Culture

Exile and the Prophetic: Gathering Light

This is part twenty of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page. 

Palestinians of a certain generation knew the Jewish score.  Edward Said was one.  For sure, Said was the last cosmopolitan Jew to draw near to the prophetic.  If ever there was a modern who deserved Elijah’s chariot and horses take-away it was Said.  He was alone in his eloquence. 

With regard to the prophetic, I also remember his friend and teacher, Ibrahim Abu-Lughod, a Palestinian exile whom I knew for years in America. 

I visited Ibrahim after he returned to Palestine in the 1990s.  It was he who told me once:  “Marc, the Jewish prophetic voice will never die.”  I didn’t understand Ibrahim’s statement until my son, Aaron, wrote a letter to the Israeli Consul who had come from Houston to lecture at my university.  It was during the height of the second Palestinian uprising when Star of David helicopter gunships controlled the sky. 

Aaron was then 14 years old and when I read his letter he reminded me of Ibrahim.  In no uncertain terms and in a beautiful poetic language, Aaron took Israel’s sophisticated power to task.  The Consul was drawn and quartered.  My analysis:  Because I taught Aaron rather than send him to Hebrew School, Aaron never had the prophetic beaten out of him by Jewish authorities.  Instead, he witnessed his father surviving their beatings and made a decision. He opted for the Jewish indigenous.

Part of the prophetic is existential – full steam ahead.  The prophet is mournful about the squandering and hopeful about a future where the squandering will come to an end.  After all, if the prophet doesn’t believe in a just future, he’s dead in the water.  Yet if the prophet speaks about a bright and cheery future, she becomes a cheerleader. 

For the prophet there is a future because none is on the horizon.   Everything has gone too far.  We are surrounded by darkness.  If only others finally understand that darkness that the prophet sees ahead is already here.  Then a glimmer of light appears.

Light through mourning.  New beginnings when the end surrounds us.  Seems paradoxical or ironic. Seems impossible.  It certainly skirts logic.  It isn’t a prefabricated answer.  Not a slogan mobilizer either.  All of the above when multiple choice won’t do.

This light seems self-generated because there isn’t any outside energy to be corralled.   Yet self-generated light is impossible.  There has to be a source outside ourselves.  In nature?  The light the prophet speaks about isn’t found in nature.  Could it come from God?

We’ve already disciplined the God as rescuer motif.  Besides, Jews of Conscience aren’t going to entertain the movie version.  Exile is too hands dirty.

How to account for light in darkness?  How to account for the persistence of the prophetic?

Perhaps they are one and the same.  Light/Prophetic.  That still doesn’t account for either or both together. 

Try this:  The prophet embodies light.  The prophetic as a movement is light.  Being light, the prophet and the prophetic gather light.  Amid the darkness.

Light gatherers, it’s hard to see this.  Or feel this.  When history keeps spiraling downward.  But then we don’t really know when the downward trend is about to turn upward.  Or when what seems upward is about to take a turn for the worse.

Since we don’t know what’s around history’s corner.  And since we don’t know where the corner, going either way, is, we are more or less rooting around in the dark – at least as far as what the future might become.   For the prophet, then, the task is at hand, keeping at it, paying attention, focus, conscious purpose, intentionality.  The prophetic sense is that the future is right here, in the now, even as we let go of where it’s going.

The logic of injustice, atrocity, ecological crisis is that all will continue.  It will.  The logic is downward.  That is correct.  Downward interrupted, a victory indeed, is followed by other downward movements somewhere else.  Injustice is like rain.  Somewhere in the world it is raining all the time. Somewhere in the world there will always be injustice.  There will never be an end to injustice, even when it stops, for a moment, where we are.

If the picture we have is always injustice, somewhere, and that the future will feature injustice, somewhere, that there isn’t an end, anywhere, then the question – Where is justice? – is too heavy.  It makes us want to set our sails in a different direction, toward conformity and empire.  Why not enjoy without a second thought riding the crest of the wave? At least for as long as we can.  Let others find their own rescue boats, make their own plans.  Since injustice is now and the future.

The logic of Israel/Palestine – downward spiral. Conquered space. Atrocity around every corner. War and more war. Disappeared Palestine.

The logic of Israel/Palestine – one state.  A civil rights movement made up of Jews and Palestinians takes hold.  After much dislocation and death, the population decides to take another tact.  Reappeared Palestine. Perhaps.

Downward spiral. One state. Or two real states working toward a negotiated unity.Empire(s) rear-guard actions within both populations, the surrounding countries, outside factions, countries, religions. Those Jews and Palestinians who survive all of this, wanting another way.

Time table – unknown. Unknowable.

Gathering light without knowing what will become of the light.  We don’t know if the light will survive the darkness or be extinguished even as it is gathered.  Or, if becomes a flame, how long it will burn or how it will burn.  Like a forest fire, terrain, heat and winds make the fire’s path unpredictable.

So deliberation is important and overrated.  Guiding the light -doubtful.  The light we gather will go where it goes.  There will be other light gatherers there.  Who will face the same (im)possibilities. 

History is (un)certain.

History is (un)knowable.

The prophet is operating in the dark.  Except for the light she gathers.

 

11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just as in an earlier thread you alluded to the deeper meaning of “having nothing”, one of the themes that comes across strongest in your article is the idea of experiencing light, as you write:

If only others finally understand that darkness that the prophet sees ahead is already here. Then a glimmer of light appears. Light through mourning. New beginnings when the end surrounds us. Seems paradoxical or ironic. Seems impossible.

This light seems self-generated because there isn’t any outside energy to be corralled. Yet self-generated light is impossible. There has to be a source outside ourselves. In nature? The light the prophet speaks about isn’t found in nature. Could it come from God?

Gathering light without knowing what will become of the light. We don’t know if the light will survive the darkness or be extinguished even as it is gathered. Or, if becomes a flame, how long it will burn or how it will burn. Like a forest fire, terrain, heat and winds make the fire’s path unpredictable.

This reminds me of a passage containing a contradictory situation where there is light: Isaiah 53.

There, the Masoretic texts, passed down through rabbinical circles and adopted by Western Christians during the Reformation say:

10. if his soul would offer itself in restitution, that he might see his seed, prolong his days, and that the purpose of the LORD might prosper by his hand:
11. Of the travail of his soul he shall see to the full
(JPS translation)

However, the Greek Septuagint version passed down in Christian communities says: “from the travail of his soul, to show him light”. And the Dead Sea Scrolls have the same Hebrew words, except they add in the word “light”: “Of the toil of his soul he shall see light, and be satisfied”
Perhaps this is also a metaphor: on the surface it appears there is no light, but then, in finding the Dead Sea Scrolls, the “light” appears.

In any case,The passage contains a deeper contradiction: in the story, the Servant is described as being killed for others, and then it says that his reward will be to see his offspring and see light. So on one hand he dies, and on the other, afterwards he experiences rewards.

Further, the passage also points to a deeper meaning of light. It goes beyond intellectual or moral enlightenment, which is what the term “see the light” often metaphorically means in English. Rather, in the scriptures, the term has a deeper meaning that points to life, if not a divine or extremely strong life.

For example, Isaiah 9:1(JPT) contrasts light and the shadow of death: “The people who walked in darkness, have seen a great light; those who dwell in the land of the shadow of death, light shone upon them”

Psalm 56:14(JPT) has a similar image of contrasts:
For You have saved me from death,
my foot from stumbling, that I may walk
before God in the light of life”.

Thus, just as there is a deeper meaning to “having nothingness”, there is a deeper meaning of “seeing light”, a meaning that is reflected in the contradictory experience of the prophetic Servant of Isaiah 53.

“…and Jewish, Christian, Muslim solidarity” (from one of your lectures available on Youtube).

Marc, could you write, sometime, your thoughts about this?

….”there has to be a source of the light outside ourselves. In nature? The light the prophet speaks about isn’t found in nature. Could it come from God?”

or does it derive from the slave that’s within us all?

This “light” thing.
It reminds me of two decades ago. There was a young man in the office I worked in who had a fiancee. Every time she (who worked in a different office on the same site) came to visit, his face would literally light up like a 200w bulb had been switched on. I hadn’t seen anything like it before – but now my own son has it with his wife.
Maybe it’s from within and without.

Moshe Dayan or Robert kennedy? Choose!
I hem and I haw.
of course, he taunts.

malcolm x or menachem begin? Choose!
I hem and I haw.
Of course, he taunts.

The book of genesis or Cat’s Cradle? Choose!
I hem and I haw.
I stop him before he taunts.
I am pulled in different directions, i continue.
Chaim Grade or Alfred Hitchcock? I myself propose.
I’d probably choose Hitch, I continue.
But thank God I don’t have to choose.

But sometimes people die from bullets (and hunger)
and always people want their freedom…
-but I can’t tell the Jew to put down his gun,
just because Marc Ellis would call me prophetic.

And I won’t stand with those who disdain Hebrew or Yiddiish
and tell me my book belongs in the garbage,
so I’m stuck in the middle,
on my side.