Haymarket Books’ plan to buy Chicago mansion is latest battleground over Zionism/anti-Zionism

Activism
on 14 Comments

Once again, anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism have been conflated, and this time it’s in the Windy City.

Haymarket Books, the left-leaning Chicago-based publishing company, is under contract to purchase property for its new offices in an old mansion in Chicago’s Buena Park neighborhood on the north side, but it had to get a zoning variance to buy the building. The Center for Economic Research and Social Change (CERSC)—Haymarket’s parent–was listed as the applicant.  CERSC is also the fiscal sponsor of Mondoweiss, which some residents argued is an anti-Semitic website. You can read about the controversy in dnainfo.com here, and in the Chicago Reader, here.  Writing about ourselves is tricky, because we are obviously biased, but the politics surrounding the variance are our issue, and for that reason I followed the deal closely and went to a couple of meetings in the neighborhood.

The controversy apparently ended yesterday in victory for Haymarket. A referendum of the building’s neighbors approved the purchase; and it is expected that officials will heed the local vote in further actions on the variance application.

The mansion is at 800 West Buena Avenue. Haymarket needs a special-use permit for the site to be able to host author readings and other events in the mansion.  Anyone purchasing the building for any reason other than a single-family home would need this same permit.  When the purchase became controversial five weeks ago, Alderman James Cappleman decided to give his decision on the permit to neighbors, and limited voting to the 500 or so people who live within 250 feet of the property.

Voting ended Tuesday, and yesterday the results were announced: 50 to 30 in favor of the special use permit (with another 220 people voting who were deemed to be outside the perimeter).

Tomorrow, July 21, Cappleman’s office said he will recommend approving the permit at a meeting of Chicago’s Zoning Board of Appeals. (His full press release is below.)

The controversy began in earnest at a June 14 meeting in the Buena Park neighborhood to answer questions about Haymarket’s plans as it applied for the special use permit needed to close on the property.  At this meeting, some community members accused Mondoweiss of being an anti-Semitic website.  Behzad Raghian, Haymarket’s financial director, and Julie Fain, Haymarket’s managing editor, responded.

According to the July 17 Chicago Reader report on the controversy, the issue pivots on the belief that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism:

The opposition, which Raghian estimates was less than half of the people present [at the June 14 meeting], was loud and vehement. Raghian and Julie Fain, Haymarket’s managing editor, tried to answer questions and explain Mondoweiss’s position and that anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism were not the same thing. ‘I’m Jewish and I’m also anti-Zionist,’ Fain told one of the protesters. The protester responded, ‘There’s a term for that: self-hating Jew.’

It became clear at this meeting that the issue isn’t only about zoning and special permits.  It’s about efforts to silence any type of criticism of Israel, or anti-Zionist thinking. But objecting to CERSC’s ideas made this a free speech issue, of course, and CERSC evidently had a lot of support on these grounds.

Last week, on July 11, a second hearing was held to answer questions about the special permit. The opposition now claimed the issue was one of zoning concerns in the neighborhood, involving gentrification and corporations. Mondoweiss was mentioned only once at that meeting. Rather than focus on issues of free speech as opponents did at the earlier meeting, a few opponents asked specific questions about parking, numbers of people at evening events, and wondering what exactly neighbors would see happening in the building.

Fain replied that people would literally see “readings, offices with computers, staff who are editing books.”

One neighbor stood up and read a letter he had written.  He said he has been in the “generational neighborhood” for 30 years. “We want to preserve a residential neighborhood,” he said.  “This is a big corporation.  Publishing houses are not qualified to be residential.”

A woman then told the crowd that the gentleman had recently put his house up for sale (!), essentially nullifying his argument against Haymarket moving in.

At the same time, a number of residents came out to back Haymarket.  One supporter reminded everyone that Haymarket Books is not a large corporation, but a small, left-leaning, independent publisher. “This isn’t Random House,” one person said.

Raghian also gave a sense of Haymarket’s character. “We’re a publishing company,” he said.  “We want to provide opportunities for our authors to discuss the ideas in their books.”  Raghian emphasized Haymarket’s desire to work with the community.  “We’d love to meet with people who want to talk about what the impact would be,” he said.  “The last thing we want to be is a bad neighbor.”

A high school history teacher who lives in the neighborhood mentioned Haymarket’s excellent reputation.  “This is the type of publishing company that I look for when I’m looking for material for my students,” he said.  As a high school English teacher, I feel the same.

Behzad Raghian (second from left) and Julie Fain (center) at July 11 meeting. Man at left represented building’s seller, the Menomonee Club. Photo by Liz Rose.

The reception for Haymarket has been overwhelmingly positive; its commitment to working closely with the Buena Park community was obvious.  The integrity and class the Haymarket folks have shown over the last few weeks has been impressive.  It’s a clear indication of how they run their press.  It’s outrageous that they’ve had to defend themselves from a few zealous Israel-supporters who are stoking fear, and trying to limit ideas.

I’m reminded that when I was a Zionist I didn’t have to look far for news and books that would perpetuate my pro-Israel thinking.  I claimed victim space, too, when my ideals were threatened and the criticism was beyond my understanding.  All I knew was to defend, be a victim, and dig in my heels when I was scared.  I didn’t know, of course, that the pro-Israel community was churning away to make sure that idealistic young people like me would fall in love with Israel and defend it at all costs.

With the worldview I have now as someone who is very critical of Zionism, it seems impossible that I didn’t know that at the time.  And understanding now what individuals have to undergo to try to undo this mythos makes a publishing company like Haymarket all the more vital.  And frankly, as a former Zionist turned anti-Zionist, the world could use more discussions about Zionism and anti-Zionism, not less.

Ali Abunimah, a Haymarket author, at meet-and-greet at the mansion Haymarket Books seeks to buy in Chicago. July 10. Photo by Liz Rose.

“We picked this building because we fell in love with it,” Raghian said.  “That’s it.”

In large print on Cappleman’s website, in quotes, a message from the alderman says, “I’m proud to represent one of the most diverse and vibrant wards in the City of Chicago.”  Toward the end of the meeting, another neighbor said, “If this purchase doesn’t go through, it’s going to make the neighborhood look awful. It will not look like a place of cultural diversity.”

Cappleman already shifted from support of the purchase to handing off his decision to the neighborhood because of the controversy. But his announcement yesterday affirmed the values so many in his community stood up for.

“While many viewed the politics of this organization as controversial, their community meetings would meet the very same criteria that any Chicago public library uses for allowing such events. In addition, the value of diversity that so many residents desire is reinforced when differing political beliefs are tolerated and respected.”

We look forward to the Zoning Board hearing tomorrow where Cappleman will make his recommendation to the board to move forward with the sale.

Alderman James Cappleman from his twitter feed.

Here is Alderman Cappleman’s full statement:

FOLLOW UP WITH 800 W. BUENA: ZONING VARIANCE REQUEST

At the request of Buena Park Neighbors, Ald. Cappleman held a series of community meetings to discuss a special use zoning variance for the Center for Economic Research & Social Change(with Haymarket Books) which would allow a community center within the building located at 800 W. Buena). This location currently has a special use variance for a community center, but a new one is required for a new organization. The residents within 250′ of this proposal voted 50 in favor and 30 not in favor for this special use variance, and the results of this vote were affirmed by an overwhelming support of residents outside the 250′ range. Ald. Cappleman supports this decision because the concerns of the neighbors regarding parking and congestion issues were adequately addressed by having parking available at both Brennemann and Disney Schools and the limited number of evening events they normally host. This special use also helps to protect the historic nature of this home. While many viewed the politics of this organization as controversial, their community meetings would meet the very same criteria that any Chicago public library uses for allowing such events. In addition, the value of diversity that so many residents desire is reinforced when differing political beliefs are tolerated and respected. Ald. Cappleman will work with this organization and the local neighbors to create a Good Neighbor Agreement so that the organization’s events do not put an undue hardship on the surrounding residents.

About Liz Rose

Liz Rose is a Chicago teacher.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

14 Responses

  1. Citizen
    July 20, 2017, 5:44 pm

    Geez, if a couple kids open up a lemonade stand, they better not serve their drinks in a paper cup with Palestine colors.

  2. JWalters
    July 20, 2017, 6:21 pm

    False accusations of anti-Semitism are either slander (spoken) or libel (written). I would love to see some victims of these defamation attacks sue in a big, noisy court case and crush this character assassination tactic, and the criminals behind it.

  3. RoHa
    July 20, 2017, 8:19 pm

    The Windy City is mighty pretty, but they ain’t got what we got, no sirree.

    Still, let us hope that the civic virtue that used to provide fountains to squirt you will also extend to allowing the sale to go through.

  4. Abba Solomon
    July 21, 2017, 4:51 am

    So, “self-hating Jew” is still a thing? :-)

    The opposition, which Raghian estimates was less than half of the people present [at the June 14 meeting], was loud and vehement. Raghian and Julie Fain, Haymarket’s managing editor, tried to answer questions and explain Mondoweiss’s position and that anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism were not the same thing. ‘I’m Jewish and I’m also anti-Zionist,’ Fain told one of the protesters. The protester responded, ‘There’s a term for that: self-hating Jew.’

    • Elizabeth Block
      July 21, 2017, 9:39 am

      In a book I read, can’t remember which one, I read so many, a man accused of being a self-hating Jew said, “I don’t hate myself. I hate YOU, you ****ing bastard!”

  5. Arafatbastard
    July 21, 2017, 9:19 am

    Mondoweiss is not inherently anti-semitic, but most of the people who post under its articles certainly are.

    Mondoweiss is basically a website run by Useful Idiots for Hamas.

    • Misterioso
      July 21, 2017, 11:12 am

      Apropos your disgusting nom de plume:

      For the record:

      As he revealed during a speech delivered in Jerusalem, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter held Arafat in high regard:

      “I personally think that Yasser Arafat did the best he could for peace. Not many of my countrymen agree. I knew him quite well. He took a heroic action in the Oslo agreement for which he won the Nobel Peace Prize. For the last 3 ½ years, as the elected President of the Palestinian people, he was kept in prison in disgrace and still expected to command the full authority of his people and he was held responsible for acts of violence.”

      “More recently, we’ve seen an abandonment of the fair and objective and balanced role of the U.S. government in the negotiations between Israel and her neighbours and sometimes enemies. Lately in particular, our president [George W. Bush,] has totally complied with the desires of the Israeli Prime Minister [Ariel Sharon] to the detriment of the Palestinians and the detriment of their hopes for the future.” (From the text of the comments delivered by U.S. President Jimmy Carter on 10 January 2005, at a meeting in Jerusalem organized by the World Council of Churches’ Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel)

      • Kay24
        July 22, 2017, 9:55 am

        Good point. Arafat was no saint, but neither were any of Israel’s leaders. Despite the hasbara and zio media demonizing him, with accusations of being corrupt, the zionist leader, and his wife, are presently under police investigations for corruption, and getting gifts of pink champagne, designer suits, and cigars, and lavish vacations overseas for dear spoilt son, Yair.
        We also have an ex PM Ehud Olmert in jail for corruption and taking bribes.

        The zionists have their share of b*stards too.

    • genesto
      July 21, 2017, 12:14 pm

      No, it’s run and populated by critical-thinking Jews and non-Jews, not by Zionist tools like yourself. If you really studied what’s said on this site, you’d know that there is no real support for Hamas here, only for Palestinian justice.

      Open your eyes!

    • CigarGod
      July 22, 2017, 9:13 am

      Love to see the research you did to back up your charge, Ziofatbastard.

    • JosephA
      July 22, 2017, 1:11 pm

      Fat bastard is back! Yay!

      ///

      Judaism ≠ Zionism
      Zionism = Racism/Apartheid
      Criticism of modern Israel ≠ Anti-Semitism
      Anti Semitism ≠ Anti-Zionism

    • Talkback
      July 22, 2017, 1:12 pm

      Arafatbastard: “Mondoweiss is not inherently anti-semitic, but most of the people who post under its articles certainly are.”

      Trying to hide your racism against Nonjews behind the accusation of antisemitism?

      Arafatbastards: “Mondoweiss is basically a website run by Useful Idiots for Hamas.”

      In other words. It’s not a website run by Useful Idiots for Zion.

  6. Elizabeth Block
    July 21, 2017, 9:41 am

    Compare this with the community in Quebec that voted down – by a few votes – a request for permission to open a Muslim cemetery. Muslims are the new Jews.

Leave a Reply