Is Targeted Assassination the American Way? Cte’d

A few days ago I raised the question of whether targeted assassinations in Iraq are helpful, when they kill so many civilians, and whether we weren’t emulating Israel too much (again).

Turns out that in late June on Democracy Now, Juan Gonzales brought up the same issue in a dialog with Josh Block of AIPAC (also Norm Finkelstein, on whose site the transcript is posted):

GONZALES: on the targeted assassinations that Israel has often participated, has often executed in Palestinian territories, we hear repeatedly of innocent civilians. Putting aside the fact whether the people who were targeted were actually terrorists or not, because we have Israel’s reporting that they are, but the innocent civilians that are inevitably killed in these missile attacks, how is that justified as not terrorism against a civilian population?

BLOCK: You’re absolutely right. Those incidents are deeply regrettable. I think any one of us would say that. And I think any American, any Israeli, would say that innocent people who are killed as a result of a military action unintentionally, that’s a tragedy. But there’s, again, a moral difference between an army — Israel’s military goes to great lengths to prevent those kinds of incidents,

I don’t think that’s a good answer because the historical pattern here is now so established; i.e., claims of innocent intention cease to have a real significance when the innocent bodies just continue to pile up on both sides (and more on the Palestinian side). (Read Henry Siegman’s keen insight here).

My questioning of the tactic stems from a conversation with Peter Voskamp, editor of the Block Island Times. Here’s his rap:

My first inkling about the “Israeli-if-ication” of the military visavis targeted
assassinations struck me in the opening days of the Iraq war when
the TV was reporting breathlessly that Saddam had been targeted and hit
by a giant bomb. It turned out to be a miss.

But my reaction has less to do with tactics themselves
necessarily than how it’s presented to the public. It’s probably been an
old and obvious military tactic to knock out the leadership, but the
chest thumping and direct reporting of it as a good and applaudable
approach, I’d argue, is new, and to my thinking, something the American
public has become inured/ desensitized to with endless nightly news
reports about the Israelis knocking out various Palestinian leaders as
they drive through Gaza or are caught in their safe-house, as the most
run-of-the-mill event.

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Beyondoweiss, US Policy in the Middle East

{ 4 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. anonymous says:

    Dropping 1000 pound bombs from the air is what kills civillians (43,000 so far in Iraq)

    Bodies piling up? The US super-sized its pile. I think the US learned more from Stalin than Israel.

    Terrorists hide behind civilians. This discussion is moronic. From Walt-Mer. to this. Blame Israel for everything and give them credit for nothing.

    Why don't you point your bleeding heart on as issue that matter like teenage pregnancy, health care or education. Maybe the US will emulate Israel on these. Hamas leaders in Jerusalem get better health care (Israeli provided) that 50 millon Americans.

  2. David says:

    Early in the Intifada, when the world was pressuring Israel to end its policy of extra-judcial assasinations, AIPAC put in front of our congressmen a letter supporting the practice. The majority dutifully signed–just as they had signed earlier letters in support of Israeli policies of torture and collective punishment.

    I have always felt this craven history must have played a role when the time came for these gentlemen to make judgements about our own policy.

    It is difficult to act honorably when frightened. You sometimes have to draw upon moral resources stored up in calmer times; that's the role of customs and precedent. But in our time of panic, we had already spent our resources on behalf of Israel.

    We pay the price for the lobby in many ways.

  3. Joe Jirk says:

    Uh Oh, noot the anti-israeli diatrib again. Say it, Jews in America or Israel. The "Israeli Lobby" is such mealy-mouthed taling out of 2 sides of the mouth nonsense.

  4. anonymous says:

    Yeah, Israel this Israel that.

    It's all Israels fault: that America consumes 25 percent of the worlds resources with 5 percent of the populations, has no health care for 50 million people, is a classist society, that the VP is on Halliburton's payroll, that the kids can't read, that there's an unmanageable deficit, that there's a never ending war in Iraq, that the president is in bed with the Saudi Royal family….

    Keep on blaming the Jews and Israel you weak-kneed, gas- guzzling, self-righteous hypocrites.

Leave a Reply