Liberal Zionists seek to strip Naftali Bennett of freedom to travel in hope of saving two-state solution

A group of liberal Zionists has called on the United States and the European Union to respond to the “genuine emergency” that settlements pose to the two-state solution and issue “personal sanctions” denying the freedom of travel to four Israeli leaders including finance minister Naftali Bennett because they support the occupation of the West Bank.

The group of 20–which includes historian Steven Zipperstein, moral philosopher Michael Walzer, former SDS activist Todd Gitlin, and Alan Wolfe, author of the new book At Home in Exile: Why Diaspora Is Good for the Jews— says that the U.S. and the EU should adopt “personal sanctions—visa restrictions and foreign asset freezes” against Finance Minister Naftali Bennett, members of Knesset Uri Ariel and Moshe Feiglin, and settlement activist Zeev Hever. All serve the occupation– “unjust, unlawful, and destructive policies in their most extreme and dangerous form.”

The posse calls itself Scholars for Israel and Palestine (SIP) and says that permanent occupation, “large-scale” settlements, and creeping annexation of the West Bank all violate international law and lead “toward catastrophe.” But SIP is part of The Third Narrative, an outfit that arose a year ago to try and drain the impact on campus of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), and it opposes generalized boycotts and sanctions “that indiscriminately target Israeli society and Israeli institutions.”

Bringing the Debate to You

Haaretz has the news — “Anti-BDS academics urge ‘personal’ sanctions against ‘annexationist’ Israelis”– and is quoting Michael Walzer on the “dramatic” use of such a call to seek to marginalize the BDS call.

“All of us are very engaged in opposing the academic boycott and other boycotts,” said Walzer in an interview…. “But at the same time we always insist we are against the occupation. This seemed to be a usefully dramatic way of focusing attention on where it should be focused and not where some of the BDS people are trying to put it,” Walzer said.

But Haaretz also quotes Eric Alterman– a liberal who is positioned more and more to the right — opposing the measure for the same reason he has opposed BDS: because “I don’t believe in politics that are purely symbolic… Some people do, and that’s fine. But I only believe in politics when I can see how what I’m supporting might actually happen.”

Max Blumenthal has dismissed the new initiative as a non-alternative to an effective movement:

Pathetic liberal Zionist professors call for “personal sanctions” on 4 Israeli fanatics in place of actual .

Myself I tend to welcome any efforts to hold Israelis accountable for their actions; and there is no question that stopping Naftali Bennett from traveling to the U.S. and Europe or freezing his considerable assets (he brags on how much he made with his tech startup) would be a blow to rightwing Zionism. But this feels a day late and a dollar short. Todd Gitlin tells Haaretz: “We are holding Israeli figures whose declarations are inimical to a just and peaceful settlement to account.” There are many, many such figures; countless Israeli governments have served the occupation; Avigdor Lieberman the foreign minister now lives in occupied territory and has an openly-racist plan to pay Palestinians to leave Israel. So why are these four the only bad guys? Peter Beinart and Peace Now’s settlement boycott ideas have greater consistency/force and have been around for a while. Maya Wahrman of Princeton sees a larger emergency than these folks do, the country has reached “such a level of injustice” that she has all but endorsed BDS as a means of transforming the place.

Also, if the occupation is so unjust and destructive, what about occupied Gaza? Is there to be any personal accountability for the killings of more than 300 children six years ago and 500 children last summer, sporadic onslaughts that would seem to represent the Israeli government’s solution for the fact that it has denied 1.7 million people rights? Gitlin has said that ExxonMobil and apartheid South Africa deserved wholesale boycott because they have/had no “right to exist,” but he has not a word to say about the collective punishment of Palestinian civilians. Even Marcel Ophuls is talking about collective punishment, and he’s 87. It would seem that the thrust of this measure is aimed at BDS– emulating BDS in a very limited way because SIP recognizes the effectiveness of BDS and is trying to come up with an alternative.

Signatory Alan Wolfe’s book on diaspora suggests strongly that BDS is an example of “Jew hatred” and avers that the movement promoting BDS expresses itself “in the language of support for supposedly oppressed people such as the Palestinians.” Supposedly oppressed? I do not believe this Scholar for Israel and Palestine has any real sense of Palestinian conditions.

62 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“unjust, unlawful, and destructive policies in their most extreme and dangerous form.” And who, pray tell, starting that whole unjust enterprise? None other than the Labor government of the seventies and I didn’t hear any of those “liberals” screaming much then.

Really, it is to laugh, for what exactly is Bennett’s crime? By not crouching his language in the delicate equivocations the liberals love he does not provide them with an out. Either they sign onto Israeli Zionism with its ethnic cleansing and bouts of “lawn mowing” or they count themselves among the ranks of the enemy.

Now we finally have an Israeli government that speaks the brutal truth and it’s too much for the Gitlins of this world. They want to return to the good ol’ days of shoot and cry: viciously put down Palestinians in the morning while in the evening you wring your hands about how awful you feel about what THEY made you do…and then go out the next day and do it again.

Gitlin, Wolfe and others like them are irrelevant. The Jewish elites with money, power and the numbers of heads of states on speed dial have Israel’s back and they are the one’s other elites listen to.

Eric Alterman has clay feet, among other things.

I’m still failing to reconcile the designation of “liberal Zionist”.

Like Phil says, this is a day late and a dollar short. These”liberal Zionists” are openly calling for this sort of action because they know the charade is over and Israel has been exposed as an ethno-supremacist, apartheid state. They are desperate to patch things up in the eyes of international public opinion and return to the status quo of mealy-mouthed platitudes and endless negotiations that will produce no concrete steps regarding the dismantling of the occupation regime. Moreover, the feckless Palestinian leadership has shown itself to be so corrupt, subservient and devoid of any real dignity that, should a “center-right/left” electoral victory happen next year, they too will be willing to continue playing this miserable game as along as it means maintaining their own status and privileges.

Unless Palestinian grassroots activists can exert unprecedented pressure on the PA to act on behalf of Palestinian national interests by forcing their leadership to ratify Palestinian membership in the ICC, go to the Security Council to demand a clear date of Israeli withdrawal from ALL Occupied Territories and call for an end to the siege of Gaza, nothing will have actually changed.

“A nascent group of well-known academics is calling on the U.S. government and European Union to impose personal sanctions on four prominent Israelis “who lead efforts to insure permanent Israeli occupation of the West Bank and to annex all or parts of it unilaterally in violation of international law…….Scholars for Israel and Palestine (SIP) a group that describes itself as “pro-Israel, pro-Palestine, pro-peace” is asking the U.S. and EU governments to impose visa restrictions and to freeze the foreign assets of Economy Minister and Habayit Hayehudi leader Naftali Bennett, Housing Minister Uri Ariel, Likud MK Moshe Feiglin and Ze’ev “Zambish” Hever, a former Jewish Underground member who heads the Amana organization, which oversees the settlement enterprise, including illegal outposts.”

Apart from being an almost “random” act of designating naughty poster boys, if the move get AIPAC/Congressional attention, it may also galvanize the Knesset’s fervent right wing and ardent settlers into heedless acts of reprisal.

I can’t believe that these Scholars for Israel and Palestine (SIP) people still hold out hopes for a negotiated settlement while condemning BDS, to date the main act of leverage that has both American and Israeli Jews rattled to the core…..

““This would provide a way of mobilizing votes against blanket boycotts but equally against the attempts to make the occupation irreversible,” Shafir said. “It would allow us to find a place in the middle and remain distinguished from but remain part of the ongoing dialogue in a productive way that is protective of Israel’s ties with the U.S., the world and liberal intellectuals.”

http://forward.com/articles/210833/anti-bds-professors-launch-push-to-ban–far-right/

I can’t say that I would be upset if this request for restrictions was acted upon. The individuals named are certainly some of the worst of the cast of characters.

That said it’s a slap in the face to the victims of the ongoing crimes against humanity perpetrated by the terrorist state of Israel. It almost legitimizes those crimes by overlooking them.