Culture

Aberrational Judaism

This is part of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page.

I have been traveling Jewish in South Korea and America.  Tomorrow I leave for Vienna.  The overall theme of my travels is simple.  Rather than continuing to mouth a moribund interfaith dialogue, we should embrace a new interfaith solidarity.

We have already experienced this solidarity.  We haven’t named it in its depth.  Is the difficulty in naming what we experience fear of permanently leaving behind what we have known?  Uncharted territory isn’t easy.  It’s the breeding ground for exile and the prophetic.

Watching the documentary Iron Wall before one of my lectures a few days ago, I thought of this.  Is there anything more likely as the breeding ground for exile and the prophetic than the factual mapping of Israel’s brutal birth and expansion?

My time at the World Council of Churches assembly in Busan, South Korea, confirmed another conundrum of interfaith solidarity.  Many of the people who greeted me at the assembly have left behind the Christianity of their youth.  They have embraced a Christianity that hasn’t existed since Christianity’s founding.  This is how they explain it.

From my perspective, the Christians I met at the WCC’s assembly embody a Christianity that has probably never existed.  Christian symbols abound but their inclusiveness and embrace of other religions is a novum in Christian history.  I see them as Aberrational Christians.  Will they survive the unbridled power – and violence – of mainstream Christian history?

Aberrational Christians are on the ropes already.  They have personally come to the end of Christian history.  I wish them the best of luck.

But, then, perhaps I have and other Jews of Conscience have embraced an Aberrational Judaism.  Fortunately, we have Jewishness to fall back on.  Within Jewishness we have a battle between empire and the prophetic that has raged for millennia.  It’s a people’s struggle rather a religious one.

Christians don’t have “Christianess” to fall back upon.  Being an empire religion, Christianity has uprooted everyone in its path, including its adherents.  Under the guise of universalism, Christians rarely have a fallback position.  This is more or less the case with Islam.  When Muslims comes to the end of Islam, as inevitably they do when they are free to vote with their feet, they have few places to land except the colonial nationality they inherit or a voracious modernity they seek shelter within.

Rooted aside, though, traveling Jewish teaches me that we are all in it together, regardless of our endings and what we can and cannot fall back upon.  That is why solidarity is so crucial.  This is also why the questions that come within that solidarity are so explosive.

False borders and boundaries drawn by others – and sometimes drawn by ourselves – cannot meet the crisis at hand.  This is obvious.  What isn’t obvious is whether the boundary-crossers of our time have the strength and rootedness to change the trajectory of our imperiled world.

13 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

”Fortunately, we have Jewishness to fall back on. Within Jewishness we have a battle between empire and the prophetic that has raged for millennia. It’s a people’s struggle rather a religious one.

Christians don’t have “Christianess” to fall back upon. Being an empire religion, Christianity has uprooted everyone in its path, including its adherents”>>>>

oh lord!… here you go again.
You are much more acccurate and objective when you stick to your political analyzing.
Most religions have their empir-ist, including yours, the only diffrence is some are already empires and others wanna be empires.

In today’s news, Pope Francis has come out as anti-fracking. Maybe, of course. The Pope is a politician, whether he likes it or not.

Assume it’s true. Well, that’s some progress. If he were strongly against the burning (and also perhaps against any other use) of fossil fuels, it’d be a stronger statement.

This is religion coming head-to-head with the global economic juggernaut. Could be part of what Marc ellis is talking about.

That said, I join “American” in discomfort with Ellis’s conclusory statements about other religions and their adherents.

My own view? The great religious teachers had very important and valuable messages for all humanity. Their early adherents understood their messages only somewhat — which is one problem — and created social organizations for the propagation of the messages (as understood or misunderstood) which led to power-politics in the societies and the “capture” of the teachings by those best at exercising the power (not best at understanding the messages).

So all the religions got a lot wrong and some right — I suppose. And there is a lot of room for religious people to move toward [1] truth, justice, and peace among men and [2] a much less destructive interaction between humankind and nature (with climate change as a most noticeable but far from only horrible consequence of human activity on earth).

Jewishness – the peoples struggle. Coming to a theater near you…

RE: “Watching the documentary Iron Wall before one of my lectures a few days ago…” ~ Ellis

The Iron Wall 2006 [VIDEO, 52:08] – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFBamQ2aONA

They have embraced a Christianity that hasn’t existed since Christianity’s founding. This is how they explain it.

That’s a pretty common view in Protestantism, which is also a common orientation of the WCC.

From my perspective, the Christians I met at the WCC’s assembly embody a Christianity that has probably never existed.
I think I know where you are going with that.

Christian symbols abound but their inclusiveness and embrace of other religions is a novum in Christian history.
Maybe they do not believe that other religions are equally correct, since that would be irrational if they believe the Bible predicts the Messiah would be killed before making an earthly victory when the two other main religions deny that. What you must mean is that they have tolerance for other religions. Tolerance for other religions has already existed in Christian societies, one example being the separation of Church and state at the US’s founding.