The U.S. Must Reverse Its Decision to Bar Gaza Boy From Coming Here to Study

by Philip Weiss on August 13, 2008 · 2 comments

Jerry Haber tells the (so far) tragic story of Ahmed Al Maghari, a 16-year-old Palestinian living in Gaza, who has studied English and won a fellowship from Amideast to study here (under this exchange program), then had his visa revoked by the U.S. because Israeli intelligence judged him to be a security risk. Al Maghari wrote to Haber:

I succeed in this program believing in my self and believing a better education and a better place to live in, but unfortunately, they destroyed my only hope for a better future, however I still insist to travel in any way. In addition, this problem effected me in a very negative way, I felt that I disappointed all my friends and my family's hopes. Moreover, a lot of hard decisions that I took based on studying in America simply destroyed.

Writes Haber:

That somebody like Ahmed could grow up in a place like Gaza seems incomprehensible to many Israelis. That Gaza could be home to doctors, lawyers, and university professors, seems as incomprehensible. Such is the power of prejudice and stereotypes.

Haber is mounting an international campaign on Maghari's behalf. Godspeed.

Related posts:

  1. Gaza is coming of age for post-Zionist bloggers, average age 26!
  2. Reverse Aliyah
  3. Palestinian students have to pass admissions process, and military screen, to study in Israel
  4. 838 Gaza students are barred from study– and the NYT publishes tunnel capers
  5. Israel Blocks Hundreds of Gazans from Pursuing Graduate Study

{ 2 comments }

1 MRW. August 13, 2008 at 1:05 pm

He was refused because he was a threat to Israeli security. That's the reason why Israel will only allow 60 Palestinian kids to get a higher education. This was reported as such early last week. SPECIFICALLY: only 60 kids allowed to get a higher education because it was" a threat to Israeli security."

People occasionally mention here how these comment boards are filled with "anti-semites." News of this sort should underscore how it's also filled with people struck by the profound unfairness of actions such as this. To call any objection to this unfairness anti-semitic is like listening to Bill Clinton complain about his racism charge.

2 charles Keating August 14, 2008 at 4:11 pm

"It is hard to convey the amount of bile and reductionist, blame-the-Jews-for-every-sin rhetoric that has taken over much of the blogosphere. Phil Weiss’s blog generally attracts some of the most articulate Jew-bashers, so I tune into the comments from time to time in order to gauge the level of hatred."–Dan Fleshler, March 7, 2008 (On Realistic Dove)

No mention of SOG, or Witty, the lights of objectivity.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Lifestyles of the Neocons

Next post: Antisemites Are on My Side of These Issues. How Much Should I Care?