Robert Naiman of Just Foreign Policy comments at Common Dreams on that very weak letter on the Gaza flotilla signed by six congresspeople, and explains why it's an achievement:
The actual text of the letter is spectacularly modest. The six Representatives express their concern for the safety of a group of American citizens; urge the Secretary of State to act to protect them (as she is legally obligated to do as part of her job); note that the Israeli government, like any other government, must conform to international law; note that The Audacity of Hope has declared its cargo of letters from Americans to Gazans to be "open to international inspection"; and note the commitment of the passengers on The Audacity of Hope to nonviolence and international law.
In any other arena of contemporary advocacy for peace, getting six Members of Congress to sign on to a letter designed to be spectacularly modest advocacy of basic common sense would not be something to crow about.
But this is not any other arena. The Freedom Flotilla is challenging the Israeli blockade of 1.6 million Gazans, and therefore, in official Washington, the Freedom Flotilla is "radioactive."
So these six Representatives deserve a huge round of applause. There is no question that if it were possible to anonymously sign Congressional letters, this letter would have many more signatures. These six Representatives were willing to publicly sign their names to this basic appeal, knowing full well that there is a dedicated and well-financed crew of pro-Likud activists in Washington determined to punish any deviance from the Likud line.
It will be interesting to see how the pro-Likud activists respond to this letter. Because the letter is so reasonable and modest, it puts the pro-Likud activists in a lose-lose situation. If they attack the six Members for expressing concern for the safety of a group of American peace activists, the Likudniks will be exposed as extremists. But if they let the letter pass, then a precedent will be established that six Members of Congress can speak up for basic decency on an issue related to Palestine without anything bad happening to them. And then maybe next time it will be twelve Members of Congress, and after that 20. On the first vote on the Afghanistan war, only Barbara Lee voted no. When the House voted a few weeks ago, only eight Democrats voted for open-ended continuation of the war.
In this way, the Congressional letter is like the Flotilla itself. By doing something so mundane - bringing humanitarian aid, or in the case of the American boat, letters - the Flotilla puts the Likud authorities in a lose-lose situation. Either they let our boats pass, in which case they concede that they are not politically invincible, or they stop our boats with force, in which case they expose themselves as extremists.

what’ll do it?
gotta acccent the proactive
eliminate the reactive
no need to mess with what’s in-between
status quo or change?
why mess with what’s in-between?
zionist entity israel or justice for palestine?
& by messing with what’s in-between?
same old same old
nothing to be gained
& what the occupiers are doing today?
entirely predictable
whereas to turn things around?
challenging the uncertain & unknown
asking oneself “what sort of world were it up to me?”
at the same time going for it
& succeeding?
so long it’s in the spirit of those eighteen magical days in tahrir square
“status quo or change?”
Change is a-coming, yourstruly, just not fast enough.
The problem is that way more American citizens have been murdered by Palestinian terrorists than shot by the IDF. So if you’re really worried about Americans, call on Hamas to renounce violence.
come on, it’s ‘dual citizens’…
It’s good to see there are at least six in Congress taking a stand on a corrupt system.
How many American citizens have been murdered by Palestinian terrorists? Does the number exceed the 34 American sailors on the USS Liberty murdered by the IDF?
Of course not! That was a military action! Like when Israel’s founders set bombs in the King David Hotel.