Last week the Wall Street Journal reported that multiple U.S. officials are admitting a ceasefire will not be reached during the remainder of Joe Biden’s presidency.
“Well, at the moment, we don’t feel like we are in a position, if we put something down today, to get both sides to say yes to it,” admits National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan.
This isn’t exactly surprising. It was always difficult to take the administration’s push for a ceasefire seriously as it has continued to supply Israel with weapons. Republicans and some pro-Israel Democrats made a big stink about Biden temporarily suspending a single ammunition shipment, but Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza has continued for nearly a year without interruption.
At the New York Times, David Sanger says Biden is “working against the clock” with just four months left in his presidency:
For a year now, Mr. Biden has warned publicly and privately about the need to avoid a regional war, one that could easily escalate into direct conflict between Israel and Iran. His caution was a major topic of conversation when he traveled to Israel days after the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas, both to promise Israel that America would stand by it, and to caution against making the same mistakes the United States made after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Mr. Biden even held on to hope for the transformative peace deal for the Middle East that he thought was within grasp a year ago, believing it could survive even as the war between Hamas and Israel tore at its foundations.
Now, Mr. Biden’s aides say, the president is beginning to acknowledge that he is simply running out of time. With only four months left in office, the chances of a cease-fire and hostage deal with Hamas look dimmer than at any time since Mr. Biden laid out a plan at the beginning of the summer. And the risk of a wider war has never looked greater.
Like most mainstream reporting on this issue, Sanger fails to acknowledge the elephant in the room.
Biden has never established any sort of red line with Benjamin Netanyahu’s government. He’s continued to send Israel weapons through all its worst atrocities and he continues to send them weapons as the death toll mounts in Lebanon. He has neglected to wield this obvious leverage to force ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu has publicly declared that he will not engage in ceasefire talks for the next 40 days and will not entertain any diplomatic ideas about Lebanon. In addition to Israel’s clear colonial goals, there’s also the issue of Bibi’s political survival and if he can help Trump win the presidency, all the better.
Here’s Alon Pinkas in Haaretz: “(Netanyahu) has a vested interest in prolonging the war for his political survival and in making it an election issue that could potentially harm Vice President Kamala Harris. It seems that the U.S. finally and very belatedly realized it last week, which is why, however unfortunate, there is little the U.S. will do until the election, unless it’s forced to act in the case of a major escalation.”
It’s obviously hard to take the last bit seriously unless you somehow don’t consider what’s happened in Lebanon to be a major escalation.
Eygi Investigation
Last week State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters that Israel’s initial findings on the killing of Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, a 26 year-old Turkish-American, do not exonerate Israeli forces.
“If the first investigation plays out… and we are not satisfied, we will of course look at whether any other measures are appropriate,” said Miller.
It’s unclear how seriously people should take this claim, as there’s not exactly a huge amount of evidence to suggest that the U.S. would ever open its own independent investigation.
Before Eygi’s funeral, her father identified U.S. bias toward Israel as the reason there hasn’t been a probe.
There have been repeated domestic calls for an independent investigation. Earlier this month Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) sent supporters an email calling for one.
“We must hold Israel to the same standards as we do other governments; we must follow U.S. and international laws that demand an end to arming any governments committing human rights abuses and war crimes,” it declared. “We will not rest until there is justice for Ayşenur and others killed by the U.S-backed Israeli government with American weapons. We will continue demanding an arms embargo and Palestinian liberation.”
Protesters have also gathered outside the Justice Department to demand action.
Turkey now says its submitting evidence on Eygi’s killing to international courts.
“We will both bring Aysenur’s reports to the United Nations Security Council’s agenda, and submit our sister Aysenur’s reports and evidence to the International Court of Justice, where the genocide case is continuing,” Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc told reporters. “We will also submit Aysenur’s evidence to the ongoing investigation about Israeli aggressors at the International Criminal Court.”
On a totally unrelated note, the US is sending more troops to “the region;” a spokesman “declined to say how many.”
15 Rules For Discussing Israeli Warmongering
Caitlin Johnstone
Sep 23, 2024
Israel killed some 500 people in a massive new onslaught in Lebanon on Monday which saw the IDF launch more than a thousand airstrikes.
The US is once again sending additional troops to the middle east as things escalate, on the orders of god knows who because the president’s brain has completely stopped functioning.
It’s been a few minutes since Israel last began a new project of mass military violence, so perhaps it’s time for a refresher on the official rules on how we’re meant think and talk about such matters.
“Rule 1: Recorded history began on October 7 2023. Maybe some things happened before that date, but nobody can remember.
Rule 2: Anything bad that Israel does is justified by Rule 1. This is true even if it does things that would be considered completely unjustifiable if it were done by a nation like Russia or Iran.
Rule 3: Israel has a right to defend itself, but nobody else does.
Rule 4: Israel never bombs civilians, it bombs terrorists. If shocking numbers of civilians die it’s because they were actually terrorists, or because terrorists killed them, or because a terrorist stood too close to them. If none of those reasons apply then it’s for some other mysterious reason we are still waiting for the IDF to investigate.
Rule 5: Criticizing anything Israel does means you hate Jewish people. There is no other reason anyone could possibly oppose military explosives being dropped on areas packed full of children besides a seething, obsessive hatred for a small Abrahamic faith.
Rule 6: Nothing Israel does is ever as bad as the hateful criticisms described in Rule 5. Criticism of Israel’s actions is always worse than Israel’s actions themselves, because those critics hate Jews and wish to commit another Holocaust. Preventing this must consume 100 percent of our political energy and attention.
Rule 7: Israel can never be the victimizer, it can only ever be the victim. If Israel attacks Lebanon, it’s because Hezbollah attacked it completely unprovoked while Israel was innocently minding its own business trying to commit a little genocide in peace. If people protest against Israel bombing entire cities into dust, then Israel is the victim because the protests made Israel’s supporters feel sad.
Rule 8: The fact that Israel is literally always in a state of war with its neighbors and with displaced indigenous populations must be interpreted as proof that Rule 7 is true instead of proof that Rule 7 is ridiculous nonsense.
Rule 9: Arab lives are much, much less important to us than western lives or Israeli lives. Nobody is allowed to think too hard about why this might be.
Rule 10: The media always tell the truth about Israel and its various conflicts. If you doubt this then you are likely in violation of Rule 5.”
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/15-rules-for-discussing-israeli-warmongering
“Mr. Biden even held on to hope for the transformative peace deal for the Middle East that he thought was within grasp a year ago, believing it could survive even as the war between Hamas and Israel tore at its foundations.”_________________________________________________
The power of public opinion rules… at election times…. and Netanyahu understands the game.
Little chance Abbas will see the coming opportunities Palestinians have been dealt from the way Netanyahu has disrespected Biden.
A Palestinian peace plan, in the short run, could marginalize greater Israel’s supremacist objectives. And earn Biden’s attention and respect. Does Abbas have a clue how to divide and conquer?
Would Palestinians support him if he tried?