Last Friday I went to three demonstrations against the occupation with Israeli activist friends. I reported on the first already. Chapter two was slightly frightening.
We drove south past the walled city of Bethlehem toward Hebron and passed the long settlement of Efrat that winds its way along a ridge, collecting as much territory as it can for Jewish colonization of biblical lands. Efrat’s enterprising Jews have claimed strategic hills up and down the ridge line. The army has pretty much let them do so, for several miles.
At the southeast edge of Efrat is a Palestinian village that winds down a gentle slope: Al Masara. Because the Israeli wall is being constructed east of the Green Line to enclose large portions of Efrat—“deep in Palestine,” as Assaf Sharon, my companion in the back seat, put it—the people of Al Masara are losing access to many of their ancestral lands. The same old story. So every Friday they have a demonstration.
The occupying army was waiting for us. As we drove into the little town, we could see them on the western end of the main road. The had several jeeps and had laid out loops of concertina wire to prevent our getting anywhere near the settlement.
Our demonstration began in the village, of grayish cinderblock houses, and proceeded west towards the barrier. The drummers were there, a group of young Israelis with piercings and odd getups, who play a wicked drumming to inspire you forward. One of them is at the front, with a whistle, coordinating.
There were probably 200 of us, including several well known activists, Yonatan Shapiro and Ezra Nawi and actor Samieh Jabbarin. When we came to the concertina wire, we had a demonstration. The Palestinian way is to chant in a kind of song, their list of grievances and declarations. First the chanting was done in Arabic, and then Yonatan called out to the soldiers in Hebrew. Finally Sami Awad spoke in English. "These villagers seek to live in peace. But living in peace means living in dignity and respect…." That means visiting their grape vines and olive trees that are waiting for them on their lands.
The villagers seek to make their voices heard, that is all, Awad said to the internationals. We are grateful to you but we ask you not to be confrontational.
There were many camera crews there. From Reuters and Al Jazeera and Al Quds satellite TV. I do not think there was any American press. Most of the demonstrators were international. The reporter for Al Quds told me that though the demonstrations are led by Palestinians, and have been for six years, the Palestinians are weary of them. They seem to achieve nothing.
As the demonstrators chanted, including chants saying that the soldiers were enforcing an immoral occupation, I looked into the Israeli soldiers’ faces. They seemed bored or upset. Yonatan had talked to them about their orders, and they were being hectored, and some of them had big eyes. You can see their lack of composure in Nathan Stokes’s photo of the demonstration here and at Flickr. Their guns are too ready, and they seem agitated.
Awad declared the demonstration over and said the village insisted on nonviolence, and then something curious happened. Maybe one of the internationals said something angry. Or the soldiers said that a rock had been thrown. I didn’t see it. But abruptly the Israeli soldiers cried out and a couple of them jumped over the concertina wire with their hands on their guns and pushed forward into the crowd. We stepped back.
The whole line of soldiers now reformed closer to us, and began urging us backward. After that there was pandemonium.
Some of the internationals, angered at the provocative soldiers, wanted to sit down in the road. The Palestinians and Israelis began yelling at us to come back, we are not confronting them. We staggered back, and now the soldiers were angry. They pushed against us. Assaf Sharon was upset. I could see that his face was red, he’d been pushed around. He held his camera up, documenting the soldiers’ behavior, still they crowded us. Yonatan Shapira is big, he wore a wide hat and a tight black shirt saying We Will Not Be Silent and stood his ground, even as he challenged the soldiers about their orders. Look at him here– brave guy.

A Palestinian woman confronted the soldiers. She stood out in the road by herself. She was about 50. The soldiers said they were going to arrest her and she cried out, Please arrest me, that way I will see my son. Her son is in an Israeli jail. She held up a photograph of hinm. Her husband was killed by the occupation forces, I was informed. Here she is, again picture by Nathan Stokes.
The soldiers did not think we were moving fast enough. Assaf came up to me and said, “Don’t be afraid of what they are going to do, it is just a stun grenade.”
Suddenly an Israeli soldier threw a black can the size of a shaving cream can into our midst and it went off with a puff of smoke and a loud crack. People ran. Over the next five minutes they threw four or five more of them. I found the sound pretty terrifying and got out of the way. Adam Horowitz says the sound of a stun grenade operates inside your brain.
It did not make any sense that they would throw the grenade, and I wondered what else they would do. Behind them crawled the jeeps. In this way they forced the crowd back down into the village.
I stood at a turn in the road, talking to a woman of about 40 wearing a red scarf. Catharine Arakelian of England is running for the Labor party for Parliament from a London district. She was as upset as I was.
"It was a very peaceful protest. Suddenly out of nowhere the whole thing became very frightening. I could only see violence coming from the Israeli side. The stereotpye is that the Israelis actually dispense violence. And I see it.
"I’ve learned that the Israelis see themselves still as at war. There is no peacekeeping function, there’s only a protective function for themselves. They do not want peace, because they don’t know anything about peacekeeping. I’m shocked and horrified.
"I said to a soldier, ‘Why do you do this, wouldnt you rather be at university, then go out to work and become a man?’ ‘It’s to protect my country,’ he said. And another said, ‘This makes us a man.’ You’re not a man unless you have done this. You cannot be a man in Israeli society unless you do that. It’s not right for young people.
"It’s makes them tough. It’s a really horrible way.
"I can now bear witness. I can talk about it back home. I can got to meetings."
What about the two-state solution? I asked her.
"I do not see any possibility of a viable Palestinian state here. The Palestinians have been sold that idea by their leadership, and they feel let down. They are being de-developed."



reminds me of what happened to us in bil’in. as members of our group approached the wire they started throwing the canisters. what a weird way to grow up, straight out of high school to be armed to the teeth facing down peaceful protesters and being big tough mean guys. what an indoctrination into adulthood.
Talk to the surviving USA NG soldiers at Kent State, back in the day.
The settlement enterprise was misguided morally and strategically and thus placing these young soldiers in the position of defending their country by attacking protesters would have been avoided.
But there is something phony about this “indoctrination into adulthood” mantra I’m hearing. Let’s not forget the intifadeh. When these kids were eight, nine and ten, people were afraid to get on buses and to eat pizzas at restaurants and many of these kids had to grow up awfully quickly in that circumstance. The army is the official taking charge of the security of the country, but seeing the country under attack they saw when they were still kids.
I wouldn’t go to a British Labor party candidate for parliament for a true assessment of the possible solutions to the conflict, she’s spent 36 hours studying the issue and she knows what her constituency wants to hear. I am not distrusting her emotions, just her intellectual input.
I guess you are saying the Palestinian kids had to grow up fast too? So now what is your vision?
Right now things are not going in a good direction.
I think the two state solution is firmly founded in resolution 242 and any attempt to push through a one state solution is too revolutionary a move to foresee in the near (10 – 20 years) future. I think the American foreign policy cannot change on a dime and to expect this type of behavior from such a conservative establishment is to expect too much. The WASPS who used to control foreign policy are peeved at the neo conservatives and their pet project Israel, but tossing Israel over would look like an act of caprice rather than consistency and the foreign policy needs some semblance of consistency. Therefore the two state solution is the way to go.
But Israel is not ready to sign onto the same borders as 67 and Abbas has not indicated what he wants, he may want for Israel to look bad (in your language; to be seen for what it is.) If Obama and Netanyahu are truly interested in peace they would arrange for back channel talks with Abbas, but there’s no evidence that this is happening.
Abbas has shown himself willing to sign any document that would legalize the occupation while being more than happy to police the Palestinian areas on behalf of Israel. We are talking about a guy who didn’t want to go ahead with the Goldstone Report…
Its the Israelis who are not indicating what they want.
They say they are working for the 2 state solution yet they continue to build settlements on the land that is supposed to become the future state of the Palestinians.
All Abbas asked for was a settlement freeze so that he could gain some credibility in the eyes of his constituencies… instead he got a settlement drive.
It’s pretty clear what the Israelis want, but it’s not something they can admit to.
What they want is a group of WB Gazas, open-air prisons surrounded by the IDF.
Occupation tourism?
link to haaretz.com
I saw it too. I feel a nasty attempt at discreting coming.
Discrediting! Those zionists are sneaking in typos in my posts again!
An occupation dehumanizes both the victims and the occupiers.
Read up on police battalion 101 – a unit of ordinary German policemen, and what happens when they are ordered to “protect their country” during WW2.
Hello all.
My name’s Nathan. The photos used above are mine, and I would like to publicly thank Phil for using them (done it repeatedly in private). Please follow the link to my flickr page for more photos of the protest (and also a bunch from Sheikh Jarrah from mid-December. Phil also attended the weekly demonstration against the theft of Palestinian homes in the Jerusalem neighborhood last Friday).
Currently there are only a few up, some options for Phil to choose from for this article, but later in the day I’ll upload the full set. There are many more of the peaceful march through the village than the ensuing chaos when the Israeli military (please do not refer to them as the IDF. They are NOT a defense force. They are 100% a machine of aggression) acted in a heinous display of unnecessary and disproportionate force (apparently a small child threw a stone that struck a heavily armored jeep).
It was my intent to show the peaceful nature of the march, and the cohesion of the local community, first and foremost, and also the support of the anti-zionst Israelis (such as Yonatan, shown above being assaulted by the military) and the international community members in attendance.
The organizers of such events around the West Bank (there are many, and also the first peaceful protest march has occurred in Gaza in the last few days) are unequivocally committed to non-violent resistance to the military occupation that has marred and blighted their home lands for over 60 years.
I would also like to draw more attention to Phil’s article about my friend Jared. Jared is a journalist working in the West Bank and has recently been refused re-entry due to his work. This despicable display of censorship of the press is appalling, and on a personal level for all of those that know Jared, deeply upsetting.
Please follow the link to the article where I am about to leave a comment detailing what you can all do to help. Any help will be appreciated beyond any words I could type.
link to mondoweiss.net
Thank you, Nathan
Oh, and for anyone that objects to my use of the word ‘assault’ in my earlier post I follow the British legal definition of assault found in section 42 (I think, no text book to hand) of the Offences Against the Person Act, 1961, that essentially states that any application of force that is percieved as a threat is an assault. This would be a very mild comprehension of the actions of the Israeli military that day.
Curious mismatch between the title and content. “Lose control” suggest temper and disciplinary problems that can easily be excused.
Today, at a protest at Sheikh Jarrah, the Israeli police arrested the head of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.
Pingback: Why was I silent about my politics in the Holocaust survivor’s house?