Harvard Prof Wisse Calls on American Jews to Serve Here as Part of Israel’s ‘Army

by Philip Weiss on May 15, 2007 · 13 comments

I see it as part of my function to document instances of dual loyalty–in which American Jews are called upon to show loyalty to Israel. These appeals are problematic: 1, they define Jewish identity in a narrow and dubious way, as loyalty to a foreign country, and 2, more importantly, they have helped to confuse Americans, especially many Jews in politics and journalism, to think that our national interest is the same as Israel’s.

These appeals are rarely explicit–people know it’s not kosher. But in late March at the Center for Jewish History in New York, Ruth Wisse, a Harvard professor of Yiddish literature, issued an appeal to American Jews to serve here as part of Israel’s "army." At a conference for young Jewish journalists, Wisse was asked about how to respond to the "demonization" of Israel by the country’s critics. I will give her answer in full (with emphasis added):

I find it humiliating to have to answer to the kinds of charges that are made. Is this what my mind was created for? Is this to what I’m supposed to attend day after day? To this kind of battle against a kind of irrationality and venality, creative irrationality by the way. This is what is devastating to people who want to be intellectuals and I think it may be one of the reasons why intellectuals do not feel comfortable fighting this fight, because the fight, I agree with you, has to be fought in other terms. One has to use one’s intelligence in certain arenas to think of strategy not of cleverness, and that is very painful. I would give you the analogy, Every Israeli has to be in the Army for two or three years of his training at least and then a month of every year at least afterwards. I think that American Jews ought to think of themselves the same way, that for a certain part of your life you are just part of that army. Now army life is rotten, it asks you to do things like this [Wisse uses her hands], not to keep thinking. You’re not asked to analyze every situation from anew. You have to exercise, you have to learn. That kind of fight that we have to wage takes a totally different kind of advocacy training, of systematic thinking …

I will give you one example, I think about this all the time. I gave a talk at Stanford…there were about 15, 20 Arab students who had come to the talk, Friday night. They had not participated in the meal, but they just sat there at the side very politely and then when it was over they had their prepared questions. ‘So what about the apartheid of Israel? What about Israel’s apartheid policy toward the Arab population?’ And I said to him, ‘Why did you kill your grandmother?’.. He was very startled and he thought I hadn’t heard the question. And he repeated the question. I said, ‘No no no I heard the question, I understood the question, but I have a question for you, "Why did you kill your grandmother?"’ Now I couldn’t think of anything clever on the spot, it was a stupid thing, but I went into it and tried to explain to the rest of the audience exactly what this was– he would now have to answer to this absurd charge. I pressed him. I was not kind. I said, ‘Where is your grandmother? Can you produce her?’ Just to show how easy it is to put someone on the defensive with an accusation that has no merit, that has no substance… That is so different from the kind of intellectual subtleties that one has to keep working at in all other areas of our life, including what is said here in relation to [criticism of] the policies of Israel.

Sociologist Nathan Glazer responded that Wisse was being too simplistic, Jews were also outraged by Israel’s behavior. No one in the panel or audience repudiated Wisse’s appeal (though Eric Alterman did so on his blog a week later).

Related posts:

  1. Hallelujah–Shaul Magid in ‘The Forward’ calls out Wisse and Peretz over Gaza, and calls Jews ‘to our collective senses’
  2. Harvard Prof Says ‘Money, Media and Establishment’ Choke Dissent Re Israel
  3. Israeli army forces Palestinians to serve as ‘human shields’ in raids
  4. Harvard Prof Says Google Cancelled His Talk on Israel Lobby
  5. Foxman and Wisse Attack Assimilation, Foxman Saying It Makes Jews Less Selfish

{ 13 comments }

1 Rowan Berkeley May 15, 2007 at 1:51 pm

"Intellectual", my foot – even allowing for this being a viva voce response, it is clearly an expression of clinical hysteria in the most florid form, as anyone with any psychiatric training will agree.
Unfortunately, Jews have always used 'controlled hysteria' as a psychological warfare blackmail device, and so this is nothing new.

2 lester May 15, 2007 at 5:27 pm

I was driving in Brooline mass today. I don't know exactly what it was, hopefully a synagogue, but right in the middle of town there was a venerable looking old building that had two flags out front: US and Israel. Its looking more and more to me like there is some movement underfoot to join the two.

3 Peter H May 15, 2007 at 10:59 pm

I have to ask why Rowan Berkeley is still being allowed to comment here. As a critic of Israel and a supporter of Palestinian rights, the last thing I want to be associated is with anti-semites like Berkeley.

4 Rowan Berkeley May 16, 2007 at 6:58 am

ha! ha! ha! ha!

"another county heard from!"

5 Rowan Berkeley May 16, 2007 at 7:37 am

the assumption behind peter h's remark is that there exists a vast pool of well disposed american jews, who are all ready to strive together for peace, social justice, and free lunch in the mid east, but will be put off if anyone is involved who ever hurt their precious little feelings in the past.

I see no reason to believe this, and I am not sure I would kow-tow to it, even if I DID believe it.

6 Phil Weiss May 16, 2007 at 9:43 am

Peter H,
I agree that Rowan B is an antisemite, and I often find his statements offensive. I allow Rowan B to comment because I believe in tolerating a wide-open discussion, though I censor vicious namecalling and profanity…
Phil

7 Rowan Berkeley May 16, 2007 at 11:12 am

define 'antisemite' phil.

or realise that you don't have the time, and can't, and therefore should dismiss the word when you hear it, instead of being a limp dicked sheep.

as I have said on another thread jewish culture places no value on truthfulness, and this is very obvious when one reads these blogs, where jews can be observed trying on political clichés for size, in a purely narcissistic way, and in this generality I include you, phil.

8 Anonymous May 16, 2007 at 1:38 pm

Much evil is being caused by the abuse of the word antisemitism. I hope this was only a slip, not an intentional attempt at finding a place to stand in jewish history.

9 phil weiss May 16, 2007 at 1:43 pm

Rowan,
Can you say anything nice about Jews?
Phil

10 Rowan Berkeley May 16, 2007 at 1:44 pm

The day is rapidly approaching when to say that Judaism is a filthy, genocidal, criminal conspiracy will sound no more extreme than to say the same of Islam, as the neocon chorus regularly does.

11 Richard Silverstein May 16, 2007 at 3:57 pm

Ruth Wisse has been a neocon since before there were neocons. I don't anything she says seriously.

12 David May 16, 2007 at 6:49 pm

Further to Rowan's point about the source of modern Islamophobia–

Posters for the big June 10-11 demonstration against the occupation have gone up in the Washington DC subway system. Here's what they look like–
http://www.endtheoccupation.org/downloads/metroposter.pdf

(At first the corporate owners resisted, but the group's lawyers prevailed and got the billboards displayed.)

Now Zionist groups have countered with their own campaign–
http://endtheoccupation.org/img/original/counterad_woodley.jpg

I think it pretty nicely displays the Zionist mentality.

13 Anonymous May 16, 2007 at 8:21 pm

That poor boy needs a girlfriend:

http://www.cjrdaily.org/images/signingshells2large.jpg

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Walzer Says Jews Aren’t Good at Governing Others

Next post: Nukes Destablized Mideast in ‘67