Here’s Jonathan Chait celebrating J Street in the New Republic and saying I creep him out. Otherwise fairly reasonable post. Good that J Street brought us together. (He gets two things wrong about me. I spell my name with one l. And I didn’t say that it’s inevitable that J Street would support a full boycott of Israel. I predict that J Street will end up supporting a boycott targeted at West Bank good.)
-
-
- Jack Ross in Brooklyn tonite– on Elmer Berger and the … 4
- Iran sanctions backlash– oil buyers ditch dollar 30
- O, Earth 3
- ‘Center for American Progress’ censors references to Israel from piece … 9
- Security expert formerly in Bush I administration says Holocaust rationalizes … 28
- Robert Reich pretends he’s stupid 9
- Factchecking Marty Peretz 2
- Israeli judges are the confessors in savage new doc’y on … 10
-
- Breaking: Israeli bulldozer, soldiers destroy entire Bedouin community near Anata … 760
- Publisher of the ‘Atlanta Jewish Times’ suggests Mossad should assassinate … 396
- Report: Israel to give US only 12-hour warning before attacking … 396
- Video: Settlers claim olive oil as ‘Israeli’ 282
- EU diplomats propose boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israeli colonialism 263
- In the last 24 hours an orgy of land theft … 219
- Arab-American high school student video targets US backing for killings … 218
- Why Christian Zionism is nothing short of outright heresy 167
-
- A regular commenter on this site seeks a more temperate … 506
- Publisher of the ‘Atlanta Jewish Times’ suggests Mossad should assassinate … 379
- New additions to the Mondoweiss comments policy 231
- Israel is at the heart of Jewish identity, Gorenberg says 136
- Report: Israel to give US only 12-hour warning before attacking … 134
- ‘Israel Firster’ gets at an inconvenient truth 120
- Video: Atlanta Jewish Times publisher’s tearful anti-apology 94
- Obama begins push for Jewish support in 2012 by touting … 91
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- Jack Ross in Brooklyn tonite– on Elmer Berger and the ‘foreign nationalism’ of Zionism (7)
- Jabberwocky: Victor Ostrovsky clearly indicates that dual loyalty is a major issue for zionists – who may have...
- RoHa: “They will also – to the detriment of America – deprive America of much that the Judaic part...
- yourstruly: what it all boils down to is that zionism posits that the interests of israel match the interest of all...
- Iran sanctions backlash– oil buyers ditch dollar (30)
- RoHa: If Iran gets lots of yuan, it will be able to easily buy lots of Chinese goods. What does China make?...
- Wolftone: Could someone explain how this shift away from the US dollar would affect China, which has, what, two...
- W.Jones: That’s a catchy, pretty song. I heard that during segregation in the US, African officials were...
- Video: Atlanta Jewish Times publisher’s tearful anti-apology (95)
- patm: EFFECTIVE APOLOGIES: A QUICK GUIDE TO THE KEY INGREDIENTS To fully clean up distressed feelings an apology...
- Allison Deger: Winnica-Adler is of course with remorse, but only extending to those he perceives as having hurt,...
- Security expert formerly in Bush I administration says Holocaust rationalizes Israel’s nuking Iran (28)
- Charon: It would most definitely be curtains for Israel. They would not be prepared for the aftermath. When people...
- ‘Center for American Progress’ censors references to Israel from piece on Islamophobic film (9)
- Hostage: The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg has referred to Aish Hatorah as “Jewish extremists.” Now there’s a...
- Jack Ross in Brooklyn tonite– on Elmer Berger and the ‘foreign nationalism’ of Zionism (7)
Our Writers
More WritersBlogroll

For what it’s worth, Philippos (‘Horse-lover’) is a Greek name and *should* have only one l.
If we’re going to play the name game, is ‘Chait’ pronounced like ‘Chair’ or more or less like a guttural form of ‘hate’?
If we’re going to play the name game, is ‘Chait’ pronounced like ‘Chair’ or more or less like a guttural form of ‘hate’?
It probably comes from the Hebrew word meaning sin. lol
Chait probably comes from chayat, the Hebrew word for tailor.
And the making fun of names on this site, whether they have been Hebraicized or not strikes me as reminiscent of Father Coughlin and it is distinctly unfunny.
Hmm, I dunno, with a name like Gellian I’ve been called a few things in my life but never worried that I was on the cusp of being targeted for ethnic ridicule, much less feared that I was becoming the new anti-Semite par excellence.
…and that’s to say nothing about one who has dubbed himself ‘wondering Jew’: if *anything*, that’s a Coughlinesque pun.
Kind of like how Golda Meyerson denigrated her name by changing it to “Meir?” Might that be another example “Hebraicization?” How much Hebrew do you suppose Golda spoke before she moved from the US to Palestine?
Chait probably comes from chayat, the Hebrew word for tailor.
And the making fun of names on this site, whether they have been Hebraicized or not strikes me as reminiscent of Father Coughlin and it is distinctly unfunny.
So if I called Iran’s president “Amadinnerjacket” you’d still be as riled up as you are now?
A while back I ran into a belligerent Zionist on another blog who repeatedly referred to me as Kaleb over the course of a single comment, which I figure was an attempt to brand me as a dog. He suggested it was an honest mistake when I asked, but he seemed like a rather dishonest person in general, so I couldn’t rightly take him at his word.
What an ass. Chait is creeped out by Weiss? There is a reason that I haven’t read TNR regularly for years (except for the occasional laugh at its expense), and the likes of Chait are a large part of that reason. Juvenile writing skills; serial name-dropping (primarily of the autoerotic variety); and arrogance and condescension rooted in privilege, rather than experience or achievement.
In the end, Chait is too decadent, too self-absorbed to recognize his impending irrelevance.
RE: “serial name-dropping (primarily of the autoerotic variety)”
MY COMMENT: Well, after all, TNR is Marty “Macho Man” Peretz’s ‘personal plaything’; so it should come as no surprise that he inculcates autoeroticism in his subordinate “pups”. God forbid, he should “f^^k with the Jews.” *
* link to salon.com
P.S. Has “The New Republic” ever had a female writer/journalist since Peretz’s Singer® Sewing Machine heiress/wife bought it for him back in the 70s? “Enquiring Minds Want To Know!”
RE: “He gets two things wrong about me. I spell my name with one l.”
PHIL(L)IP: “They” all know how you “are” about that missing second ‘L’. The word is out as to the missing second ‘L’ being your AchiLLes’ heeL. “They” purposefully taunt you by including the missing second ‘L’ as though they innocently assume that you spell you name in the manner Phillips normally do (Trojan Horses notwithstanding).
P.S. Did your wife ever get the ink out of your jeans (or was it your genes)? Time plays such tricks on the mind.
link to mondoweiss.net
Frankly, it seems to me that Chait’s use of what he called “creepy” to be a cheap shot at discrediting Philip’s positions.
And in the end, if J Street is just like the Ma’arach government or Kadima as Chait seems to believe. Then the Goldstone Report, the colonial expansion and the apartheid wall will continue to enjoy the silent endorsement of J Street, as well.
FYI, in Greco-Roman times names like Philippos and Philo seem to have been used as the equivalent of Hillel — may the source of the double-l confusion.
In recent times Yiddish Jews in America often confused Phayvl with Philip even though it is probably from Pheyvish, which could be either Φοιβος meaning shining and equivalent to Meir or Vivus and equivalent to Haim.
“with whom I disagree”
It wouldn’t happen to Phil. Would it?
Unfortunately, on the key point Chait is entirely correct:
“An organization representing Jewish anti-Zionists would have about as much clout as a group representing Jewish professional athletes.”
Whether it was intended that way or not, J-Street will in practice function as old-school triangulation — raising the ramparts on the side where the current threat is greatest.
And this is only the first of Zionism’s responses. It will continue to adapt to the attacks on it. There are more than enough Jewish billionaires to keep this game going indefinitely.
So long as this fight is treated as a “Jewish issue,” it will be hopeless. Because, much as we hate to admit it, Zionism really IS Jewishness today.
But I don’t think Phil is an anti-Zionist. Maybe closer to his wife, who declares herself a post-Zionist. I prefer to think of Phil without any labels, in a constant state of flux, like water, and one of my problems with Richard may well be that this is exactly what he demands of Phil: Tell me what you are, who you are: enemy or friend.
I see LeaNder’s point that labels are lame, but Phil did say he was anti-Zionist and that post-Zionist just wasn’t strong enough to convey how he feels about Zionism as it exists now. Read the post, “I’m gonna wave my freak flag high” (is that a Hendrix reference?) from back in January of this year. Google it, I’m too lazy.
Here we go, former CoMMenter, MM?,
I am still not sure if he struggles with the fact that anti-Zionism is often or always–from a certain perspective–associated with antisemitism. I am not sure to what extend Phil’s position is essentially a protest against the “petrified” conventions. He surely is struggling with them as much as with the larger taboo. But then, I may be mirroring.
But yes, Jimi:
If_6_Was_9
Pingback: Envirofitfashion » Blog Archive » What people thinks about … | Fashion Beauty Wisdom