News

Dear Senate: ‘The American people have made it clear they don’t want another war in the Middle East’

Robert Menendez, Democratic N.J. Senator. is a key supporter of more sanctions on Iran
Robert Menendez, Democratic N.J. Senator. is a key supporter of more sanctions on Iran

Earlier today we referred to a letter written by an incredible group of liberal, left and peace groups calling the Senate to uphold the Iran deal, not destroy it by passing further sanctions. Here’s the letter.

January 14, 2014
To: Members of the U.S. Senate
The following 62 organizations are writing to warn that Senate passage of new Iran sanctions would critically endanger the possibility of a diplomatic resolution to the nuclear standoff with Iran, increasing the likelihood of a nuclear-armed Iran and an unnecessary and costly war. We call on you to not cosponsor S.1881 (the “Nuclear Weapon Free
Iran Act of 2013”) and strongly discourage Senate consideration of new Iran sanctions while negotiations proceed.
The Joint Plan of Action signed between the P5+1 and Iran in November boosts American and regional security by freezing and rolling back Iran’s nuclear program for the first time in nearly a decade. The agreement also institutes unprecedented transparency for international inspectors, including daily inspection of Iran’s enrichment facilities.
However, as part of the agreement, the U.S. has agreed to “refrain from imposing new
nuclear-related sanctions” on Iran. Even with the delay mechanisms included in S.1881, U.S. and Iranian officials warn that new Congressional sanctions would kill the deal. The White House has added that new Congressional sanctions would be perceived as a sign of bad faith by allies critical to the enforcement of the sanctions regime, including the other permanent members of the UN Security Council. As a result, new sanctions will erode rather than strengthen our leverage for negotiations. Further, an unclassified U.S. intelligence assessment warns that, “new sanctions would undermine the prospects for a successful comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran.”
S.1881 also sets insurmountable demands for a comprehensive nuclear deal by insisting that Iran dismantle its entire “nuclear infrastructure, including enrichment and reprocessing capabilities and facilities.” Such a demand is a poison pill for negotiations and is not necessary to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.
Further, any comprehensive deal will require trading in existing sanctions for Iranian nuclear concessions. But the sanctions provisions included in S.1881 could only be waived by the President for a final nuclear deal if Iran agrees to the zero enrichment demand, effectively eliminating the President’s ability to offer sanctions relief. Rather than attack Presidential waiver authority, Congress should ensure that the President has full authority to lift sanctions as part of a comprehensive deal.
By foreclosing diplomatic prospects, new sanctions would set us on a path to war. The
American people have made it clear that they do not want another war in the Middle East and strongly support pursuing diplomatic prospects until they are exhausted. It would be the height of irresponsibility to step in and undercut diplomatic negotiations before this opportunity has the chance to bear fruit.
We strongly urge you to withhold co-sponsorship of S.1881 and delay consideration of new
Iran sanctions while negotiations are ongoing.

Sincerely,
National Iranian American Council
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Win Without War
Adventist Peace Fellowship
American Friends Service Committee
American Values Network
Americans for Peace Now
AntiWar.com
Augustinians Province of St. Thomas Villanova
Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America
Berim
Center for Interfaith Engagement, Eastern Mennonite University
Center for International Policy
CODEPINK
Come Home America
Conference of Major Superiors of Men
Council for a Livable World
CREDO
Daily Kos
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding
Evangelicals for Social Action
Fellowship of Reconciliation
Franciscan Action Network
Global Exchange
Global Ministries of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and United Church of Christ
GlobalSolutions.org
Havaar
Institute for Policy Studies, New Internationalism Project
International Civil Society Action Network
Islamic Society of North America
J Street
Jewish Voice for Peace
Just Foreign Policy
Maryknoll Office For Global Concerns
Mennonite Central Committee U.S.
MoveOn.org
Multifaith Voices for Peace and Justice
Muslim Public Affairs Voice
Muslims for Progressive Values
New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good
On Earth Peace

Orthodox Peace Fellowship
Pax Christi International
Peace Action
Peace Action West
Physicians for Social Responsibility
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Progressive Democrats of America
River University Chaplain
The Shalom Center
Shomer Shalom Network for Jewish Nonviolence
Society of the Divine Savior American
Province
Sojourners
Tikkun/The Network of Spiritual Progressives
United Church of Christ, Justice and Witness Ministries
United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society
U.S. Province of the Congregation of the Holy Spirit
USAction
Veterans for Peace
Women’s Action for New Directions
Young Democrats of America

28 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

That picture is just asking for someone with the appropriate photoshop skills to correct the color and pattern his tie.

Hmm they must call out Israel and aipac if this is going to work.

Look at that Effin face of Menedez…disgraceful man.

Nice to see Tikkun and the Presbyterians in there on the side of reason.

RE: “Earlier today we referred to a letter written by an incredible group of liberal, left and peace groups calling the Senate to uphold the Iran deal, not destroy it by passing further sanctions.” ~ Weiss

TAKE ACTION! TAKE ACTION! TAKE ACTION!
LET YOUR SENATORS KNOW YOU OPPOSE PASSAGE OF S. 1881!

Senate Sanctions and Saber-Rattling Could Sabotage Diplomacy
1/6/2014 – Contact Your Senators
The Senate could vote in the next few weeks on dangerous saber-rattling legislation (S. 1881) that would impose new sanctions against Iran. As the White House, ten Senate leaders, and a bipartisan group of top national security experts have warned, new sanctions could immediately sabotage the delicate diplomatic progress with Iran. The bill also calls for pledging U.S. military support for a potential Israeli attack on Iran, which countless U.S. and Israeli officials have warned would be catastrophic.
While the White House has vowed to veto these sanctions, proponents of the bill are lobbying for a veto-proof majority of sixty-seven senators to support the bill, in an attempt to have Congress prepared to override the president’s veto.
That is why every Senate vote is absolutely critical. By filling in your zip code, you will get a message corresponding whether your senator has yet cosponsored the Menendez-Schumer-Kirk sanctions bill.
See a full list of cosponsors of the bill and the full text of the legislation. You can also write a letter to the editor against S. 1881, and get updates on the sanctions push.
TO SEND AN EMAIL TO YOUR SENATORS (WITH SUGGESTED TEXT) – http://capwiz.com/fconl/issues/alert/?alertid=63045381

RE: “Earlier today we referred to a letter written by an incredible group of liberal, left and peace groups calling the Senate to uphold the Iran deal, not destroy it by passing further sanctions.” ~ Weiss

ALSO SEE – “Exposed: Serious Flaws in the Kirk-Menendez Iran Sanctions (Wag the Dog) Bill”, by Jim Lobe, CommonDreams.org, 1/14/14

[EXCERPT] Ed Levine, an arms control specialist who worked for both Republican and Democratic senators for 20 years on the Intelligence Committee and another ten on the Foreign Relations Committee, has written a detailed and devastating analysis of S. 1881, the Kirk-Menendez bill, for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation on whose advisory board he currently serves. We have reproduced it below, but it makes clear that, contrary to claims by the bill’s Democratic co-sponsors, the Iran Nuclear Weapon Free Act of 2013 is designed to torpedo the Nov. 24 “first step” nuclear agreement between Iran and the P5+1. Passage of the bill, Levine concludes, would “leave the United States closer to a Hobson’s choice between going to war with Iran and accepting Iran as an eventual nuclear weapons state.”

Indeed, it’s quite clear from Sen. Mark Kirk’s reaction (as well as those of other Republicans, including that of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor) to the implementation accord between the P5+1 that the entire purpose of the bill is to derail the Nov. 24 agreement, as opposed to acting as a “diplomatic insurance policy” to ensure that its terms are fulfilled, as Sen. Menendez argued last week in the Washington Post. Indeed, Senate Republicans, all but two of whom have co-sponsored the bill, are clearly doing the bidding of AIPAC and Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu in trying to subvert the Nov. 24 agreement, while the 16 Democratic senators who have signed as co-sponsors have insisted that the bill is intended to support that accord. One would think the very partisan difference in the understanding of the intent of the bill would lead some of these 16 Democrats to reconsider their support. That may well be beginning to happen anyway as a result of Sunday’s successful conclusion of the implementation accord, as pointed out in this report by Reuters. But the difference in intent will probably make it easier for the White House to keep the majority of Democrats from breaking ranks.

As of now, the bill has 59 co-sponsors, but the magic number is 67 — a veto-proof majority. . .

ENTIRE ARTICLE, INCLUDING LEVINE’S ANALYSIS – http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/01/14-6