At a time when Israeli violence is shattering Palestinian lives and dreams once again, an important political development is taking place in the United States. Some American leaders are not taking Israel’s side to the hilt for the simple reason that the Democratic Party base is aroused and angry over the persecution of Palestinians, and the mainstream media are reflecting that view.
The progressive base is at last making itself heard in Congress, and the White House hears the echoes. While no one should be celebrating this moment, we need to acknowledge a grassroots victory that appears to be reshaping American politics and, ultimately, policy. The era of Israeli impunity in U.S. politics appears to be coming to an end with Israel’s violent response to Palestinian protests.
Yes it is true that the Biden administration doesn’t want to spend any political capital on Palestine. And yes, the State Department is coming down on Hamas for firing rockets. But Axios reports that behind the scenes, Biden’s team is putting the onus on Israel, and Israeli leaders are bridling at the pressure. “Israel calls on Biden administration to stay out of Jerusalem Crisis” is the Axios headline. Imagine that, the Israelis don’t want to hear from Joe Biden!
Barak Ravid reports that the progressive base is creating all the political pressure here.
But the Jerusalem crisis that erupted over the weekend prompted many members of Congress and progressive organizations to weigh in and demand that the White House intervene.
National security adviser Jake Sullivan had a call with Israeli counterpart Meir Ben Shabbat, and pressed Israel to curb its extremist actions.
The White House said Sullivan raised concerns about tensions at the Al-Aqsa Mosque and in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in East Jerusalem, where 300 Palestinians are under threat of eviction from their homes….
Ravid says the Israelis characterized the conversation as “difficult.” My emphasis:
- Israeli officials said Ben Shabbat told Sullivan during the phone call that Israel believes the Biden administration and the rest of the international community should stay out of the crisis in Jerusalem and avoid pressing Israel.
- Ben Shabbat told Sullivan that “international intervention is a reward to the Palestinian rioters and those who back them who were seeking international pressure on Israel,” according to an Israeli official briefed on the call.
Again, we are now living in the era of Israeli impunity. Israeli officials are used to getting away with anything with the American government, notably during the several Gaza massacres right before and during the Obama administration.
But now the “Squad” is driving the discussion on the left. And most of the political pressure on the Democratic side is coming from that direction. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman of NJ dares to issue a statement about “accountability” for Israel. She urges Biden and Tony Blinken to “hold responsible those who violate the rights of worshipers and protesters.” P.S. Watson Coleman represents Trenton and Princeton.
Here’s a strong tweet from Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland:
As this [UN statement] makes clear, evictions of families in East Jerusalem would violate international law. If the Biden Administration puts the rule of law and human rights at the heart of its foreign policy, this is not a moment for tepid statements.
American politicians are supposed to trash the U.N.! Van Hollen links a UN High Commissioner for Human Rights statement sharply criticizing Israeli expansion in East Jerusalem and calling on Israel to allow “free expression” by Palestinians — i.e., Israel shouldn’t be shooting Palestinians in their holy places.
Politico says progressive Dems are ending the era of Israeli impunity in U.S. politics.
The U.S. lawmakers’ tweets critical of Israel came primarily from the left, progressive flank of the Democratic Party. But they reflected a broader trend of Democrats being increasingly willing to criticize Israel, a country that once enjoyed widespread and solid bipartisan support on Capitol Hill.
Riding this shift, the liberal Zionist group J Street has retweeted Van Hollen’s comments and issued its own statement condemning the evictions of Palestinians.
The media are surprisingly open to the Palestinian narrative. CNN has an amazing interview of the Jerusalem activist Mohammed El Kurd in which he explains the history of ethnic cleansing: “This is what every Palestinian feels like under the crushing fangs of Israel colonialism. My grandmother was thrown out of her home in 1948 in Haifa and again in 1967… It’s settler colonialism and apartheid.”
The apartheid reports are having an effect. Even mainstream Democratic voices are using the term: “Israel… has created an apartheid state that denies fundamental rights and freedoms to the Palestinian people and has sought to carve away from those people year-in and year-out what little land and dignity and freedom that they still have.”
And here is Ben Rhodes, who spent eight years having to grovel to the Israel lobby in the White House, expressing his anger toward Israeli intransigence on twitter:
Just try for a moment to look at the world through the eyes of a Palestinian child.
The rightwing Israel lobby is exhibiting some fear over this new moment. The American Jewish Committee is complaining about the US media coverage for lacking nuance. It says that the media and Palestinians have turned victimized Palestinian families in East Jerusalem into cause celebres!
[R]ather than wait for a court decision, Palestinians have made the families cause celebres, inciting violent clashes with Israeli police and Jewish extremists.
More about that media climate and the left. Here is Vox’s lead by Alex Ward:
Weeks of violence in Jerusalem, sparked by Israel’s attempt to evict several Palestinian families from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem, have Democrats, activists, and experts calling on President Joe Biden to speak out forcefully against the American ally’s actions.
Amazingly, Ward gave a platform to Hamas to explain why it is doing what it’s doing:
Abu Obeida, a spokesperson for Hamas’s military wing, said the rocket attack was retaliation for what he called Israel’s “crimes and aggression.”
“This is a message the enemy has to understand well,” he continued. Hamas had given Israel until 6 pm local time to move its police forces out of the Aqsa mosque compound.
The Vox story also highlights the fact that the State Department said its foreign policy would be based on “human rights.” Well, the bill is due: “Calling out Israel’s attempted eviction of Palestinians is the perfect time to show the administration means what it says, experts say.”
Some things never change. AIPAC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz are back together again, chanting about Palestinian terrorists. Dennis Ross is being Israel’s lawyer. The Israel Policy Forum, funded by the rightwing Schusterman Foundation, is putting all the blame on Palestinians.
“Things are in flux and a new line in the sand is being drawn,” an ally writes. “Last chance for certain folks to take a stand. We’ll see where they end up. At a certain point it will be too little too late to take a stand. The people faced with a choice are lucky they even still have it. And it’s mostly a testament to the Palestinian people’s patience and good faith that this is so. I doubt it would be the same if the power structure was reversed.”
H/t Adam Horowitz, Michael Arria, Yumna Patel, Allison Deger and James North.
I am so glad these progressive leaders are taking leadership in this, when no one else in both parties seems to care that our money is funding the violence going on right now. Israel has refused to end the occupation, the land theft, and kills unarmed civilians with impunity. What kind of “democracy” is this, and we have pretended we expect democracy from other nations, when our dear charity case and welfare queen is behaving as if they can break international laws, steal, lie, and kill, and the US will continue to love them.
This is an old video taken in 2014, it shows how Israeli officials should be questioned and given a good dose of the truth, instead of walking around them on eggshells, which our members of Congress does. Great guy. I wish we had some like him here in the US.
Richard Boyd Barrett TD challenge Israeli ambassador at Oireachtas committee over Israel’s brutal war assault on Gaza and challenged the Israeli representative over their apartheid regime and racist policies as Israel is not a normal state and should not be treated as such.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RYBV1X7_CM
Majority of Democrats say US should focus political pressure on Israel | Middle East Eye
“Majority of Democrats say US should focus political pressure on Israel”
“For the first time, the majority of Democrats surveyed by Gallup say US pressure should be focused on Israel, not the Palestinians” Middle East Eye, March 19/21, by Sheren Khalel.
EXCERPT:
“This year’s annual Gallup poll has revealed a shift in sentiment among Americans regarding Israel & the Palestinians, with the majority of Democrats for the first time responding that the US should be putting more pressure on the Israeli government than the Palestinian leadership.
“The poll, published on Friday, said 53 percent of Democrats want US pressure to focus on Israel, compared with the 29 percent that said they want US pressure to be placed on the Palestinians. That figure is up from 2018, when 43 percent of Democrats said they supported putting more pressure on Israel.
“The findings continued among the general population, with the number of all Americans wanting more US pressure on Israel increasing from 27 percent in 2018 to 34 percent in 2021.
“The figures represent the highest level of demand for pressuring Israel in Gallup’s data since 2007. Over the same period, the percentage in favour of the US putting more pressure on both parties, or on neither, declined from 21 percent to 14 percent.
“The findings come amid unprecedented moves in Congress, with critical demands coming from Capitol Hill, including those condemning Israel’s treatment of Palestinians during the Covid-19 pandemic, & a handful of lawmakers in support of applying conditions on US aid to Israel.
“Maya Berry, executive director of the Arab American Institute, said the shift in attitudes laid out in the Gallup poll was particularly significant given the ‘very rigorous campaign’ launched by pro-Israel groups to silence those advocating for Palestinian rights.
“‘I think what you’re looking at is that people understand this issue is one of justice, & no matter how much time & resources are devoted to attempting to misrepresent the issue, it’s finally reaching the general American public in a way that they can’t ignore,’ Berry said.”
CNN Europe carried an interview with Noura Erakat in which She was able to relay some factual history about what Israel has been doing for decades and it was largely without the usual interuption.The interview was at least 12 to 15 mins and there was no zionist there to provide the usual propaganda.
Haven,t seen that level of openess –well , ever before.
Re the topic of the current political zeitgeist, there are more questioning voices in the Jewish media – this just appeared in the Forward:
https://forward.com/opinion/469326/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-liberal-zionist-in-the-era-of-sheikh-jarrah/
What does it mean to be a liberal Zionist in the era of Sheikh Jarrah?…The controversy over Sheikh Jarrah is a painful and clarifying moment for liberal American Jews to reevaluate our commitment to Zionism, a term that may no longer simply denote support for a Jewish state, but an effort aimed at domination of Palestinians under Israeli control….The Israeli laws that allow for the Jewish “reclamation” of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem is a one-way street. While Jews can reclaim land based on pre-1948 deeds, Palestinians cannot make claims on land their families owned in West Jerusalem before Israel’s independence….In brief, Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah are being targeted with an unjust and discriminatory legal regime that denies Palestinians the right to make the same claims as Jews….But if being a Zionist is to be associated with nationalist excesses like the evictions of Sheikh Jarrah and the ever-expanding settlements in the West Bank— a Zionism of conquest rather than safety, then it will be a term will lose its resonance for many of us.
Ayman Mohyeldin did a great job yesterday on MSNBC sticking it to Mark Regev and giving the Palestinian cause a very human face. Sure he allowed Regev to score a few cheap points with his usual distorted narrative, but he came across as a prize asshole with little empathy and feigned outrage. He is clearly unused to finding a highly educated and informed host regarding the issues in American mainstream media that is willing to not just push back, but unwilling to allow him to change the subject when it looks bad for Israel. He walked right into Mohyeldin’s trap and was caught wriggling around like the slimy snake he is. Pity no one else on cable news had the spine or acumen to give this latest tragedy anything more than the usual cursory carefully crafted “both side-ism” and perfunctory scratch at the surface of the issue while quoting Israeli official statements verbatim.