Tahrir demonstrators say they aim to liberate Jerusalem

From Angry Arab News Service

For those who say that there are no foreign policy goals for Egyptian protesters, you need to watch this. In it, Egyptians (more than 2 million [yesterday]) in Tahrir Square chant: "To Jerusalem we are heading, Martyrs in the millions." (Yes, it rhymes in Arabic)

(hat tip Taxi)

About Annie Robbins

Annie Robbins is Editor at Large for Mondoweiss, a mother, a human rights activist and a ceramic artist. She lives in the SF bay area. Follow her on Twitter @anniefofani
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 402 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. eee says:

    The Egyptians are welcome to try, but not to complain about the results.

    • CK MacLeod says:

      If they meant it literally, they could have started marching east right then. I don’t believe that they’re the first people to come up with using “Jerusalem” as a rallying point or symbolic goal. ;)

      Not that someday someone might not show up who not only means it literally, but literally possesses the means. Probably not within the next decade or two.

    • Taxi says:

      The Egyptians aren’t asking for your permission – geddit eee? THAT’S their point!

      And Nasrallah dropped a bomb on the isreali ears the other day by asking his fighters to be ready to liberate the Galilee area in the occupied territories should another war “be imposed on Lebanon”.

      Seems to me that a heck of a lot of people, like millions of them, are ready for big changes.

      Is israel ready? Cuz they’re still ‘welcome’ to change their agressive behavior.

      Be warned thou: the door of that opportunity is fast closing in its face.

      • annie says:

        And Nasrallah dropped a bomb on the isreali ears

        it was after barak’s provocative bomb from the day before.

        • Taxi says:

          Oh he means it, annie.

          And he’ll hand it over to the real owners when all is said and done.

          It’s standard military strategy/practice to teach/show the encroaching enemy that THERE ARE equal deterrents. It’s just not been stated before as a ‘call out’.

          Israel will be launching a war sooner than later – everybody in the region knows that. Only three weeks ago it was hoping that civil strife will ensue over the Hariri business and it can use this as pretext to strike at Lebanon and hizbollah. The much laboured over evil plan whimpered out in the eleventh hour and the war that israel was preparing for COULD NOT materialize – because the hizb had yet again outsmarted the usa-israel combined.

          The hizb has no other option but to send very strong signals of warnings and this one WILL prick up jthe lazy-from-arrogance israeli ears.

      • yonira says:

        israel and it’s people aren’t the ones talking about an invasion with millions dead.

        this is so silly anways, there is no way the military will allow anything close to it.

        • annie says:

          talking about an invasion with millions dead.

          ratchet ratchet ratchet.

        • Taxi says:

          yonira israel doesn’t have to talk about invasion: it bloody well does IT!

        • annie says:

          Suleiman Responds to Barak: Entering Lebanon No Longer Walk in the Park

          President Michel Suleiman condemned on Thursday Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s recent threat against Lebanon, saying that it was a violation of international law and U.N. Security Council resolution 1701.

          The president said that the threat was aimed at lifting the Israeli army and the new Israeli chief of staff’s morale “because he knows full well that entering Lebanon is no loner a walk in the park as demonstrated by the July 2006 war.”

          He added that Barak believes that the current Lebanese tensions over the formation of a new government would be a suitable time for an Israeli assault.

          Suleiman said that such an assault would backfire against the Jewish state because the Lebanese will retaliate with their army, people

        • yonira says:

          sure taxi, when did Israel last invade a country they have a peace treating with?

        • Taxi says:

          “when did they LAST invade a country…..?

          Well I rest my case.

          You’re funny, but not haha funny.

        • yonira says:

          Taxi,

          nice try, but the answer is never. Israel has never invaded a country they were at peace with. you’re dishonesty knows no bounds.

        • Taxi says:

          Who EXACTLY is israel at peace with? Jordan doesn’t count for obvious reasons: Jordanians hate israelis – a known fact.

          What is peace to you? You on top of the rest?

          Well the ‘rest’ ain’t taking bottom place no more.

        • Potsherd2 says:

          Israel not only talks about invasion, it invades.

        • pjdude says:

          well you know except for the whole palestine thing

        • yonira says:

          Egypt for one Taxi, the country you are anxiously awaiting to ‘liberate jerusalem’ with millions of deaths i might add.

        • annie says:

          a cold peace perhaps yonira, a peace only because our dictator puppet has not requested israel live up to it’s end of the treaty.

          that’s not real peace, that is appeasement.

        • biorabbi says:

          Taxi, so if the peace treaty does not count with Jordan or with Egypt. Since it was a top down effort, at odds with the democratic masses who hate the Jews, then is it ok for the Jews to reoccupy the Sinai? You don’t seem to see the outcomes of your argument.

          Yes. Israel signed the CDA with Sadat, not with the Egyptian people, but, they withdrew from the Sinai. Maybe they believed the possibility of peace? maybe through pressure.

          But, if you are right and the peace treaties have no meaning, then ultimately relations will case, the gas flow will stop, the Egyptian border will be a hostile one. Sounds great to the crowd, but for the lowly point that Israel will occupy the Sinai. It is obvious war is coming. There is nobody for Israel to negotiate with. I realize there is no possibility of appeasement.

          This is not about settlements, ’67 borders, Nakba, but about vilification of Jews as an excuse for cultural stagnation. For those who claim Jews are an implant, a foreign implant, on to an arab land. I would completely 100 % agree.

        • Taxi says:

          Hey guys, hey zionists, please understand the REALITY:

          YOUR PEACE WITH JORDAN AND EGYPT WAS A FAKE PEACE.

          YOUR ZIONIST RULERS FOOLED YOU AND PUT YOU IN THIS POSITION OF PERMANENT INSECURITY.

          Fakes peaces don’t count.

          You idiots never bothered to befriend the ‘people’, you ONLY signed contracts with their DICTATORS!

        • Kathleen says:

          Israel clearly has no shame. I believe they are in violation of more UN resolutions than any other nation on earth

          link to mediamonitors.net
          .html

          During the period between 1967 and 2000, Iraq was the subject of 69 Security Council resolutions. By comparison, Israel, our closest “ally” in the Middle East, has been the subject of 138 resolutions. Not surprisingly, most of those resolutions call upon Israel to comply with basic principles of international law embodied by the UN Charter. Many of them condemn actions taken by Israel and call upon Israel on more than one occasion to comply with previous resolutions that Israel ignored and continues to ignore to this day.

          On June, 14, 1967, through Resolution No. 237, the Security Council called upon Israel to “ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants, facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of the hostilities and recommends the scrupulous respect of the humanitarian principles contained in the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.” In subsequent resolutions, the Security Council deplored Israel for the delay in its implementation of Resolution 237. Yet, Israel continued to defy the world community, including the United States. The Security Council, in the face of Israel’s defiance, passed no less than five subsequent resolutions demanding that Israel comply but to this day, thirty five years after June 14, 1967, the defiance continues.

        • Kathleen says:

          I have always thought this was damn brave

          Zbig Brzezinski: Obama Administration Should Tell Israel U.S. Will Attack Israeli Jets if They Try to Attack Iran
          link to blogs.abcnews.com

        • sethla says:

          It seems to me that this chant is not meant literally yonira. What these people are saying is that the Egyptian revolution is one step in overthrowing American and Israeli control over the Middle East. Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians is the ultimate symbol of the injustice that the US and Israel has perpetrated against everyday people in the region. Like Mubarak’s reign, Israel’s violent control over a group of people cannot last forever.

        • Shingo says:

          If the US cannot occupy Iraq, then Israel hasn’t got a hope of occupying the Sinai.

        • piotr says:

          When Japan imperial forces attacked Pearl Harbour, there was no peace treaty, and somehow USA did not appreciate that.

          Clearly, issuing threats of invasion and/or bombardment is not a USUAL behavior nowadays. Israel is really sticking out. Barak had no business threatening Lebanon.

        • The Jews have never been at peace with anyone, ever, in five thousand years. When conquered or dominated they remain quiescent, coyly pious. When empowered or sovereign, their aggressiveness awakens, feeds on their paranoia, and so they are on a hair trigger of distrust and preemptive violence 24/7/365/5000. The USS Liberty, the Lavon Affair, the bombings of the Iraqi Jews, the Mavi Marmara, no one, adversary, ally, or disinterested third party is immune to attack. And the justification is always the same: the self-fulfilling prophecy of “They hate, us they want to exterminate us, they were coming to kill us.”

      • Kathleen says:

        And we have sold both sides weaponry with our military aide.

        • yonira says:

          which makes a war between the two pretty unlikely. and in the unlikeliness their is a war, Israel will be the one the US backs, not the Egyptians.

        • Seham says:

          Doesn’t really matter who the U.S. backs or doesn’t back anymore. The last month should have clued you in on that. And the U.S. backed the last war on Lebanon, and remind me, what did Israel get from that???? It’s a serious question, you see, I can never figure it out.

        • Taxi says:

          Israel won’t win – it has no moral highground and will be defeated in a prolonged engagement.

          Oh yeah and it WILL be abandoned by the usa when push comes to shove – which is where israel is dragging us towards anyway.

          Please yonira understand the new reality: GAME OVER.

        • Kathleen says:

          “Doesn’t really matter who the U.S. backs or doesn’t back anymore”

          Hope and pray you are right. Hope and pray that the will of the majority of the people rules

      • biorabbi says:

        So, Nasrallah is giving an opportunity to Israel? Thanks, I didn’t realize he was giving them an opportunity. Oh, I forgot, He’s head of ‘the resistance movement’ in Egypt.

        Taxi, thanks for the warning. Is it ‘ok’ if Israel fight back? Is that ‘ok’ with Annie and Phil? Is it ‘ok’ if Israel wins? What will the masses in Tahir Square do then? Protest harder or threaten to March to Tel Aviv?

        I don’t get you Taxi. You seemed like a reasonable poster, but according to your thesis it is Nasrallah who is being reasonable. My own position would have been for Israel to withdraw to the ’67 borders. But that doesn’t seem even close to appeasing Nasrallah, the great unwashed everywhere, or the posters and Mondoweiss.

        But I’m a warmonger and that’s all that matters. Israel is full of warmongers and that is our only problem in the middle east. Nothing else. There is no problem of any type other than the Jewish inplant. Thanks. But I guess the question remains: is it ok if the deck is stacked against Israel like in ’67, that Israel kicks the ass? Is that OK? For as Edrogan reminds us: you know well how to kill.

        So you stigmatize the Jews. Demonize them. Threaten killing them. Kill them. But, god forbid they fight back. That’s not ok. But I’ve got news for you, somehow I don’t see a victorious arab masses marching anywhere near Jerusalem, let alone through the Sinai.

        But the victory will give solace to Jew Lovers everywhere: more occupied lands to bitch about. More grist for the mill. And the lovely Helen Thomas will have a bad hair day at the uppity, occupying oven dodgers. Did I get it right?

        • annie says:

          nice strawman bio. are you denying the fact barak threatened lebanon prior to either Nasrallah or Suleiman’s response?

        • biorabbi says:

          Nasrallah only spews talk on a weekly basis against a. the Jews and b. sometimes differentiating them as Israelis from the start. Are you claiming that H. Nasrallah only began hostile comments towards Israel after Barack statements. So, that’s the extent of your history. And what of H. Nasrallah’s talking against the Jews as an ethnic group. Is that a straw man as well?

        • eee says:

          What Barak said was that the army needs to be prepared in case it has to enter Lebanon. He was not threatening war. He was making a point about the readiness of the IDF. Nasrallah and the Lebanese of course took it out of context and started their diatribes.

        • annie says:

          do you have the quote?

        • annie says:

          don’t ask me what i said when you can read it yourself. what do you think of what suleiman said?

        • Taxi says:

          bio (and eee if he must),

          The people of the region, the new generation, don’t believe in the crappy 67 border idea – it doesn’t address the Nakba.

          So long as israel refuses to admit, apologize and compensate for the Nakba refugees, no ‘peaceful’ road is possible.

          Israel physically pushed people out of their homes, so why are zionists outraged at the prospect of them being pushed out of their illegal land acquisitions?

          And as far as Nasrallah is concerned, dismiss him at your own risk. The man means business and you damn well know he does which is really what scares you.

        • annie says:

          thanks eee. ynet carries a fuller quote.

          Less than 24 hours after he was appointed IDF chief of staff, Lieutenant-General Benny Gantz went out to tour Israel’s border with Lebanon, accompanied by Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Northern Command Chief Major-General Gadi Eisenkot.

          “The look-outs on the other side are recognizing the new chief of staff,” Barak said, praising Gantz. “He headed the Northern Command Reserve Core, the Liaison Unit with Lebanon and served as Northern Command chief. He knows the other side well.”

          “In Lebanon, the government has changed, an inconvenient government with a connection to Hezbollah,” he said. “We saw what is happening in Tunisia and Egypt.”

          “There is no doubt that Hezbollah remembers well what it got from us in 2006, but this situation won’t last forever,” he added. “We must be better prepared and better trained. Every little mistake has consequences and a heavy price. We must focus on the targets.”

        • MRW says:

          Biorabbi,

          Re: Nasrallah only spews talk on a weekly basis against a. the Jews and b. sometimes differentiating them as Israelis from the start.

          As Jeffrey Blankfort has pointed out on these boards many times, the word Jews to describe Israelis is commonplace in the ME. It doesn’t have that holocaust-laden-omigod-they’re-coming-to-kill us-ethnic-horror meaning that North Americans like to impute to its usage.

          How is he supposed to address the inhabitants of the country? Is he supposed to pull a Prince and develop some symbol?

          When in Rome….

        • eee says:

          Taxi,

          I totally agree with you. It is the Palestinian and Arab “all or nothing” stance that is the main reason there is no peace.

          As for Nasrallah, what he will bring about is the destruction of Lebanon. I am not dismissing him. I hope you understand that if he wants to destroy me, I have every right to destroy him. Most Lebanese do not want peace with Israel but they also do not want war. I can live with that. If Nasrallah can’t, Lebanon has a major problem. But the fact is that for the last 5 years the northern border of Israel has never been so quiet. And during Cast Lead, Hezbollah did not shoot ONE rocket at Israel or help the Palestinians in any way.

        • Taxi says:

          bio,

          Yes I expect you, like all zionists, to be confused as to the difference between zionism and judaism – the zionist manifesto is designed to create this confusion.

          But I’m not confused about the difference between the two like you are. I really don’t give a flying fig what religion you are or how many holocausts you’ve had – all I care about is that you’re not using this as justification to murder and steal from others.

        • fuster says:

          eee

          I hope you understand that if he wants to destroy me, I have every right to destroy him.—
          respectfully suggest a change from “wants to destroy” to “acts to destroy”.

          the wish may be father to the deed but wishes aren’t deeds.

        • Graber says:

          Bio, calling for democracy is a far cry from hating people. The fact of the matter is that there is less than a majority of Jewish people in Israel. So that Jewish minority has no right to impose their values upon the rest of the population. But they choose to do it anyways – by force.

          But what’s most frightening is the adherence to the language of domination. The idea that might makes right. We have so many brave Palestinians engaging in nonviolent protests, only to be met with strict applications of violence. If the entire Arab world engages with Israel nonviolently, what will Israel do?

        • Hu Bris says:

          eee(k!) – “As for Nasrallah, what he will bring about is the destruction of Lebanon. I am not dismissing him. I hope you understand that if he wants to destroy me, I have every right to destroy him”

          unlike Israeli military, HezB have never attacked within the borders of the Zionist state Israel unless Israel first attacked them – so who exactly is out to destroy?

          Israel has invaded Lebanon many times now trying to destroy both Lebanon and Hezbollah – Hezbollah have never invaded Israel –

          By your logic eee(k!), HezBollah have the absolute right to destroy Israel by whatever means necessary since, time and time again, Israel has tried to destroy Hezbollah, usually without prior provocation – the mere existence of Arabs who have the sheer unmitigated gall to dare to fight back when Israel invades their country and tries to kill them, seems to be provocation enough for the Zionists.

        • Hu Bris says:

          eee(k!) “I hope you understand that if he wants to destroy me, I have every right to destroy him.—”
          fuster – “respectfully suggest a change from “wants to destroy” to “acts to destroy”.

          even changing eee(k!)’s statement to that recommended by fuster, according to the ‘logic’ (I use that word in it’s widest possible sense) employed by both eee(k!) AND fuster, Hezbollah STILL have the absolute right to destroy Israel by any means necessary, since it is obvious that Israel has acted numerous times to attempt to destroy both Hezbollah and Lebanon,

        • fuster says:

          “Israelis” is succinct and clear, MRW

        • Citizen says:

          “We, however, were forced to such things. We had no choice. We do it not because we feel superior, but because we must in order to survive.” Joseph Goebbels

          Hat tip: Antidote; see his comment below for a link to the whole thing.
          Israeli hasbara copies nicely, eh?

        • Walid says:

          Annie, about the erroneous YNet report, Barak had to be using the Amir Peretz idiot binoculars when he observed Hizbullah on the other side of the fence because no one sees Hizbullah doing anything military close to the border or anywhere else in the country. He also failed to mention that the Israelis that ran with their tails between their legs in May 2000 were led by none other than Benny Gantz and the rout of the 30,000 IDF soldiers by about 4,000 Hizbullah fighters in 2006 also happened while Gantz was the Israeli commander in Lebanon. So with already 2 failures in Lebanon against the new Chief of Staff, what is Barak talking about?

        • Antidote says:

          exactly, citizen, that was her (my) point ;)

        • thetumta says:

          eee, “the Palestinian and Arab “all or nothing” stance”, oh please!
          The Saudi peace plan offer has been out there for over 5 years. No interest what so ever from the Zionists and you?. Tabba, no interest. Complete capitulation by Fatah(Palestine papers), no interest and on and on. Your people have passed on some of the best offers in human history and you, eee, just demand more. History has just done a major about face and it looks like you might be “the bag holders” once again. Got greedy and held a rising stock just a little too long. Who’s to blame? People with no insight, such as yourself. The prize is Saudi policy which is playing out next door, today. When it changes, say goodbye to the west and all the rest, eee. You just became a footnote in history.

        • MHughes976 says:

          Once someone wants me dead, I have a reason – I might, indeed should, regret having it, but it’s there – to want him dead. And at least from the moment that I have recognised that reason his desire for my death itself becomes as reasonable as my desire for his. That’s one of the basic propositions of Hobbes’ Leviathan, which it has been very difficult to refute, though Hobbes goes on to say that a life dominated by fear of suffering or inflicting destruction is unacceptable and needs to be changed. Recent generations tried after terrible experiences to make the change by developing international law, but this attempt is not meeting with full success.

        • Antidote says:

          “So you stigmatize the Jews. Demonize them. Threaten killing them. Kill them. But, god forbid they fight back. That’s not ok. ”

          So if Jews do the same to other people, it’s not ok to fight back? Never works to attack a double standard while applying one.

    • Antidote says:

      I did a quick search for the matching Goebbels quote, and found this. Was WW II Hitler’s War? Churchill’s War? Stalin’s War? FDR’s War?

      link to calvin.edu

    • James North says:

      3e: Israel almost lost the 1973 war, so a little humility might be in order. Instead of boasting from wherever you are, why not join the campaign for BDS, to bring about a peaceful solution?

      • eee says:

        James,

        First, I was not boasting. Annie and Taxi and Seeham are justifying a war against Israel or for some reason happy with the Egyptians wanting to fight a war. That is fine. What is not fine, is starting a war and then complaining about the results. My advice to the Egyptians is simple, if you start a war, better be sure you can win it. The last thing I want is a war, but if you start one, be prepared to suffer the consequences.

        During the Yom Kipur war Israel was never in real danger of losing. Neither the Syrians nor the Egyptians could advance past the defense lines of their SAMs. Not that Israel did not make mistakes and was taken by surprise. But Israel’s air superiority was only negated by the SAMs and they had limited range. Each time the Egyptians tried to move into areas with no SAM coverage, they were severely defeated. The fact of the matter is that Israel started out in the worst possible position, yet was able to turn the tables on its enemies.

        • James North says:

          Egypt crossed the canal, which the Israeli high command said was impossible. Israeli generals were reprimanded in a commision of inquiry, if I remember correctly.
          No one should want war. But don’t be sure Israel will conrinue to win all of them.

        • eee says:

          The only war one wins is the one you don’t have to fight. I don’t want to fight any war, but I am certainly going to prepare for one. I (as one of many Israelis) am going to use Israeli ingenuity to develop the most sophisticated weapons I can. I am going to train as hard as I can. I am going to build shelters for the civilian population. I will fight the war in the most ferocious manner possible in order to end it as soon as possible. Does this promise that I will always win? No. But I am going to give it my best. And of course, when I make mistakes, I will learn from them.

          Who said getting and holding a Jewish state is going to be a walk in the park?

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Toppling Nazi Germany wasn’t a walk in the park, either, but it needed to be done to save innocent civilians from being crushed to death to feed a fascist ethnocentric police state, too.

        • fuster says:

          James North.
          Egypt did a very nice job in that war, but they never expected to win and their great aim was to redeem themselves for the disgraceful showing that they made in 67 by winning at least one battle so that they could honorably make a deal with the Israelis.

        • Citizen says:

          Golda Meir was sure glad for the whopping US military aid; she thought of Nixon as her good pal to her dying day. That aid cost the US a lot & the US still was dealing with Vietnamm.

        • Walid says:

          eee, from the way you carry on about Israel and the 73 war, you were probably not born back then and you’re getting your history from some hasbara talking-points handbook. It’s a fact that at no time was Israel in danger of losing the war, especially after it threatened what it would do if America did not help it. Look up the Samson Option.

        • pjdude says:

          I (as one of many Israelis) am going to use Israeli ingenuity to develop the most sophisticated weapons I can.

          Israeli ingenuity??? quit believing your thug states propaganda. Israeli ingenuity is not responsible for the weapons Israel uses a steady stream of foreign funding and gifts form other nations

        • Donald says:

          “their great aim was to redeem themselves for the disgraceful showing that they made in 67 by winning at least one battle so that they could honorably make a deal with the Israelis.”

          Half right. They wanted to redeem their honor. But Sadat had already made a peace offer and was rejected. The storyline in the US is the one you just used, as part of the claim that Israel was always ready to make peace with any Arab country that offered it, but in fact it’s not true.

        • thetumta says:

          That’s odd? If Israeli major cities weren’t in range of the Russian supplied 175s, why did they blackmail Richard Nixon with threats of nuking the Russian Med Fleet, putting me and mine at Defcon5 that October? Why did the most massive airlift of armor from Diego Garcia and Europe commence when Nixon capitulated yet again(causing the firing of the Army’s most senior officer over the issue)? “Israel’s air superiority”? I don’t think so!
          Hej! Tumta

        • Shingo says:

          Actually, Israel were considering the offer from Sadat before 1973, but Kisinger told them to forget about it and stick to their guns.

      • Kathleen says:

        “humility” non existent

    • Cliff says:

      Egyptians don’t need your permission “eee”.

    • Chaos4700 says:

      Oh they’ll be in Jerusalem within a week of you putting your boots down in the Sinai, eee. Count on it.

      • annie says:

        i wish this war drumbeat would stop. i don’t think this needs to be translated as a call for war.

      • eee says:

        You remind me of Nasser. So much trash talk, so little results.

        • Taxi says:

          Nasser’s grandchildren are coming to bite you in the ass – or ya think the Nasserite ideology is dead and buried?

          You know his ‘secular, socialist, pan Arab ideology’.

          From recent events, looks like EVERYBODY in the mideast wants to live the Nasserian Dream (as opposed to the American Dream).

        • Saleema says:

          Don’t be arrogant. Jews suffered for centuries before they got the balls to come to Europe as colonizers. So let’s not talk about “results.”

          Fortunately, tides of history show that nations rise and fall. Israel is no different. It’s time will come. So it would be in Israel’s interest to stop the murders, ethnic cleansing, and lies and man up and offer real peace to Palestinians.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          The only thing Israeli soldiers hit reliably are children and medics. I cringe to think what the targeting range you trained on looked like, eee.

        • fuster says:

          —Don’t be arrogant. Jews suffered for centuries before they got the balls to come to Europe as colonizers. So let’s not talk about “results.”—Saleema

          I think that you may need to cool off a bit. You’re garbling.

        • annie says:

          both are essential for the survival of the group. taking out medics and children makes sense if your goal is to ethnically cleanse the population. that explains hitting hospitals and schools.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Why don’t you call her a neanderthal too, huh fuster? Or do you save that epithet just for Pakistanis you don’t consider “d0mesticated.”

          Racist troll. You know, no one would miss you if you joined eee and Witty’s son in storming the Sinai.

        • Taxi says:

          Contrary to what the common belief is, Neanderthals were actually peaceful and domesticated beings. The only faculty they lacked was the faculty for organizing a pre-meditated war. Unlike us homo sapiens who ambushed them and genocided them out of existence.

          But that certainly doesn’t excuse the new resident racist smartass (you know who you are) using this ignorance of real Neanderethals to spew out hatred against brown skinned people.

          I don’t know why, chaos, but I think it’s Phil who lets these trolls post their trash here. I see Adam as more considerate and less egotistical.

        • annie says:

          i doubt if phil or adam saw that comment. look at the site today. there are almost 200 comments on this thread alone and phil’s ‘obama gives thumbs up’ post has almost 400 comments not to mention omar’s post and seham’s post.

          that comment is inexcusable. as far as why he allows this poster to post here i really can’t say. write phil and email. use the report function.

        • Taxi says:

          Why is it ‘inexcusable’ annie?

          Phil doesn’t mind a bit of critique, he’s a journalist. You don’t have to take it personally. Especially that I didn’t say it as a dig, but as an observation.

        • annie says:

          taxi, i’m talking about fester’s comment which was definitely racist and used in a racist way.. not our conversation about it.

        • Taxi says:

          oh okay annie – I musta completely forgot that fuster existed and didn’t put two and two together.

        • fuster says:

          here you go, annie …..

          “The local Taliban have issued fatwas denouncing vaccination as an American ploy to sterilize Muslim populations.”

          link to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

        • annie says:

          i get it fus, and no i would not be lining up my children to have the people who are bombing my villages give them an injection.

          either way it is off topic and you should apologize for making a gruesome offensive statement.

        • fuster says:

          no annie, you don’t get it if you think that the people who were injecting the Pakistani kids were the same people who were bombing their villages.
          The doctors and nurses weren’t involved with any bombing. They must assuredly aren’t the same people. They weren’t even Americans, annie.
          You want to call medical teams from Europe ….bombers?
          You sure wouldn’t like hearing that Americans were calling Indian or Jordanian doctors in American hospitals bombers because Americans were lumping them in Al Qaeda.
          YOU need to sort out some stuff.
          And you sure didn’t understand that remark that offended you.

          When, the other day, I called the dozen Brooklyn rabbis that attended the Iranian event neanderthals, did you find that equally racist?

        • yonira says:

          more bringing in peoples families, you are a class act chaos.

        • yonira says:

          The only thing Israeli soldiers hit reliably are children and medics.

          tell that to the Egyptian air force Chaos.

        • fuster says:

          sent you a reply, annie, an hour ago.
          if and when it pops up, let’s see if we can reach some understanding.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Oooh! Yes, yonira, how courageous! hitting a bunch of stationary, disarmed targets in a blitzkrieg strike while they are grounded!

          It took more skill for the 9/11 hijackers to commit their atrocities, and they were flying planes that maneuvered like whales, on a few months of flight school.

        • annie says:

          sans this there will be no understanding

          you should apologize for making a gruesome offensive statement.

        • Shingo says:

          Go easy on him Chaos,

          Yonira’s clingint to the last time Israel won a war, and a the last military that knew how to fight one.

        • Citizen says:

          Meanwhile we can all “migrate” to Witty’s property, and “reside”in his house. He said that’s fine.

    • kalithea says:

      It’s music to my ears! Suck it up.

  2. Seham says:

    Annie,

    Thanks for posting this, if not for the horrifying videos from Bahrain that I believe need as much coverage as possible, I most definitely would have selected THIS video for my lead. Boyfriend and I have watched this a million times.

    “lal Quds ray7een, shohadaa2 bil malayeen”

    • annie says:

      it’s stunning isn’t it seham. yes, i have watched it over and over since taxi linked to it last night.

      • Seham says:

        Annie, it is beyond stunning. All these years I looked around in disbelief at the Arab world’s reaction to the Palestinian issue. But look what happens when the Arabs no longer live under a dictator that will throw them in jail and sodomize them for not towing the government line: you see two million people in Tahrir chanting for the liberation of Palestine. It literally takes my breath away. And the same happened in Tunisia after they got rid of Ben Ali. This is from Al Jazeera Arabic but it shows Tunisians chanting that the people want the liberation of Palestine go to minute 2:50, that’s what Tunisians chanted when Mubarak fell: link to youtube.com

        • annie says:

          seham, last night taxi said (paraphrasing) ‘can you imagine being a palestinian in that crowd and witnessing them breaking out in this chant’ and i replied something along the lines of ‘can you imagine being a palestinian watching this on TV?’ (i think that is what i wrote, it was very late).

          needless to say i cried. they have to stop judaizing jerusalem. they have to stop. it is unsustainable. they can’t steal all of jerusalem and expect to ever live in peace.

        • annie says:

          i was so immersed in your comment i forgot to open the video.

          yes, palestine is not a local issue and it isn’t a regional issue and it isn’t an arab issue. it is a global issue. it isn’t just a symbol it is real. the palestinians are the longest suffering repressed people on the globe right now in modern times. and the ethnic cleansing still goes on right now unabated for decades. it has massive implications. this is what i mean by Palestinians are holding up the world. it is a global issue and it’s not going away until it is resolved. really.

          i’m so glad you’re here.

        • Seham says:

          I’m glad you’re here Annie.

    • annie says:

      seham .“lal Quds ray7een, shohadaa2 bil malayeen”

      what does this mean? i tried putting it thru google translate but that only works for arabic letters. i know Al Quds is jerusalem.

  3. A very bad precedent.

    This is not conditional acceptance, this is murderous threat. (“Martyrs”)

    • Taxi says:

      Don’t panic, Richard. It’s only democracy in action….

      “Don’t let it bring you down, it’s only castles burning…”

      • I don’t see that a threat of mass murder is “democracy in action”.

        • Potsherd2 says:

          Tell it to eee, he’s the one threatening mass murder.

        • annie says:

          witty, you need to work on your messaging. you said this less than an hr ago.

          Why do you speak only in terms of force, rather than in terms of goals?

          now i could ask you the same thing.

        • yonira says:

          what world do you people live on!?!?!?!!?!? the post is about the Egyptians talking about 1 million martyrs and an invasion of Israel.

        • annie says:

          beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

        • Seham says:

          Annie, I find it hard to see how Witty can respond to your quote. I wouldn’t be shocked if he disappeared for a few days.

        • I regard Annie’s response as fascist, advocacy of mass murder.

        • annie says:

          richard, the term means

          David Hume’s Essays, Moral and Political, 1742, include:

          “Beauty in things exists merely in the mind which contemplates them.”

          my meaning was yonira’s thought and your thoughts and how you process these events exists merely in the mind which contemplates them

          that means the idea of ‘mass murder’ tells us about you. it’s a window into your soul. it is not only beauty in the mind of the beholder, it applies to ugliness also. it is you channeling mass murder here although i will not stoop to your level and imply you are advocating it.

          take chill pill and expand your mind.

        • pjdude says:

          They aren’t talking about an invasion. that just pure paranoria.

        • pjdude says:

          I regard Annie’s response as fascist, advocacy of mass murder.

          You know your hypocrisy is really begining to get under my skin. you supported violence to steal people’s property and rights so if people feel they need violence and force to those back from the thieves you do not get to complain. Your the one who wants fascist mass murder because you refuse to peaceful let people have what is rightfully theirs.

        • “Martyr operation”.

          It doesn’t ring a bell to you?

        • Citizen says:

          Why not, Dick Witty? The Egyptians are chanting they want to march to Jerusalem to “cash a check” for “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” They’ve not stopped warning fellow protesters not to “allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.” They have a dream not unlike the American Dream, and the religious themes often used by MLK–just a different religion, but same God. They are chanting and singing of a Middle East where their children “will not be judged by the color of their skin, or their religion, or their ethnic group, but by the content of their character.” Let freedom ring.

          When they allow freedom to ring, when they let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, they will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men, brown men, and white men, and all women too, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, Shia and Sunni, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old American Negro spiritual, “Free at last, free at last. Thank God Almighty, we are free at last.” That’s a good thing, all and all. Might not be too good for Zionists, but what the hey, it wasn’t too good for the KKK either.

        • Saleema says:

          I regard you a racist and advocate of Palestinian ethnic cleansing.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          This is just Witty’s attempt to yet again Goebbelize Arabs as “the great Muslim threat to the West!” by suborning the meaning of words. If he can convince people that Arabs are all suicide bombers, he can keep chanting that they were going to die anyway so Israel has every right to bomb every Arab in sight.

          Witty’s no peace maker. When the Mavi Marmara was under bloody assault, he took a break to go off and celebrate.

        • Taxi says:

          So like wasn’t jesus a martyr?

          A jewish martyr?

      • Seham says:

        “Don’t panic, Richard. It’s only democracy in action…. ”

        I know, I know! I read the comment and laughed too. Usually after I read his comments I feel my blood boiling, since the fall of Mubarak, I can only laugh my teez off at the Zionist comments here and elsewhere, much healthier reaction!

    • LeaNder says:

      here comes the “mob”, Richard, the equivalent of us the left/right posse.

    • Antidote says:

      “this is murderous threat. (“Martyrs”)”

      martyr = someone who suffers a violent death for a religious/political cause

      murderer = someone who kills someone else (including martyrs)

      • yonira says:

        not sure i understand your point. i think he was more concerned over the part of “liberating Jerusalem.” any liberation of Jerusalem would include many deaths.

        • annie says:

          not so, see: south africa.

        • yonira says:

          i love this crew, you guys have an irrelevant answer for everything on here.

          yep Annie, just like SA.

        • pjdude says:

          not necessarily though given the Israeli and a lesser extent jewish belief in the idea that the palestinians have no right to palestine it would probably involve some violence. though if the violence is an issue you could instead of supporting thugs and thieves support their victims and advocate a peaceful transfer of palestinian property back to them, the return of the palestinian to their country, and the removal of the obsteciles to their self determiantion you and yours have put in their way.

        • MRW says:

          any liberation of Jerusalem would include many deaths.

          It would if the Israelis were doing the ‘liberating’, but not the Egyptians, as recent events show.

          Egypt was already an old, old, old society by the time Sun Tzu wrote his directives.

          Don’t forget: Egyptian society is over 5,000 years old and contiguous (just like China). Egyptian knowledge, invention, and philosophy (not to mention their architecture and astronomy) is some of the greatest the world has ever known. Nothing in Israel’s past can hold a candle to Egyptian achievement over millennia.

        • MRW says:

          Yonira,

          You need some serious self-educating. Ditto Witty.

          The word ‘martyr’ in Arabic/Islam does not mean what you think it means. I would suggest you look it up. Not much different than what the Isley Brothers sang about in 1966 in Testify, or what Christians mean when they say, As God is my witness:

          I’m a freak for music it’s in my soul
          I can’t help it if it moves me down to my toes
          I said I’m a witness I’m here to testify
          I wanna to tell yall about it…I’m here to testify !!

        • fuster says:

          MRW
          nothing in Egypt’s present or recent past is worth the candle, if you want to be silly about it.

        • Jose says:

          I wonder if Annie would feel the same if we suggested liberating her home. . .

        • annie says:

          bwwwahh. Annie would feel the same if we suggested liberating her home

          thinking about moving the zionist ethnic cleansing operation to northern calif are ya? not so sure the jewish community here is as in sync w/zionist agenda as they are in jerusalem. you could try tho.

          lol, you crack me up.

        • fuster says:

          so when Hamas says that it sent somebody with a vest or a truck bomb and the person was martyred, it’s got nothing to do with being dead or engaging in an act of violence?

        • Taxi says:

          fuster and jose,

          You both sound very worried – anything I can do to help?

        • annie says:

          sometimes it amazes me people actually address your stupid questions. it’s all a rhetorical game for you, or that’s how you come across.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Fuster, when an Israeli soldier fires on a teenage boy in the “kill zone” in Gaza from a sniper post and shoots him dead, he is referred to as a martyr. Are you going to blame him for — oh wait, that’s right. You do blame Palestinian children when they end up with Israeli bullets in them. “Damn suicide babies!”

        • Antidote says:

          “any liberation of Jerusalem would include many deaths.”

          by heart attacks? pre-existing conditions? Muslim honor killings? Or by what and whom?

          “To Jerusalem we are heading, Martyrs in the millions.”

          Just says they are going to Jerusalem. Doesn’t say they are staging a military attack. How would the IDF handle it?

        • Jose says:

          Why not? I’ve got as much historical right to your house as the Egyptians have to Jerusalem.

        • yonira says:

          No reason citizens of Egypt couldn’t go to Jerusalem I guess. Not sure Al Aqsa can accommodate 1 million worshipers at the same time.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Is that before or after the IDF opens up on crowds of Muslim near the Al-Aqsa for the nth time?

      • piotr says:

        martyr = terrorist if killed by IDF, like Turks of the flotilla, or Gaza fishermen.

        Thus a peaceful march toward Jerusalem is a terrorist threat. Why aren’t those folk arrested? Shouldn’t we call Egypt’s president and kvetch?

    • Hu Bris says:

      “A very bad precedent. This is not conditional acceptance, this is murderous threat.”

      certainly no worse than saying : “I think ethnic cleaning [of Palestinians] is currently not necessary”, eh Dick?

  4. Kathleen says:

    The MSM keeps repeating the Egyptians are not pissed off with Israel or the U.s.

  5. Kathleen says:

    If only Israel would play by the same rules that they demand that their neighbors abide by.

  6. harveystein says:

    Uh, can everyone take a chill pill?! (I know it does excite some of you guys…..)
    “A million martyrs to Jerusalem” is a trope (a metaphorical phrase), used many times. The last most well known is Arafat, in 2003 (in the middle of the Intifada, when he was under “house arrest” in Ramallah). The Israelis had made vague threats to “remove” him. He responded with the same phrase. I think Egyptians are flexing muscles of freedom of expression they haven’t been allowed to use for many years. Throughout the last 3 weeks in Tahrir one of the most used chants was also, “Peaceful, peaceful.” Why don’t we make a big deal out of that one too?

    • Taxi says:

      Cuz they DON’T mean ‘peaceful’ towards israel, harvey.

      It’s a frigging fact!

      They half blame israel for their 30 years of Mubarak!

      This is beyond realism – this is ULTRA REALISM:

      The people of the middle east will NEVER accept zionism amongst them.

      And the will of the MAJORITY of the people, will eventually be manifest.

    • Avi says:

      harveystein and all the usual Israel defenders on this thread are responding with predictable denial.

      They are still consumed and confident in their own military’s might, counting on the Israeli army to wipe out thousands if not millions should they dare to challenge Israel’s brutal and criminal policies.

      Instead of taking this moment to reflect on Israel’s actions over the years, instead of reflecting on the democratic changes sweeping the region and modifying their behavior and their policies toward the Palestinians, they are busy chest-beating, intoxicated with their own might and supremacy.

      Those symptoms, namely that denial is typical of many of the dictators across the Middle East. Mubarak was in extreme denial and then he fell. Israeli society and the Israeli government are still in denial.

      It’s not too late to reform, alas Israelis will not wake up from their stupor until it’s too late, until they are the only ones left in the region as an island of belligerence, oppression and barbarity. And then millions will truly march to Jerusalem in defiance of Israel’s conceit.

      Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.

      • thetumta says:

        All they need to do is to participate in one failed small unit operation against a comparably armed equal force that doesn’t go as planned. They’ll find their legs. Think 2006 South Lebanon. Perhaps they could volunteer for the next one?

  7. chet says:

    I have to admit that I am confused as to the significance of the chant by the demonstrators (WOW!! 2 MILLION!!) – is it a reaction to the US veto or an ongoing repudiation of Israel’s maltreatment of the Palestinians or the sub-text to another issue?

    As an aside, don’t hold your breath in anticipation of this video making its way to the MSM.

    • annie says:

      don’t hold your breath in anticipation of this video making its way to the MSM.

      lol, death by suffocation is not one of my aims in life. no i don’t think this will go mainstream unless israel decides to use it as a pretext to invade. then it could go viral like the ‘push into the sea’ or ‘wipe off the map’ jargon.

    • MRW says:

      Chet,

      Those images from Bahrain aren’t helping, nor the reports on Al-Jazeera that the people doing the shooting in Bahrain are outside-the-country troops. God help the US if any of the materiel is discovered to be American.

      I think that veto yesterday was a huge mistake. I watched Susan Rice on Al-Jazeera call it “Sovereign Israel” and it struck my ear as so wrong. She was the only one who opposed the resolution. There are consequences, and our government should have listened when McMullen and Petraeus told them a year ago that the I/P situation was the tinderbox.

      Look at the map to see what is happening, and remember that China is in Africa. Big time. Add Pakistan.

  8. Kathleen says:

    “”To Jerusalem we are heading, Martyrs in the millions.”

    Wonder if CNN, MSNBC, Fox, Cspan are streaming this ?

    • Citizen says:

      They should; this march was televised:

      The revolution is at hand, and we must free ourselves of the chains of political and economic slavery. The nonviolent revolution is saying, “We will not wait for the courts to act, for we have been waiting hundreds of years. We will not wait for the President, nor the Justice Department, nor Congress, but we will take matters into our own hands, and create a great source of power, outside of any national structure that could and would assure us victory.” For those who have said, “Be patient and wait!” we must say, “Patience is a dirty and nasty word.” We cannot be patient, we do not want to be free gradually, we want our freedom, and we want it now. We cannot depend on any political party, for the Democrats and the Republicans have betrayed the basic principles of the Declaration of Independence. John Lewis, August 28, 1963.

      Now that old Dick Witty’s zionist shoe is on the other foot, he’s just not as thrilled as the young Witty was at the time. He does’t want that lift taken out of his right heel. It makes him taller than he really is.

  9. Kathleen says:

    Annie you are an honorable individual giving a “hat tip” to Taxi. Wise..and keeps it coming

  10. Jose says:

    “The Egyptians are welcome to try, but not to complain about the results.”

    That was the first comment on this thread, and it really does sum it up. If the
    People in Tahrir Square really want millions of dead Arabs, Israel can oblige.

    • annie says:

      iow, you’ll take the part of the treaty you like and thrash the part where israel doesn’t keep it’s end of the bargain.

      it’s called stepping up to the plate and demanding israel meets it’s obligations wrt palestinians. it’s not kowtowing to the continued ethnic cleansing of palestine.

      you are probably right, israel will fight, but they cannot genocide the entire middle east. at some point they have to stop the ethnic cleansing. jerusalem is not theirs for the taking.

      reasonable minds will prevail. i have faith in that. everyone will not always subordinate to israel, that is an unsustainable solution.

      • Ellen says:

        Well….Israel is the only Nuke power in the ME and the current government is ultra nationalistic and Lieberman (former Kach party member) has made veiled threats and repeated rants for a Palestinian Holocaust of Gaza.

        Has supported what would result in a genocide of the Egyptian people by calling for the destruction of the Aswan Dam in Egypt.

        An ultra nationalistic regime driven by religous fevor may not hesitate to use the Samson option.

        No one anywhere will care about Tel Aviv when that happens. Israel’s neighbors have reason to feel threatened.

        I wish I could share your optimism. I hope you are right. Hope all can be friends and give up on the sickness of who gets what. It is all really meaningless.

    • Kathleen says:

      All Israel has to do is abide by UN resolution after the next. Stop building and expanding illegal settlements. Stop.

      The pressure to cut off aid to Israel is going to build. Israel has/is and seems to continue being their own worst enemy.

    • Citizen says:

      Well, Israel may try to stop the march of time, and no doubt it will–with something more than water hoses, clubs, and dogs as in 1963 USA; it may even threaten to use nukes, as Golda Meir did to get massive saving support from Uncle Sam. But this is not 1973 either. When the US politicians try to do this again on such a massive scale, or worse, call us to direct war for Israel, Tahrir Square will rise up here too because more and more Americans will not take it anymore; it’s against our best values, we cannot afford it, and the MSM media no longer controls our access to news. Plus, if they have to gear up the Military draft, our women will be directly involved and few males too will answer the call. We remember Curveball too.

      • Kathleen says:

        former President Jimmy Carter and others have brought up the possibility of Israel using their nukes
        link to youtube.com

        Zbig Brzezinski Admits Zionist power. Talks straight
        “settlements with swimming pools”
        link to youtube.com

        After massacre on the Mavi Marmara “Israel is a lunatic state”..Norman Finkelstein
        link to youtube.com

        link to jpost.com
        UK feared Israel would use nukes, archives reveal
        By JPOST.COM STAFF
        12/30/2010 05:15

        Cable from 1980 shows British officials’ concern over “Israel’s dangerous mood of isolation and defiance”; Thatcher exasperated by Begin.
        Talkbacks (44)

        British officials were concerned Israel would use its nuclear weapons in a potential war against its Arab adversaries, secret documents from 1980 released from the British National Archives revealed, according to a Wednesday AFP report.

        A diplomatic cable from the UK embassy in Tel Aviv, dated May 4, 1980, warned “the situation in the region is deteriorating and with it Israel’s dangerous mood of isolation and defiance will grow. If they are to be destroyed they will go down fighting this time. They will be ready to use their atomic weapon. Because they cannot sustain a long war, they would have to use it early.”

    • Donald says:

      What does it mean anyway? If it means Egypt will no longer cooperate with Israel to oppress Palestinians, good. If it means war (which I doubt), that’s bad. War with Egypt will mean slaughter for both sides, though probably most of the civilian deaths will be Arab. You can see a couple of the resident Zionists salivating about the prospect of Israel killing Arabs in large numbers.

      And for once I agree with yonira–a war is pretty unlikely if we’re talking about Egypt and/or Turkey and if it did happen the US would side with Israel. And Egypt and Turkey know it.

      • MRW says:

        Donald,

        if it did happen the US would side with Israel. And Egypt and Turkey know it.

        But Africa won’t. And China got to Africa first in the last few years with benevolent loans and no fanfare.

        • Saleema says:

          Africa and most of Asia against Israel. Let’s see who comes out victorious.

        • fuster says:

          MRW, in a couple of years you’re gonna start seeing just how unbenevolent China is.
          They’re hungry and really don’t give a shit about other people or other places.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Europe would be at worst neutral. They will not side with Israel and the US in another war. Not after Iraq.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Fuster, you’re mistaking strategy for motivation. MRW is describing Chinese strategy, not motivation. Too sophisticated for you though, I fancy.

        • Potsherd2 says:

          Who ever claimed that China is benevolent?

        • annie says:

          oh i think it was MRW upthread saying the loans were benevolent. it’s about chinese strategy and troll word twisting.

        • fuster says:

          Pot
          MRW is claiming that China is in Africa with “benevolent loans” when the reality is that China is in Africa exploiting the hell out of it and the loans are hardly benevolent.

        • annie says:

          compared to drones bombing civilians loans are a benevolent tactic to gain access to resources.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          So your saying China took over Paul Wolfowitz’ job at the World Bank?

        • Antidote says:

          “They’re hungry and really don’t give a shit about other people or other places.”

          They won’t fall for the ‘uniqueness of the Holocaust’ either, and simply say: ‘cry me a river’, and ‘let’s get back to business’

          I hear the Israelis are pushing ‘Holocaust education’ in China. Wonder why.

        • MRW says:

          ‘Benevolent loans’ meaning not World bank-style loans that ask for a country’s resources as collateral. China has been offering low-interest loans to fix their infrastructure which is in China’s interests for its operations there. Google it.

          Hyperbolic statements like this They’re hungry and really don’t give a shit about other people or other places shows history isn’t one of your strong suits, considering that it was China that introduced the idea of a civil society and the whole notion of governance while people were building mud huts and traveling by donkey in Canaan.

          The Chinese remember their history as well.

        • fuster says:

          MRW

          —to fix their infrastructure which is in China’s interests for its operations there. —-

          that’s where our thoughts unite.

          but an invocation of Chinese history as a defense for the idea that the present Chinese regime and its state capitalism doesn’t serve

          China is indeed an ancient society and the Chinese have a long and varied history. The Chinese living throughout Asia have a reputation as skillful traders who prosper a bit more than do their trading partners.

        • Ellen says:

          Unlike Europeans earlier (shall we remember King Ludwig and his crimes in the Congo — the first time the expression “Crimes against humanity” was used in reference to the horrific treatment of the Congolese) the Chinese are building huge infrastructure in Africa. Hospitals, schools, roads., etc.

          Heck, they even bring in their own labor and workers and pay for the privilege. The Chinese, Indians (and the Saudis) are also building farms in Africa.

          Of course it is self interested motivation. Point is,as MRW said, China got there first!

        • Antidote says:

          Merkel: “An attack on Israel is an attack on Germany.”

          Harper: “An attack on Israel is an attack on Canada”

          Both of them have said so on several occasions.

        • Citizen says:

          China has been very intelligent in its handling of foreign affairs, as MRW astutely notes; it’s been sowing just the right fertile seeds while the US louts have been tossing around rusty grenades.

        • Antidote says:

          “Unlike Europeans earlier (shall we remember King Ludwig and his crimes in the Congo — the first time the expression “Crimes against humanity” was used in reference to the horrific treatment of the Congolese) the Chinese are building huge infrastructure in Africa. Hospitals, schools, roads., etc.”

          Words, words, words. Yes Ludwig was bad, bad, bad. One of his Belgian colonels told the Congolese that cannibalism was barbaric, asking: ‘Why would you eat people who have done you no harm? You could keep your victims alive, enslave them and put them to work and become a source of wealth instead of mere food?’ That’s Western civilization for you, in a nutshell. Check out Spanish colonial history. They forced the man-eating Caribs to eat their testicles, thus becoming guilty of incitement to cannibalism and genocide, and worse than their victims. The Romans didn’t call it ‘crimes against humanity’, but ‘tabula rasa’: Eliminate entire villages and their population, unless they submitted to Roman rule. Kill the native, not the man. So the Chinese appear to take the middle road between the British (British rule on site) and American model (pro-American native dictators/governments) of colonization

    • Taxi says:

      isreal’s already ‘obliging’, jose.

      Ya don’t think in ten years time there’ll be an official committee formed to hunt down the leaders of zionism? Ya think this kinda thing only happens to Germans?

      Ya think zionism can survive for long in a region where it’s utterly and violently rejected and ALWAYS WILL BE by just about MILLIONS OF PEOPLE?

      • Jose says:

        Always will be? Wow, and here I though it was the actions of those meany Jooooos that everyone disliked. But you, Taxi, are telling me that it will always be this way?
        Oh No!
        I am gonna have to totally rethink my worldview! I thought if only Israel stopped settlements and returned to 1967 borders . . .darn!
        Better get a whole mess a nukes to use on Israel’s enemies.
        Oh–check.

        • Taxi says:

          Mr. Jose (whose name is NOT FROM THE MIDEAST),

          Ya think it makes any difference whether israel uses nukes or not?

          Israel’s a gonner anyway.

          Use nukes and lose your holocaust begging bowl forever more – well you kinda already lost that anyhooz.

          Ya think nukes can help stop the world from punishing you for your crimes against humanity.

          Man you and israel sound like maniacs waving nukes at blue earth.

          Rogue state, terrorist state, state with NO LEGITIMACY.

          Now buzz off with your certifiable pathetic threats.

        • Jose says:

          Jose–It’s pronunced “Yossi,” cabbie. And it’s in the Bible.

        • Taxi says:

          Khosay, Jowzy, Yossi: So you think I care how many ‘versions’ of your name you can come up with? I bet it’s Yohey in Chinese too!

          And just because you allege your name is from the bible gives you NO RIGHT to biblical land!!

    • Chaos4700 says:

      Yes yes, we know, you wackos will nuke anyone who tries to set foot in the judenreich. We’ve heard your threats before.

  11. My modest understanding is simply that Egypt will no longer cooperate with Israel against the Palestinian people but on the contrary do all it can to help their brothers … Change we can (this time) believe in …

    • Citizen says:

      Witty sees it as a violent threat. He only likes a Jewish democracy over there, while over here, he likes the proposition nation divorced from religion and ethnic extraction. You know, whatever is good for Witty.

    • Kathleen says:

      the neocons will flip this into …Egyptians have said they want to wipe Israel off the map. Just the way Bill Kristol, Ledeen, Bolton, Terri Gross, Rachel Maddow etc have taken what Ahmadenjad really said and flipped it into “Iran wants to wipe Israel off the map”
      Instead of what the Iranian President actually said “He quoted Khomeini that “the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time.”

      From Coles site
      link to juancole.com
      But the actual quote, which comes from an old speech of Khomeini, does not imply military action, or killing anyone at all. The second reason is that it is just an inexact translation. The phrase is almost metaphysical. He quoted Khomeini that “the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time.” It is in fact probably a reference to some phrase in a medieval Persian poem. It is not about tanks.

      Since Mr. Hitchens wants to splash my private mail all over the internet against my will, as though he were himself an agent of the Bush Administration’s electronic spying on the private conversations of Americans, I’m glad to share the message that encapsulates the results of our deliberations at Gulf2000.

      Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:34:18 -0400 From: “Cole, Juan”

      The speech in Persian is here:

      Sorry that I misremembered the exact phrase Ahmadinejad had used. He made an analogy to Khomeini’s determination and success in getting rid of the Shah’s government, which Khomeini had said “must go” (az bain bayad berad). Then Ahmadinejad defined Zionism not as an Arabi-Israeli national struggle but as a Western plot to divide the world of Islam with Israel as the pivot of this plan.

      The phrase he then used as I read it is “The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).”

      Ahmadinejad was not making a threat, he was quoting a saying of Khomeini and urging that pro-Palestinian activists in Iran not give up hope– that the occupation of Jerusalem was no more a continued inevitability than had been the hegemony of the Shah’s government.

      Whatever this quotation from a decades-old speech of Khomeini may have meant, Ahmadinejad did not say that “Israel must be wiped off the map” with the implication that phrase has of Nazi-style extermination of a people. He said that the occupation regime over Jerusalem must be erased from the page of time.

    • fuster says:

      we’ll see. the Palestinian people haven’t got much in the way of help from their “brothers” up until now.

  12. biorabbi says:

    The masses marching to Jerusalem was a metaphor for social justice. The rape of the South African reporter by a crowd yelling ‘Jew, Jew’ was also a metaphor. It had to do with the colonialist ambitions of the Zionist project. Nothing to see there, moving right along.

    • Walid says:

      biorabbi, marching to Jerusalem may be a metaphor in the Egyptian sense but when mentioned by Nasrallah, the man doesn ‘t talk in metaphors. History will show that what is appearing as a sudden awakening to oppression everywhere is rooted in Hizbullah’s army of about 3,000 pushing back Israel’s 30,000 in 2006 with not much other than courage. It will also explain why Israel and especialy the US were and are still adamant about putting out Hizbullah’s lights. They don’t realy care what’s happening to little harmless Lebanon but they are very concerned about the inspiration that Hizbullah has been giving to all oppressed neighbouring Arabs especially the ones in countries that are allied up to their necks with the US. Hope you don’t trip in your moving right along in the dark.

      • Taxi says:

        Propagandists know that symbolism is the binding agent of ideology.

        Destroy the symbol and you break down the movement oh so very quickly.

        Nasrallah remains the most popular leader in the Arab world and what is he really? The son of a fallah (farmer) from the south of Lebanon, steady salt-of-the-earth people who grow their own wheat in their small gardens, a people who still bake their own bread.

        In other words, a poor but self-reliant people, down-trodden but independent, conservative yet firey – a modest people who perceive the concepts of ‘dignity’ and ‘truth’ as holy duties to be practiced on a daily basis.

        A people who take their personal freedom very seriously and actually physically act towards continuing this freedom. Nasrallah leads this empowered minority with wit, wisdom and a steadfast message to the rest of the Arab people: Oppose injustice continuously, vigilantly, cleverly, and you will soon enough be free.

        Walid, I agree with you that we cannot underestimate the influence of Hizbollah and it’s victories against israel on what is occurring today on Liberation Squares all over the Arab world.

        Kudos to those hazel-eyed and honorable people of south Lebanon who against all odds, fought hard, paid with the blood of their elderly and their youth, to guarantee that their grandchildren would live in honor and freedom.

        Now THAT’S what a call a generous generational sacrifice in the name of the future of your lineage and nation.

  13. Reb says:

    I do not understand – is this supposed to be a good thing? For the Egyptian people to support the Palestinian people is not the same thing as marching to liberate Jerusalem.

  14. Kathleen says:

    Juan Cole as always doing a great job informing (except when it comes to criticizing Jon Stewarts beating the Iran war drum while Stewart carries water for the I lobby)

    Cole refuses to criticize Stewart’s clear biases…odd.

    link to juancole.com

  15. fuster says:

    and Cole also says that Ahmadinejad is a despicable bigot, but I’m sure you find that odd as well….all bias must be denounced except for the ones that you refuse to notice.

    • annie says:

      nice divert/strawman dude. you’re a pro fus

      • fuster says:

        hey, annie, you’ve got 100+ comments before I replied to Kathleen’s mention of Cole.

        you wander off-topic every now and then yourself. allow us poor oppressed minority commenters a little freedom.

        • annie says:

          allow us poor oppressed minority commenters a little freedom

          lol! sure thing their fus. as soon as that little criminal state you represents allows the poor and oppressed people is rules over with it’s apartheid gov a little freedom.

        • Taxi says:

          Nothing about you fuster , not even that unsightly picture of you, spells out “oppressed minority”.

          But of course ALL zionists ALWAYS reach for that violin everytime they run out of excuses and justifications for their land theft, ethnic cleansing and murder.

        • fuster says:

          I don’t represent anything beyond my poor oppressed green self, annie.
          I do identify with the US of A, though.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          The last time Zionist immigrants were given “a little freedom,” five hundred villages were wiped off the face of the Earth, with you guys shooting any man, woman or child returning to the scene of the atrocity.

        • annie says:

          I don’t represent anything beyond my poor oppressed green self, annie.

          of course you don’t mr frog. i’m so looking forward to the paid brigade identifying themselves. and by all means explain to me why the goi (mfa) and the israel project would not target this site?

        • annie says:

          smelling salts taxi! or does salt make frogs shrivel like slugs? frogs are fresh water only aren’t they or do pollywogs also thrive in salt water?

          hmm, let’s contemplate on that instead of ethnic cleansing. oh wait..i hear some more ribbiting..gotta go.

        • fuster says:

          I’m proud of my land theft, Taxi. Got a nice big old house on it, too, more’n a 100 years old.
          Stole it from a couple of indigenous people here who had come to the US from Italy and wanted to retire to Florida.
          I woulda genocided them I guess if I had to, but instead I just broadcast weather reports pointing that it was always 30 degrees warmer down there and that heating oil for this big old barn was never going to get any less expensive.

        • Taxi says:

          Yawn. Yes fusty we know you’re proud of your crimes.

          Ya think anything you say’s gonna rile me?

          Pathetic.

        • Citizen says:

          Hahha. The “poor oppressed minority” voice here is the all-pervasive rich majority AIPAC-MSM voice and voice too in Congress & WH. Let’s keep this in real perspective, fuster, faster, fuster.

        • Kathleen says:

          Or applies the same criticism to Israel, Netanyahu, illegal settlers etc as fus applies to others

    • Chaos4700 says:

      You just really want to do to Iran what you got us to do to Iraq, don’t you?

    • Kathleen says:

      Yes he has called the Iranian President out on inflammatory things that he has said. Just went looking. Cole has called out the neocons in congress and in the US medias lies as well as Netanyahu and Ahmadenejads unnecessary and inflammotory rhetoric

    • Kathleen says:

      And Ahmadinejad never said “Iran wants to wipe Israel off the map” no matter how many times NPR’s Terri Gross, Scott Simon, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, Micheal Ledeen, Reuel Marc Gerecht, Bolton, Joe Scarborough, Andrea Mitchell, Cheney and others keep repeating that lie

      • fuster says:

        we’ve been through that one, Kathleen. The Cole translation of Mahmoud’s remarks are quite sufficiently damning.

        • Jose says:

          The site you linked makes a big deal about others getting words wrong–and they headline it is thusly:
          “Does Iran’s Predident deny the Holocaust?”
          forgive me for not reading any further.

        • Sumud says:

          Except that’s not the headline at all. It is:

          “DOES IRAN’S PRESIDENT WANT ISRAEL WIPED OFF THE MAP AND DOES HE DENY THE HOLOCAUST?”

          The typo you refers to occurs in a subheading almost halfway through the article. How *do* get through they day if a single typo in an article is so distressing you can’t continue reading? It’s even a German language website!

        • annie says:

          too difficult for you jose

          “They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan. Let’s take a step back. [[[We had a hostile regime in this country which was undemocratic, armed to the teeth and, with SAVAK, its security apparatus of SAVAK [the intelligence bureau of the Shah of Iran's government] watched everyone. An environment of terror existed.]]] When our dear Imam [Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Iranian revolution] said that the regime must be removed, many of those who claimed to be politically well-informed said it was not possible. All the corrupt governments were in support of the regime when Imam Khomeini started his movement. [[[All the Western and Eastern countries supported the regime even after the massacre of September 7 [1978] ]]] and said the removal of the regime was not possible. But our people resisted and it is 27 years now that we have survived without a regime dependent on the United States. The tyranny of the East and the West over the world should have to end, but weak people who can see only what lies in front of them cannot believe this. Who would believe that one day we could witness the collapse of the Eastern Empire? But we could watch its fall in our lifetime. And it collapsed in a way that we have to refer to libraries because no trace of it is left. Imam [Khomeini] said Saddam must go and he said he would grow weaker than anyone could imagine. Now you see the man who spoke with such arrogance ten years ago that one would have thought he was immortal, is being tried in his own country in handcuffs and shackles [[[by those who he believed supported him and with whose backing he committed his crimes]]]. Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime [Israel] has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world.”
          (source: http://www.nytimes.com, based on a publication of ‘Iranian Students News Agency’ (ISNA) — insertions by the New York Times in squared brackets — passages in triple squared brackets will be left blank in the MEMRI version printed below)

        • Jose says:

          A German language website? I suppose a lot of what you guys say sounds better in the original German.

        • Shingo says:

          forgive me for not reading any further.

          We forgive you Jose. If you’re anything like Witty, then reading more than a headline is probably a challenge for you anyway. Witty much prefers his talking points to be spoon fed to him rather than doing his own research.

        • Taxi says:

          I can’t tell the difference between German and Hebrew.

          For instance the Hebrew ‘Nakhon’ sounds German to me.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          A German language website? I suppose a lot of what you guys say sounds better in the original German.

          Yes, because everyone who speaks German is a NAZI! Where does that place Yiddish speakers, incidentally, Yossi?

        • Jose says:

          I remember reading it–thanks for the reminder. In truth though, would you, as a citizen of Israel, find his statement threatening?

        • Shingo says:

          In truth though, would you, as a citizen of Israel, find his statement threatening?

          Only if Israel had no options. Of course, it does have options, namely the Arab Peace Initiative. Iran has said that they would accept it if it was agreed to by all parties.

          The only party that does not accept it is……………….Israel.

        • fuster says:

          I would remind you where most of the Yiddish speakers were placed, Chaos, but for some reason known only to the Lords of the Mond, it’s a grave secret.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Irrelevant! The point is, you and your cadre are lying about Ahmedinejad being openly genocidal and denying the Holocaust. You even say you read it and you lied until we pointed it out! And as far as what Israel finds threatening, Netanyahu was bellicose about Obama being even slightly permissive of the demonstrations against Mubarak.

        • annie says:

          well let’s look at what he says:

          We had a hostile regime in this country which was undemocratic, armed to the teeth and, with SAVAK, its security apparatus of SAVAK [the intelligence bureau of the Shah of Iran's government] watched everyone. An environment of terror existed.]]] When our dear Imam [Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Iranian revolution] said that the regime must be removed, many of those who claimed to be politically well-informed said it was not possible.

          i think he is giving an example of “the regime occupying iran that vanished from the page of time”.

          let’s look at more of it.

          All the corrupt governments were in support of the regime when Imam Khomeini started his movement. [[[All the Western and Eastern countries supported the regime even after the massacre of September 7 [1978] ]]] and said the removal of the regime was not possible. But our people resisted and it is 27 years now that we have survived without a regime dependent on the United States. The tyranny of the East and the West over the world should have to end, but weak people who can see only what lies in front of them cannot believe this.

          what i see here is him comparing the iranian regime at that time to israel’s zionist regime today (both corrupt). also he compares the people who say “the removal of the regime was not possible” meaning the removal of the zionist regime is not possible, he calls those people weak for they can see only what lies in front of them and cannot believe it will ever be different.

          i think he fancy’s himself a visionary and he’s giving an example. no, i do not think it is a threatening statement. no where in his comparison does ellude to invading israel or even being the cause of the fall of the apartheid regime.

          Imam [Khomeini] said Saddam must go and he said he would grow weaker than anyone could imagine. Now you see the man who spoke with such arrogance ten years ago that one would have thought he was immortal, is being tried in his own country in handcuffs and shackles [[[by those who he believed supported him and with whose backing he committed his crimes]]].

          so again i think he is referring to a people removing their own leader (regime) tho i would beg to differ w/him here. i think the US removed him. either way iran didn’t (although we have sort of handed iraq to iran, but that’s not something you can blame on iran. i think iraq started the war w/iran.

          Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. (ed note, this is a question and deserves a question mark) This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime [Israel] has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world.”

          i think ‘[Israel]‘ was inserted by the nyt. i think he was speaking of the ‘ the occupying regime’. i think the original sentence was ‘This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world.’ i also think when he said ‘ Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor’ the word ‘target’ should be taken in the same context he used before for the iman before, iow ‘identifying’ or ‘predicting’. and besides, isn’t this the translation that is contested, about this alleged ‘wiped off the map”?

          yes, if you support the zionist regime i can see how you might be threatened by this in the same way mubarak was threatened by the revolution. but i don’t think he means iran is going to invade israel.

          either zionism is going to transform into some version of zionism we’ve yet to ever witness, or the zionist regime is going to vanish from the pages of time. i think that is inevitable because permanent apartheid and oppression is unsustainable.

        • fuster says:

          Chaos you asshat, please funkin try to print out where i said that he called for genocide…. I said just the flamin opposite.
          You are an idjit.

          And he doesn’t deny the Holocaust ,,,, he denies that he has enough evidence one way or the other.

          You reread the stuff, and try to stop spreading your lame confusion.

        • yonira says:

          But I am sure you can tell the difference between Arabic and Hebrew can’t you Taxi?

        • fuster says:

          here, annie, is Juan Cole taking a look at some of what Ahmadinejad has to say ….
          link to juancole.com
          —————

          here’s Cole in an interview with Amy Goodman……
          attn Chaos…..

          JUAN COLE: Yes, Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust denier.

          http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364×2222500

        • He means that Iran will incrementally seek to expedite the elimination of Israel from the map of the world. (At least you included the translation that DID state “wipe off the map”).

          That includes funding, arming, training semi-proxy and proxy armies on Israel’s borders, inciting maximalist interpretations of anti-colonialism (an ideology of progressive intent, but which often ends fascistic, especially when anti-colonialism oriented to the past, ends up superceding present democracy.)

        • Chaos4700 says:

          So on one hand I have yonira bashing me that I mention the Holocaust too much, and now I have fuster needling me that I haven’t mentioned it enough.

          Seriously now.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Actually, Modern Standard Hebrew borrowed a lot from Arabic, since as a dead and mostly ceremonial language — like Latin — it hadn’t accommodated any sort of modern evolution.

          In fact, Modern Standard Hebrew even drops traditional Semitic phonemes that aren’t present in Yiddish or German, specifically to make it easier to learn.

          Or is that too much factual information for you, yonira?

        • Chaos4700 says:

          So? As it happens I think Juan Cole is wrong about that.

          What do you think this is, the Republican Party? I’m not going to bow down and prostrate myself just because you manage to staple a name I respect to your regurgitation, fuster. I respect Juan Cole’s opinion about a lot of things — almost everything, really — but we don’t goose step in lockstep on this end of the political spectrum.

        • Shingo says:

          Juan Cole also said this:

          I am not saying that Ahmadinejad is genocidal.

        • Hu Bris says:

          “JUAN COLE: Yes, Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust denier.”

          who gives a damn?
          How does that in any way mitigate the crimes of the Zionists – how does it excuse the genocide they have continued to this day?

          How does that change the fact that you zionists have been inventing lies about Iran nuke-programs for years?

          If you couldn’t pin that on him you’d just try to invent some other bullshit to pin on him – that’s what Zionists do all the time – Long before he came on the scene Israel was threatening Iran, so it doesn’t matter one way or the other what he says about the big H, because you would still be trying to justify attacking Iran anyway

        • annie says:

          fuster, cole’s opinions are cole’s opinions and not a replacement for ahmadinejad’s text. he definitely sounds like an anti semite but i don’t read, in that slice of ahmadinejad’s text that he denied the holocaust took place. perhaps you have some other text.

          some governments and their people have always abhorred the Jews because of indecent behavior by some of the Jews and they were willing to evict the Jews out of Europe. However, some European governments and statesmen and the Zionist network did the main plot of anti-Semitism.

          note in the first segment how he places all the blame by ‘some governments and their people’ for anti semitism on some of the jews and none of the people. in the last segment he spreads the blame around a little but still not blaming the general populace at all. so i wouldn’t argue he not an anti semite. i’m not going to argue he’s a not a holocaust denier either because i’m not familiar enough with his speeches. but i will argue this particular quote doesn’t prove he is.

          to me a holocaust denier is someone who denies the holocaust existed and that millions of jews didn’t die. they did.

        • fuster says:

          horse laugh and a half, annie.
          if you keep both of them closed real tight and place your hands over your eyes, it’ll all go away.
          otherwise, do yourself a favor and remember that Cole went all-out for Ahmadinejad when people were going nuts saying that he actually said directly genocidal stuff.
          Cole is fair and not prone to interpreting harshly against the Iranians.
          annie, I expect you to stick to your convictions, but I don’t see you as really having a closed mind.
          you can find more in Cole’s blog if you want to look for it.

        • Taxi says:

          fuster,

          Ahmadi doesn’t deny: he questions the numbers game and asks for independent investigations into the findings, for the purposes of confirmation of the facts of the holocaust that so far only euro jews have been allowed to assemble and present.

        • yonira says:

          I took 4 years of Modern Hebrew Chaos, I am not sure where you copied and pasted your shit from but, like always, it is far off.

          Modern Hebrew(Hebrew used in Israel) is based on Sephardic pronunciation. Because of it’s sephardic origin of course it uses some Arabic words.

          If you would have added that Modern Hebrew is based on the Khazarian language your diatribe of nonsense would be complete.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Oh whatever. Fuster is just putting up straw men again, and trying to maintain Zionist media orthodoxy. So now we’re arguing about Ahmedinejad when this article is about Egypt. This is all just laying a groundwork for Israel making hostile moves toward Iran.

        • annie says:

          fuster, cole didn’t go ‘all out’ for ahmadinejad , he just translated his words from farsi. that said this has nothing to do w/cole. it has to do w/ahmadinejad. if you have evidence he denies the holocaust just present it. i already told you ‘i’m not going to argue he’s a not a holocaust denier … because i’m not familiar enough with his speeches. but i will argue this particular quote doesn’t prove he is.”

          so just cough it up already. does ahmadinejad ever deny the holocaust or not? certainly he’s well documented so i’m sure if you want to find it you will.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Yes, yes, yonira. We all know you had a crash course in “How to Be a Jew!” care of the Israeli MFA half a decade ago. And I’m sure those mere five years of “Jewishness” have been so very enlightening to your opportunism — oh, I mean, “getting in touch with your spiritual heritage.”

  16. Kathleen says:

    Pro Palestine Pro Israel (internationally recognized borders) Pro Peace.

    later
    Praying for the protesters…peaceful peaceful

  17. Seham says:

    Wow, who’s in charge of the comment’s section today? It feels like 6th grade with a substitute teacher here in here.

  18. kalithea says:

    Israel has been given so many chances to abide by the law in the past 60 years. I look forward to the liberation of the Palestinian People and their territories by every means possible . Enough is enough!

    • Taxi says:

      I’ll second your “by every means possible”.

      • yonira says:

        Kathleen, not sure if you realize what you are saying, but you are condoning genocide. This is sickening, when was it ok to advocate genocide on MW?

        Taxi, have fun watching the bloodbath from LA, people like you make my sick you are more than willing to see millions die on Al-Jazeera.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Not as sick as the fact that you were best buds in college with militant ex-US turncoats who decided to join a foreign military so that they could set fire to UN schools and strip search Palestinian schoolgirls.

          Or is their service with the IDF over, and now they’ve switched to the “civilian” lifestyle of running people down with cars and firing handguns into villages from hilltop condos?

        • Taxi says:

          There ain’t gonna a million dead yonira unless israel decides it’s gonna be so.

          I predict israel, being the giant ruthless robot dictator of the region, will be going the way of Mubarak, Ghaddafi et all yes with far more blood but a heck of a lot faster – that country is full of soft noses who’re so twisted already with unhinged paranoia, boy they’re afraid of their own shadows and they were stupid enough to think that living in a house of cards protected by big guns makes for a real and enduring nation.

        • Taxi says:

          yonira you softie, there’s ALREADY a slow-drip BLOODBATH going on in the occupied territories and Gaza – so you tuning in to the charming idf channel then you trolling hypocrite?

          DGB: Go away you pathetic little anti-semite: killing Palestinian and Lebanese and Syrian semites right in the heart of their homeland to steal their land and resources IS anti-semiticism and you support this! You realize the ancestors of the Arabs you’re killing used to be jewish, right?!!!

          Which part of the UNIVERSAL DOCTRINE that says that ‘an occupied people have the inalienable right to defend themselves BY ALL/ANY means possible’ do you think is “anti-semitic” you paranoid puppet?!!

    • pjdude says:

      I agree with you. I would prefer a peaceful liberation but should it be required other means could and should be used. their is never an iexcuse to let crimes go unpunished and unrectified.

  19. Shingo says:

    The timing of this could not be more appropriate.

    Over at Huffington Post, Danny Ayalon has witten a typical diatribe trying to dssavow that the Egyptian revolt had anything to do with the I/P conflict.

    I didn’t see any signs about settlements, the Palestinians or the stalemate in the peace process on the streets of Tunis, Sanaa or Cairo.

    It brought a wmile to my face.

    link to huffingtonpost.com

  20. I think the shout of the crowd is not a good thing, but a bad thing. But then again, “we will free Jerusalem with our million martyrs” is more appropriate as a crowd chant than, “the changes coming to the Middle East will require a new approach by all”.

    The “war chant” in this comments section is not a good thing either. Some people have already come out on record for their preference to turn back the hands of history with force. Anyone who recognizes injustice recognizes the anger that injustice incites. But anyone who recognizes human nature should recognize that war chants are “impure”.

  21. I guess not everything about Tahrir is a liberation. Comments, ANNIE?

    I know this is a distraction.

    link to nytimes.com

    Reporting While Female

    Last week, CBS News said that its reporter Lara Logan was assaulted by a crowd of men in Cairo. CBS News did not detail the circumstances, but the network’s statement — that she had suffered a “brutal and sustained sexual assault” — said enough.

    link to cbsnews.com

    On Friday, Feb. 11, the day Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak stepped down, CBS chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan was covering the jubilation in Tahrir Square for a “60 Minutes” story when she and her team and their security were surrounded by a dangerous element amidst the celebration. It was a mob of more than 200 people whipped into frenzy.

    In the crush of the mob, she was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers. She reconnected with the CBS team, returned to her hotel and returned to the United States on the first flight the next morning. She is currently home recovering.

    • Donald says:

      There are racists who dismiss the significance of the Egyptian revolution because a mob of Egyptian men brutally assaulted Lara Logan, who was then rescued by Egyptian women with some Egyptian soldiers. So what is your point?

      Mob violence can happen anywhere and mobs of men assault women in other places besides Egypt.

    • Chaos4700 says:

      God damn, Witty, but are you a hideous racist troll. You actually aped eee and hophmi?!

    • Donald says:

      Oh, and as a distraction from your distraction, here’s a link to an HRW report on how the Palestinian Authority assaults peaceful protestors demonstrating in favor of Egyptian democracy. There was a sexual assault against one of the demonstrators–

      link

    • Kathleen says:

      This is a crime and my prayers are with Lara Logan.
      Hey Richard Witty what do you feel about the rapes that are committed in the U.S. military that often go unpunished and our MSM basically ignores. Some of those sexually assaulted in our military have been forced to serve right along their attackers. Hear anyone in our MSM focused on this?

      If these sexual assaults in our own military that often go unpunished received a fraction of the media attention that Lara Logan’s assault is receiving we might witness some justice and change in our military.

    • Shingo says:

      What happened to Logan is appaling, but in a sea of 2 million highly emotional and passinate people, it is not statistically unuusl for one secual assault to take place – especialy given that a beatiful blonde woman like Logan would be even more exotic.

      1 in 3 women in the US military are raped. 1 in 5 women have been secual abused throughout their lives.

      While Witty is desperate to explaoit this to demonize Arabs, it does need to be put in context.

  22. Eva Smagacz says:

    Richard, watch the film “The Accused” with Jodie Foster. This, I believe will give you a much more likely explanation about the dynamic of what happened to Lara Logan.
    And, yes, bringing attack on Lara Logan to derail the discussion shows me that you are using her, and her distress, to achieve your own objectives. (better than using her to offload sexual frustration, but still using her to score points).

    • fuster says:

      No Eva, the discussion here will not be derailed by noting that the Egyptian people have failings and that the people there are as prone to criminality as people anywhere else.

      And mentioning an instance of vile criminality in a discussion where people are considering the character and ambitions of the crowd in Cairo is germane, even if it’s not good news.

      • Chaos4700 says:

        So now every Egyptian man, woman and child needs to be blamed for Lara Logan’s rape? Or is it just that you still haven’t forgiven the Arabs for not jumping into the sea to make way for a “Jewish state.”

        Raaaaacist.

        • yonira says:

          Cairo is actually a hot bed for sexual harassment.

          link to npr.org

          Lora Logan should have gave the following website a look before she decided where to report from:
          link to harassmap.org

        • yonira says:

          Chaos, there is a Jewish state, a fledgling state btw.

        • Taxi says:

          Israel and the sex-slave trade…. ehm… israel and human oragan trafficking….

        • yonira says:

          Israel and Egypt are both Tier 2 countries in terms of trafficking:

          link to state.gov

          And another article about the organ trade in Egypt:

          Egypt is one of a half dozen countries identified by the World Health Organization as organ-trafficking hot spots. Under international pressure, other trouble spots like China, Pakistan and the Philippines have outlawed organ sales and barred foreigners from undergoing transplants to stop “transplant tourism.”

          link to msnbc.msn.com

        • RoHa says:

          Taxi, none of those things count. Israel invented the cherry tomato (or was it hummus?) and we all know that technological competence confers moral legitimacy, regardless of any other considerations.

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Why exactly do we have to be subjected over and over again, endlessly, to yonira trumpeting how much he hates Arabs? This is almost as bad as when I was fending off his homophobic slurs. Seham, Walid, Olive? If Phil isn’t going to apologize for this hot mess you’re subjected to, I will. Yonira is an embarrassment to white people worldwide.

        • Shingo says:

          That’s far from convincing Yonira.

          So the so called only democracy in the ME is as bad as a 2nd world, poverty riddled country in terms of human trafficking. That speaks well of Israel doesn’t it?

          Your msnbc article in interesting for the fact that it fails to mention which are the top offenders for organ-trafficking. It turns out that Moldova (aka Liebermna’s real home) is number one with Brazil and India behind them.

          Most interesting though is that Israel is part fo the Modovan organ-trafficking industry.

          Wow, you guys must seriousy have to hold your noses being associated with such macabre practices.

  23. I am not dismissing the importance of the Egyptian popular revolution (though the invocation of a million martyrs marching on Jerusalem and the rationalization that that is humane chills me).

    And, if you respectfully read my post, my first sentence was that I acknowledge that this is a distraction.

    Time to represent, rather than misrepresent.

    • tree says:

      And, if you respectfully read my post, my first sentence was that I acknowledge that this is a distraction.

      Acknowledging what you are doing does not mean that you are absolved of doing it, nor does it mean that others here can’t criticize you for doing it.

      Time to represent, rather than misrepresent.

      Again, Richard, if you would only take your criticisms seriously as subconscious self-criticisms you might make some progress towards self understanding. You were the one misrepresenting what Eva said, not the other way around.

      • Donald says:

        “take your criticisms seriously as subconscious self-criticisms you might make some progress towards self understanding.”

        Heh. I hadn’t thought of it quite that way, though I’ve suspected his subconscious understands that his liberal values are in conflict with his romanticized view of Zionism. He can write clearly when the facts really do support a point he wants to make–he lapses into word salad or weird tangential BS when he is making a point that would be clearly illiberal if he made it clearly. That suggests there’s something inside the man that knows he’s wrong.

        • Shingo says:

          he lapses into word salad or weird tangential BS when he is making a point that would be clearly illiberal if he made it clearly.

          Though now and then (with incresing frequency I might add), he has allowed his fascist, pro Likud sentiments surface, and posted some real clangers on this forum. Eljay has exploited these beautifully.

  24. annie says:

    helena cobban wrote a post about this event. i rec.

    An American friend has described the chants in Tahrir yesterday as “bellicose”. What is bellicose about saying you’re going to pray at your holy sites in Jerusalem, and you’re prepared a die as a martyr if necessary to get there?

    Don’t western Christians have a long history of understanding and respecting the concept of martyrdom, that is, being prepared to die for what you believe in? (As 365 of Egypt’s pro-democracy activists already have.)

    • Good rationalization, Annie, Helena.

      Maybe thats what they meant. Maybe thats what you were gleeful and rude about.

      I doubt that they meant “a million suicide-bombers”. That would be out of character of the revolution.

      And, if only a thousandth of the million martyrs meant it in terms of actually willing to die, eager to die, eager to take others along?

      Or, only a ten-thousandth. (100 bombers). Or, only a hundred thousandth (10 bombers).

      What if only ONE were inspired by your “permission” to do so?

      So careless are you with bombs and toxicity.

      • fuster says:

        Richard,
        You can’t go around positing that chant as a call for suicide bombing.
        That’s every bit as unwarranted as saying that the chanting must be understand as being meant by all there as non-violent.
        The chanting is …chanting and can be fairly understood to express disapproval of Israel’s actions in the governance of Jerusalem.
        And it’s pretty hard to disagree with that disapproval.

        • yonira says:

          Since the Tunisian and subsequent Egyptian revolutions, the war-monger by the anti-Israel group as multiplied. This is scary because most of these people cheer leading for war live 1/2 world away.

          How is cheer-leading for war any better than the guy who sends out the suicide bomber while he sits in the comfort of his own home?

        • Taxi says:

          How is occupying Arab land not ‘scary’ for Arabs yonira?

          How is it not ALREADY AN ACT OF WAR?!

          Don’t even try and pretend you’re a peace activist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • fuster says:

          How is it not ALREADY AN ACT OF WAR?!

          How? because it’s a consequence of war.

        • Shingo says:

          How is cheer-leading for war any better than the guy who sends out the suicide bomber while he sits in the comfort of his own home?

          So are you comparing 90% of Israelis (who cheered during Cast Lead) with suicide bombers Yoni?

          I wouldn’t have put it that way myself, since you bring it up….

        • Shingo says:

          Yes I knew that Taxi,

          Some names are just unfiortnate that way. ;-)

        • Taxi says:

          Israel started the evil.

          Nakba fucking much smartypants?

        • yonira says:

          Taxi, get over it seriously, it was 60 years ago. You call for the ridding of Jews from Palestine by any means necessary, fine. Put your money where your mouth is, send some money to al-qaeda or to Hamas or Hezbollah. Quit your war-mongering shit, or do something about it.

        • yonira says:

          Great deflection Shingo, i’d expect nothing more from a person with zero ability to create an original thought.

        • Taxi says:

          Let’s ALL forget about the holocaust too why don’t we then yonira eh – it’s been frigging how many years now?! Huh? What?! I can’t hear you please say it LOUDER how many years?!

          And how about we ALL forget what the alleged god told the alleged jews some TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO TOO! Now THAT one is sure way way way way overdue for dumping!

          Yonira you’re a cheap propagandist on an average day and it’s clear you aim to confuse and muddle the BIG difference between a call for justice and warmongering.

          NOW FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME ASSHOLE: I HAVE NEVER CALLED FOR THE RIDDING OF ‘JEWS’ – ONLY ZIONISM YOU CREEPY SOB!!@!

          Note to Phil & Adam: If you guys keep allowing the same incessant and repetitive ugly slander by couch-potato zionists like yonira, also especially zionists with blood on their hands like eee, hand-on-heart I’ll be seriously considering checking out of mondo for good.

          These guys can never carry a serious debate, they’re not here for the ‘war of ideas’ but for slander and personal attacks on supporters of the Palestinian cause.

        • yonira says:

          How are we supposed to interpret “by any means necessary” Taxi? You are the biggest war-monger on this blog, don’t guy whine to Phil and Adam about it when someone calls you out.

          Kalithea:

          Israel has been given so many chances to abide by the law in the past 60 years. I look forward to the liberation of the Palestinian People and their territories by every means possible . Enough is enough!

          link to mondoweiss.net

          Taxi:

          I’ll second your “by every means possible”.

          link to mondoweiss.net

          How do you rid an ideology “by any means necessary” if you don’t rid the believers of that ideology?

        • Chaos4700 says:

          Yonira, the Holocaust happened more than sixty years go which is longer than you’ve been Jewish (which isn’t saying much, since that has been less than a decade.)

          We’re supposed to believe that the rest of the non-Jewish world is still supposed to atone for the Holocaust, yet an ongoing war on Arabs to divest them of their property and herd them behind concrete walls topped with razorwire and we’re supposed to “get over it?”

          You Zionists all talk about the existence of the “Jewish state” “by any means necessary.”

        • “NOW FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME ASSHOLE: I HAVE NEVER CALLED FOR THE RIDDING OF ‘JEWS’ – ONLY ZIONISM YOU CREEPY SOB!!@!”

          I share Taxi anger at the slime Yonira. It certainly must be unacceptable to let pass slander so low! Enough is enough.

      • eljay says:

        >> What if only ONE were inspired by your “permission” to do so?

        …lectures the man who said “I cannot consistently say that ‘ethnic cleansing is never necessary’.”

        To anyone looking to be “inspired by your permission” to commit ethnic cleansing, the message is crystal clear.

  25. fuster says:

    —What is bellicose about saying you’re going to pray at your holy sites in Jerusalem, and you’re prepared a die as a martyr if necessary to get there?—-
    annie asked naively…

    Two million Americans chanted that they were going to join the marchers in Tehran at the next demonstration and nothing short of death could stop them.

    Apologists for the American chanters said that they expected that there would be no violence and that they would simply cross Iran’s border and traverse the country into Tehran and once there would march, say a few prayers, and expire from happiness, going directly to heaven.

    • tree says:

      Two million Americans chanted…

      Quite a triumph of a stupid analogy. I suppose I missed the part where Americans of any religious persuasion consider Tehran a holy city. Maybe you should post less frequently and with more import and wisdom, if that’s possible. You’re getting to sound as reflexive as hophmi.

      And you might want to improve your reading comprehension along the way. Your quoted statement was from Helena Cobhan, not annie.

      • fuster says:

        tree—And you might want to improve your reading comprehension along the way. Your quoted statement was from Helena Cobhan, not annie.—

        you’re quite right. my error, and my thanks for the correction.

  26. Kathleen says:

    Absolutely nothing on any of the MSM Sunday morning programs about these chants…not a whisper.

    Although CNN’s Candy (or is it Kathy) Crowley allowed Donald Rumsfeld to keep spinning the false pre war intelligence. She did not ask him one challenging question…allowing this warmongers and others to still blame everyone else…the CIA, intelligence outlets, Curveball.

    Crowley did not ask one thing about the NIGER DOCUMENTS. Who, what,where, when, why? Not a thing. Although we all ready know the WHY. The Bush administration needed more false intelligence to fix around their agenda.

    Did I miss it has someone been held accountable for the NIGER DOCUMENTS that El Baradei came out in early March of 2003 and told the world they were forgeries and poorly done forgeries

    How do people like Crowley keep their jobs as journalist? Oh I know kiss ass, and don’t ask any tough questions
    link to cnn.com

  27. Is Christian pride in the concept of martyrdom so respectful that this is now a term that has no negative connotations? The Jewish Zionists must stop using religious terms, but the Arab Muslims’ religious terminology is holy.
    Because you agree with their political goals therefore the cheerleaders and their Friday afternoon chants are now words of appropriate and legalistic assertions of international law. I doubt it.

  28. annie says:

    youtube says the link has gotten 29,488 viewings now. that didn’t take long.