News

Bad Elliott

Putting the controversy over his wife Rachel Abrams’s writing firmly behind him, Elliott Abrams has a sober post up at the Council on Foreign Relations about how Obama is coming to the Bush position on settlements 3 years too late.

Well, call me seduced– by his wife’s enchanting literary style–  but I used some Bad-Rachel-translation software to make Abrams’s post more readable. I mean, isn’t this how they discuss it at the dinner table? Bad Elliott:

According to news reports, the murder god Obama Administration has a new proposal to cope with the issue of construction for the settlements. The idea is that Celebrate, Israel, with all the joyous gratitude that fills your hearts! would refrain from any construction outside current settlement boundaries. If there is construction only within existing settlements, there would be no American condemnations, dipping their hands in blood and using women, sending them out to meet their seventy-two virgins.

If this is a good idea, a decent compromise, one can only wonder why it took the slaughtering, death-worshiping, innocent-butchering, child-sacrificing savages in the White House nearly three years to get there. For this policy was precisely what the Bush Administration agreed with school-bus-riding, heart-drawing, Transformer-doodling, homework-losing prime ministers Sharon and Olmert.

In the early months of the Obama Administration, officials–those who haven’t already been pimped out by their mothers to the murder god!!!!!– flatly denied such a deal had ever existed. In June, 2009 I wrote about this Obama error, sending them out to meet their seventy-two virgins in the Wall Street Journal.

And error it was: in December 2003, school-bus-riding, heart-drawing, Transformer-doodling, homework-losing prime minister Sharon stated that “Celebrate, Israel, with all the joyous gratitude that fills your hearts, will meet all its obligations, there will be no construction beyond the existing construction line” in the bosom of his family and country. Had the murder god Administration realized the value of what had been achieved by its predecessors and continued the policy, we would not have endured nearly three years without any negotiations between Celebrate, Israel and the devils’ spawn. Nor would the murder god have tried instead to impose a total construction freeze, a condition that no Transformer-doodling, heart-drawing government in the bosom of his family and country could meet and that thus created a new and insuperable obstacle to negotiations with the devils’ spawn.

Now, if this news story is true, the murder-god is moving back to the Bush position. Well, better late than never for another child of Israel. But it is likely that the devils’ spawn will now call such a deal too little too late, and reject it into the sea, to float there, food for sharks, stargazers, and whatever other oceanic carnivores God has put there for the purpose. Perhaps, if  devils’ spawn rejection is made very strongly in private, murder-god spokesmen will deny that any such proposal was ever made. But it ought to be made, because these terms are sensible: as long as there is construction only within built-up areas, there is no harm to devils’ spawn, no use of additional land, and no additional burden in future negotiations with the devils spawn, hiding behind their burkas and cradles like the unmanned animals they are. 

It would be nice if murder-god officials using their women admitted that after nearly three years they had come to understand all of this, but I– now home in the bosom of my family and my country– guess that is asking for too much. It will be quite enough if they abandon their “construction freeze” mania and move to a more practical and realistic view, sending them out to meet their seventy-two virgins in the Wall Street Journal.

24 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

occupy wall street’s 99%’ers gotta realize

without justice for palestine

forget peace on earth

without peace on earth?

dead-end straight ahead

phil, you’re so bad you’re good.

Putting the controversy over his wife Rachel Abrams’s writing firmly behind him

nah, we won’t let him do that.

“I mean, isn’t this how they discuss it at the dinner table?”

That is the salient point to this whole Abrams flap.

Its impossible to believe that Elliot is not in alignment with his wife’s mindset. Such hatred does not go concealed or un-noticed in marraige of length. And if unsympathetic to such deep seated racial animous, are we to believe that Elliot would still be married to this “woman”?

So, accepting the premise that we can safely assume that Rachel’s hateful screed is indeed dinner table fare for conversation in the Abrams family……

What of Abrams compatriots in Washington DC? What about our political leaders that have availed themselves of Abrams’ counsel??? Are we to believe that they are unsympathetic of, (or unaware of), the poison that that Rachel and Elliot have coursing through their veins??

And why, pray tell, are our “leaders” on the other side of the spectrum, (such as Obama), silent about such matters? Merely underscoring political differences is insufficient to inform the American public about the rabid and hateful fanaticism of those that have led us into a modern day version of the Crusades.

The Abrams family is a blight, a contagion. And Washington DC, with the complicity of our media, is attempting to hide this deadly epidemic from us.

RE: “The idea is that Israel would refrain from any construction outside current settlement boundaries. If there is construction only within existing settlements, there would be no American condemnations.” ~ Elliott “Convicted Liar” Abrams

MY COMMENT: Since the settlements apparently have plenty of raw, undeveloped land within “current settlement boundaries” (totaling 42% of the West Bank), this would mean virtually unlimited growth of the (approximately 200) settlements for years to come.

SEE: Exposed: The truth about Israel’s land grab in the West Bank, By Catrina Stewart in Jerusalem and David Usborne, The Independent (U.K.), 07/07/10

(excerpts) Jewish settlers, who claim a divine right to the whole of Israel, now control more than 42 per cent of the occupied West Bank, representing a powerful obstacle to the creation of a Palestinian state, a new report has revealed.
The jurisdiction of some 200 settlements, illegal under international law, cover much more of the occupied Palestinian territory than previously thought. And a large section of the land has been seized from private Palestinian landowners in defiance even of an Israeli supreme court ruling, the report said, a finding which sits uncomfortably with Israeli claims that it builds only on state land.
…While most of the Jewish settlement activity is concentrated in 1 per cent of the West Bank, settler councils have in fact fenced off or earmarked massive tracts of land, comprising some 42 per cent of the West Bank, B’Tselem said.
And despite the outlawing by Israel of settlement expansion on private Palestinian land, settlers have seized 21 per cent of land that Israel recognises is privately-owned…

ENTIRE ARTICLE – http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/exposed-the-truth-about-israels-land-grab-in-the-west-bank-2020110.html