Opinion

Israel lobby will face blowback, eventually

Every cancel and smear campaign the Israel lobby wages alienates some new people and opens others’ eyes.

How much is too much? When will Israeli nationalists in North America completely discredit themselves by overusing their power to crush those who defend Palestinians?

The recent ruthlessness of the Israel lobby is remarkable. Recently they’ve convinced Zoom to cancel a university sponsored talk, a prominent law program to rescind a job offer, a public broadcaster to apologize for using the word Palestine and companies to stop delivering for a restaurant.

A week ago Israel lobby groups convinced Zoom to cancel a San Francisco State University talk with Palestinian resistance icon Leila Khaled, former South African minister Ronnie Kasrils, director of women’s studies at Birzeit University Rula Abu Dahou and others. It is thought to be the first time Zoom has ever suppressed a university-sponsored talk.

Last month the Israel lobby pressed the University of Toronto’s law school to rescind a job offer to head its International Human Rights Program. The pressure to block the hiring committee’s candidate, Valentina Azarova, came from judge David Spiro, who was a former Toronto Co-chair of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) and whose uncle Larry Tanenbaum owns the Toronto Raptors and grandmother Anne Tanenbaum financed the University of Toronto’s Centre for Jewish studies. While Spiro’s efforts were covert, B’nai B’rith has openly called on University of Toronto administrators to block the hiring committee’s decision.

CBC’s The Current recently apologized for employing the word “Palestine”. On August 18 guest anchor Duncan McCue introduced graphic artist Joe Sacco by referencing his work in Bosnia, Iraq and Palestine (Sacco has a work called Palestine). At the beginning of the next day’s edition McCue apologized for having mentioned Palestine and Honest Reporting Canada boasted about their efforts to pressure the public broadcaster from employing the P word.

As part of a bid to bankrupt a small left-wing Toronto restaurant that has a “I love Gaza” message in its window the CIJA and B’nai B’rith successfully campaigned to shutter Foodbenders delivery services, institutional contracts and social media accounts. They allied with the far-right Jewish Defense League and others who vandalized the restaurant in July.

In an August Walrus story titled “Objectivity Is a Privilege Afforded to White Journalists” former CBC journalist Pacinthe Mattar describes a senior editor stepping in to suppress an interview from Jerusalem with Ahmed Shihab-Eldin, an Emmy-nominated journalist of Palestinian descent. Many months later Mattar was blocked from an expected promotion by the “director who had decided not to run the 2017 interview from Jerusalem” who “had expressed concerns that I was biased and therefore should not be promoted, an opinion shared by some of the other committee members. And that was that.”

Anti-Palestinian organizations are waging an aggressive campaign to have Facebook adopt the ‘stop criticizing Israel’ International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. The explicit aim of those pushing the IHRA’s definition of antisemitism is to silence or marginalize those who criticize Palestinian dispossession and support the Palestinian civil society led Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement.

The Israel lobby cancel-machine rolls along in spite of evermore overt Israeli racism, conquest and rights violations. Many of those targeted in the above-mentioned incidents have suffered emotionally and career wise yet the impacts on them are insignificant compared to the daily indignities Palestinian suffer. The Israeli state continues to steal Palestinian land in the West Bank, oversee a punishing blockade of Gaza and allow Toronto Jews to emigrate while Palestinians driven from their homes in 1948 can’t even visit, let alone emigrate.

The Israel lobby is a unique political force. Rooted in European colonialism and the US empire’s regional interests, it is backed by many zealous billionaires and a substantial portion of a generally influential ethnic/religious community. It also crassly exploits victimhood. As John Clark, a well known organizer with the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, recently posted on Facebook, “Zionism is the only political ideology I know of that claims that disagreement with it is a hate crime.” 

Fortunately, every cancel and smear campaign it wages alienates some new people and opens others’ eyes. Unfortunately, many more well-meaning individuals will suffer emotional and financial consequences before the Israel lobby cancel-machine is stopped.

15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/adri-nieuwhof/human-rights-defenders-sue-german-parliament-over-anti-bds-resolution

“Human rights defenders sue German parliament over anti-BDS resolution”
By Adri Nieuwhof, Rights and Accountability, Electronic Intifada, 5 October, 2020

EXCERPT:
“Three human rights defenders are mounting a court challenge to the German parliament’s resolution condemning BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement for Palestinian rights.
“The BDS supporters are suing the German parliament for violation of their rights to freedom of expression and assembly.
“Based on the widely criticized IHRA definition that is promoted by Israel and its lobby, the resolution passed by the Bundestag in May 2019 smears BDS activism as anti-Semitic.
“The IHRA definition deliberately conflates criticism of Israel’s anti-Palestinian policies and Zionist state ideology, on the one hand, with anti-Jewish bigotry, on the other.
“The Bundestag resolution baselessly compares calls not to buy Israeli goods to the Nazi slogan ‘Don’t buy from Jews.’
“It also enshrines Israel’s racist, apartheid system as a value by declaring that anyone who ‘questions the right of the Jewish and democratic state of Israel to exist or Israel’s right to defend itself will meet with our resolute resistance.’
“The resolution alleges that ‘argumentation, patterns and methods of the BDS movement are anti-Semitic.’
“In fact, the demands of the BDS movement that Israel respect Palestinian rights are firmly rooted in international law.”

1 of 2
https://www.ijvcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Canadians-Reject-Branding-Criticism-of-Israel-as-Antisemitic-Survey-2020-Part-3.pdf

CJPME, Canadians for justice and Peace in the Middle East

EXCERPTS:
Survey: “Canadians Reject Branding Criticism of Israel as Antisemitic Part 3 of a national opinion survey of Canadians conducted June 5-10, 2020 Issued by: Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV) United Network for Justice and Peace in Palestine-Israel (UNJPPI)

“Executive Summary A recent survey conducted by EKOS Research Associates sought to probe the opinions of Canadians on issues related to antisemitism. It found that a strong majority of Canadians believe that most forms of criticism and protest of Israel are not in principle antisemitic. EKOS Research Associates (https://www.ekos.com/) conducted a national online survey of 1,009 Canadians, between June 5-10, 2020, on behalf of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (http://cjpme.org), Independent Jewish Voices Canada (http://www.ijvcanada.org/) and the United Network for Justice and Peace in Palestine-Israel (http://www.unjppi.org/). The margin of error associated with the sample is plus or minus 3.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.”

“The findings show that a strong majority of Canadians believe that most forms of criticism of Israel are not antisemitic. These include: • Accusing Israel of committing human rights abuses against the Palestinians (80% not antisemitic) • Claiming that Israel is unlawfully pushing Palestinians off their land. (79%) • Calling for a boycott of Israel because of alleged human rights abuses (76%) • Establishing campus groups which criticize Israeli government policy (74%) • Suggesting that Israel’s restrictive movement and residency laws on Palestinians are similar to South African Apartheid laws (69%) (cont’d)

The house of cards is based on the assertion, “Israel has the right to defend itself.” When that argument can no longer be made and equal justice under law is the issue, the house will fall.

Zionism is garden-variety injustice and immorality, and Zionists are nothing more than supremacist hypocrites who wish ill to anyone who opposes their preferred brand of evil.

As catalan rightly pointed out yesterday in a moment of uncharacteristic lucidity, “Those that wish ill end up with nothing.”

They seem to be going from strength to strength. The Corbyn episode must have boosted Z morale all round the world.