Which side are you on? Which side were you on?

settlers

littlerockAbove, Jerusalem 2010, photo by Ahmad Gharabli/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images, from the Wall Street Journal.

Below, Little Rock Central High School, 1957

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 79 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. The side of liberal dissent.

    Robert Kennedy, sending in the federal troups after attempting to appeal to reason, and getting to later.

  2. James says:

    those 2 pics together sums it up well…. too bad some folks are so slow to see how ugly their own behavior is and intentionally or otherwise makes others life one of suffering as is the case with this lady displaced from her home…we know who richard witty identifies with in the picture…

  3. Don says:

    Serious “Wow”, Phil. Breathtaking.

  4. jimby says:

    There is a big difference in the 2 photos. In the Little Rock shot the whites are angry and upset, in the Jerusalem shot the yeshiva boys are enjoying themselves.

  5. Colin Murray says:

    That is powerful for only 10 words (not counting the photo credits) and two pictures. Great job, Phil.

    Note that there are National Guardsmen in the top photo, and no IDF soldiers in the bottom one. In the end, it will come down to the state imposing its will on colonists and their supporters.

    The magnitude of change in Israeli people’s views and perceptions necessary for this to happen, to turn the state around 180 degrees, is daunting. I think there is no way it will happen without decisive unified pressure from American Jewish institutions, i.e. AIPAC or an equally powerful successor organization is going to have to do an about-face first.

    • Don says:

      I think you are correct, Colin. The link below may seem like a small thing, but I think it is very important to be aware of those Israelis (and Palestinians) who are collaborating, with relentless determination (and little if any outside support) to “embrace each other”. The last of the three videos is both inspiring…and heartbreaking.
      link to interfaithencounter.wordpress.com

    • potsherd says:

      When the National Guard was there, it was to protect the students from the white racists.

      When the IDF is there, it is to protect the Jewish racists from their Palestinian victims, lest they think of striking back.

      • Mooser says:

        The IDF has many soldiers and Officers who are settlers.

        • VR says:

          One could say it takes a settler mentality to serve in the IDF

        • Mooser says:

          VR, the settlements are illegal, aren’t they? It’s got nothing to do with a mentality. If the IDF soldiers and Officers live in the settlements, they are involved in a criminal enterprise. And Israel makes them IDF soldiers, and IDF Officers?

          I’m not even curious about their “mentality”. There’s no question about it, they are involved in profiting from a criminal enterprise. And they are fit to be Officers and IDF soldiers?

      • Todd says:

        One could get similar photos from ethnic or racial conflict anywhere. I’d say that there are more differences between the U.S. civil rights struggle and the plight of Palestinians in Israel than there are similarities. I don’t recall segregationists waging military campaigns against blacks or using napalm against them, either.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          That has less to do with lack of will and more to do with lack of resources. I don’t really have any doubts that napalm would have been used in lieu of gasoline and automatic weapons in lieu of shotguns and lynching ropes, had they been made available.

        • Todd says:

          I suppose you could be right in the case of some individual extremists, but I don’t believe that any states were organized to make war against blacks with state militias, or to ethnically cleanse blacks. Israel exists to make war against Palestinians in order ethnically cleanse the area of Palestinians. Keeping a people in an inferior position isn’t the same as wanting to destroy them.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Yeah, actually, I think you’re right on that point. At least there were other white people who were willing to stand between and the racist murderers and their targets in significant numbers.

          In Israel, vis-a-vis Jews? Yes, but by all accounts not nearly as many. And in the civil rights movement here it was by no means a majority of white people willing to put themselves on the line, but it was enough to put a stop to it, at least. (And I’m sorry to sound so critical, but that’s the lay of the land, isn’t it?)

    • Mooser says:

      “I think there is no way it will happen without decisive unified pressure from American Jewish institutions”

      So “American Jewish institutions” are no responsible for limiting the power of nuclear-armed states? Nah, I don’t think they are up to it.
      That is the fantasy which Phil seems to indulge in, that somehow Jews can clean up their own mess. If Jews could have done anything about the Zionists, Israel would not have happened.
      And there is no win-win for the Jews here. In fact, it’s a lose-lose.

      • Les says:

        The recognition that (American) Jews alone don’t have the numbers to clean up the mess means that they have no choice but to reach out to non-Jews. This is not only a break from the past but, more important, an empowering position from which to go forward.

        • Mooser says:

          Les, I agree, completely. And I think the idea the Israel is a Jewish problem to be solved by Jews is at best a very niaive illusion, and at worst, an underhanded way of avoiding the seriousness and extent of the problem.
          What can we, as Jews, do to put pressure on Israel? Tell them there is nothing about nuclear weapons in the Torah?

  6. radii says:

    a picture truly is worth a thousand words

    … I find the biggest difference being that the unseen majority of Americans (mostly white) not in the civil rights image were very much in their hearts supporting equal rights and against the intolerance and hate of those in the image … and the civil rights movement gave voice to the larger mood and feeling and helped make it manifest – the top image, however, of these zionist hooligans does not have an unseen majority in opposition to their hate but rather supporting it

    • Citizen says:

      Another difference is one picture involves the forced desegregation of a public high school to allow in students from a minority population, rather than keeping them to schools for the minority only; the other involves the forced dispossession of a minority from their own homes.

      • robin says:

        I also find it interesting to reflect on that, Citizen. In a broad sense the analogy here is apt. But in a more detailed comparison — well, desegregation of schools isn’t even a thought in Israel. If the Palestinian woman in the picture here is demonstrating, it is likely for the right to remain in her own home. The irony is that the comparison would likely be seen as hyperbolic by many Americans steeped in the history of our civil rights movement, when in fact the injustices are if anything more fundamental in contemporary Palestine.

        • Citizen says:

          It’s truly amazing in the large sense that the government of the USA supports the dispossession of a people, and has for many decades now, and that any criticism of Israel is THE third rail in US politics, especially for congressional candidates. And it doesn’t change if, once in congress, they want to keep their jobs. What is better proof the tail wags the dog?

        • sammy says:

          Not really. I recommend William Blum’s “Killing Hope” or Stephen Kinzer’s “Overthrow” for your personal edification.

  7. Philip, thank you for the brilliant post.
    Don, thank you as well….the videos were moving…hopeful… then left me in tears wondering what the hell I can do. I’m trying but know it’s not nearly enough.
    While speaking to a group in a small town, large by Iowa standards, the peace group (Christians) who came to hear me brought with them “problems” with their Jewish community…”they” wouldn’t cooperate or talk. Who would want to talk and cooperate with someone who’s face is as angry as those in Little Rock or as taunting and mocking as the Israeli boys? I wrote about what I’d suggested to the Iowa group in a post last week.
    The Palestinians and Israelis engaged in peaceful conversation deserve support….that same process should and could be effective here in the US.
    Israel/Palestine is huge! Too often time is spent intellectualizing “the problem” when simple, down to the earth and doable alternatives can actually help move closer to a goal. Not solve it…but make some movement. Conversations similar to Interfaith Encounter helped move the Civil Rights Movement.

  8. Thanks very much Phil for posting this vivid juxtaposition.

    What is striking about the young settlers in Sheikh Jarrah is their glee, their sense of impunity, their apparent feeling (like the famous psychology experiments from the 60′s in which shocks delivered to subjects were rapidly ramped up when the inflictor was shielded by anonymity) that they will never be held to personal account for the pain they are causing.

  9. “I find the biggest difference being that the unseen majority of Americans (mostly white) not in the civil rights image were very much in their hearts supporting equal rights and against the intolerance and hate”

    Randii…wish I could agree. I wonder now if the majority agree. I fear it would be a slim majority. I am always shocked when someone I thought I respected thinks they’re “safe,” lets their hair down and starts in on civil rights and equal rights…which their group should have but others groups shouldn’t. They don’t exhibit hatred….just laugh, smirk (like the Israeli boys) and enjoy their cleverness at being so superior…. “these clever people” include elected officials, community leaders, teachers, plumbers, you name it. It’s disgusting but true in way too many cases….they many not be the majority but there are millions of them.

    • Mooser says:

      Susan, I have been the fly on the wall in too many situations like that. You are right, as my experience goes.

      An alarming experience I have all too often is non-Jews who simply will not believe, no matter how many times and how strongly I tell them, that there is such a thing as a Jew who is not entranced with or admiring of Zionism. It simply doesn’t register.
      Thank God so many Americans think they have something to gain by sucking up to Jews, which is what’s at the base of that. I keep plenty of change in my pockets so as not to disillusion them.

  10. demize says:

    Bill I believe it was the Milgram experiment. It was primarily indicitive of how individuals would react to directions from an authority figure. These pics are important in the sense that no amount of rhetorical moral suasion can take the place of the viseral nature of the visual.

  11. demize says:

    Viceral, God I hate this phone.

  12. My question is: Was the young woman in the BW photo thrown out of her home and had to live in the street? Is what taking place here kind of rubbing it in? Not to minimise what those young African American have endured but the comparison stops when one considers the immense sense of loss, helplessness and desperation.

    • Another point. The ugly crowd in the top photo, having won, are celebrating a victory over their helpless victim. What I see in the second photo is the a victory for the young woman and those who are taunting her are sour, ugly losers. A huge difference, but we got the idea thanks Phil.

  13. I have seldom seen such disgusting glee as shown by the yeshiva boys as they taunt this single defenceless woman, in the certain knowledge that they will be uninterrupted by local Army or police, and will be wholly immune from any punishment for their vile behaviour.

    By contrast, the Little Rock crowd are hateful but sullen; they know they are losing. And their victim is guarded by soldiers and not homeless.

    A small detail struck me about the photo; all the men are wearing long-sleeved shirts; an almost sure sign they are very recent immigrants from the US or Eastern Europe, and keen to establish their credentials as vile racists.

    If I was a radical Palestinian activist, I would mark each of these young men, singling him out for retribution in kind, one by one. (No, I don’t say eliminate him before he joins the IDF, but that did occur to me).

Leave a Reply