News

N.Y. town fosters ‘anti-Christian’ hatred against Roger Ailes, says Ailes editor

Roger Ailes
Roger Ailes

Here’s some crazy news from my town. An editor who answers to Roger Ailes, the Fox News president, is accusing my Hudson Valley community of fostering “anti-Christian” feeling against Ailes and his family.

First the back story. Roger Ailes moved to Philipstown, N.Y., six years ago and soon after bought The Putnam County News & Recorder (PCN&R), a weekly that has come out since just after the Civil War. His wife Elizabeth Ailes took over as publisher.

Roger Ailes likes to mix it up in local politics, so the paper has become something of an advocacy rag for conservative causes. But because this is a fairly progressive community, Ailes’s horses have usually lost, and there’s been a lot of local resistance, manifesting itself in the startup of a rival weekly published by a former aide to Jimmy Carter, in a Facebook group, in a memoir by a local shopowner, and in a website that parodies the PCN&R. The New Yorker and New York magazine have both written this story up, and a forthcoming biography of Ailes called The Loudest Voice in the Room is expected to tell the story too.

All healthy signs of democracy in action, right? But according to the PCN&R, the opposition has also resulted in vandalism targeting piles of newspapers outside the PCN&R offices. The PCN&R people put up surveillance cameras, and sought arrests, etc.

This week Douglas Cunningham, editor-in-chief and associate publisher for the Ailes weekly, wrote a column in the full-on paranoid style, titled, “Motives, and The Motives Under The Motives,” attributing the vandalism to a widespread local conspiracy of haters aimed at running the Aileses out of town.

Cunningham says he’s feared for his life, and twice describes the conspirators as anti-Christian. First:

“We have never written about the sick, aggressive, anti-Christian haters who are determined to control all thought and speech in Philipstown.”

The column is a rant. It elides death threats with messages scrawled on paper plates and teenagers on the ramble: “four or five young men… appeared in our windows, at least two them on the front step. It was threatening to our staff in light of the dangerous things going on in the world.” Huh.

The selfless editor is loyal to the Aileses:

“The threats against me and the newspaper pale in comparison to those against our owner and her family.”

Cunningham blames the threats on “dividers” and “an intolerant group of local loons who decided they needed to get ride of the Aileses and/or the PCN&R.”

Here’s his second claim that they’re anti-Christian:

“[The parody website] ridicules the efforts of any number of local residents. It belittles Christians generally and churches specifically. It attacks the Tiny Mites football players…”

Cunningham names only three people: Judith Kepner Rose, “the instigator of the Facebook discussion;” Ann S. Beddingfield, a lawyer; and Shane Scott-Hamblen, an Episcopalian rector. I can’t say where any of these people stand on the Tiny Mites, but I’m told that Scott-Hamblen has drawn the ire of the local Catholic priest because he’s married to a man, and that Ailes’s newspaper gives a lot of press to the Catholic church.

I find Cunningham’s column embarrassing, because this is a good town and I’ve never seen religious prejudice here. In fact, I’ve often gone to the Catholic church for funerals of dear friends. If Cunningham believes that bigotry is here, he should produce his evidence rather than talking about teenagers on the doorstep and greasy paper plates.

Of course I wonder whether the paranoia reflects the boss’s ideas. Roger Ailes is a conservative by temperament. At public meetings here, he has quoted George Washington (not without eloquence). If he thinks his neighbors hate Christians, he should say so.

20 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If his newspaper just got vandalized I think we can forgive him an angry rant. It’s a pretty human response. I got vandalized I my first reply might not be in perfect diplomatic, coached language either.

Also, what exactly does this have to do with the Middle East or I/P conflict? I’m rather confused about what this is doing here…..

it’s really bizarre how they came to the conclusion this was somehow related to the Ailes’s religion. from the entertaining nymag embed:

….Under the Aileses, the PCN&R took a rightward turn, alarming some local residents when it began publishing selections from the Federalist Papers. In May 2009, it ran a two-part editorial attacking the Obama administration’s stimulus plan. Around the same time, the paper aggressively covered a local debate over zoning, framing the story as a philosophical issue of property rights. With the paper, Ailes became a fixture in town. He renovated the paper’s office on Main Street and sponsored the annual July 4 fireworks celebration in 2010, hanging a large banner across Main Street. That year, he drove his vintage red Cadillac in the July 4 parade.

It was on July 4, 2010, when Stewart launched Philipstown.info, a local news website to compete with the PCN&R. The launch triggered a media war in town. Beth Ailes felt betrayed when Stewart staffed the site with several PCN&R reporters who quit the Ailes’ paper en masse to work for Stewart. “When we bought the paper we didn’t say to all the people who worked here, ‘You’re fired,’ knowing full well that there were people here who didn’t share our same way of looking at the world,” Beth Ailes told The New Yorker in 2011. The media rivalry between Stewart and Ailes split the town. Local Republican politicians all but refused to talk to Stewart’s reporters. Democrats complained that the PCN&R took shots at them.

there’s a lot more in that article. it sounds a tad like an out of towner bought the town paper for his wife to have a hobby and turned it into a conservative rag and is now complaining because the town’s folks started a new paper more to their liking (and have called it “The Paper” challenging the old paper which used to informally be called the paper!)

but it sounds to me like someone is just using the ol’ anti semitism catholic fallback canard. silly/shameful. that said maybe people in the town are not so nice to them, but it doesn’t sound racist in nature.

The fact that you live in the same small town as Roger Ailes is in fact quite unbelievable. This is a gold mine.

There is a certain part of me that sympathizes with Ailes, perhaps because he reminds me of my own conservative old uncles, even if they’re wrong on mostly everything, they are deep down good people. I know a lot of people see Ailes as a monster, and he’s easy to make fun of since he is intellectually and in many ways emotionally still in the 50s. The 1850s. But I think he fundamentally believes his ideology is good-natured and I think he’s smart enough to see that the country, especially the millenials, are way past his values. He has described himself as a ‘Taft-Republican’. Taft was active in the 1940s, so that’s his political frame of mind.

Maybe his paranoia has gotten worse with older age. But I also remember reading that he apparently bullet-proofed the Fox News station with very expensive glass and so on. He was convinced al-Qaida wanted to assassinate him or something.

If I remember correctly, he gave his grandson a box with a pistol, a few bullets and a bit of gold inside it(like a true conservative, he has deep distrust of the Federal reserve system and is a fierce proponent of gold as currency).
Why? Because Ailes sees the country going to hell in his grandson’s lifetime(which, considering the last few weeks might not be so surreal to consider anymore) and in fact within a decade or two.

Is Roger Ailes a “Taft Republican”? Senator Robert Taft was opposed to labor unions, and headed up the effort that passed the Taft-Hartley anti-union bill, over-riding Truman’s veto. So on domestic issues, maybe Roger Ailes is a Taft Republican.

But on foreign affairs, Robert Taft was a famous isolationist, opposing NATO and opposing US entry into the Second World War. Taft was skeptical of Cold War claims that the Soviet Union was an expansionist power like Nazi Germany. Ailes was a propagandist for the Reagan Republican, who were (and still are) ultra-interventionist. The very opposite of Robert Taft. Don’t forget, Ailes is the head of Fox News.

RE: “I’m told that Scott-Hamblen [an Episcopalian rector] has drawn the ire of the local Catholic priest because he’s married to a man, and that Ailes’s newspaper gives a lot of press to the Catholic church.” ~ Weiss

MY COMMENT: I’m confused. So very, very confused! Pastor John Hagee sayeth that Catholics are not even Christians! He insists that Catholics are “apostates”*.
Please help me Dear Lord! I beseech thee! Save me from this crazy, crazy world! ! !

* John Hagee on the Catholic Church, 2003 [VIDEO, 08:13] – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OygDw2m3z4U

P.S. Apostasy in Christianity – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Christianity