News

Roger Cohen (who doesn’t live there) explains the need for ‘my Jewish state’

Kerry leaves for Middle East last July, in State Dep't photo
Kerry leaves for Middle East last July, in State Dep’t photo

Tis the day we hit Reset on last year’s predictions. Tis the day for prominent pundits to predict the end of the two-state solution.

In his Times column, Roger Cohen (who once held out hope that Netanyahu would be a peacemaker), says that John Kerry will fail to achieve a peace deal in 2014. But the column is titled, “My Jewish State,” and Cohen does something I’ve always pressed Zionists in the media to do: he is frank about his Zionism and what that means.

If Israel looks like a Jewish state and acts like a Jewish state, that is good enough for me — as long as it gets out of the corrosive business of occupation. Zionism, the one I identify with, forged a Jewish homeland in the name of restored Jewish pride in a democratic state of laws, not in the name of finicky insistence on a certain form of recognition, nor in the name of messianic religious Greater Israel nationalism.

When I spoke to him in Tel Aviv a few months ago, Yair Lapid, a top government minister, said: “The fact that we demand from Palestinians a declaration that they recognize Israel as a Jewish state, I just think this is rubbish. I don’t need that. The whole point of Israel was we came here saying we don’t need anyone else to recognize us anymore because we can recognize ourselves. We are liberated.”

That’s right. It’s also true that Palestinians leaders, with zero democratic accountability, and through facile incitement, are not preparing their people for territorial compromise at or close to the 1967 lines. Then again, nothing in Israel’s actions facilitates that. And on we go to more failure, more victories of narrative over normalcy.

I’ve always sensed that Cohen had a deep need to identify with muscular Jewish nationalism in the wake of the Holocaust. Now he says as much; and his candor allows us to question these ideas. How is Israel’s “democratic state of laws” doing after 46 years of occupation? When does a historical experiment in religious nationalist democracy cease to be experiment and earn the stamp of Failure?

What does it mean that a Zionist doesn’t live in Israel, doesn’t feel any need to live there; and actually has led a fairly good life as an ethnic minority, unfolding in Cohen’s case on two or three other continents? If Jewish “liberation” is such a symbolic, psychic, metaphysical construct, then why shouldn’t Jews in the Diaspora mark their own liberation with affirmations of our liberties: We believe that minority rights in a democracy and the separation of religion and state are the guarantors of freedom!

P.S. And wasn’t Naomi Klein right to question why North American Zionists demand the right “to not just one state but two” in the era of global warming, when other people are losing their countries?

77 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

the end of his third paragraph:

Israeli ministerial committee vote advancing legislation to annex settlements in the Jordan Valley. Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, said the vote “finishes all that is called the peace process.” Such contemptuous characterization of a negotiation from a leading protagonist is ill-advised and bodes ill.

that’s as far as i got. but ah, any comment on that vote roger? or is it just erakat’s assessment of it that’s ill-advised and bodes ill? one would almost think the vote was insignificant.

this will be another year in which peace is not reached in the Middle East. ….And on we go to more failure, more victories of narrative over normalcy.

there’s something very same ol same ol about his outlook, which in itself is not unusual. but i don’t think it’s going to be a same ol year.

Phillip – no, not really!

Jews have rights in democracies.

But for most of their history, Jews lived as oppressed, persecuted and despised people – and unwelcome guests in Christian Europe and the Muslim World.

In Europe, Jews did not attain civic equality until the 19th Century and even then it was bitterly opposed by most Europeans. They were never anything but dhimmis in the Muslim World with no rights.

Against that background, Zionism was born. And with the resurgence of anti-Semitism throughout the world in our own time, the need for a Jewish homeland remains as great as ever.

19,000 Jews made aliyah to Israel in 2013 and that number will only accelerate over the coming years. Israel is the most successful achievement of the Jewish people. Its not perfect but then again we all live in a fallen world.

America is the Great Exception to the historical Jewish experience. But there is no guarantee it will remain that way forever.

”Israel to reportedly increase scope of recognized French diplomas as part of campaign to potentially draw 42,000 French immigrants by 2017.
Israel to announce plan for attracting more French Jews”

http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/Israel-to-announce-plan-for-attracting-more-French-Jews-336354

I think the Zio orgs trying to stir as much anti semitism as they can, or what they can label anti semitism, is part of trying to get more Jews to Israel.
Question is where will they house them—and will they shoot themselves in the foot with this plan—-the US and France have the most Jews outside of Israel so every
Jew that leaves France or the US lessens the Jewish political threat that Zios employ on the politicians.

‘Zionism, the one I identify with, forged a Jewish homeland in the name of restored Jewish pride in a democratic state of laws”

..a ‘democratic state of laws’….?
Quelle delusion! ..beyond hopeless.

Jews need 2 states while Palestinians aren’t even allowed one. Zionism is such a joke.