As for religious freedom, its sincerity is not measured by a rejection of other people's faith. And women's rights are not to be confused with the approval or discountenancing of an orthodox custom…
It was a long speech, fifty-five minutes, none of it easy to take in at a glance; but there were two decisive moments in Obama's peroration: "It's easier to start wars than to end them." The suggestion seemed to be that even in Afghanistan, he has his eye on the difficult work of ending a war. And the last of his three quotations from the Hebrew Bible, the Koran, and the New Testament was drawn from the Sermon on the Mount: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God."
In a discussion moderated by Senator Daniel P. Moynihan some twenty-five years ago, Leslie Gelb said with a genial irony that covert wars brought no real impairment of democracy…
Obama in Cairo spoke as the leader of a constitutional democracy. By contrast, Gelb, and many others of the policy establishment, think a president should take Congress into his confidence only for the reason that Machiavelli advised the prince to hold the powerful close by. You keep a sharper eye on them that way; it is better to have them as visible allies than as secret enemies. But the involvement of Congress in policy is presented, in this book of advice to a democratic prince, as a strictly instrumental good. Policy is the property of the strategists. You work out a policy, and you implement it.
Among the tacit assumptions of Gelb's argument is the good that should have come, and that may yet come, from America's bombing, invasion, and occupation of Iraq. He offered the assistance of the Council on Foreign Relations to Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Hadley in the aftermath of the war, and he wishes that they had not declined the help of so many qualified talents.

Related posts:

  1. Leslie Gelb admits he supported Iraq war for the sake of his career
  2. Let’s Don’t Be Naive (About Obama and the Jewish Establishment)
  3. A pro-Israel Egyptian changes camps, over democracy…
  4. Obama aide calls Israel her ‘homeland’ and a ‘healthy democracy’
  5. Walt says Obama could start by calling occupation ‘cruel’ and ‘contrary to democracy’

{ 6 comments }

1 Mooser June 23, 2009 at 3:44 pm

"Among the tacit assumptions of Gelb's argument is the good that should have come, and that may yet come, from America's bombing, invasion, and occupation of Iraq." When all else, as it has in this case, fails, there's always Dr. Pangloss. If something happened, like the bombing and invasion, it must be for the best, in this best of all possible worlds. And if yopur stomach is full, and your chair comfortable, it's a very convincing arguement, best truncated by Mr. Newman: "What! Me, worry?"

2 DICKERSON3870 June 23, 2009 at 5:03 pm

RE: "…a book by Leslie Gelb of the Council of Foreign Relations." FROM JEFF HUBER: …Leslie Gelb, who hasn't been right about a single aspect of U.S. foreign policy from Vietnam on, avows, "They're making decisions there, at the White House. On everything… SOURCE – http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/05/04/dumb...

3 onlooker June 23, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Obama has yet to internalize Candide. He probably never read the short novel. OTH, McCain will go to his grave without reading it.

4 Meeser June 23, 2009 at 7:36 pm

I'm sure its not big on the books to read by the Israeli regime either.

5 Citizen June 23, 2009 at 9:49 pm

The brown Goldilocks: http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/05/04/dumb... Thanks Dickerson. This seems about right. Maybe it is?

6 wakeup June 23, 2009 at 10:39 pm

CODEPINK's "Stolen Beauty" AHAVA boycott campaign is part of the International Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement for Palestine to economically pressure the Israeli government to end its assault on Palestine and comply with international law.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Nightmare, or bad spy novel, or unindicted coconspirator (the Israel lobby)

Next post: my nagging question since Gaza