News

Golden oldies: Tom Friedman at start of Iraq war telling Arabs to ‘suck on this’

I forget this, but Belen Fernandez, author of the new book on Thomas Friedman: Imperial Messenger, reminded me of it today. It’s a video she has made featuring Thomas Friedman on Charlie Rose at the beginning of the Iraq war, explaining the great moral/historical necessity of the war. Because the Arab world had formed the belief that terrorism could bring down the west, from our bond options to television, sayeth Tom, it was a noble thing to see “American boys and girls going from house to house” in Baghdad and Basra telling the Arab world to “suck on this.”

Wow, what a simplistic world view. I don’t think those people ever believed that. Maybe Al Qaeda did. This is pure collective punishment, and racism.

Here is Friedman talking to Avi Shavit about the causes of that war, at about the same time, and being far more thoughtful (Shavit is a wonderful interviewer). Notice the Israel link:

Actually, the Iraq war is a kind of Jenin on a huge scale. Because in Jenin, too, what happened was that the Israelis told the Palestinians, We left you here alone and you played with matches until suddenly you blew up a Passover seder in Netanya. And therefore we are not going to leave you along any longer. We will go from house to house in the Casbah. And from America’s point of view, Saddam’s Iraq is Jenin. This war is a defensive shield. It follows that the danger is the same: that like Israel, America will make the mistake of using only force…

Is the Iraq war the great neoconservative war? It’s the war the neoconservatives wanted, Friedman says. It’s the war the neoconservatives marketed. Those people had an idea to sell when September 11 came, and they sold it. Oh boy, did they sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded. This is a war of an elite. Friedman laughs: I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened.

37 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well at least we have some honesty here. The United States is adopting Israeli military policy and tactics vis-a-vis attacking Arab civilians, and the people who supported the war make no bones about the fact that Israel was their guiding light in taking the US to war with Iraq.

It looks like sometimes they do tell us the Truth.
“Friedman laughs:
I could give you the names of 25 PEOPLE (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war WOULD NOT HAVE happened.”
“An nescis, mi fili, quantilla sapientia mundus regatur?”, (Don’t you know, my son, how little wisdom is needed to rule the world?”.
Yes, if it takes 25 people to start the war by so called “democratic” country.

RE: “We will go from house to house in the Casbah.” ~ “Tommy Boy” Friedman

MY COMMENT: Well isn’t that just too cute! It says a lot about Tom Friedman. I didn’t realize what an immature über-ass he was.
The Clash of Civilizations?
The Clash: Rock The Casbah (VIDEO, 03:43) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2aItuM1-J4
Rock the Casbah in HEBRON REMIX 2010!!! *NEW* (VIDEO, 01:51) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLU2R3Zro4U

P.S. REGARDING TOM FRIEDMAN AND HIS ÜBER-MACHO “SUCK ON THIS”, SEE: Israel’s Defense Chief OK’s Hundreds of Israeli Deaths, By Ira Chernus, CommonDreams.org, 11/11/11

(excerpt)…An essential motive of Zionism from its beginning was a fierce desire to end the centuries of Jewish weakness, to show the world that Jews would no longer be pushed around, that they’d fight back and prove themselves tougher than their enemies. There was more to Zionism than that. But the “pride through strength” piece came to dominate the whole project. Hence the massive Israeli military machine with its nuclear arsenal.
But you can’t prove that you’re stronger than your enemies unless you’ve also got enemies — or at least believe you’ve got enemies — to fight against. So there has to be a myth of Israel’s insecurity, fueled by an image of vicious anti-semites lurking somewhere out there, for Zionism to work. Since the 1979 Iranian revolution, Iran has gradually risen to the top of Israel oh-so-necessary enemies list. Iranophobia is rampant in Israel, as one Israeli scholar writes, because “Israel needs an existential threat.”
Anyone who has grown up in Israel, or in the U.S. Jewish community (as I did), and paid attention knows all this…

ENTIRE COMMENTARY – http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/11/11-2

Another hate diatribe from another alleged civilized idiot.Someway,somehow their will be retribution for all these criminals.

There’s a “rule of da hood” component in the neocon worldview. Schoolyard ethics. They are bullies so it is not surprising. Nationalism of their sort is also very infantile. At one point in early life, you’re supposed to grow up, see the bigger picture and stop following a possibly natural instinct toward tribalism. Or you don’t and become vindictive adults like Rachel Abrams or Jennifer Rubin or Tom Friedman (using neocons to make my point here but I don’t see bullies only in this corner).

I’m surprised that Phil could have forgotten this very juicy little nugget of Friedman. True Friedman “connoisseurs” know it’s one of his best quote!