The New York Times is so reluctant to criticize Israel that even the US State Department has taken tougher positions on the current Netanyahu government’s policies. The Times’ coverage of the latest bout of Israeli aggression is a case in point.

The Jenin onslaught further damaged Israel’s reputation in the U.S., and J Street knows it. No wonder the liberal Zionist group had almost nothing to say even as AIPAC and the ADL and Josh Gottheimer, too, were defending Israel.

In a clear example of how the New York Times distorts the truth, a recent analysis insinuated there is not international consensus that Israeli settlements violate international law.

A recent Nation article attacking CUNY Law speaker Fatima Mohammed recycles the deeply dishonest Zionist claim that Jews cannot live in historical Palestine without the protection of a Jewish State.

A possible new U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement is the best news from the Middle East in years. So why isn’t the U.S. media reporting it?

The story of Ethiopian Jews is “the best reminder that Israel, whatever else is said against it, has been a beacon for the oppressed,” Bret Stephens writes. But that’s not true.

The Israel Policy Forum, an Israel lobby group, hosted Israeli reserve Colonel Michael Milshtein, a former expert on Palestinians in Israeli Military Intelligence, to spout anti-Palestinian comments.

The well-funded bipartisan group “No Labels” wants politicians to compromise, but its CEO says “there is no middle ground” when it comes to Israel. Why is media coverage leaving this part of the story out?

Once again, the U.S. mainstream media tries to hide Israel’s provocative Jewish-supremacists, even when they are government officials.

The 75th anniversary of the Nakba brought unprecedented coverage in American media of the Palestinian experience.