Understanding Darfur: An Olympic Update

Another dispatch on "How to Think About Darfur," by James North:

Lopez Lomong, who was chosen by his Olympic teammates to carry the American flag at the opening ceremonies, is an extraordinary young man. He is one of the "Lost Boys" of the Sudan, who escaped the civil war in the south 17 years ago and lived in a refugee camp in Kenya until 2001, when he was adopted by an American family, became a U.S. citizen, and made the Olympic team as a 1500-meter man.

Lopez Lomong is also part of Team Darfur, an unofficial group of athletes (led by Joey Cheek, who was denied entry) who are bringing  pressure on China for its support of the Sudan regime. Along with the rest of the Darfur solidarity movement, Team Darfur contends, correctly, that Chinese investment in Sudan’s oil industry sustains that regime and that China provides it with weapons.

But hold on, there's more to this story. China is actually a relative latecomer to the Sudan.

The first big oil company to set up shop in the Sudan was Chevron, the American giant; it was succeeded in the 1990s by Talisman (formerly Anakis), a Canadian oil company, and a Swedish enterprise called Lundin. Talisman was instrumental in building the 670-mile, $3.7 billion pipeline from the south that raised the Sudanese government’s oil revenues from nothing in 1998 to 42 per cent of its budget by 2001.

All this of course was pre-Darfur. But in 2001 a small band of activists in Canada and elsewhere in the west who were appalled at the Khartoum regime’s atrocities in the south – in which ten times as many people died since 1983 as have died in Darfur and where the Sudan regime was using attack helicopters to clear sites for drilling – targeted the oil companies. One tactic the activists tried was to ban companies that did business in the Sudan from raising capital in the U.S. or listing their stocks on U.S. markets.

The New York Times, in a July 2001 editorial, did chasten Sudan, but said the proposed financial moves would "set a dangerous precedent."  Still, the solidarity movement persisted, and finally did force Talisman to sell its interest a year later, at a profit.

I am delighted that Lopez Lomong carried our flag in Beijing. But I would forgive Chinese officials for detecting some hypocrisy on this issue, and maybe even wondering why no one who watched the 2000 Olympics in Sydney stumbled across any mention of western oil interests in the Sudan.

(Much more detail on oil and human rights in Sudan is available in a 2003 report by Human Rights Watch’s distinguished investigator, Jemera Rone.)

Posted in Israel/Palestine, Middle East

{ 3 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. scorpio says:

    happy for Lopez myself, but too bad the propaganda machine in this country sees fit to use anyone or anything to poke others in the eye, while we pursue far worse maladventures around the globe. the mere fact that Amurricans use 10 X per capita the carbon of Chinese and Indians (5 X the Europeans, who have higher standard of living) should disqualify us from speaking on any subject, least of all murderous behavior of others

  2. americangoy says:

    Hey, find a minute to think about Ossetia and Georgia.

    I am back, baby (somehow – thank you American public library system!).

  3. charles Keating says:

    OK, can we give a hail to the Geogian Jews nee Israelite businessmen, you know, the ones who saw a good deal?
    Israel, the home of the economic raper, defended to the last.

Leave a Reply